Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
159,201 - 159,220 of 200,586 Comments Last updated 4 hrs ago
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182345 Mar 2, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously?
Honestly, and for true. Unless, you are like Big D, who states that nothing is rigge..Wait a minute. You ARE like that.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182346 Mar 2, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Put down the bottle and step away from the bar.
What a quaint and ineffective attempt to be patronizing. How cute. Aren't you just the little chappy ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182347 Mar 2, 2013
xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Do you think your backward, puritanical opinion is going to stop the evolution of marriage? You can either adapt, or you can go extinct.
This is not evolution, it is sheer derailment.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#182348 Mar 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Afraid?
Stupefied?
Or both?
Come on, I'm a near senile old man with only common sense. Concentrate your all your wisdom, call in the gay troops, give it your best shot, lets see what you got.
Smile.
Again...crazy fluck....how are the psych evaluations going?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182349 Mar 2, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Most people into anal sex are straight, stupid.
And you are an extremely poor counterfeit of nature's design, with your monster mutation.
<quoted text>
You are a genetic defect.
<quoted text>
Aren't you the 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form?
LOL.
Think you should have been aborted?
I keep telling your dumb-ass that most people into ANYTHING are straight. Because we are the majority. I know that this detail confuses you, and nullifies you claims that anal sex is okay, but you are well able to ignore this most fundamental of facts. So, why not step in front of a moving train and try to ignore that, as well ? Kimare is a complete person, unlike you. You have only these elementary school level taunts to resort to, so we ignore you and your shinola. And we know that you WERE aborted, to about 80% completion of the process, then they must have pitied you for the noises of anguish you were probably gurgling out. Pity they didn't finish the job...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182350 Mar 2, 2013
xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Do you think your backward, puritanical opinion is going to stop the evolution of marriage? You can either adapt, or you can go extinct.
Do you think your backward, puritanical opinion is going to stop the decriminalization of poly marriage? You can either adapt, or you can go extinct.
Dan

Roseville, CA

#182351 Mar 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are Afraid?
Stupefied?
Or both?
Come on, I'm a near senile old man with only common sense. Concentrate your all your wisdom, call in the gay troops, give it your best shot, lets see what you got.
As I have noted many times before, I focus on one single aspect of gay sex for two reasons;
One, intercourse is at the heart of a union between a couple. Anal sex is an extremely poor counterfeit of nature's design.
And two, anal sex is an inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning, clearly indicating a genetic defect.
While lesbian sex is simply unhealthy and demeaning, it still is a silly attempt by duplicate genders trying to imitate the design of evolution, the 'reunion' of diverse genders to one life form.
Smirk.
ROFL!!!

I was going to answer but realized you're bath-shit crazy to begin with.

Ever figure out who you were yet?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#182355 Mar 2, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I keep telling your dumb-ass that most people into ANYTHING are straight.
Well, then, Bigfoot, most people into anal sex are straight.
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
Because we are the majority. I know that this detail confuses you, and nullifies you claims that anal sex is okay, but you are well able to ignore this most fundamental of facts. So, why not step in front of a moving train and try to ignore that, as well ?
WTF?
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
Kimare is a complete person,
Two complete people. LOL!
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
unlike you. You have only these elementary school level taunts to resort to, so we ignore you and your shinola.
Well, if replying to my every posts is ignoring me...
imagine what you'd do if you were paying attention to me.
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
And we know that you WERE aborted, to about 80% completion of the process, then they must have pitied you for the noises of anguish you were probably gurgling out. Pity they didn't finish the job...
They finished the job on your face. Grabbed that ugly sucker by the tongs!
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182356 Mar 2, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and the appellate courts upheld his decision ( not gay ) and 200 businesses have filed with the supreme court calling the overturn of Prop 8 a "business imperative" and now a majority of all Americans support same sex marriage.
The fact that one particular was gay is really beside the point, and yes it was reported in the main stream media, you were too busy watching cartoons, or Faux news which comes to the same thing.
200 businesses that have no business meddling in the affairs of the nation. These same businesses were against this exact issue 20 years ago, based on financial analysis, now, they have been infiltrated by the same lobbyists that wish to turn Amerikkka into their private experiment. They have thrown financial wisdom out the window, to accommodate personal views. It is part of why Amerikkka is dying. And, no, the majority of Amerikkka does not support SSM, spit out your venomous propaganda elsewhere, if you please. Because this is a bald-faced lie. I haven't met anyone who seems to support it, and I travel extensively. And I do ask people. On the CB radio, in stores, all over the place, just to test this theory of yours. It does not stand up to the test of reality. Most people do not seem to care one way or the other. Far cry from "supporting" it. Very few support it. Most with any feelings on the matter are against it.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/262668/d...

http://www.nomblog.com/24660/

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher...

