Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[KiMare]

KiMare wrote:
You and I are GIFTED with one mother and one father. No one can ever replace that relationship.

NorCal Native wrote:

<quoted text>
What you are first and foremost is an IDIOT!!!
I know of a person who's grandchild DOES NOT have a biological father or sperm donor.....the child is solely conceived by the biological mother......seems as if the medical staff took Stem Cells from her bone marrow, which became sperm......which they then took and fertilized her egg and presto......a child was created.......today, that child is a healthy happy 2 year old!!!!
Guess what......that child is an American Citizen and is loved by their mother and her family:-)

What you are first and foremost is a liar.

You know no such thing, because it has not been done with humans.

What you are second is a platinum blonde idiot of unsurpassed degree! What you even suggest is highly unethical.

What kind of person would DELIBERATELY deprive a child of one parent and one gender? Do you even begin to understand the perversion you are promoting once again???

Seriously, you need to get a letter validating your sanity. Just a suggestion, but one I highly encourage you to pursue. Ask your family and friends if they think you are sane, see what they say!

:-)

[KiMare]

A blonde from 'southern' CA. Why am I not surprised...

[Jazybird58]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
First of all, The Romans were the most decadent society ever conceived. Secondly, Nero was clearly known as insane. Even in Rome, he went beyond the pale. However, That "these were usually reported in a critical or satirical manner.' clearly shows that even these perverse people thought it aberrant, " so that a marriage between two Roman males (or with a slave) would have no legal standing in Roman law (apart, presumably, from the arbitrary will of the emperor in the two aforementioned cases)." shows that the emperor could overrule the common trends of decency, as is the attempt being made now. Also, "In 342 AD Christian emperors Constantius II and Constans issued a law in the Theodosian Code (C. Th. 9.7.3) prohibiting same-sex marriage in Rome and ordering execution for those so married." shows the lengths to which such unions were frowned upon. Hmm, doesn't sound like it was accepted back then, either, even though aberrations always occur.
So, in order to be a sport, I will merely say the rest of the story (to paraphrase Paul Harvey) shows that these were not accepted, but exceptions to the rule that has always governed marriage.

I believe you said that no christian church allowed same sex marriage, yet I posted the truth. I also showed that same sex marriage went back several thousand years. Like I said you have no reasonable objection to same sex marriage, none, nada, zip, zilch. Marriage is a contract between two adults of legal age, nothing more. Marriage has nothing to do with reproduction.

[Jazybird58]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
English broad eh. I can dig it. Did she have good teeth? You know those limeys are dentally challenged.
Had a g.f. in Hong Kong. Annie. HOT Chinese girl spoke with a cultured British accent! HUBBA HUBBA! Something about that silly accent. This was in 1969. I'm an old f**k. Proud of it. Lucky to be alive 6 or 7 times over. Like an old cat. Most of my old sidekicks are long gone.

Nice bigotry

[Jazybird58]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Yup. Jizzybird didn't stay long. He was funny. He thought he was a real tough guy!

Wrong again sugar nipples, I have been pissing on asshats like you for well over a year. You got nothing spunky

[Mike DiRucci]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Nice bigotry

Dumb post. There was no bigotry in my post. You're stupid.

And you are a bigoted jackass!

[Mike DiRucci]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Wrong again sugar nipples, I have been pissing on asshats like you for well over a year. You got nothing spunky

Too funny!

You never did tell us the tree joke. Why can't a man marry a tree? Remember you asked that dummy? You didn't give us the punchline.

We give up. Why?

