Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211093 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Shocking!! I love it when fundamentalists always speak about how gays want their children. Yet there is not one person on the planet that has ever said, "yes I'm gay because I was recruited". It's so stupid. Yet I can find you 30 websites in a matter of moments, all created and run by fundamentalist Christian organizations, that will all still promote the idea that recruitment exists!! I can't imagine having a life built on a platform of lies. It would be like being in the closet again. Terrible. Fundamentalists are in their own closets. I feel sorry for them.
OK! Do it. Chop chop. Fetch. Remember! You only have moments. And we want 30, not 29.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211094 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
Oh, and you also sound like a huge Cry Baby.
That's rich coming from you.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#211095 Aug 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.
I exercised my right to ignore a gay troll whose brain fell out a reamed a//hole.
Your obsession with a//holes is very creepy. Ever notice that it is only fundies like yourself talking about them all the time? Reaming? My, you sure to seem to know a lot about how ass sex works. The Lady Kirschmann doth protest too much.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211096 Aug 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I was not trying to rip you argument apart, I am letting you know that I have absolutely zero concern about something you worry about a lot.( shrug )...
You are concerned enough to compose a post to tell him you have "absolutely no concern..."

Priceless!
Hoikers

Covina, CA

#211097 Aug 20, 2013
We got no Frankie whistles left, they were taken away as a 'bio-hazard."

Got rid of those "fork Hoikers" those nasty tweeters on drugs.

Now it's the tweakers on religion.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211098 Aug 20, 2013
Hoikers wrote:
We got no Frankie whistles left, they were taken away as a 'bio-hazard."
Got rid of those "fork Hoikers" those nasty tweeters on drugs.
Now it's the tweakers on religion.
Always encouraging to be singled out by the master troll. Shows I'm effective. Thanks for your continued feedback.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#211099 Aug 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Blatantly untrue as usual. The APA knowingly uses clearly fraudulent and unscientific studies while ignoring a study that is the largest and most scientific to date.
Fairy tale time again!!

Feel free to present APA studies and demonstrate the fraudulency and expose where science has been distorted!! Get right on that. When you do, be sure and present all the numerous other studies that basically reach the same conclusion as the APAs!!!

I love that idiots like you actually think that anyone above a 6th grade education would believe that an organization as large and respected as the APA would risk their credibility in order to promote your mythical "gay agenda"!!!!! You are so f*cking stupid Greggie!!!! LOL!!!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Moreover, they ignored clear medical science to support inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning anal sex.
Your obsession over anal sex is creepy. Secondly, medical doctors would never state that a sexual practice was "demeaning". This is a judgment only, and it's yours. It's as irrelevant as all your other made up bullshyt!!! And you will not find medical research that states that anal sex is inherently unhealthy or harmful. You lie. A lot.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You trumpet putting children in that deceitful and unnatural situation.
And yet none of the children raised in gay headed households will concur with that. And guess what, they know better than you. More irrelevant and unsupported judgment from the fantasy land of KiMare's head!!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
2. You compare worst case situations to justify putting children with ss couples.
No dear, worst case situations would be children being raised by lying, hypocritical bigots like yourself. Can't imagine how horrible that would be for a child.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
And sadly, especially for the child, that is the best you can offer.
Sadly, none of the hundreds of thousands of children being raised in gay headed households would concur. You lose again.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If your concern was for the child's best interest, you would fervently be arguing for the best case scenario.
We already are. But mindless slugs like yourself keep trying to prevent children from being given loving and supportive homes. You don't care about children at all. You're a despicable hypocrite. Nasty and vile to the core. Ugly.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your motivation is clearly not the best interests of the child.
And yet none of the hundreds of thousands of children already raised by gay parents would agree with you. Know who else doesn't agree with you silly bitch?

American Academy of Pediatrics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
American Psychoanalytic Association
National Association of Social Workers
Child Welfare League of America
North American Council on Adoptable Children
Canadian Psychological Association

LOL!!!! Smile Greggie!! You've just been spanked. Again. But do rush back with any of the supposedly fraudulent studies you mention and dissect them for us!!! We'd love to watch the meltdown!!!!

My guess is instead, you will cowardly ignore doing so and revert back to one of your other nonsensical talking points!!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#211100 Aug 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The fact remains;
In EIGHT THOUSAND years of human history, not one SINGLE culture accepted ss couples as married from start to finish.
Common sense told billions of people and every single culture that ss couples do not equate to marriage. They could simply SEE the difference. They understood the unnaturalness of gay sex, a violation of nature. They were smart enough to know that a barren duplicate gendered couple was not marriage.
Fact remains;
Historical context is the argument of fools!!! Always has been, always will be.

Now you just go to your corner and pout about the fact that just because something hasn't been done before, that that doesn't mean it shouldn't be done now!!!!!! Whether something was done in the past will always and forever be COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!!!!!!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#211101 Aug 20, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Delusions of grandeur--"I know better than the entire American Psychiatric Association"
Histrionic characteristics--"Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy, and demeaning" (even though millions of gay and straight people engage in it regularly without experiencing any of these issues).
Denial and generalization--"All gay parents are unable to provide adequate environments to raise children. All straight couples provide a better environment than any other parent combination."
----------
You keep showing your cards...
He is the epitome of a DOLT!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#211102 Aug 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. I made no such assertion. I simply and accurately pointed out the duplicity of the APA.
No, you made an accusation. One you can't support. One you hope that no one will question, because once they do, you can't support yourself.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
2. As noted many times before, simple common sense says who engages in a harmful behavior does not change it's consequences.
And simple common sense notes that stating something is harmful doesn't make it so. As always, you are completely unable to support your statement. And everyone knows what a liar you are!!!
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
3. I made no such assertion. That is why you lied about quoting me.
The one showing their cards is you.
You make no assertions whatsoever. You just make shyt up and then think by expressing it that it magically becomes truth. Those of us that don't live in your fairy tale land just make sure to point out how wrong you are. Sorry you don't like that.

