Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
196,981 - 197,000 of 200,593 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago
Cali Girl 14

Idyllwild, CA

#227902 Jan 15, 2014
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>STFU PUTz
Make me dirty old man!
Poof

Cambridge, IL

#227903 Jan 15, 2014
Cali Girl 14 wrote:
<quoted text>
Make me dirty old man!
I showered this morning, now what PUTZ
Trying

Covina, CA

#227904 Jan 15, 2014
Pretty clever but #227903 hasn't got it yet
Cali Girl 14

Idyllwild, CA

#227905 Jan 15, 2014
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>I showered this morning, now what PUTZ
Can't clean your kind of filth off...
Not going head to ass with you today!
Too beautiful here...Go freeze!
Trying

Covina, CA

#227906 Jan 15, 2014
Pretty clever but #227905 hasn't got it yet
Huh

Lakeport, CA

#227907 Jan 15, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
No thank you. The federal government doesn't recognize civil unions.
SS couples are married. FYI.... gay couples have been legally marrying for 10 years now. you live in an alternate reality, please post on their forum.
Take it up with the federal government, and stop trying to change the english language....and history.
Huh

Lakeport, CA

#227908 Jan 15, 2014
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, I think ;-)
.
So, I posit that denying a couple the right to marry for the sole reason that they are gay is hurtful and benefits no-one.
.
Do you agree with this statement? If not, which part do you not agree with?
I was pretty clear. SScouples should be afforded all of the same rights/privileges of a married man/woman, except, it is not a marriage. It is a civil union of a SS couple..
Since your definition of marriage is different than has been the traditional historic definition, may it include 3 folks? or a horse? or?????
Huh

Lakeport, CA

#227909 Jan 15, 2014
bt, if that is your pic....you're a doll.
Skeet Packers

Covina, CA

#227910 Jan 15, 2014
Skeet packers
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227911 Jan 15, 2014
Big D wrote:
It is going to be fun watching them allow same sex marriage in Utah.
Poetic Justice
It is all a matter of time now, recognized in all 50 states by the federal government and more and more individual states every year.
But D, the 50 states are each their own sovereign places. To applaud the Federal government overstepping its bounds, in order to make the USA a generic entity, with no states having a variety, is a poison to us all. Surely you see that? Of course you do, you corporate toadie, you must have a reason to cheer the downfall of individuality in America?
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227912 Jan 15, 2014
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
.
Randy, the other side of fear is freedom.
.
Here is the simplest way of putting it: Denying a couple the right to marry for the sole reason that they are gay is hurtful and benefits no-one.
.
I think you may have embodied your anti-gay stance too deeply for me to reach.
I don't understand. What is it that you are afraid of? They are being denied something that wasn't meant for them. Just as we are supposed to deny illegals American citizenship. Don't imagine that you are going to be able to deter me from my stance, it is the right one. I have embodied nothing, I am in tune with the propriety of things. Where does your "anything goes" stance stem from? A morally confused base, by any chance?
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227913 Jan 15, 2014
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
It is obvious that you have a good heart, but you have been led down the primrose path.
Marriage is the civil union/spiritual union of one man and one woman.
SScouples can never be married. SScouples can have a civil union, and I suppose they have a spiritual union, but they will never have a one man/one woman relationship.
Perhaps another name would better describe the SS civil union.
Garriage perhaps?
Leave the term "marriage" for what it has been forever. The civil union of one man and one woman........and go ahead and have all of the SS civil unions you desire.
Great post.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227914 Jan 15, 2014
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, I think ;-)
.
So, I posit that denying a couple the right to marry for the sole reason that they are gay is hurtful and benefits no-one.
.
Do you agree with this statement? If not, which part do you not agree with?
I prefer "refuse to grant" instead of "deny", don't you? It puts things in the proper light.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227915 Jan 15, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
No thank you. The federal government doesn't recognize civil unions.
SS couples are married. FYI.... gay couples have been legally marrying for 10 years now. you live in an alternate reality, please post on their forum.
Actually, you're living in the immediate now. You are preferring to use the recent turn of events, instead of viewing our existence in its entirety. Perhaps, you could petition the Fed to recognize "civil unions", instead of forcing your inclusion into an institution that has never allowed for your type of relationship. Is it better to besmirch someone else's tradition, instead of creating your own? Forced inclusion into our party does not grant any sort of legitimacy. It cheapens what we have cherished, and diminishes it.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227916 Jan 15, 2014
Leeward Lolo wrote:
<quoted text>
I BELIEVE this poster has been hating on our Honolulu Forum for many years. Goes by the name GURU and has many others aliases such as this one Jerry Sandusky. His location is usually Los Angeles but he told me he lives in the Huntington Beach area. Who cares really.
Just thought you would like to know that obsessed Obama hater, birther, self described realtor mastermind and vulgar Topix obsessed dude may be walking your streets or jazzing your forum. aloha
Yeah, he's a nothing to me. not worth responding to.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227917 Jan 15, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>... and you think that is permanent?
Yes, as all that they have to do is stand their ground, and not bow to the peer pressure that is todays lobbying. They don't have to accept any sort of Federal intervention, as the Constitution grants the final say to the individual states. Most of the country knows this, but is many states have been seeded, in order to accomplish this miraculous feat of turning the country over to subversive parties.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227918 Jan 15, 2014
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>I showered this morning, now what PUTZ
Man, why waste any keyboard power responding to that idiot?
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227919 Jan 15, 2014
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Take it up with the federal government, and stop trying to change the english language....and history.
To paraphrase the poster to whom you are responding: "Testify!". Xavier said that, more than once. I think it sounds silly, but it seemed a good time to use it...
:-D
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#227920 Jan 15, 2014
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
I was pretty clear. SScouples should be afforded all of the same rights/privileges of a married man/woman, except, it is not a marriage. It is a civil union of a SS couple..
Since your definition of marriage is different than has been the traditional historic definition, may it include 3 folks? or a horse? or?????
It was Genghis Khan said it best. His philosophy was" It is not enough that I win, everyone else must lose". They must be Mongoloids....
:-D
Skeet Packers

Covina, CA

#227921 Jan 15, 2014
Skeet packers are at it again and doing it with

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 3 hr go away 5,007
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 12 hr lazy posts 15,963
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Thu Tank ever 7,926
Judge John D. Freeland is wrong! (Dec '13) Aug 28 Kes 8
Family Aug 27 Baby Girl 1
I am a multi millionaire (Aug '13) Aug 27 KeS 11
Fraud claims coming to court (Jun '07) Aug 26 KeS 2
•••
•••
•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••