Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205492 Jul 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me exactly how many relationships include all of the elements that I mentioned. You say there are "numerous". Please list as many as you can.
And since we've already established SO MANY times that "mating behavior" and/or procreation are not a prerequisites for marriage, please stop using it as an excuse. No one buys it. I don't even think you buy it at this point.
You really need to get new material.
Go "demean" yourself...
No, you list them.

I never said procreation was a requirement. I said you lied about ss couples being capable of mutual procreation.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205493 Jul 28, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem confused. The citizens said "No". The Judge(singular) said "Yes".
Actually, the judges (plural) said "yes". Remember, Walker's decision was sent to an appellate court. And three heterosexual judges in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with his decision. Also, let's not forget the 5 Supreme Court justices who let the ruling stand.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205494 Jul 28, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the judges (plural) said "yes". Remember, Walker's decision was sent to an appellate court. And three heterosexual judges in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with his decision. Also, let's not forget the 5 Supreme Court justices who let the ruling stand.
I'm amazed, all that ruling power, and reality didn't change one iota.

Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered, mating behavior defect half of marriage.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#205495 Jul 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm amazed, all that ruling power, and reality didn't change one iota.
Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered, mating behavior defect half of marriage.
It couldn't change. It was swept aside, though...
Man dismisses reality, in order to appease the politicos.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205496 Jul 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm amazed, all that ruling power, and reality didn't change one iota.
Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered, mating behavior defect half of marriage.
Reality changed immediately. Remember my post about all of those thousands of same-sex couples who went out and got marriage licenses just after the Supreme Court decision came down?

Heterosexual couples have made a mockery of marriage. Millions of kids without a father figure. Abortions used as birth control. Divorce rampant.

Good God, you guys are lucky it wasn't heterosexual marriage being argued before a court. With your track record, it probably wouldn't have stood a chance.
Quartz eyes

Monrovia, CA

#205497 Jul 28, 2013
Are you still using that quartz eye I gave you last summer?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#205498 Jul 28, 2013
Zoro wrote:
Well, Frankie is Gay. Good for him
You wish Jizzy!

P.S. I thought gay was good?
Far Right

Monrovia, CA

#205499 Jul 28, 2013
No, No not the FR.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#205500 Jul 28, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you list them.
I never said procreation was a requirement. I said you lied about ss couples being capable of mutual procreation.
Um, I think I did list them... Heterosexual relationships and homosexual relationships. Those are the two.

You keep saying that "Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. A defective failure of mating behavior. Ss marriage is an oxymoron."

You're the one who keeps dragging procreation and mating behavior into the conversation; insisting that they be present, otherwise a couple cannot be married.

And you always conveniently forget that even though same-sex couples don't procreate, we do adopt children. So, we have families. While you might not define these groups of people living under the same roof as "families", they are indeed families.
Randy Hudson

Elmwood Park, IL

#205501 Jul 29, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem confused. The citizens said "No". The Judge(singular) said "Yes".
Can you name another instance in US history where a popular vote was used to deny rights to others? What if the good people of Ohio decided to deny internet access to people with the surname Hudson?

Rights are rights and you don't get to vote to deny them.
Randy Hudson

Elmwood Park, IL

#205502 Jul 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm amazed, all that ruling power, and reality didn't change one iota.
Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered, mating behavior defect half of marriage.
Don't you have a triplicate marriage? I'd kill to have two vaginas in my marriage!
laughing man

Pulaski, TN

#205503 Jul 29, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you name another instance in US history where a popular vote was used to deny rights to others? What if the good people of Ohio decided to deny internet access to people with the surname Hudson?
Rights are rights and you don't get to vote to deny them.
The NAMBLA types are certainly busy nowadays, thanks to SCROTUS.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205504 Jul 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm amazed, all that ruling power, and reality didn't change one iota.
Ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered, mating behavior defect half of marriage.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality changed immediately. Remember my post about all of those thousands of same-sex couples who went out and got marriage licenses just after the Supreme Court decision came down?
Heterosexual couples have made a mockery of marriage. Millions of kids without a father figure. Abortions used as birth control. Divorce rampant.
Good God, you guys are lucky it wasn't heterosexual marriage being argued before a court. With your track record, it probably wouldn't have stood a chance.
Reality changed?

