Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,794

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#189610 Apr 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, a 'professional' social worker is asserting that those who disagree with ss couples being called married is secretly a closet gay.
Meanwhile, while posting a study of college boys asserting their masculinity, you still avoid answering my questions about parenting studies.
Clearly a bigoted contradiction...
Smile.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't assert it; the authors of the study did. I just happen to agree.
I've answered your parenting studies question. Shall I tell you again? Here it is. Don't forget it this time.
The best parents for children are ones who are responsible, supportive, loving, disciplined, resourceful, etc... Sometimes they're heterosexual, sometimes they're homosexual. Sometimes they're married, sometimes they're single, sometimes they're unmarried, sometimes they're divorced.
You cannot say with 100% certainty that all heterosexual couples make good parents. They just don't. And not all homosexual couples make good parents.
It is the SKILL of the parents, not the sexuality, that makes all the difference.
Silly queen, you diagnosed, on line, those who simply disagree with calling ss couples married, and you gave your opinion about parenting.

The first is idiotic and unprofessional, and the second is avoiding the fact that you only have fraudulent, unscientific studies supporting ss parents.

You not only support a lie, you do so at the expense of little children.

From the article YOU posted;

"A separate analysis in the same journal edition by Loren Marks, associate professor at Louisiana State University, more directly challenges previous same-sex parenting studies as inadequate, biased and unreliable. He lists seven concerns with the science, including the fact that "well-educated, relatively wealthy lesbian couples have been repeatedly compared to single-parent heterosexual families instead of two-parent marriage-based families." Single-parent families typically have poorer child outcomes across several measures, so it's easier to look better against them, he said.

W. Bradford Wilcox of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia said biological married families are the gold standard for better outcomes for children."

You are a disgrace VV too your profession, and an embarrassment to your cause.

Snicker smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#189611 Apr 21, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You expect that I should be gracious toward Kuntmary (Kimare)?
Ain't gonna happen...
Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.

Smile.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189614 Apr 21, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, one could say the same about an MSW. Takes a real genius to pay for 6 years of college for the privilege of working a dead-end, underpaid, and overworked career.
Good for you.
Now tell us again how stupid we all are?
Oh, and you are a social worker, don't break any limbs patting yourself on the back, acting like you deal with the complexities of the brain. There is no Dr. in your name.
Baby, I'm an EXCELLENT social worker. Hardly went into it for the money or glamour. I'm particularly good at taking a person's train wreck of a life and putting them onto a much more successful course.

The reward I get from my job is the satisfaction that I have positively impacted lives for over a quarter of a century.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189615 Apr 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.
Smile.
But you ARE the embodiment of a closeted bisexual/homosexual man.

1.) You know WAY too much about gay male sex to just have a passing interest in the matter.

2.) You have spent years on this site trying to convince others (and yourself) that being gay is unnatural, broken, etc.

3.) You come to these sites in order to give yourself a reason and an outlet in which you can have constant contact with primarily gay men.

4.) Your comments are clearly based on some inner angst you experience regarding male sex.

I've said it before and I'll say it again... You should go to somebody and work on your issues--your self-acceptance.

Otherwise, you'll spend the rest of your life obsessing over homosexuality--chasing it like you have over the past few years. You'll never find peace if you don't get to the root of whatever demons that plague you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#189616 Apr 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.
Smile.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
But you ARE the embodiment of a closeted bisexual/homosexual man.
1.) You know WAY too much about gay male sex to just have a passing interest in the matter.
2.) You have spent years on this site trying to convince others (and yourself) that being gay is unnatural, broken, etc.
3.) You come to these sites in order to give yourself a reason and an outlet in which you can have constant contact with primarily gay men.
4.) Your comments are clearly based on some inner angst you experience regarding male sex.
I've said it before and I'll say it again... You should go to somebody and work on your issues--your self-acceptance.
Otherwise, you'll spend the rest of your life obsessing over homosexuality--chasing it like you have over the past few years. You'll never find peace if you don't get to the root of whatever demons that plague you.
So you ignore the blatant hatred of a gay troll I respond to, and instead, join in with the troll making false and idiotic statements.

Do you understand how obvious it is that all your claims of being a unbiased, successful professional social worker were fatally exposed by your own response?

What are you going to do now?

Snicker.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189617 Apr 21, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you? Nah, I am pretty sure you simply read the abstract and liked what you saw so you stopped there. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made this stupid comment:
<quoted text>
You see, because had you read the actual study cover to cover, which I just did since you brought it up.(Bet you didn't expect someone to do that?) You would have known that the very people who conducted the study presented in their conclusion OTHER valid reason's for the results they recorded- other than your beloved homophobes are closeted gay's.
Here ya go, since I guess you missed it the first time you pretended to read it.
"Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's (1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986) theory would predict that sexual arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function of anxiety. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research. "
As I said before, I read the article in its entirety. Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study looked at the impact of the anxiety produced from the threat of an electrical shock would have on the sexual responses of a small group of men. They theorize that some men had a sexual response to the possibility of receiving an electric shock.

Having had a penis all my life, I can tell you from personal experience that when I become anxious or frightened, the last thing that happens to my dork is for it to start getting erect.

Now this might not be the case for those few people who get excited by torture.

Now Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study did not look at erections as it relates to visual stimuli.

Adams, Wright, and Lohr's study DID look at this connection.

