Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Big D

Modesto, CA

#181696 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am saying legalizing same sex marriage will make it much easier to legalize polygamy.
And it will, it's logical, grasshopper. Glad it makes you so silly mad. It makes me happy. I like same sex marriage being allowed I also like poly marriage being allowed.
Marriage is good for society ALL marriages. Not just Big D approved marriages. You have no say in anyone's equal rights. You don't matter. Just grin and bear it. Won't hurt you at all.
I know you are saying that, you are free to have all the opinions you want to have, but there is not a single fact backing you up

go get the fact, get one state to recognize Poly, and it cannot be a state that does not recognize Same sex Marriage or that will disprove your argument

you are free to have all the opinions you want, and we are free to laugh at you about it

But you canít claim that A ( SSM ) leads to B ( poly ) much less C ( your sister ) or D ( your goat ) until you have a single fact of a same sex marriage state recognizing Poly, and even then you would have to show how one led to the other

and remember if Utah or any state that does not recognize SSM recognizes poly you argument just got flushed down the toilet

The Brown case is working against you, because that is happening in a state that does not recognize SSM, so you cannot say one led to the other.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#181697 Feb 28, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
......
Either marriage means what itís always meant, or it will end up meaning whatever the next interest group wants it to mean.
And in the end, it will have no meaning at all.
In your opinion, not in reality.

There is no requirement to make any and all changes to every law because one change is logical and sensible.

A civil right cannot be denied to one group ONLY because you are afraid that another group might someday push their cause.

Sorry, that's not rational, and it's not constitutional.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181699 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Looks like Jizzybirdy is not around. The judge-its aren't being rigged!
There is a lot of room in your head
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181700 Feb 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
...you are free to have all the opinions you want, and we are free to laugh at you about it...
Gee thanks Fruitcake! Same to you.
Randy-Rock-Hudso n

Candler, NC

#181701 Feb 28, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Wow, still not one rational argument against gay marriage. You'd think in all this time, someone would be able to come up with ONE.
Silly thing, we have ... You just wish to dismiss them... LOL
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181702 Feb 28, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>There is a lot of room in your head
Get to work rigging the judge-its Jackass! You're slacking off.

Speed it up, no Viagra or Night Train for you today! Hup! Hup!

Remember now, good judge-its if your gay, no matter what, and bad judge-its for straight no matter what they say!

Except of course for your own posts which you rate good even though you're straight!

YUK!YUK!YUK! JizzyBrid. What a tool!
Dorn

La Puente, CA

#181703 Feb 28, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't! The only thing that will eliminate prostitution is extinction of humans.
If polygamy ever becomes legal and women could have as many husbands as she wants, prostitutes could marry their Johns. It might not eliminate prostitution, but it could diminish it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181704 Feb 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>

"...hate against Frankie...bla bla bla angry rant..bla bla bla...
But you canít claim that A ( SSM ) leads to B ( poly ) much less C ( your sister ) or D ( your goat ) until you have a single fact of a same sex marriage state recognizing Poly..."
There is a federal law against poly fruitcake, No state can recognize poly.

Get educated, it's the best defence against hate and bigotry.

P.S. Goats cannot enter into contracts. You use all the bigotry people use against SSM, but you use it against polygamy and poorly. Study up, there are much better ignorant insults against poly then the goat one, study the great homophobes work for some better ones.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181705 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polyamorists wishing to marry are denied equal protection Miss Thing.
The are not allowed to do it. They will go to prison if they do.
Same sex and opposite sex marriages are allowed by the feds. You can do it. You won't go to prison, you'll even get lots of free stuff!
This is not equal protection. Are you starting to get it Miss Thing?
"Equal protection" means you get to take your grievence to Court, you flaming dumbass. It does NOT mean equal rights. And the Browns aren't even asking the Court to have their marriage legally recognized.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181706 Feb 28, 2013
Dorn wrote:
<quoted text>
If polygamy ever becomes legal and women could have as many husbands as she wants, prostitutes could marry their Johns. It might not eliminate prostitution, but it could diminish it.
Yeah.... and I could swallow a dime and shit $5 bills.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181707 Feb 28, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
Either marriage means what itís always meant, or it will end up meaning whatever the next interest group wants it to mean.
And in the end, it will have no meaning at all.
That is what the Romans said when they stopped killing Christians for entertainment in the coliseum

