Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191443 May 8, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Gay twirl.
WE were discussing both the history of marriage AND homosexuality. The article related to the later. I've never asserted that GLBT wasn't present at a defect rate of about 4%.
Epi-markers are 'normally' erased. They weren't fully erased in the case of homosexuals. Unbiased persons would term that a 'mistake'.
Scientists have NOT determined that homosexuality is a normal orientation. That is the whole point of the article. Some psychologists have made an assertion unvalidated by scientists.
Keep trying...
Smile.
Scientists have determined chimerism is a defect.
They can test the fetus and abort it.

:)

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191444 May 8, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Proposition 8 is simple and straightforward. It contains the same 14 words that were previously approved in 2000 by over 61% of California voters:“Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”
Simple and straight forward violation of the 14th Amendment.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191445 May 8, 2013
Praise Jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree and these morons don't comprehend that but the homosexuals are suing everyone now for special rights and privileges that supersede heterosexuals to have the fear factor over our society.
Name one special right gay people are asking for.
Oh, no, looks like you are going to have to STFU.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191446 May 8, 2013
Praise Jesus wrote:
<quoted text>
I personally think, from what I have read, the reason you refuse to give a position on poly marriage is because you want this with your homosexual marriages adding to the enormous list of special rights and privileges that supersede heterosexuals. You were married to a man at one time and father children with you so why not be married to both.
So, can you name one of these special rights?
:::crickets chirping:::
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191447 May 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then don't. But the only thing I'm going to say when it comes to polygamy is it's not an equal rights issue.
<quoted text>
No, that's like saying interracial marriage wasn't an equal rights issue because everybody could marry someone one of the same race.
A man can marry a woman, but a woman can't. That's an equal rights issue.
A woman can marry a man, but a man can't. Again, an equal rights issue.
<quoted text>
Not true.
You can't get anything right, can you?
Polygamy most certainly is an equal rights issue. How dare you.

Poly marriage deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex or any other marriage.

Equal rights extends way beyond gender. You are an idiot.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191448 May 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Name one special right gay people are asking for.
Oh, no, looks like you are going to have to STFU.
To marry someone of the same sex.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#191452 May 8, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."
<quoted text>
Wrong, there are 18,000 currently legally and recognized same sex couples married in California. recogenized as married by the state.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191453 May 8, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
...racist post reported...
Why are fundies such racists?
Why do lions lick their balls?
To get the taste of fundies out of their mouths.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191454 May 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not heard one yet
The procreation argument was dead on arrival
The history/tradition argument was dead before arrival
There is no religious argument that applies to US law
I have not heard a single argument that was anything more than laughing stock.
Yeah, there just isn't a rational argument against gay marriage.
All the fundies can do is spew hate.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191455 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
In very plain words, you ignore all the rational arguments that have been delivered. Then you act as if you haven't heard any...
And the rational argument is?
Yeah, looks like you don't have one.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191457 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you purporting that there IS a purpose for homosexuality? And, we all know that no society has ever smiled upon homosexuality, except for the ancient Greeks, who no longer exist, and the oh, so decadent Romans, also gone for walkies down the ol' Extinction Trail... It would seem that any of the ancient civilizations that may have engaged in such behavior have fallen, by the wayside. Detrititus on the road...
ALL past cultures no longer exist, dummy.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191458 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No-one would marry that, anyway..Trying to pass itself of as a woman, and pulling out the "Midnight Intruder"...
So dumb, you can't tell a woman from a man.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191459 May 8, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously?
YOU determine whether it is a defect or not?
]

"Chimerism is a type of chromosomal disorder."
http://www.innovateus.net/innopedia/what-chim...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191460 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
IOW, you cannot provide any compelling reason to legalize SSM. Thank you for your admission of failing to be up to the task. Accepted.
Equal rights.
I know that's a bit complex for you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191461 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not protection. It is the gilding of a sexually oriented behavior. NOT the same thing, at all.
Stupid, gender isn't a behavior.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191462 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't try to use the logic, it's too complicated for you. Leave it there, for the grown-ups who DON'T get all strung out, then post, as you do...
Even with typos, what I post makes more sense than what you post.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#191463 May 8, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
To marry someone of the same sex.
You homophobes can't have it both ways.
Straight people would also be able to marry someone of the same sex, so it would not be a special right.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191464 May 8, 2013
Rock Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You know that I love you, old man, in a manly way (of course)...
:-D
Not in a Greco-Roman sort of way...
As Gunnery Sergeant Highway (Clint Eastwood) said in the movie Heartbreak Ridge "You're alright. But this doesn't mean we'll be taking long hot showers together at 2 AM."
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191465 May 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You homophobes can't have it both ways.
Straight people would also be able to marry someone of the same sex, so it would not be a special right.
I am not a homophobe. And I support SSM.

Your ridiculous belief that polygamy is not an equal rights issue makes you a bigot and a hypocrite. Not to mention stupid and arrogant. But that's not news.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#191467 May 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You homophobes can't have it both ways.
Straight people would also be able to marry someone of the same sex, so it would not be a special right.
Of course you're too stupid to realize that straight people would no more want to marry someone of the same sex than homosexuals would want to marry someone of the opposite sex.

So your argument is just as dumb and biased as theirs. Congratulations.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mrs moller Apr 24 Angry mother 1
Female teachers at Oakdale. Apr 24 Concerned friend 1
mrs moeller at oakdale !!!' read this now Apr 24 killyourselfbitch123 1
News East County E-views: Have you seen a lot of gra... Apr 21 Riverbank resident 2
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Apr 15 randy 122
News Scott Peterson family asking for donations (Jul '09) Apr 14 tom wingo 64
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) Apr 14 legalize gamefowl... 10
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]