Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201844 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183281 Mar 13, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you're saying is he couldn't out do your average of blowing and tossing salad for 60 homeless men in dire need of a bath per day for free.
I do believe that is what he is saying, yes...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183282 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
uh-huh.... so you blank your mind when you rail against gays, eh? Interesting.
Oh....Do I? What else do I do?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183283 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep butting in. It proves your obsession.
He's not butting in, I invited him. While you made false claims.
duck soup

Klamath Falls, OR

#183284 Mar 13, 2013
free Hitler showers for the D-faced
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183285 Mar 13, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
what obsession?
you are an angry ignorant a-hole and I don't mind telling anyone you are posting to while I am around...
obsession like you and my job?
It's X-Box that has the obsession.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183287 Mar 13, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Stringing unrelated words together just makes you look silly.
What you need to do is prove that gay couples legally marrying has any negative effect on society, on other couples, and on their own children.
Can't do that? Then keep conflating marriage with apartheid and segregation.
Actually, sweets, we don't need to do that, at all. It's you who must show compelling need for changing the existing laws.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183289 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Discredit your posts????? You haven't proved them in the first place. They are nothing but your opinion..... based on lies and misinformation. But here in America, you are free to hold the craziest opinions you can conjure up. Just don't be surprised when people laugh in your face.
Kimare's posts make perfect sense. You just have no recourse, but to scoff and ignore. It's the only defense that you have. Like going off-topic to accuse someone of being a lawyer. Or not being a lawyer. Or trying a case. Or not trying a case. Aw, shit, who knows what you are trying to say ? Not that it matters.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183290 Mar 13, 2013
right on wrote:
<quoted text>It is disgusting that we have come to this point in our decrepit society that we actually consider allowing men to marry men and women to marry women. I cannot wait for the return of God.
I'm not pushing the religious side of this, just the common sense part of it, so I agree with you...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183291 Mar 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?
Really.
Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?
Marriage has no correlation to procreation?

2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.
To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.
3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.
4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.
Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.
5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!
However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.
Welcome back VV.
Smirk.
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183293 Mar 13, 2013
NE Jade wrote:
<quoted text>Oh that great story where Lot's wife turned into a large salt lick, and his two daughters took him up into a cave, got him drunk, and boinked their father silly? Great family values story!
Silly thing, it's not a "family values story", it's a comparison. Dopey Jade....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183294 Mar 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Con dumb parroting. You don't even know what socialism is! Why are you against the Constitution and equal rights?
Yes, why don't you describe socialism to us, while staying on-topic?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183295 Mar 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!
Oh yes, that's VERY on-topic. Why don't you spin the propeller on your beanie while you describe socialism to us?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183297 Mar 13, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes, that's VERY on-topic. Why don't you spin the propeller on your beanie while you describe socialism to us?
Here's a clue, fuckwit, use Amerikkka as a model, because the politicians own all the business that matter, anyway.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183298 Mar 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!
Well, we know that YOU were aborted, anyway...
respect authority

Klamath Falls, OR

#183299 Mar 13, 2013
U R A L I A R wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you were in charge of the CHC!
far from it,

i was homeless and in the Christian Help Center because i would not sleep with the manager of my apartments, i could have been the assistant manager but I would not sleep with him and he ended up running off with the company's 10,000 rent money but they caught him in Mexico.
respect authority

Klamath Falls, OR

#183300 Mar 13, 2013
U R A L I A R wrote:
<quoted text>
Enough of your magical atheist Nazi fantasies!:( Now you have Oblunder, you can move into the future!
no, i am stating that the homeless are subject to abuse, like free showers for the jews,
Francis

Covina, CA

#183301 Mar 13, 2013
No need to ask, thaq answer is the same!

No! and Hill No!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183302 Mar 13, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes, that's VERY on-topic. Why don't you spin the propeller on your beanie while you describe socialism to us?
WTF are you going on about, Bigfoot? Socialism?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#183303 Mar 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?
Really.
Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?
Marriage has no correlation to procreation?
2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.
To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.
3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.
4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.
Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.
5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!
However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.
Welcome back VV.
Smirk.
I didn't mean to imply that marriage is devoid of offspring.

However, given that many marriages do not involve procreation, offspring is not the center of all marriages. The number of childless adult women has been on the increase since the 1970s.(According to 2004 U.S. Census Bureau data, the proportion of childless women 15 to 44 years old was 44.6 percent, up from 35 percent in 1976.)

Even marriage is on the decline. In 1960, 72% of all adults ages 18 and older were married; today that figure has fallen to 51%.

It's so simple that even a fool like you should be able to understand that.

As you very well know, procreation is so legally detached from marriage that it isn't even listed on a marriage certificate.

And if marriage were truly about procreation, then why hasn’t the “cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior” phenomenon that you keep regurgitating led to across the board divorces once children have been raised or once couples are beyond the age (or medical ability) to procreate?

Look, as has been REPEATEDLY been pointed out to you, people get married for a variety of reasons. Child rearing is just one reason. Other reasons include love, money, lust, family pressure, personal pressure, etc. And that’s just in our culture. In other cultures people get married as a part of arrangements to wed entire families or tribes.

In this country we’re free to marry for whatever reason we wish. The government may say WHO we can marry, but it cannot dictate WHY we marry.

And if same-gender couples wish to marry, there is no legitimate legal reason to keep us from doing so.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#183304 Mar 13, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
The new Pope Francis (St Francis of Assisi) isn't going to be giving San Francisco (St Francis of Assisi) gays any slack. He's conservative and hardline and will be keeping an eye on what's going on around here......
http://www.businessinsider.com/pope-francis-c...
Bergoglio is seen an unwaveringly orthodox on matters of sexual morality, staunchly opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and contraception. In 2010 he asserted that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children.
Who F'n cares? I'm not Catholic, or even a recovering Catholic. The opinions of a minister/pastor (and that's all he is) have no bearing on my life, my husband's life, or our children's lives.

Did you have some point here with your post????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Linda Ronstadt gained fame with pop songs, but ... (Nov '08) Jul 26 Ted 8
News Police Write Ordinance for City Council that Cr... (Jun '12) Jul 22 Riverbank resident 5
TE Cable Service (Jan '06) Jul 21 KeS 2
News In brief: Higher tax rates kick in for Greece -... Jul 20 Eleanor 1
to the young girl selling tamales at winco (Feb '10) Jul 14 spt54 103
News Man, woman discovered dead inside Modesto house (Sep '08) Jul 12 BeenMobbin 12
Walmart in Oakdale? (Aug '07) Jul 9 TellItLikeItIs 15
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages