Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
168,281 - 168,300 of 200,565 Comments Last updated 49 min ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192768
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

F rizzidoos wrote:
Just take the first exit, you fool.
AW SHUDDUP you silly jackass!

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192769
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

There was a ban ?!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192770
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

The belief that polygamous marriages must be evil and oppressive even in societies where they are traditional is an expression of cultural prejudice.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192771
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Facing reality.
Accepting that homosexuality is a sexual disorder.
The fear that they cannot establish their own identity except by faking marriage.
I didn't know you were a homosexual.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192772
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So do you live in Fortuna? Fine town.
Not any more.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192773
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Joe Fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't know you were a homosexual.
A genetic chimera, a lesbian trapped in a straight man.

Surprise!

Smile.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192774
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
I was thinking the same thing. Seems this guys opinions were formed when his understanding was at itís weakest.
He was probaly taught that as a child, and can't help continuing the cycle.
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192775
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"Fortuna"? Italian?
The gist of the issue is how do we, as a society, define marriage? There has to be "line in the sand" so to speak. Other wise what's the point of the state issuing a license?
Why does the state need to issue a license?
freaked out

Antioch, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192776
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

thats why i dont vote anymore doesnt mean a thing..........wasting our money..........
Joe Fortuna

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192777
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
A genetic chimera, a lesbian trapped in a straight man.
Surprise!
Smile.
:O)!
Could it get any better?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192779
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Joe Fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Not any more.
Spent a lot of time there in the nineties, geophysical research. The Mendocino triple junction. Nice little town the only thing is not enough sun!
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192780
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

freaked out wrote:
thats why i dont vote anymore doesnt mean a thing..........wasting our money..........
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.

I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )

Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
KeS

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192781
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.
I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )
Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
Wrong is not a right!
KeS

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192782
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

100% of California voters should Vote this Judge out he's/she's obviously demon possessed. Bannish the Judge!
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192783
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

KeS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong is not a right!
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
KeS

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192784
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible is an collection of ancient Jewish puppet plays.
GOD: 2 Kings 18:27, "...that they may eat their own dung and drink their own pisss with you..."
God was joking KeS, you can stop eating and drinking now.
God wasn't Joking in Moore, Oklahoma was he?
KeS

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192785
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
KeS

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192786
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that is why the wrong of Prop 8 wil be righted.
Are the homosexual tendencies getting louder and louder?

Prop 8 is not wrong.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192787
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

KeS wrote:
<quoted text>
"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
Yes they took away a right, and now same sex couples that cannot marry now are seeing for equal rights with same sex couples that are already married in California legally right now ( some 18,000 of them )

Prop 8 is doomed, one way or the other.

Either the Supreme Court will get it right and uphold it being overturned, or it will go back on the ballot and Prop 8 will be soundly and easily defeated.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192788
May 21, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, if you donít understand this, then you should not vote.
I could get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, it would be overturned as unconstitutional ( and rightly so )
Same thing here, a majority voted to deny a minority a right they already possessed, it will and should be overturned.
No you couldn't. You couldn't get the majority of brown eyed people to vote on a ballot measure to deny blue eyed people the vote, dummy. You couldn't even get the ballot measure. The state is broke enough without wasting money on your harebrained ideas.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Judge John D. Freeland is wrong! (Dec '13) 1 hr KeS 3
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 4 hr Donny B 7,922
Fraud claims coming to court (Jun '07) 16 hr KeS 2
to the young girl selling tamales at winco (Feb '10) 17 hr KeS 100
Homeless Modesto Men Headed for Trial (Apr '08) 18 hr KeS 25
Broker held in realty scam (Nov '08) 19 hr KeS 4
Stanislaus county Embezzles hundred of thousand... (Nov '08) 19 hr KeS 8

Search the Oakdale Forum:
•••
•••
•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••