Now, I know that my words will be ignored, or discounted, as your side finds the words of my side as easily banished, but I have tested this theory, and it does not stand up to an honest and fair test. But these links will state some of my assertion.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182357 Mar 2, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
You've been recovering from your 'surgery' for almost 4 years now given you're in here on a daily basis during that time. Must have been some pretty goofy surgery to make you lay up in bed for three plus years.
You idiotic bullshitter. You're an anti-social LOSER who claims to have been a million things. Now it's you're in here all the time because of surgery and you're a veteran os search and rescue with the Navy. What's next superstar? What's your next claim while you hide in anonymoty? Maybe you're Spiderman and you're waiting for your 3 'Spidy Suits' to come back from the Southside Drycleaner while you wait on your FedEx package wioth your new web supplies.
LOL!!!!
You lying sack of shit.
Never had surgery for it until late last year. And again last week. You're a loudmouthed liar.

Maybe you'll list those million things I claimed to be jackass?

P.S. I didn't see your draft dodging ass over there coward.

Hope that helps Danny boy.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182358 Mar 2, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife was never able to bear children.
Funny thing shitforbrains....we're no less married.
LOL!!!
That's because you can't get it up. It's not her fault.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#182359 Mar 2, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
She Voh....sigh....sounds great on a hallmark card...but that's not why marriage developed as a distinct relationship. If sex between men and women didn't make babies would marriage as we know it even exist? Does the state care if a couple is only in like as oppossed to in love?
It makes for a stronger marriage if you actually love the person you're a fiddin' to git hitched to. That is why I asked my wife to marry me. Sex is the icing on the cake, not the entire cake. It took me a long time to find someone I was happy with. Someone I could converse with or sit in total silence just happy to be with.

You must be really old to be offering up the reason marriage developed as if you have authority over and access to such "facts." I'd be willing to bet there were a great number of reasons behind the development of the contractual agreement we currently call marriage. In some cultures the bond was agreed upon before the blushing bride even knew the groom. So much for your "sex is the reason for marriage" theory. Many purposes are served including the guarantee of future cooperation between family groups.

You're monochromatic view of the world is just as absurd as K-Mart's. The two of you are in good company with Brian_G.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#182360 Mar 2, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Its simple biology, not a "puritanical" opinion. At what point does marriage evolve, or perhaps devolve is the better word, where its no longer recognizable? Or no longer a need or reason for state interest and/or recognition?
Divorces are a dime a dozen and you're only reason for marriage is sex. I'd say we're already there. Or at least some of us are. Maybe you with your shallow approach to finding sex. Not me though, I'm content with mine and see no reason to exclude others from trying for the same, regardless of their sexual orientation (with the caveat that all participants are consenting adults.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182362 Mar 2, 2013
I have thought of a rather novel approach to this whole issue.....What if we legalized polygamy, as polygamy is rooted more firmly in nature than homosexuality. Then, all the SSM crowd could marry into a herd and no-one would wonder about the sexual relations. We'd all just assume that heterosexuality was the primary form the marriage was taking, and if the various members wanted to "experiment" with each other, we wouldn't have any thoughts on the matter ? Observing, of course, the proper legal matters of not including children in these marriages, even though that would upset JizzyTurds little view of polygamous relationships ?
Hell, it works for me...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182363 Mar 2, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because you can't get it up. It's not her fault.
I've offered to help ... I imagine that his pride would get in the way, though...
OldRocker

Covina, CA

#182364 Mar 2, 2013
Why even bother asking permission frm me.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#182365 Mar 2, 2013
OldRocker wrote:
Why even bother asking permission frm me.
I wasn't consulted, either, I think that it is an oversight ...
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182366 Mar 2, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...crazy fluck....how are the psych evaluations going?
You're failing badly. Worse than last year. You might have to stay in the mental ward for a while until we get you stabilized.

Meanwhile, try to stay calm and don't do dopey stuff. Do not bother or annoy the other patients.

Dr. Rizzo.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182367 Mar 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Whats up my biotch
Why don't you ask her, instead of hanging out on the gay threads?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182368 Mar 2, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!
I was going to answer but realized you're bath-shit crazy to begin with.
Ever figure out who you were yet?
What stupid post.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 15 hr Macko mono 5,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Thu Tank ever 7,926
Judge John D. Freeland is wrong! (Dec '13) Thu Kes 8
Family Wed Baby Girl 1
I am a multi millionaire (Aug '13) Aug 27 KeS 11
Fraud claims coming to court (Jun '07) Aug 26 KeS 2
to the young girl selling tamales at winco (Feb '10) Aug 26 KeS 100
•••
•••
Oakdale Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••