Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Miley DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174424 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Er, I'm the wicked pagan, and I agree with Mikey, polygamy is another facet of the issue. We are not allowed to use God, or Christianity, in this forum, it has been targeted by the resident self-appointed arbiters of moral correctness. The poofs. They have decided to act as our moral compasses, and deny any reasons to deprive them of their pet project, namely the undermining of moral fiber.
They are also the self appointed thread judge, jury and police. Anything that threatens their dogma is "off topic". Continued controversy causes banning.

Notice the extreme hypocrisy when alternate forms of marriage other than same sex are even mentioned.

Unfortunately these clowns give same sex marriage a bad rap. I don't see the pressing need for it but I also don't see much harm. The only harm I see in it is the stupid dishonest zealotry demonstrated by these assholes like Rose_NoHo.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174425 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
What's the question?
Next time that you have a question, please raise your hand, like they told you, today, in Mrs. Dolans class..
Miley DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174426 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you fundies such racists? Do you believe Jesus died for black people?
(Didn't read the rest of your post.)
Why are you such a hypocrite?

(Read your whole stupid post.)

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#174427 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it isn't. It is a behavioral problem. The whole gay marriage issue exists because you wish to lay claim to rights that are not yours to claim. Financial gain. You seek societies approval, in order to feel accepted, whilst you display aberrant behaviors. Anyone who claims that they "need" emotional support from another is weak. Relationships are the spice of life, not the crutch that you claim.
Homosexuality isn't a problem, behavioral or otherwise. Homosexuality isn't a behavior. And everybody seeks society's approval to one degree or another. BTW, ugly, I'm straight. And, why marry if you don't need emotional support?
Miley DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174428 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
What's what question ?
Ever see Jane Dodo's ("Mona Lott") videos on YouTube? Check it out search for "go to monas church" on YouTube and see what this jackass looks like.

Warning! Not for the faint of heart!
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174429 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, anybody can look.
I asked you to name a single book, promoted by GLSEN to children as young as five, that showed adult/child sex in a favorable light.
Anybody interested can look at
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
and see I am telling the truth.
You didn't come up with a single title. Free clue, "And Tango Makes Three" doesn't show adult/child sex in favorable light, that was one of the titles you posted. And people can now see you are lying when you said I dropped the subject. I'm the one posting a link to the original challenge!
Now, scoot, ugly.
No, dude, you said "LOL can you name any of those books?", in reference to the indoc books that I said existed, but that you said did not. Stay focused upon the truth, and you will be free. Lie, and be known as a liar. It's all there, in the post. Go look. Nowhere in that post did you make any specifications, at all. You subsequently posted that you "meant" to post something about GLSEN, which clearly shows that you had omitted to include this in your post. Now shut up, or admit defeat like a man.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174430 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, anybody can look.
I asked you to name a single book, promoted by GLSEN to children as young as five, that showed adult/child sex in a favorable light.
Anybody interested can look at
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
and see I am telling the truth.
You didn't come up with a single title. Free clue, "And Tango Makes Three" doesn't show adult/child sex in favorable light, that was one of the titles you posted. And people can now see you are lying when you said I dropped the subject. I'm the one posting a link to the original challenge!
Now, scoot, ugly.
There is no challenge on that page that you posted a link to. And you said that we could go round and round, but that you were not going to argue the point any more. You dropped the issue, and now claim that you didn't. Liar. No one can trust a liar, and you are plainly that.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#174431 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
So, it's not all literally true? Fine.
I just don't get why so many Christians insist everything in the buy-bull is literally true when so much of it is clearly absurd.
I find it interesting that so many sinners focus on what they think they understand and ignore what they can't explain in the Bible.

It's even more interesting to watch the passionate persistent push against something you say is fiction.

Ho, Ho, Ho.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174432 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, anybody can look.
I asked you to name a single book, promoted by GLSEN to children as young as five, that showed adult/child sex in a favorable light.
Anybody interested can look at
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
and see I am telling the truth.
You didn't come up with a single title. Free clue, "And Tango Makes Three" doesn't show adult/child sex in favorable light, that was one of the titles you posted. And people can now see you are lying when you said I dropped the subject. I'm the one posting a link to the original challenge!
Now, scoot, ugly.
And, nothing COULD show adult/child sex in a favorable light. What's wrong with you ? Were you hoping to find some sort of "family friendly" pedophilia, and thought that I'd be able to steer you towards some ? I told you that you'd have to find your own bedtime reading material.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174434 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Can you name one of those books?
Here it is, right here ! Lies from the drama queen. Can you show me where you made mention of GLSEN ? NO ! Of course not.

