Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179664 Feb 14, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you whining for a "redefinition" for polygamy?
We're just riding on your train, Purple Passion, since you're already fiddling with it...Someone has to make sure that all the groups receive equality, not just some...
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179665 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I did not say that, you how ever are in favor of welfare cheats and perverts. Nice, bet your votes go through the roof
Yes you did say that.

You have no argument so you try to use dishonesty, but it fails because you are stupid.

You and Big D say that since some polygamists are bad, we should deny equality to all polygamists.

Now that I point out your bigotry and ignorance you're going to try and lie your way out of it.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179666 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not. Why are you so stupid?
JizmyTurd can't help it...
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179667 Feb 14, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
JizmyTurd can't help it...
I think he needs new tin foil, his hat is receiving garbled transmissions from dope headquarters.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179668 Feb 14, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Why is The FSM imiginary? Why do you hate him? Do you feel the same towards the mean god in your book? What a maroon
Ramen!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#179669 Feb 14, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.[/QUOTe]

No, it's a legal contract.

[QUOTE who="KiMare"]
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
You don't have to be able to reproduce in order to marry. Next.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179670 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But the current definition violates the 14th Amendment.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia correctly says the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not apply to sex discrimination or sexual orientation cases. Activist federal judges, on the other hand, see the 14th Amendment as a blank check to legalize whatever conduct they happen to approve of, such as abortion, homosexuality, & gay marriage. But these activist judges are destroying federalism by bringing about a massive transfer of power from The People and the States to their own black-robed selves.

So, there's that...
Spoils

Monrovia, CA

#179671 Feb 14, 2013
This is a running buddy of Chris Jeffers, Douglas Tessitor, Gene Murabito, Jeff Kugel, Josh Betta and D. Wayne Leech all of Glendora, California - are they going down with Nick Conway too?

Nick Conway has been ordered to stand trial on charges of conflict of interest for work with SGVCOG for 17 years, he has been ordered back to court Feburary 28, 2013.

Spoiler Alert, yipee! Off with some White Collar Heads.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179672 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you two trolls flooding the forum with posts about polygamy because you realize there isn't a good argument against gay marriage?
(One of you is clearly flying false colors, pretending to be for gay marriage.0
No, dumb-ass, they are examining the ramifications of this case. Confusing for you, but, there it is. There are, as you well know, many arguments against SSM, but you refuse to acknowledge any. It does not invalidate them, it merely infuriates you to the point of ignorance. As we all know.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179673 Feb 14, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
I love it. Anyone who doesn't agree with Rose_NoHo is a troll!
Then, call me "The Mega-Troll", because I think that Chongo is insane.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179674 Feb 14, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
"Mormon boy"? Are there Italian Mormons?
Haven't you heard of Donny and Marie Osmondelli ? How about Mitt Romneoni ? Can't forget Brigham LoYoungo...LOL
Spoilers

Monrovia, CA

#179675 Feb 14, 2013
Glendora city council making plan to throw out it's low income seniors in mid 2013.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179676 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Equal rights.
No other argument is needed.
<quoted text>
They have it. They have the same right to marry more than one person everybody else does.
<quoted text>
Stupid troll, equal means "the same". Everybody is treated equally, the same, when it comes to getting married to more than one spouse, so it's not an equal rights issue. Are you really so dumb you don't understand that? But everybody is not treated equally when it comes to getting married to a man (or a woman), so that is an equal rights issue.
Should everybody be able to marry more than one spouse? Well, why not start a forum and talk about it?(Notice, I'm not stating a position on polygamy, it's just a red herring in this forum.)
There's no equality when gays can change prevailing laws and customs, but polygamists cannot. Stupid Chongo...

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179677 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ramen!
Noodles?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179678 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't make my argument based on sexual orientation, but on gender.
A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
A woman can marry a man, so a man should have that same right.
That is entirely incorrect. Because some things are simply wrong. Get it ?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179679 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have to be able to reproduce in order to marry. Next.
Then why can't I marry my sister?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#179680 Feb 14, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have to be able to reproduce in order to marry. Next.
So Rose

Why do u think marriage developed at all!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179681 Feb 14, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
So Rose
Why do u think marriage developed at all!
This should be good!
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#179682 Feb 14, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, not going to play, because you're talking about related individuals. You're also aware of the "taboo" pertaining to incest and the resultant problems from swimming in too small a pool.
I was talking about two non-related consenting adults.
Game over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =wT-8Dm1VThcXX
"Taboo" ? You, of course, refer to the views of the majority, correct ? The same majority that has no rights to dictate what happens behind closed doors, between consenting adults, correct ? Hmmm...Something about this seems wrong... Oh, of course, SSM was "taboo" a few years ago, but that has been changed, due to frenetic lobbying by a minority. So, then, if that can change, why, so can laws against incest...Especially in light of the argument, used by the SSM crowd, that procreation is not a part of the equation for marriage. And, of course, this can be insured by the use of contraceptives. Hey, problem solved. You forgot to include the important parts... Now, it is game over.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#179683 Feb 14, 2013
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Available for dating Bachelorette (Dec '13) Dec 20 KeS 2
New OAKDALE Fema Concentration camps being buil... (Nov '08) Dec 18 classified1234 12
Review: A & A Temporary Fencing (Jun '14) Dec 18 Matt Dalek 2
Obamaa s Action on Immigration Praised in Modesto Dec 3 stell88 1
1980's Restaurant; Rax or Arbies? (Jul '06) Nov '14 xsturgeonx 3
Turlock candidate has long history in Stanislau... (Oct '06) Nov '14 Joe 6
Walmart in Oakdale? (Aug '07) Nov '14 Riverbank resident 13
Oakdale Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:37 pm PST