All I see are thousands of mutually sterile, duplicated gendered halves of marriage with a piece of paper making the idiotic claim that they are just like married heterosexual couples.

Moreover, it was government redefinition of marriage that made a mockery of marriage. In spite of that, there are millions of marriages faithfully maintaining the very foundation of our society. Something not one single ss couple can ever provide.

This ruling by SCOTUS will join the infamy of no fault divorce and abortion as disgraceful, horrendous violations of justice. Against the God of nature and nature's God.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205505 Jul 29, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, I think I did list them... Heterosexual relationships and homosexual relationships. Those are the two.
You keep saying that "Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. A defective failure of mating behavior. Ss marriage is an oxymoron."
You're the one who keeps dragging procreation and mating behavior into the conversation; insisting that they be present, otherwise a couple cannot be married.
And you always conveniently forget that even though same-sex couples don't procreate, we do adopt children. So, we have families. While you might not define these groups of people living under the same roof as "families", they are indeed families.
Another lie. You didn't list the relationships that exist apart from sex and procreation that are not called marriage. Virtually every personal relationship that exists qualifies.

I drag nothing into marriage. I simply note that mating behavior is the basis for marriage and procreation has no need to be 'demanded'. They are the very foundation and only reason for the social constraint of marriage.

Nor do I 'forget' anything. There is a vast distinction between offspring of marriage and all other default situation.

Homosexuals can live a lie if they want. You cannot demand that I live that lie with you, or be quiet about pointing it out.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205506 Jul 29, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you have a triplicate marriage? I'd kill to have two vaginas in my marriage!
LOL

The lesbian has a dusty non-functioning vagina, and I didn't want to be married to a Hillary.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205507 Jul 29, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you have a triplicate marriage? I'd kill to have two vaginas in my marriage!
My wife just informed me I'd have a non-functioning penis if I tried it anyway...
Mikey

Fullerton, CA

#205508 Jul 29, 2013
laughing man wrote:
Only 2 sets of negative smilies in 8 minutes?
C'mon, Mikey Stain, you hit like a grrrrrl.
You talk'n to me licker? I think your dementia has set in pappy, Fk off.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#205509 Jul 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you list them.
I never said procreation was a requirement. I said you lied about ss couples being capable of mutual procreation.
You mention it constantly

as there are millions of couples even before same sex marriage without the ability to have children you have been belittling people non-stop who are married

You are an excellent example of why people are leaving religion
.

the only thing you have been taught is hatred and spite, that doesn't sell as well as it used to

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#205510 Jul 29, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You mention it constantly
as there are millions of couples even before same sex marriage without the ability to have children you have been belittling people non-stop who are married
You are an excellent example of why people are leaving religion
.
the only thing you have been taught is hatred and spite, that doesn't sell as well as it used to
Calling out liars is why people are leaving religion?

LOL
Nurse Kratchett

Sonoma, CA

#205511 Jul 29, 2013
The radio whiz has just said the bacmann states that anthony wiener is why the gay egyptians are rioting and that we should have sample pictures on the ballots for each election so that people can really chose who is best fitted for the job. Holey Moley, did she mean that? My charges here in the home are all up and hollering about this, most think it is a good idea. We are going to introduce a little noctec calm at snack time and be sure they take it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mrs moller Apr 24 Angry mother 1
Female teachers at Oakdale. Apr 24 Concerned friend 1
mrs moeller at oakdale !!!' read this now Apr 24 killyourselfbitch123 1
News East County E-views: Have you seen a lot of gra... Apr 21 Riverbank resident 2
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Apr 15 randy 122
News Scott Peterson family asking for donations (Jul '09) Apr 14 tom wingo 64
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) Apr 14 legalize gamefowl... 10
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]