Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179761 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't want five wives or to marry my brother. I want to discuss equal rights.
Do you want to marry a man? If not why are you arguing for same sex marriage?
Don't be so stupid.
I am trying, its a shame you wont.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179763 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm real proud of you Fruitloops! Real proud.
I can discuss marriage equality without your permission. Glad it makes you mad.
Censorship sucks.
Aww , did you not like my answer? So what have you done to help your cause???? I know sit on your lazy azz and spam Topix
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179764 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
But he is not the public image of same sex marriage, never was.
Dahmer was not using same sex marriage as an excuse to commit his crimes.
I get it that you donít understand the difference, but everyone else here does.
What I understand is that you are ignorant.

You are trying to tell me that polygamy has a bad and that is justified. Ignorance and bigotry plain and simple.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179765 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>LOl, trees to follow
He said Dogs, I was expecting Goats as that is what the "arguments against same sex" pamphlet calls for
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179766 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I talked to your sister, she doesnt want to marry you
And I don't want to marry her, I just want to discuss the right to marry her. Too bad you don't understand the difference.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179767 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no mistake, you would not follow that path so precisely defined for so long. Granted it is no surprise, falling that path means you donít have to actually think for yourself at all.
?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179768 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>It seems that you are wrong again. I posted a link to Warren Jeffs. Had you opened it and read the article. You would see that you are wrong. The dude was marring 12 and 15 year old girls off.
So that means to you that the other few million poly marriages around the world should be made illegal?

"Cool beans" fruitcake!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179769 Feb 15, 2013
Necessary repeat of disclaimer, for the dopes who forgot again-

You have to try and understand, when I talk of marriage equality, it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.

In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it? Got it? Good!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179770 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I am trying, its a shame you wont.
Perhaps you will direct me to one of those posts where you discussed marriage equality. All I see is dopey troll.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179771 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Aww , did you not like my answer? So what have you done to help your cause???? I know sit on your lazy azz and spam Topix
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Snappy

Monrovia, CA

#179772 Feb 15, 2013
Will the pencil lipped fool from out of town who keeps posting snap-poola, shut up
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179773 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>LOl, trees to follow
Remember when they used that against same sex marriage fruitcake? You are the civil rights champion of us all, you must remember that. It was stupid then, remember? It still is.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179774 Feb 15, 2013
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179775 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
Necessary repeat of disclaimer, for the dopes who forgot again-
You have to try and understand, when I talk of marriage equality, it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.
In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it? Got it? Good!
and the decline of the influence of religion in America that made it possible.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179776 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
And I don't want to marry her, I just want to discuss the right to marry her. Too bad you don't understand the difference.
I dont thinkg your dog does either
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179777 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What I understand is that you are ignorant.
You are trying to tell me that polygamy has a bad and that is justified. Ignorance and bigotry plain and simple.
No I have been trying to tell you that it has an image problem, you donít want to believe it.

so when you try to get your pet obsession on the ballot you will be facing a very unexpected surprise

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179778 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means to you that the other few million poly marriages around the world should be made illegal?
"Cool beans" fruitcake!
Go back and read your post dummy. Why are you now talking about what is allready legal in other countries? Still deflecting?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179779 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and the decline of the influence of religion in America that made it possible.
More people in traditional MARRIAGES are child molesters and welfare cheats than people in poly MARRIAGES by a factor of about 15,500,000 to 1.

Watch, you'll whine about the mention of poly, but not traditional marriage! Priceless.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179780 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means to you that the other few million poly marriages around the world should be made illegal?
"Cool beans" fruitcake!
"it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.
In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it"

I posted you a link, thats not the case in EVERY poly marriage. Why do you support child molestation?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179781 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Go back and read your post dummy. Why are you now talking about what is allready legal in other countries? Still deflecting?
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Apr 15 randy 122
News Scott Peterson family asking for donations (Jul '09) Apr 14 tom wingo 64
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) Apr 14 legalize gamefowl... 10
New OAKDALE Fema Concentration camps being buil... (Nov '08) Apr 6 Just wondering 14
News $1.8 million mosque rising at Islamic Center in... (Feb '14) Apr 6 Mikey 42
Review: Andrews Appliance Repair (Oct '13) Mar '15 Julia 3
Motorcycle accident near Jack in the box in oak... Jan '15 Watch 1
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]