Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,861)

Showing posts 157,201 - 157,220 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180180
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>You think I don't know US servicewomen have died in Iraq and Afghanistan? The article says nothing about cause of death, sometimes illness, accident and negligence kill more people than hostile action.
More than 1522 US servicemembers have been killed in Afghanistan under Obama's leadership since 2009, less than a third that number were killed under Bush's leadership during the first eight years of the war.
Putting women in combat units means training injuries and deaths, even if they never get to combat.
Girl cooties?
Brian_G wrote:
Then, there's the effect on male troops fighting and training alongside...
Obama is a disaster as a military leader.
Do you con dumbs get bonus points for mentioning Obama's name, and the more off topic the mention, the more points you get?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180181
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Living in close confinement with members of your own sex is stressful enough, do you really want this shame on our bravest volunteers?
Do you have something against the people who defend our freedom?
You hate women, we get that.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180182
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You hate women, we get that.
You hate everyone, we get that.
Wooden

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180183
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

6

The panel is still out

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180184
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You hate women, we get that.
I am amazed that you can post stupid hate comments with nothing of beneficial substance ever.

How do you do that so perfectly???

Ho, Ho, Ho.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180185
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>LOL I gave the voters 4 options, what can I say but your asshattedness is well known.
Aw shuddup you dopeyass cyberstalking creep!

YUK!YUK!YUK! Jizzybird. What a jackass!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180189
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The verdict has been in for a long time. The Regnerus study only confirmed it. Nature established the ideal ions ago.
Why does a self described monster mutation bring up nature?
LOL!
KiMare wrote:
A father, mother and their biological children. Default situations dramatically increase the negatives for everyone.
Really?
KiMare wrote:
And gay couples with children rank last. After single parents.
Hardly a reason to smile...
Smirk.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
Why won't you answer the question?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180190
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No it doesn't.
You have one mother. That is simply a scientific fact.
Children have one father and one mother. That's it.
What if you were the parent, you monster mutation?
LOL!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180191
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
What legitimate practical logical comparisons could be made? What family structure can be compared to children born to, and raised by, their own biological parents in a low conflict stable marital home? A SSC, male or female, raising a child from birth, are still two men
or two women.(snip)
Can't slip anything past you.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180192
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a pathetic excuse for, one of our own. You're what most people would actually call a fagg@t. Get a grip, idiot
Robert
Sounds like you want to get a grip on Jazybird, IYKWIM.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180193
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Amazing, there you go again!

Perfect stupid hate!

Ho, Ho, Ho.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180194
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.
Smile.
Allowing gay couples to marry will "remove the element of procreation" from marriage?

How? In what way?

No state in the country bans people who cannot procreate at all, or couples who cannot procreate together, from legally marrying.

Remember, logic is your friend.

Can you prove that allowing gay folks to marry will stop straight people (or gay people) from procreating or raising children?

If not, then you will have a hard time showing how a gay couple marrying "removes procreation" from marriage.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180195
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
This is one of many;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too is simply silly.
You are so dumb, you can't make up a decent analogy.
You are trying to make an analogy to the definition of marriage. But you fail because unlike the ability to bear apples is pretty much the definition of an apple tree, the ability to reproduce isn't part of the definition of marriage. LOL!
KiMare wrote:
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples do not just fail in the primary essence of marriage, out of all relationships, they are the oxymoron of marriage.
You don't know what the word "oxymoron" means! Damn, this is funny.
KiMare wrote:
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.
Smile.
Stupid, allowing gay marriage won't remove the element of procreation, people will still procreate. Once and a while there will be a monster mutation. Do you think those mutations should be aborted?

LOL!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180196
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so dumb, you can't make up a decent analogy.
You are trying to make an analogy to the definition of marriage. But you fail because unlike the ability to bear apples is pretty much the definition of an apple tree, the ability to reproduce isn't part of the definition of marriage. LOL!
<quoted text>
You don't know what the word "oxymoron" means! Damn, this is funny.
<quoted text>
Stupid, allowing gay marriage won't remove the element of procreation, people will still procreate. Once and a while there will be a monster mutation. Do you think those mutations should be aborted?
LOL!
You call him dumb? You think polygamy is a fish!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180198
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Is there really a reason to think otherwise? What adult, who was raised by his/her own married biological parents in a stable home, looks back and thinks, "Gee, I wish Mom and divorced and I was raised by....."?(snip)
Any adult raised by you.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180199
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.
Smile.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Allowing gay couples to marry will "remove the element of procreation" from marriage?
How? In what way?
No state in the country bans people who cannot procreate at all, or couples who cannot procreate together, from legally marrying.
Remember, logic is your friend.
Can you prove that allowing gay folks to marry will stop straight people (or gay people) from procreating or raising children?
If not, then you will have a hard time showing how a gay couple marrying "removes procreation" from marriage.
First, there is no procreation in gay relationships. Zero.

Second, gays are the ones attempting the 'removing' of procreation form marriage. I'm removing nothing. Remember the desolate walnut tree hanging apples on itself claiming to be an apple tree?

I doubt if you ever met logic...

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180200
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so dumb, you can't make up a decent analogy.
You are trying to make an analogy to the definition of marriage. LOL!
You are so dumb, you can't understand a decent analogy.

I'm not making an 'analogy to the definition of marriage', I'm mocking the claim that children are not a part of marriage.

Everyone but you knows that...

Smirk.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180202
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

I have not posted in 12 hours, Frankie has brought up me 3 times. In
your head rent free.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Feb 13

Is A Reality

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180203
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
We were talking about parameters.
Smirk.
Damn. I thought you were still talking about perimeters and I was ready too chime in.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Feb 13

Is A Reality

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180204
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
....
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship.
No, you're the only one dumbing down relationships. And you simply don't have the power to do that to others.

Have you smelled down here lately? we're a bit rank.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 157,201 - 157,220 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Oakdale Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••