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, Mike,
You owe me $1..._:D..
From the desk of Jazybird58:
"I believe you said that no christian church allowed same sex marriage, yet I posted the truth. I also showed that same sex marriage went back several thousand years. Like I said you have no reasonable objection to same sex marriage, none, nada, zip, zilch. Marriage is a contract between two adults of legal age, nothing more. Marriage has nothing to do with reproduction."
And...
"the early Roman Empire.[68] For instance, Emperor Nero is reported to have engaged in a marriage ceremony with one of his male slaves. Emperor Elagabalus "married" a Carian slave named Hierocles.[69] These were usually reported in a critical or satirical manner.[70] It should be noted, however, that conubium existed only between a civis Romanus and a civis Romana (that is, between a male Roman citizen and a female Roman citizen), so that a marriage between two Roman males (or with a slave) would have no legal standing in Roman law (apart, presumably, from the arbitrary will of the emperor in the two aforementioned cases).[71] Furthermore, "matrimonium is an institution involving a mother, mater. The idea implicit in the word is that a man takes a woman in marriage, in matrimonium ducere, so that he may have children by her."[72] Still, the lack of legal validity notwithstanding, there is a consensus among modern historians that same-sex relationships existed in ancient Rome, but the exact frequency and nature of "same-sex unions" during that period is obscure.[73] In 342 AD Christian emperors Constantius II and Constans issued a law in the Theodosian Code (C. Th. 9.7.3) prohibiting same-sex marriage in Rome and ordering execution for those so married.[74] A same-sex marriage between the two men Pedro Díaz and Muño Vandilaz in the Galician municipality of Rairiz de Veiga in Spain occurred on 16 April 1061. They were married by a priest at a small chapel. The historic documents about the church wedding were found at Monastery of San Salvador de Celanova.[75]"... Sounds like choking, to me...

I didn't take that bet!

The jackass is back this morning claiming he pisses on asshats like me.

WOOOHOOO!

[Mike DiRucci]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>Marriage has nothing to do with reproduction.

Right. That's why there is no reason incest marriage should not be allowed.

[O dark 30]

Must be real slow at your house, can't you afford a TV ?

[Mike DiRucci]

NorCal Native wrote:

<quoted text>
What you are first and foremost is an IDIOT!!!
I know of a person who's grandchild DOES NOT have a biological father or sperm donor.....the child is solely conceived by the biological mother......seems as if the medical staff took Stem Cells from her bone marrow, which became sperm......which they then took and fertilized her egg and presto......a child was created.......today, that child is a healthy happy 2 year old!!!!
Guess what......that child is an American Citizen and is loved by their mother and her family:-)

Wow that's a whopper!

You big fibber!

[d w p]

hi whats up

[d w p]

hello anyone want to date

[d w p]

hi randy

[Tosser]

Wooster, Mass..

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
....I could have been $1 richer......

Looks like he's gone again. Hope he comes back.

Dopey tin foil hat wearing dummy with some long boring story about some old Roman auntie boffing his man slave! He's too funny!

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Beats me, if I can hug a tree, why can't I marry one ? Oh, it's because only the gays deserve the "equality" that all others are denied, due to the governmental interference, that they have been claiming is wrong, when it is used against the gays, but seems to fly, when it is pointed at any other group. I get it now, or ...wait....I don't get it ....

He asked me why a man can't marry a dog or a tree. I heard the dog one but not the tree one, he never did give me the punchline.

Might have been a good one. I guess he's sulking now and we'll never hear it.

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Beats me, if I can hug a tree, why can't I marry one ? Oh, it's because only the gays deserve the "equality" that all others are denied, due to the governmental interference, that they have been claiming is wrong, when it is used against the gays, but seems to fly, when it is pointed at any other group. I get it now, or ...wait....I don't get it ....

But jazzybird58 is not gay.

;)

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, some old cobblers about a twisted old Roman catamite, and he acts the fool. Didn't Rome collapse ?
:D

What's with all the Rome love from these clowns? Yesterday that dopey "Big D" was trying to tell us that Christians stole Christmas from the Romans. He tells his grand kids that silly nonsense gets em all anxious and confused, ruins Christmas for them. What a jackass!

Probably tells em Obama saved Christmas from Romney stealing it for the Mormons.

[Mona Lott]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Right. That's why there is no reason incest marriage should not be allowed.

That's right, Mr. Double Negative.