Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172893 Jan 2, 2013
snyper wrote:
Very dark mockery, indeed.
Very dopey post indeed!
Cantor Fool

Covina, CA

#172894 Jan 2, 2013
Eric or should I say Little Eric, of the rat pack of Republicans and Tea (Baggers) party.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#172895 Jan 2, 2013
What about eric?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172896 Jan 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen child, homosexuality spreads through the US like an illness, it is a perversion and very sick!
Not to others who are homosexual. Now then,please do back up your silly claims with a little factual documentation.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172897 Jan 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
The judge is very evil.
Why, because he did his job, by upholding the laws of this country?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172901 Jan 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/
articles/253971.php
Do you understand the implications of epi-marker discovery?
"Different kinds of epi-marks safeguard different sex-specific characteristics; some protect the genitals, others protect sexual identity, and this study suggests others keep safe sexual partner preference.
When these epi-marks are passed between generations from fathers to daughters or mothers to sons, they have the potential to result in reverse effects. The outcome is feminization of characteristics in sons or masculinization of some characteristics in daughters, occasionally affecting sexual preference."
First they will identify different epi-markers. Next they will be able to correct markers mistakenly left. Literally shape not just gender, but the masculization or feminization of either gender!
The whole issue of homosexuality will be rendered mute!
Please do continue to miss the mark. Homosexuality is not an illness any more than left handedness. Are you just a religious fundie searching for justification of your bigotry?
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#172902 Jan 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Not to others who are homosexual. Now then,please do back up your silly claims with a little factual documentation.
Women with big hips can bear healthy children, muscular men can produce strong children. A TV program also says this.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172903 Jan 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Women with big hips can bear healthy children, muscular men can produce strong children. A TV program also says this.
I see, tell me is reproduction a requirement in all marriages?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172904 Jan 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I see, tell me is reproduction a requirement in all marriages?
No. So we should allow incest marriage.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172905 Jan 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Please do continue to miss the mark. Homosexuality is not an illness any more than left handedness. Are you just a religious fundie searching for justification of your bigotry?
Oh boy! Q&A! Love it. Here goes!

Are you just a dope?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172906 Jan 2, 2013
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
No. So we should allow incest marriage.
Hire a lawyer and go for it.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#172907 Jan 2, 2013
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh boy! Q&A! Love it. Here goes!
Are you just a dope?
Could be. I guess that makes you a stain on your mothers sheets.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#172908 Jan 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Women with big hips can bear healthy children, muscular men can produce strong children. A TV program also says this.
You can't be serious......
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#172909 Jan 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Another sexual deviant eh? I thought we would have scared you homosexual deviants away.
Scared off by retards like YOU?

hahahahaha
ahahahahah

You couldn't scare a fly.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172910 Jan 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Could be. I guess that makes you a stain on your mothers sheets.
What is that some sort of jackass logic?

They told you wrong, son!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172911 Jan 2, 2013
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>Scared off by retards like YOU?
hahahahaha
ahahahahah
You couldn't scare a fly.
Neither can you!

Nana!Nana!Nana!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#172913 Jan 2, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Hire a lawyer and go for it.
Now why would I do that jackass?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#172915 Jan 2, 2013
Kimare a wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you meant gender, not DNA!
In evolutionary mating behavior, gender diversity is required for survival.
In marriage, gender segregation is not allowed. I would think you would be against segregation too...
Wow, you are stupid.
Kimare a wrote:
It is interesting that the ancient book Genesis noted the same.
The ancient book Genesis said plants were growing before there was a sun.
Kimare a wrote:
Adam was not 'complete' until Eve was created and 'complimented' him when they joined in marriage. Jesus echoed that when he said, "From the beginning it has been so".
Smile.
Did god make a mistake when he made you? You have both sets of DNA, right? Do you think you should have been aborted?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#172916 Jan 2, 2013
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Loving V Virginia was never about gender, merely race, as I taught you.
Dummy, some idiot was talking about marriage laws and states' rights. You do know Virginia is a state? During the 60's, "states' rights" were often used as an argument against getting rid of Jim Crow Laws.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#172917 Jan 2, 2013
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
If they were a same sex couple. LOL. It doesn't matter, as Loving v Virginia was a gender based decision. So it's irrelevant.
Wow, you are stupid. It was a case of "states' rights" and religion against equality when it came to marriage laws.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Scott Heller wanted on Grand Theft Auto and emb... 21 hr Your Service Prov... 1
susan bender missing since 1986 (Jan '11) Dec 6 Sarah Chupco 16
Sheila Garcia Del Rio's scam artist Nov 29 Well Well 2
Two children among four found dead after mobile... Nov 23 openmind693 1
unsolved. murders Nov 21 unsolved 1
News Homeless Modesto Men Headed for Trial (Apr '08) Nov 17 Your Service Prov... 28
Did you know?... Nov 10 Your Service Prov... 1

Oakdale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages