Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179990 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Thers my biotch
Great argument fruitcake! Even dopier ad hominem than Mona Lott. But that's all you've got, so you go with it, I understand.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179991 Feb 16, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why do you attempt to censor it away? And why does it make you so mad you do stupid childish stuff like start a troll thread?
Methinks you're full of sh!t!
Do you want 5 wives, OK by me. Do you want to marry your sister, OK by me.

Yet you keep posting on the thread, why is that? BTW did you notice your vote total? Puppy went up HUH?

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179992 Feb 16, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Get a sense of humor frikkin jerk.
Oh I see making off color remaks about a persons sexuality,whom you have never met is funny . Do you also enjoy sticking a firecracker up a frogs ass and the lighting the fuse funny? Tell me Frankie what else do you consider funny?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179993 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Do you want 5 wives, OK by me. Do you want to marry your sister, OK by me.
Yet you keep posting on the thread, why is that? BTW did you notice your vote total? Puppy went up HUH?
No as I've told you many times I don't want five wives, I want to discuss the concept as it applies to marriage rights.

You want to discuss same sex marriage. Does that mean you want to marry a man?

Stop being so stupid. You're just angry because I hurt your feelings, I understand. But try and get over it for your own sake fruitcake.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#179994 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow you really are a piece of work. Prior to the repeal DADT men and women homosexuals served in the military. Women have been subject to sexual harassment in the military for quite some time. It just did not happen. Or are you implying that Gay men are the reason?
Of course it existed before.

Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.

The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.

Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...

Smile.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179995 Feb 16, 2013
Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA

The topic is marriage, not ad hominem insults.

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Reply
Jazybird will never understand what you are saying, don't bother trying. He's "stuck on stupid"!

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA

No, I was in the Navy. That jackass Big D was a coastie. That's the only thing he's got going for him.

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Great argument fruitcake! Even dopier ad homonym than Mona Lott. But that's all you've got, so you go with it, I understand.

Hey Frankie, can you just see the Hypocracy, in your posts?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#179996 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Gay historians? Do you always look at persons sexuality prior to judging thier work?
I wonder if Madame Curie would have been a homosexual, would her work discovering radioactive substances of radium and polonium been discredited by science?
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.

Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...

Smile.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179997 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Clueless.
I never saw the movie, must have been one of your favorites, you must know every line.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179998 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it existed before.
Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.
The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.
Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...
Smile.
If you check the sources, you will find most are rooted in a Homophobic historian who has been discredited by his peers and even other heterosexuals.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179999 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
Humm, if a heterosexual then does reaserach on hetersexuals, its a clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180000 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it existed before.
Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.
The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.
Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...
Smile.
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you check the sources, you will find most are rooted in a Homophobic historian who has been discredited by his peers and even other heterosexuals.
Did you deliberately confuse issues?

I understand why, you are losing your ass.

Smirk.
Time

Drakes Branch, VA

#180001 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
......
Did you deliberately confuse issues?
I understand why, you are losing your ass.
Smirk.
After reading many of your posts, I have not seen a single logical argument against extending the same protections to gay couples that are extended to married straight couples.

Do you have any?

Remember, the key word is logical.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180002 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Humm, if a heterosexual then does reaserach on hetersexuals, its a clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
I didn't base the criticism on my opinion or the orientation.

In the case of Boswell, other historians discredited his work, which exposed his gay bias.

In the case of lesbian family studies, again, the methodology was extremely unscientific. So much so that even an article in Slate magazine noted the poor quality. In the most notable case, the lesbian researchers made the claim that lesbian couples made better parents than natural parents. It is why I require any family studies to include the methodology.

The question I never get answered is this; Why is this deception necessary for a legitimate cause??? Or, why is the denial of basic anatomy, evolution and scientific facts necessary to justify a legitimate cause???

Maybe you have a real answer?

Smile.
Changes

Monrovia, CA

#180003 Feb 16, 2013
Looks as if you all better enjoy it.
Time

Drakes Branch, VA

#180004 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
As long as a study and it's results was thoroughly peer-reviewed, why would it matter who conducted the study?

When studying what criteria is used in a study, and examining the final outcome, it's not hard to figure out if that study was correct or not.

That's why there IS a peer-review process.

For instance the Regnerus study failed on many points. Can you show where the study you mention failed?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180005 Feb 16, 2013
Time wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as a study and it's results was thoroughly peer-reviewed, why would it matter who conducted the study?
When studying what criteria is used in a study, and examining the final outcome, it's not hard to figure out if that study was correct or not.
That's why there IS a peer-review process.
For instance the Regnerus study failed on many points. Can you show where the study you mention failed?
The Regnerus study was challenged and found to be the largest, most scientific study to date.

The study I noted was disqualified by peer review, not just for a small and selective study group with no comparisons, but with extremely dubious information collecting methods.

Here is a challenge; Find me a study that lists it's study methods and challenges the Regnerus findings.

Smile.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180006 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly equal to urinals and tampon dispensers... By the way, have you ever seen one used in the men's room (for babies).
Basically, you are defending brainless equality. Think about it...
Smile.
He's rushing to the defense of his hero the great Rose_NoHo!

Even if she says something very stupid, JizzyBird will defend it. Being that he is so stupid himself.
Time

Drakes Branch, VA

#180007 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Regnerus study was challenged and found to be the largest, most scientific study to date.
T.......
I don't think you actually read the "challenges".

Again, opinion is not the same as fact, and smiling in condescension doesn't make it look any better.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180008 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Can you say Unisex bathrooms? Its my guess that you would not use one. A woman might discover your umm, shortcomings?
Happens to you, eh?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#180009 Feb 16, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Oh I see making off color remaks about a persons sexuality,whom you have never met is funny . Do you also enjoy sticking a firecracker up a frogs ass and the lighting the fuse funny? Tell me Frankie what else do you consider funny?
Does anyone know a good siding contractor? By good, I mean good skills, not a good ass!

The last thing I want is some guy like Jizzybird58 coming over my house and flashing me hairy sweaty man-butt!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) Tue Un agenda 21 and ... 13
Mrs moller May 22 proud mother 3
Review: Massage By Karin (at Embody Day Spa) May 18 jjberri 1
Review: Wiegand Cort V Attorney At Law May 14 Walmart 1
Azenth Castillo she will try to take your man k... (Jul '13) May 12 friend 6
News Suspect in fatal Oakdale shooting dies in Stani... (Jan '13) May 10 Hard knox 22
News Ryan Neal Mazzariello, 25, of Oakdale suspected... (Nov '12) May 5 Emily 48
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]