Every good study tries to provide a possible theory (or theories) for the results they encountered. It provides a leaping-off point for future research.

But their article still stands as proof that heterosexual men who self-report a strong distaste for homosexuality may have a tendency to become sexually aroused when presented with visual stimulation of homosexual acts.

Their work has not be disproven.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#189618 Apr 21, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I've seen your response played out here going way back, if a straight person is on here questioning a gay person, then it plays out that they must be seeking out a gay person and desire to be gay....How childish.
How childish?????? It's actually SCIENTIFIC. 4 out of 5 vocal homophobes are secretly gay. Are you THAT ignorant of psychology???? Well adjusted males don't care.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#189620 Apr 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.
Smile.
.
We really don't care what YOU call married same sex couples. Evidently something about it causes you great discomfort.... enough discomfort to write things that make you appear delusional, inflexible and psychotic.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#189621 Apr 21, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you? Nah, I am pretty sure you simply read the abstract and liked what you saw so you stopped there. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made this stupid comment:
<quoted text>
You see, because had you read the actual study cover to cover, which I just did since you brought it up.(Bet you didn't expect someone to do that?) You would have known that the very people who conducted the study presented in their conclusion OTHER valid reason's for the results they recorded- other than your beloved homophobes are closeted gay's.
Here ya go, since I guess you missed it the first time you pretended to read it.
"Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's (1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986) theory would predict that sexual arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function of anxiety. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research. "
Hey simple simon..... what would the homophobes be 'anxious' about? Are you really THAT dull that you can't see it's the same thing? Jesus Christ on a stick!
SEYMOUR DUCK

United States

#189622 Apr 21, 2013
Ok going out to the pool, Get in drained,dryed & sweped be SK8 ING BY11:00am Barbie Qing aswell. NO DUCK.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189623 Apr 21, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>as it 34,43 or 44 years? Come on Frankie keep your story sraight
34. But if it were 43 or 44 would that mean your stupid argument is correct Jizzy? Would that mean we shouldn't allow marriage equality?
How would a same sex marriage or a poly marriage hurt you Jazybirdy58?

I mean what are you here for? If it's just to get some dirt on Frankie, your doing a bad job of it and if you do get some dirt what are you going to do then jackass?

Would that prove that your idiotic argument is correct? I think not dummy!

What a dope! Too funny.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189624 Apr 21, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey simple simon..... what would the homophobes be 'anxious' about? Are you really THAT dull that you can't see it's the same thing? Jesus Christ on a stick!
As always no point at all just stupid ad hominem.
SEYMOUR DUCK

United States

#189625 Apr 21, 2013
Its skatable so bitchen IT SICK! Coals are on ribs and coping Yea.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189626 Apr 21, 2013
This video is dedicated to some of our more frequent posters...

"I'm Not Gay!"
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189629 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
This video is dedicated to some of our more frequent posters...
"I'm Not Gay!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =hS9KPwfylmgXX
Aw, don't be so hard on Jizzy! He is very cute though. Like in cute very silly-cute Ha Ha, not cute as in I wanna boink him!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189630 Apr 21, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>Frankie, its all about credibility. You see Frankie, when you lie, about simple things such as a military career, and then being a geologist with 44 years of experience. How are we to know that you support marriage rights as you say that you do? No, Frankie you are just another troll that does not support marriage rights. You like to play the game, but you suck at it.
What you always forget when you get all silly-mad like this is a few things:

1. No one gives a sh!t except you if my story is true. Suppose it isn't? Whatcha gonna do then dummy?

2. You are an even bigger jackass troll than I, except you're stupid!

3. Let's say you catch me in a lie about my irrelevant to the topic life. Whatcha gonna do then jackass?

4. If you do get some dirt on me, so what? How does that prove you are not a hypocrite liar?

5. You mad swizzlestick?

6. YUK!YUK!YUK!

7. I support marriage equality, you do not.

Hope that helps tough guy.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#189631 Apr 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
This video is dedicated to some of our more frequent posters...
"I'm Not Gay!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =hS9KPwfylmgXX
The only lyrics I would add are:

Sittin' on my Mac until two in the mornin'
Screaming at those f*gs on the Topix forum!

Scared that they are gonna find out that my secret hope
Is to have some of them over and play "drop the soap"!

I'm not gay, I'm not gay!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189632 Apr 21, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>This one is just for you, ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =fHC05_9b0gwXX
WOW! She can f*** me very much all day long! Night too.

I think this means you're mad at me? Actually you're mad at yourself, I am just the messenger delivery the news of your hypocrisy.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#189634 Apr 21, 2013
For all you polyphobes posters, this one is for you.

:)

Love Times Three: Our True Story of a Polygamous Marriage - Changing Perceptions of Polygamy

http://m.youtube.com/results...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#189636 Apr 21, 2013
I think Jizzy is having another bad hair day.

Too funny!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Andrews Appliance Repair (Oct '13) Mar 18 Julia 3
News Scott Peterson family asking for donations (Jul '09) Mar 16 Cathy Odell 60
News $1.8 million mosque rising at Islamic Center in... (Feb '14) Mar 15 truthseekerss 34
Review: Northern California Cancer Center Mar 11 Anonymous 1
Review: Law Offices Of Ernie Spokes (Dec '13) Mar 7 jewelz 3
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Mar 7 Riverbank resident 115
Review: Consolidated Reliance (Mar '13) Mar 3 Mod 5
Oakdale Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]