As I said, on your bike, punk.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174435 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, anybody can look.
I asked you to name a single book, promoted by GLSEN to children as young as five, that showed adult/child sex in a favorable light.
Anybody interested can look at
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TH6FC2NTH...
and see I am telling the truth.
You didn't come up with a single title. Free clue, "And Tango Makes Three" doesn't show adult/child sex in favorable light, that was one of the titles you posted. And people can now see you are lying when you said I dropped the subject. I'm the one posting a link to the original challenge!
Now, scoot, ugly.
The whole enchilada, right here:
"The same indoc that Chongo disputes is cited here, however...
"Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education – Kevin Jennings
Jennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. They’re sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way...

LOL! Can you name one of those books? "
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174436 Jan 11, 2013
In case you hadn't noticed, it says that "they even promote books that show adult/child sex in a favorable way". It doesn't say, however, that any were listed in my titles barrage. That titles list included Pro-Gay Indoc books that were being used to brainwash children about accepting gays, at all. Not to be confused with pedophilia, as you wish to make it seem.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174437 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So, go look all you want. Everything in this post of yours is a lie. Now, beat feet, b1tch. Kick rocks...
And get about it.
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174438 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Three does not equal two.
Are you arithmetically challenged?
And man does not equal woman.

Are you gender blind? Why not number blind too? Why is one more valid than the other?
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174439 Jan 11, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
hahahahaha
hahahahaha
ahahahahah
Did you learn THAT from Jane Dough, too?
So if Prop 8 is overturned, does that mean polygamy will be legal in California? Of course not. It's a completely seperate issue. Prop 8 has NOTHING to do with polygamy.
Prop 8 being overturned is a victory for marriage equality therefore it is a victory for poly too. It will be a big step forward for poly.

Glad you don't like that fact.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174440 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know what "reported" means?
<quoted text>
Whatever.
I know what "reported" means. I am at a loss for what you had to report. What did you report me for ?
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174441 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't matter what the majority wishes, the Constitution grants equal protection.(Though I have a feeling things have changed since Prop H8 was voted on.)
Equal protection, but not equal status for defunct pairs.
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174442 Jan 11, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you fundies such racists? Do you believe Jesus died for black people?
(Didn't read the rest of your post.)
Why are you haters such omniphobes ? Don't you believe that Jesus died for black people ?
(Can't find rationality in any of your posts)
Randy Hudson

Wooster, OH

#174443 Jan 11, 2013
Miley DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
They are also the self appointed thread judge, jury and police. Anything that threatens their dogma is "off topic". Continued controversy causes banning.
Notice the extreme hypocrisy when alternate forms of marriage other than same sex are even mentioned.
Unfortunately these clowns give same sex marriage a bad rap. I don't see the pressing need for it but I also don't see much harm. The only harm I see in it is the stupid dishonest zealotry demonstrated by these assholes like Rose_NoHo.
Yeah, with agents like Chongo, who needs to point out reality to them ? They have their own "foot-shooter" in their front line, getting all the bad press that they wish to avoid. Honestly, if I was for SSM, I would have told Chongo to STFU a long time ago, as damaging to the cause.
Micky DiRucci

Union City, CA

#174444 Jan 11, 2013
Randy Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what "reported" means. I am at a loss for what you had to report. What did you report me for ?
I wondered too. She's insane.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mrs moller Fri proud mother 3
Legalize COCKFIGHTING in AGRI ZONINGS to fund p... (Feb '13) May 18 Un agenda 21 and ... 11
Review: Massage By Karin (at Embody Day Spa) May 18 jjberri 1
Review: Wiegand Cort V Attorney At Law May 14 Walmart 1
Azenth Castillo she will try to take your man k... (Jul '13) May 12 friend 6
News Suspect in fatal Oakdale shooting dies in Stani... (Jan '13) May 10 Hard knox 22
News Ryan Neal Mazzariello, 25, of Oakdale suspected... (Nov '12) May 5 Emily 48
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]