That is what the slave masters said in the deep south during the emancipation

That is what the far right said when women got the vote

I know you desperately want to protect the sanctity of Brittany Spears "just of fun" 3 day marriage, but I promise you, same sex marriage will not diminish Brittanyís marriage one tiny little bit
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181708 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a federal law against poly fruitcake, No state can recognize poly.
Get educated, it's the best defence against hate and bigotry.
Oh really? Did you get educated? What federal law prohibits poly from being recognized by the States?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181709 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a federal law against poly fruitcake, No state can recognize poly.
Get educated, it's the best defence against hate and bigotry.
P.S. Goats cannot enter into contracts. You use all the bigotry people use against SSM, but you use it against polygamy and poorly. Study up, there are much better ignorant insults against poly then the goat one, study the great homophobes work for some better ones.
So.. you are saying when and if Utah recognizes Poly, that it will be because of their support for Same Sex marriage.

donít mind the laughter you are hearing, we are all laughing at a private joke.

I am not using anything against poly, I am not opposed to poly, I am just trying to bring you down to reality just a little bit. Right now you are higher than Rush Limbaugh at the Elvis Presley estate pharmaceutical sale
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181711 Feb 28, 2013
Randy-Rock-Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly thing, we have ... You just wish to dismiss them... LOL
Just like the Court does......
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181712 Feb 28, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
"Equal protection" means you get to take your grievence to Court, you flaming dumbass. It does NOT mean equal rights. And the Browns aren't even asking the Court to have their marriage legally recognized.
Don't keep giving me lame excuses for your bigotry and hypocrisy.

Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181713 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't keep giving me lame excuses for your bigotry and hypocrisy.
Is that another "...ooops I was wrong?" I didn't think so. You're not even honest enough to admit your own mistakes.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181714 Feb 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So.. you are saying when and if Utah recognizes Poly, that it will be because of their support for Same Sex marriage.
donít mind the laughter you are hearing, we are all laughing at a private joke.
I am not using anything against poly, I am not opposed to poly, I am just trying to bring you down to reality just a little bit. Right now you are higher than Rush Limbaugh at the Elvis Presley estate pharmaceutical sale
Won't be that simple.

So you are saying granting equality for one group has no relation to any other group?

That's not the way it has worked throughout history so far.

We know, you're not against poly. Everybody else is though because they're child abusers and pedophiles! That's Big D's "face of polygamy" and he's sticking to it!
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181715 Feb 28, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So.. you are saying when and if Utah recognizes Poly, that it will be because of their support for Same Sex marriage.
donít mind the laughter you are hearing, we are all laughing at a private joke.
I am not using anything against poly, I am not opposed to poly, I am just trying to bring you down to reality just a little bit. Right now you are higher than Rush Limbaugh at the Elvis Presley estate pharmaceutical sale
woohoo..... save me some percodan
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181716 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Won't be that simple.
So you are saying granting equality for one group has no relation to any other group?
That's not the way it has worked throughout history so far.
Did you forget your meds this morning?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181717 Feb 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Won't be that simple.
So you are saying granting equality for one group has no relation to any other group?
That's not the way it has worked throughout history so far.
We know, you're not against poly. Everybody else is though because they're child abusers and pedophiles! That's Big D's "face of polygamy" and he's sticking to it!
I am saying flat out, that if Utah recognizes Poly, it will not be because of their support for same sex marriage.

At least not in the short term

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) Tue Un agenda 21 and ... 13
Mrs moller May 22 proud mother 3
Review: Massage By Karin (at Embody Day Spa) May 18 jjberri 1
Review: Wiegand Cort V Attorney At Law May 14 Walmart 1
Azenth Castillo she will try to take your man k... (Jul '13) May 12 friend 6
News Suspect in fatal Oakdale shooting dies in Stani... (Jan '13) May 10 Hard knox 22
News Ryan Neal Mazzariello, 25, of Oakdale suspected... (Nov '12) May 5 Emily 48
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]