Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Post # 172430. You said this: "..You know I'm black, I said so, and posted my pic.". Then, in this post, you said :"..never have said I've put a pic of my face up..". I ask you to explain what this means...It would seem that making contradictory claims is not
considered to be lying, in your neck of the woods....

LOL! Are you REALLY this stupid? Well, every time I think, "Nobody can be THAT stupid!", I'm proven wrong.
The pic I have up is my pic, yet it's not a pic of my face. Duh, moron.

R Hudson wrote:

As to not being a beauty queen, you must have one pug ugly mug.

Bigfoot, you're not in the position to call anybody "pug ugly"! LOL!

R Hudson wrote:

You do not dare to show a picture of yourself, because you lack the guts to. simple. Lies and word games are your fare. Duly proven.

No, stupid, you con dumbs are violent, racist, and immoral. I would risk my life if I put a picture of my face up. You just risked ridicule.
So, why isn't your face up now? You don't have the guts?
Sauce of the goose...

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
The ignorance is to use a respectable ceremony to claim respectability in an unnatural union. Simple. Marriage has always been a rite to join man and woman,

Appealing to tradition, a logical fallacy.
Next.

R Hudson wrote:

it is clearly spoken in the ceremony, you know the bit about "Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded husband", and then the corollary "Do you take this woman to be your lawfully wedded wife" ? Or do you choose to ignore the whole ritual, except for the part where a title is wrongfully bestowed, through the use of legal chicanery ?

Bigfoot, people can have any type of marriage ritual they want to, say whatever the like, or no have ritual at all. Marriage is a legal contract.

R Hudson wrote:

We all pay taxes to make this country run smoothly, and then we get this idiocracy taking over, in order to upset the whole applecart, in order to satisfy 10% of the population. 90% of us don't want our money wasted of this trash, but 10% want it to happen, so our majority is now being forced to pay for something we don't want. Thanks a lot for seeing my money go to waste. Just because of a loophole.

Boo hoo.

Sorry stupid, the Constitution grants all people in the US equal rights. Even members of minorities. If you hate what America stands for so much, why not move? I hear Iran is rather homophobic. You'd be in heaven there.

[Wash your hands]

Dr Claude Balls wrote:

I want to marry my doggie, Bowser. He's my soulmate and we've been together for three years.
We have our rights too!

You're going to get carpal tunnel, stay off the porno,Doc.

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you fundies randomly bring up Obama's name in every argument?

Why do you randomly bring up fundies in every argument?

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, yeah, you're a fundie.

See what I mean?

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
You'll now be asked to explain how union contracts, which involve unions, are of any concern to me, who is neither in a union, nor working for a union company ?
Please, go ahead and try to make sense of this ? Explain it, if you can...

You are a parasite. You take advantage of the contracts the unions negotiate, these contracts don't just affect union companies, but you don't join a union and pay dues. Leach. Oh, no wait, leaches have some value.

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a parasite. You take advantage of the contracts the unions negotiate, these contracts don't just affect union companies, but you don't join a union and pay dues. Leach. Oh, no wait, leaches have some value.

You don't pay any taxes quit whining. Talk about a parasite.

[Rose_NoHo]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody has the right to marry the same sex. Everybody has one right only, and that is the right to marry the opposite sex.

That's like saying everybody had the right to marry within their own race. Sorry, doesn't cut it.
A man can marry a woman, there is no reason a woman shouldn't be able to.
A woman can marry a man, there is no reason a man shouldn't be able to as well.
That's equal.
Don't they have equal rights where you are?

[KiMare]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
It was dealing with the issue: marriage rights!
So, I asked:
Should your rights depend on your genes?
Both in your case, and in general.
Should our rights depend on our genes?
It seems you think our rights should depend on our genes.
So, it's logical to ask:
Should you be allowed to marry twice because you have both sets?
Or should you not be allowed to marry at all because you have both sets?
LOLSER!

Calm down ho.

No where did I suggest any such thing.

Are you really suggesting we allow cross species marriage?

Smile.

[Jazybird58]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
The ignorance is to use a respectable ceremony to claim respectability in an unnatural union. Simple. Marriage has always been a rite to join man and woman, it is clearly spoken in the ceremony, you know the bit about "Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded husband", and then the corollary "Do you take this woman to be your lawfully wedded wife" ? Or do you choose to ignore the whole ritual, except for the part where a title is wrongfully bestowed, through the use of legal chicanery ?
We all pay taxes to make this country run smoothly, and then we get this idiocracy taking over, in order to upset the whole applecart, in order to satisfy 10% of the population. 90% of us don't want our money wasted of this trash, but 10% want it to happen, so our majority is now being forced to pay for something we don't want. Thanks a lot for seeing my money go to waste. Just because of a loophole.

Not so much Rock.

http://www.soyoureengayged.com/2010/vows-for-...

No one is talking about a religious wedding. Vows can be written, by anyone........

[Wakanatabi]

Dr Claude Balls wrote:

I want to marry my doggie, Bowser. He's my soulmate and we've been together for three years.
We have our rights too!

Good luck.

They'll seperate you two for good at Bethesda Mental Hospital in time just so you know.

[Snappers]

Just get off the boat on this topic.

[Ronald]

We dog lovers are always being asked by our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and yes, even by the Africans, whether "pet therapy" (so to speak) can rid them of their troublesome 'addiction' to members of the same sex.

I always tell them that, yes, according Raymond Bell, Chief Pastor of Virginia's Cowboy Church, "Equine Assisted Psychotherapy' can, help any person who is living the homosexual lifestyle or involved in it any way."

Source: http://tinyurl.com/aycyokv

Source: http://tinyurl.com/barjqas

Ronald

[Rose_NoHo]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Calm down ho.
No where did I suggest any such thing.

Liar. 99.9% of the time our gender is determined by our genes.

KiMare wrote:

Are you really suggesting we allow cross species marriage?
Smile.

Why do you ask? You want to marry a human?
Do you think you should have been aborted?
LOL!

[Rose_NoHo]

Ronald wrote:

We dog lovers are always being asked by our Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and yes, even by the Africans,

Why are you fundies such racists?
(Didn't finish reading your post.)

[Kimare a]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Liar. 99.9% of the time our gender is determined by our genes.

Oh, you meant gender, not DNA!
In evolutionary mating behavior, gender diversity is required for survival.
In marriage, gender segregation is not allowed. I would think you would be against segregation too...
It is interesting that the ancient book Genesis noted the same. Adam was not 'complete' until Eve was created and 'complimented' him when they joined in marriage. Jesus echoed that when he said, "From the beginning it has been so".
Smile.

[d w p]

is this a gay chat room do u got to be gay to hang out here

[d w p]

what are u doing talking about god rose when u are going to hell like all u gay are sick sick u need help

[Wakanatabi]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
They won't care a bit.

Not many care about losers like you and "Brian G" in or out of this TOPIX nonsense would be my guess.

[Wakanatabi]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Loving V Virginia was never about gender, merely race, as I taught you.

The parallels are too close to ignore friend.