VV was right. It is you showing your cards, and they all have rips and tears.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211103 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact remains;
Historical context is the argument of fools!!! Always has been, always will be.
Now you just go to your corner and pout about the fact that just because something hasn't been done before, that that doesn't mean it shouldn't be done now!!!!!! Whether something was done in the past will always and forever be COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!!!!!!!
Yep, just because something was true in the past, does not make it a good thing.

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#211104 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn you are dumb. You sound like someone that dropped out of middle school, got pregnant and married before 18, found Jesus through a tent revival and now think you hold a PHD in biology, cultural history and language arts. You sound like a child, and you display the knowledge of a child.
The only confusion you are experiencing is the realization that you don't know what the hell you are talking about and others do, and you can't deal with it. It's called a fundie meltdown.
I can't imagine going up to a handicap kid and telling him it's because of sin in his genealogy.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211105 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fairy tale time again!!
Feel free to present APA studies and demonstrate the fraudulency and expose where science has been distorted!! Get right on that. When you do, be sure and present all the numerous other studies that basically reach the same conclusion as the APAs!!!
I love that idiots like you actually think that anyone above a 6th grade education would believe that an organization as large and respected as the APA would risk their credibility in order to promote your mythical "gay agenda"!!!!! You are so f*cking stupid Greggie!!!! LOL!!!!
<quoted text>
Your obsession over anal sex is creepy. Secondly, medical doctors would never state that a sexual practice was "demeaning". This is a judgment only, and it's yours. It's as irrelevant as all your other made up bullshyt!!! And you will not find medical research that states that anal sex is inherently unhealthy or harmful. You lie. A lot.
<quoted text>
And yet none of the children raised in gay headed households will concur with that. And guess what, they know better than you. More irrelevant and unsupported judgment from the fantasy land of KiMare's head!!!
<quoted text>
No dear, worst case situations would be children being raised by lying, hypocritical bigots like yourself. Can't imagine how horrible that would be for a child.
<quoted text>
Sadly, none of the hundreds of thousands of children being raised in gay headed households would concur. You lose again.
<quoted text>
We already are. But mindless slugs like yourself keep trying to prevent children from being given loving and supportive homes. You don't care about children at all. You're a despicable hypocrite. Nasty and vile to the core. Ugly.
<quoted text>
And yet none of the hundreds of thousands of children already raised by gay parents would agree with you. Know who else doesn't agree with you silly bitch?
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
American Psychoanalytic Association
National Association of Social Workers
Child Welfare League of America
North American Council on Adoptable Children
Canadian Psychological Association
LOL!!!! Smile Greggie!! You've just been spanked. Again. But do rush back with any of the supposedly fraudulent studies you mention and dissect them for us!!! We'd love to watch the meltdown!!!!
My guess is instead, you will cowardly ignore doing so and revert back to one of your other nonsensical talking points!!!
Wow! Hysterical much?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211106 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact remains;
Historical context is the argument of fools!!! Always has been, always will be.
Now you just go to your corner and pout about the fact that just because something hasn't been done before, that that doesn't mean it shouldn't be done now!!!!!! Whether something was done in the past will always and forever be COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!!!!!!!
Relax fruitloops. You're screaming.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211107 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
He is the epitome of a DOLT!!
Yeah. That's our Big D alright!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211108 Aug 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, just because something was true in the past, does not make it a good thing.
Or a bad thing.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#211109 Aug 20, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
...VV was right. It is you showing your cards, and they all have rips and tears.
Yours are wilted and floppy.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#211110 Aug 20, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Or a bad thing.
right... zero bearing at all

I don’t care if same sex marriage was embraced by other cultures in history or not

I don’t care if slavery was embraced by other cultures in history

I don’t care of women were regarded as second class citizens in history

I don’t care if protestants were burned at the stake for their religion in history

That was then, this is now.. welcome to... today

Just because something was true before, does not mean it should be today.
Hoikers

Covina, CA

#211111 Aug 20, 2013
Festered up big punk- d you mean;

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#211112 Aug 20, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
right... zero bearing at all
I don’t care if same sex marriage was embraced by other cultures in history or not
I don’t care if slavery was embraced by other cultures in history
I don’t care of women were regarded as second class citizens in history
I don’t care if protestants were burned at the stake for their religion in history
That was then, this is now.. welcome to... today
Just because something was true before, does not mean it should be today.
Truth doesn't change. It will always resurrect when denied. History tells us that happens quickly regarding marriage.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Editorial, July 17, 2016: Fr. Peter Carota, 194... 8 hr kms 5
News Sacramento Gas Prices Creeping Up Jul 22 Go Blue Forever 9
Ben Savage of the Oakdale Police Department bei... Jul 22 KBS 3
to the young girl selling tamales at winco (Feb '10) Jul 20 DOITFORMYDAYGHTER 107
News Former hospital destroyed Jul 18 Dave Esper 1
News Michael Ray Joins KATM/Modesto, CA For 'Karpool... Jul 18 James Henderson 2
Defamation charges in effect Jul 15 Your Service Prov... 6

Oakdale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages