Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201864 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180148 Feb 18, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>You're a Homophobic asshat, got it.
No, you are!

Nana!Nana!Nana!

Grow up jackass.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180149 Feb 18, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>No not are all my friends, like I told you, your asshattedness precedes you. The votes don't lie now do they. You can only vote one time. Non registered cant vote at all. So Frankly over 200 people consider YOU to be the biggest asshat/Moron on Topix. That makes me feel all warm inside.
Sure Fruitloops. That's credible.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#180150 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you seriously insinuating that the state in the worst situation of 50 follows logical advice?
Silly stupid.
Smirk.
This is the best argument you have against SSM?
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180152 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Spell check?
That's your rebuttal?
Snicker.
"Every study sets numerous perimeters. If you don't like his, do your own. None of the other family types are whining, stop yours."

That's YOUR rebuttal? Are you kidding me? His methodology was flawed. It had nothing to do with his "perimeters." Way to prove you know zilch about research methods.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180153 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly! Which at the most would equate to a step parent situation, but with the added negative of missing one gender.
This also puts the child in the Cinderella Effect situation, 100 times more dangerous to the child's life than a natural home.
Smile.
You cannot draw valid conclusions about parents that were NOT studied, you flaming dumbass. Research Methods 301... check into it.
phaines

Big Bear Lake, CA

#180154 Feb 18, 2013
Mrs Anblomi

Schenectady, NY

#180155 Feb 18, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
You cannot draw valid conclusions about parents that were NOT studied, you flaming dumbass. Research Methods 301... check into it.
You stop that right now young man, you're dishonoring the family, and our name with your insults and crude disgusting spelling of Anblomi. Do you think you're funny? Well you're most certainly not. Your father and I want this nonsense to stop right now....and you're to be nice to other people here from now on!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180156 Feb 18, 2013
Mrs Anblomi wrote:
<quoted text>
You stop that right now young man, you're dishonoring the family, and our name with your insults and crude disgusting spelling of Anblomi. Do you think you're funny? Well you're most certainly not. Your father and I want this nonsense to stop right now....and you're to be nice to other people here from now on!
Yes, Mrs. Anblomi, we sympathize with you and do not blame you for Neil's outrageous vulgarity and crudeness.

Some children turn out bad even though they come from fine loving homes like yours. Perhaps he'll grow up some day and be responsible and sober.

We wish you good luck.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#180157 Feb 18, 2013
Marriage is good for society. All marriages.

Opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly are all marriage and all deserve the same respect and consideration.

There is no "one" right way!
SameOs

Covina, CA

#180158 Feb 18, 2013
Nothing new, go away.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180159 Feb 18, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the best argument you have against SSM?
No.

This is one of many;

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too is simply silly.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples do not just fail in the primary essence of marriage, out of all relationships, they are the oxymoron of marriage.

Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.

Smile.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#180160 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
This is one of many;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too is simply silly.
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples do not just fail in the primary essence of marriage, out of all relationships, they are the oxymoron of marriage.
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.
Smile.
So you would say that all couples that do not have children are not actually married.

You just lost the entire argument... again

In fact you have lost the argument so many times now that states are falling away from your stupid argument like dominoes

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180161 Feb 18, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
"Every study sets numerous perimeters. If you don't like his, do your own. None of the other family types are whining, stop yours."
That's YOUR rebuttal? Are you kidding me? His methodology was flawed. It had nothing to do with his "perimeters." Way to prove you know zilch about research methods.
Every study sets parameters on participants, time, topics of study to name a few. Perhaps you might have more to learn about research methods???

Regnerus established parameters for SEVEN family types. Gays are the only ones whining. Even Slate magazine commented on the illegitimate ad homoan attacks. Their advice? Produce legitimate studies that counter Regnerus.

However, as of now, the Regnerus study is the largest, latest most scientific study to date on family types. Lesbian couples ranked last, after single parents...

Oh, and natural parents ranked first. Again.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180163 Feb 18, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
You cannot draw valid conclusions about parents that were NOT studied, you flaming dumbass. Research Methods 301... check into it.
Step parent situations are not well studied???

Orientation makes a difference?

Well, it may, but according to the latest, largest and most scientific study on family types to date, it is an extremely negative difference...

Smirk.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180164 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Every study sets parameters on participants, time, topics of study to name a few. Perhaps you might have more to learn about research methods???
There are scientific standards, ya know? Each scientist doesn't get to make up his own rules to suit himself. Variables MUST be accounted for, or you have nothing. You really have no idea, do ya? Didn't you take any social sciences in college?

Comparing apples to oranges is meaningless. You can't draw conclusions about gay couples if you didn't study any. You can't compare long term hetero couples to short term gay couples with any validity. Do you understand? One would have no way of knowing if it was a difference in time or a difference in sexual orientation that caused the results.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180165 Feb 18, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So you would say that all couples that do not have children are not actually married.
You just lost the entire argument... again
In fact you have lost the argument so many times now that states are falling away from your stupid argument like dominoes
Said no such thing.

I said married couples without children are like barren apple trees.

Gay couples are like desolate walnut trees hanging apples on their branches demanding to be apple trees.

I've seen dominoes fall. States are not falling like dominoes.

What grade are you in???

Smirk.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180166 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Step parent situations are not well studied???
Orientation makes a difference?
Well, it may, but according to the latest, largest and most scientific study on family types to date, it is an extremely negative difference...
Smirk.
Did they specifically study gay step parents??????????
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180168 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
However, as of now, the Regnerus study is the largest, latest most scientific study to date on family types. Lesbian couples ranked last, after single parents...
Oh, and natural parents ranked first. Again.
Smile.
Nope. Not scientific. No validity. Data did not support conclusions.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

#180169 Feb 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Said no such thing.
I said married couples without children are like barren apple trees.
Gay couples are like desolate walnut trees hanging apples on their branches demanding to be apple trees.
I've seen dominoes fall. States are not falling like dominoes.
What grade are you in???
Smirk.
Yeah.... we've all seen trees hang apples on themselves.

You are a goofball.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180171 Feb 18, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Did they specifically study gay step parents??????????
First you demand that gay couples are the same as heterosexual couples, now you want to separate them???

Can you make up your mind Nelly???

Smirk.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Wed deeV8 125
sugar daddy Aug 31 hydrangea24 1
Walmart in Oakdale? (Aug '07) Aug 24 rusure 16
NO DRUGS in PARKS Aug 21 NO POT IN OUR BANKS 1
Oakdale's finest. (Dec '09) Aug 19 sissy 4
Miserable dispicable, Louise Singleton Aug 18 Concerned neighbor 2
News Will men's salon be bust due to its titillating... (Jun '06) Aug 15 Riverbank resident 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages