Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,843)

Showing posts 156,841 - 156,860 of200,206
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179806
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I call BULLSHIT. Its a cold fact that you are OH so wrong.
"Adoption expert, Carrie Craft cites the Child Welfare Information Gateway (previously National Adoption Information Clearinghouse) as stating, "A child's risk of being molested by his or her relatives' heterosexual partner is over one hundred times greater than by someone who might be identifiable as being homosexual." The study also found that of 269 cases of child sex abuse, only two offenders where found to be gay or lesbian. The American Psychological Association agrees, "Another myth about homosexuality is the mistaken belief that gay men have more of a tendency than heterosexual men to sexually molest children. There is no evidence to suggest that homosexuals molest children."
http://www.google.com/url...
Trot out all the rhetoric you like it's all ignorant bullsh!t used by haters.

Give me numbers jackass. I'll tell you right now I am correct. Many many more men in monogamous marriages are child abusers than men in poly marriages.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179807
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I call BULLSHIT. Its a cold fact that you are OH so wrong.
"Adoption expert, Carrie Craft cites the Child Welfare Information Gateway (previously National Adoption Information Clearinghouse) as stating, "A child's risk of being molested by his or her relatives' heterosexual partner is over one hundred times greater than by someone who might be identifiable as being homosexual." The study also found that of 269 cases of child sex abuse, only two offenders where found to be gay or lesbian. The American Psychological Association agrees, "Another myth about homosexuality is the mistaken belief that gay men have more of a tendency than heterosexual men to sexually molest children. There is no evidence to suggest that homosexuals molest children."
http://www.google.com/url...
More gay men molest children than men in polygamous gay or straight marriages. I stand by my statement.

More straight men in monogamous marriages molest children than straight men in poly marriages.

The end.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179808
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh! So is that your only reason to try and not allow me to even mention the word POLYGAMY? That it has a bad image and it will be hard to enact? Same thing happened with ssm remember?
You'll be surprised at how fast images can change with education. But you shouldn't be, you saw it happen with same sex marriage.
Come on Jackass get your sh!t together and try again.
Idiot I never said we should not allow polygamy, I said it was not likely to be allowed for the next decade or so, but not because of me

I said you have an image problem, which is why you would not succeed right now.

You cannot even recognize it, so you are blindsided by it
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179809
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
NO I am not attacking everyone for same sex marriage and defending everyone against same sex marriage, you are.
and using a playbook from decades ago
and it isnít working too well for you is it?
You have it backwards again. You are suing the old playbook, and poorly. You trot out all the old arguments that were used against same sex marriage.

Don't you understand irony son?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179810
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiot I never said we should not allow polygamy, I said it was not likely to be allowed for the next decade or so, but not because of me
I said you have an image problem, which is why you would not succeed right now.
You cannot even recognize it, so you are blindsided by it
How many times are you going to repeat that poly has an image problem? So what?

You have no good argument against it but you wish you did. Try harder.
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179811
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
More heterosexual men molest children than gay men, should we outlaw heterosexual marriage?
That isnít the issue dummy
The issue is again, one of image, you could not get enough signatures on the ballot until you find more responsible people to represent your case. THAT is what you need to correct
I would buy a ticket to watch Frankie try to gather signatures promoting polygamy.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179813
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times are you going to repeat that poly has an image problem? So what?
You have no good argument against it but you wish you did. Try harder.
I am not arguing you fool, Iím just laughing at you
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179815
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You have it backwards again. You are suing the old playbook, and poorly. You trot out all the old arguments that were used against same sex marriage.
Don't you understand irony son?
Wrong again

I am not opposed to same sex marriage
I am not particularly opposed to poly marriage

you are just too stupid to comprehend what other people are saying
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179816
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
I would buy a ticket to watch Frankie try to gather signatures promoting polygamy.
I won't be doing that. So save your money.

I can discuss polygamy without gathering signatures and you can discuss same sex marriages without gathering signatures. Got that Miss Thing?

If I mention traditional man/woman marriage no one panics, why do you panic when I mention poly marriage?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179817
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not arguing you fool, Iím just laughing at you
ha ha so funny! poly has an image problem.

ha ha polygamists are child abusers and welfare cheats yuk yuk.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179818
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I won't be doing that. So save your money.
I can discuss polygamy without gathering signatures and you can discuss same sex marriages without gathering signatures. Got that Miss Thing?
If I mention traditional man/woman marriage no one panics, why do you panic when I mention poly marriage?
of course you wonít, you arenít for that any more than you are for same sex marriage.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179819
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiot I never said we should not allow polygamy,...
I didn't say you did IDIOT, this is what I said:

"Oh! So is that your only reason to try and not allow me to even mention the word POLYGAMY?"
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179820
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
I would buy a ticket to watch Frankie try to gather signatures promoting polygamy.
I wonder if we can get a two-fer, I want to see him propose to his sister too
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179821
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
of course you wonít, you arenít for that any more than you are for same sex marriage.
Great argument jackass! One of your best. Try harder. Much harder.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179822
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
of course you wonít, you arenít for that any more than you are for same sex marriage.
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179823
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again
I am not opposed to same sex marriage
I am not particularly opposed to poly marriage
you are just too stupid to comprehend what other people are saying
So you're not opposed to letting those child abusing welfare cheats get married, you're just opposed to discussing it?
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179824
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're not opposed to letting those child abusing welfare cheats get married, you're just opposed to discussing it?
I am just laughing at you so obsessed about it, scared to death people might talk about same sex marriage instead
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179825
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if we can get a two-fer, I want to see him propose to his sister too
I don't want to marry my sister, I want to discuss marriage equality. Which by it's very definition applies to all forms of marriage.

You wish to censor some types of marriage for the obvious reasons. Let's cut through your bullsh!t.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179826
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't want to marry my sister, I want to discuss marriage equality. Which by it's very definition applies to all forms of marriage.
You wish to censor some types of marriage for the obvious reasons. Let's cut through your bullsh!t.
Yes you only want to discuss things you are not actually for, but want to pretend to be for.

I am not trying to censor you, I am laughing at you telling others to stay on topic.

You are scared to death that someone might actually be on topic, which is same sex marriage
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179827
Feb 15, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am just laughing at you so obsessed about it, scared to death people might talk about same sex marriage instead
Of course it's the other way around. You are scared to talk of poly.

How many same sex marriages have you been to fruitcake?

How many of the people you love are homosexuals?

Have you served in the Coast Guard with a brave gay man and kept his sexuality a secret because of the tremendous bigotry in the military in the sixties?

I have the right to be proud of my very low level of bigotry. You, probably not so much.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 156,841 - 156,860 of200,206
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••