Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,968

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
TrapDoor

Covina, CA

#180935 Feb 22, 2013
Frankie they are getting your gallows with the trap door that falls away ready for you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180936 Feb 22, 2013
TrapDoor wrote:
Frankie they are getting your gallows with the trap door that falls away ready for you.
Is that what happens to those that don't toe the party line in the land of tolerance and diversity?

Be careful! You may be next.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#180937 Feb 23, 2013
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180938 Feb 23, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't seem to know what "default" means, stupid. And gay people have other options. And, stupid, anal sex isn't inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
1. It means 'another option', but includes the element of 'fault' in it.

2. Where did I say gays didn't have other default options. Or anyone for that matter. What I did say, is the that the union of body, mind and spirit by marriage can only be imitated by gays by default.

3. Intercourse violates sphincter muscles. Eat sh/t and die if it is so healthy, otherwise sit on it!

Ho, Ho, Ho.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#180939 Feb 23, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
If you love diversity and hate segregation; keep marriage one man and one woman.
This is the type of line of thinking that happens when someone finally gives up. They KNOW there is no rational argument against same sex marriage, and admit it, but they just can't stop posting.

It's sad, really. But kind of funny, too. They are proposing that the government interfere with marriage choices to an unprecedented and unsustainable level.

They are demanding "diversity" inside of each marriage, so they must also require different religions and races to be present inside each marriage. It's not just gender that receives government protection against segregation and discrimination.

Can you imagine the tax dollars and levels of governmental interference in personal lives required to implement their ideas?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180940 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>

This is a perfectly good marriage equality thread. If you are truly interested in MARRIAGE EQUALITY. And not more of the same. Equality for approved groups only.
Your attempts at censorship suck.
Silly me, I thought the thread was entitled "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage". Mea culpa.

Your attempts at diversionary tactics suck.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180941 Feb 23, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly me, I thought the thread was entitled "Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage". Mea culpa.
Your attempts at diversionary tactics suck.
That's what they all say, poly isn't marriage equality because the judge didn't mention it.

But striking down prop 8, which mandates that marriage is between one man and a one woman, also strikes down that pesky "one" thing along with that pesky "man woman" thing. Glad it makes you mad, hypocrite! But you can't have one without the other and have equality.

Marriage equality is for everyone, not just people you approve of.
Rainbow

Covina, CA

#180942 Feb 23, 2013
And why doesn't the little pea brained GOP, Republican and tea party idiots go fly kites.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180943 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Eat sh/t and die if it is so healthy, otherwise sit on it!
Ho, Ho, Ho.
Careful, your sock puppet is showing.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180944 Feb 23, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the type of line of thinking that happens when someone finally gives up. They KNOW there is no rational argument against same sex marriage, and admit it, but they just can't stop posting.
It's sad, really. But kind of funny, too. They are proposing that the government interfere with marriage choices to an unprecedented and unsustainable level.
They are demanding "diversity" inside of each marriage, so they must also require different religions and races to be present inside each marriage. It's not just gender that receives government protection against segregation and discrimination.
Can you imagine the tax dollars and levels of governmental interference in personal lives required to implement their ideas?
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.

The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.

Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.

Smile.
aLeppoo

Covina, CA

#180945 Feb 23, 2013
What took you clown "out of towners" post-toasties so long to make a come back?
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180946 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
The subject is marriage equality, why does that upset you so much if it includes ALL MARRIAGES? Are you a hypocrite and you're mad at me for it? It's on you Miss Thing. Deal with it.
http://poly-nyc.com/
The subject is Prop 8, not marriage equality. You fail at reading comprehension....AGAIN.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180947 Feb 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what they all say, poly isn't marriage equality because the judge didn't mention it.
But striking down prop 8, which mandates that marriage is between one man and a one woman, also strikes down that pesky "one" thing along with that pesky "man woman" thing. Glad it makes you mad, hypocrite! But you can't have one without the other and have equality.
Marriage equality is for everyone, not just people you approve of.
Polygamy was illegal BEFORE Prop 8. It will reamin illegal after Prop 8. Striking down Prop 8 will NOT strike down bigamy laws. Prop 8 had NOTHING to do with polygamy. This thread is not about polygamy. The article in question is not about polygamy, nor does it mention polygamy. None of the judges made any ruling concerning polygamy.... they did NOT strike down that "pesky one thing."
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#180948 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
So now two is half of two, eh? I figured out you are "unstable" but now I know you're off-the-deep-end nuts.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180949 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject is Prop 8, not marriage equality. You fail at reading comprehension....AGAIN.
Yes. Prop 8 says marriage is a man and a woman. That's not fair. Not fair to homosexuals and EQUALLY unfair to polyamorists.

Striking down prop 8 strikes down the "a" part of "a" man and "a" woman as well as the "man" "woman" part.

So you see, it is very on topic. The only reason you try to spin that it's not is because you are a hypocrite. And it righfully makes you uncomfortable. That's on you Miss Thing, not me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180950 Feb 23, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamy was illegal BEFORE Prop 8. It will reamin illegal after Prop 8. Striking down Prop 8 will NOT strike down bigamy laws. Prop 8 had NOTHING to do with polygamy. This thread is not about polygamy. The article in question is not about polygamy, nor does it mention polygamy. None of the judges made any ruling concerning polygamy.... they did NOT strike down that "pesky one thing."
Yes. Polygamy will still be illegal, but it will have one more restriction removed, prop 8.

Prop 8 says marriage is a man and a woman. That's not fair. Not fair to homosexuals and EQUALLY unfair to polyamorists.

Striking down prop 8 strikes down the "a" part of "a" man and "a" woman as well as the "man" "woman" part.

So you see, it is very on topic. The only reason you try to spin that it's not is because you are a hypocrite. And it righfully makes you uncomfortable. That's on you Miss Thing, not me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180951 Feb 23, 2013

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180952 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly, it is in fact carrying the context of gender, rather than illogically embracing every other aspect of marriage.
The fact is, marriage has always been the reunion of genders into a genderless being. In fact, it harkens back to the very roots of life; simple, genderless life forms.
Gay couples, on the other hand, are simply duplicate unions. Always only half of what a heterosexual couple equates to.
Smile.
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
So now two is half of two, eh? I figured out you are "unstable" but now I know you're off-the-deep-end nuts.
I accurately correct an attempt to divert from gender equality, and you turn around and do the same thing right off the bat (pun intended).

Here, let me school you;

We were not talking about numbers, we were talking about genders (See the very first sentence I posted for context). A gay couple represents half the available genders. A heterosexual couple is as diverse as gender possible. Both have two people, but one has only half the genders.

If I am unstable, what does that make you?

I have a letter certifying my sanity, this is a clear indication you need to pursue one. I can help you some more if you'd like.

Smile.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180953 Feb 23, 2013
If anyone sees "Xavier Breath" stick a fork in him. I think he's done.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180954 Feb 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

I have a letter certifying my sanity, this is a clear indication you need to pursue one. I can help you some more if you'd like.
Smile.
You claim to have 3, and you also claimed to lie to friends in order to obtain them.

Why are you so boastful about this?

Inner lesbian remembers things.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 3 hr TWP 5,078
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 4 hr Pizza 16,000
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 5 hr nickled 2,269
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Wed Blazing saddles 7,954
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Sep 16 🙈🙈 99
michael walker? Sep 15 meh 1
I am a multi millionaire (Aug '13) Sep 9 KeS 16
•••
•••
•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••