|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> Like you DISHONESTLY changed your assertion that "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "all the intents and objectives listed in the impeachment failed"? And then called me a liar to deflect further from your original lost argument. Nice! Liberal rules. P.S. Are you ever going to tell us what these "intents and objectives listed in the impeachment" are? I cannot find them. I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing
|
|
Chrisnris
Hesperia, CA
|
KiMare wrote: <quoted text> Mating behavior today is the end result of simple genderless life forms evolving into two genders resulting in the ability for those species to survive. Marriage is simply various customs culture created to support and celebrate the mating behavior union of those two genders. It is a union that hails back to the very roots of evolution, the recreation of a simple single genderless life form. Duplicate genders cannot in any aspect replicate those basics. Marriage links the beginning of life to the present. That has always been the case in every single culture. A 'reunion' of genders to 'one.' What has changed? Please, be specific. Gay couples have never and CAN never replicate that. Let me know if you have any more questions. Smile. I understand your idea of the evolution into the two genders for survival, on the flip side of that idea don't you think that maybe the world could be evolving again for the purpose of controlling the population? At this point in time I would have to say that most people would agree that our world is over populated. I believe that everybody is entitled to their own oppinion, but what I just dont get is why and how can my marriage to another woman instead of a man harm hetrosexual married couples.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Chrisnris wrote: <quoted text> I understand your idea of the evolution into the two genders for survival, on the flip side of that idea don't you think that maybe the world could be evolving again for the purpose of controlling the population? At this point in time I would have to say that most people would agree that our world is over populated. I believe that everybody is entitled to their own oppinion, but what I just dont get is why and how can my marriage to another woman instead of a man harm hetrosexual married couples. On the flip side, as there is documented homosexuality in many different animals, I wouldn’t spend too much time on that idea This is America, you are free, free to love, free to choose, free to be yourself, your marriage to another woman has not or would not hurt my heterosexual marriage in any way at all, I honesty don’t see how it could. There is a large ( but shrinking ) segment of our population that are busybodies, wanting to tell everyone else how they must live their lives. They claim to be opposed to "big government" but in truth wants a government that gets right into your life telling you how you must live. Fortunately for you this is a shrinking segment, and support to equality in marriage is increasing dramatically Please know you have the support of many of us heterosexuals as well.
|
|
Chrisnris
Hesperia, CA
|
R Hudson wrote: <quoted text> O.K. You stand corrected, because your marriage was the result of a "fad" that won't last long... HOW DARE YOU belittle the grounds under which I was legally able to marry the woman that I LOVE. Its very sad to see so many people in this world filled with hate and ignorence. Just because I'm gay doesn't mean that I discredit hetrosexual couples I just dont understand why certain people can't do the same for same sex couples. What are you so afraid of? How is it directly affecting YOU? How is it making the world worse? Igrnorance must be bliss for you? Its so sad to see people like you that are so full of opinions on something they now nothing about. I feel sorry for you
|
|
Chrisnris
Hesperia, CA
|
Big D wrote: <quoted text> On the flip side, as there is documented homosexuality in many different animals, I wouldn’t spend too much time on that idea This is America, you are free, free to love, free to choose, free to be yourself, your marriage to another woman has not or would not hurt my heterosexual marriage in any way at all, I honesty don’t see how it could. There is a large ( but shrinking ) segment of our population that are busybodies, wanting to tell everyone else how they must live their lives. They claim to be opposed to "big government" but in truth wants a government that gets right into your life telling you how you must live. Fortunately for you this is a shrinking segment, and support to equality in marriage is increasing dramatically Please know you have the support of many of us heterosexuals as well. Thank you very much for voicing your opinion on this topic. It truly is nice to hear or read rather. After all we are all sharing this beautiful earth that we live upon and hopefully one day we will all able to share it in peace. Thank you again :)
|
|
“DOWN WITH SECTION 3 OF DOMA”
Since: Aug 08
AND PROP 8 COME JUNE 2013
|
Please wait...
KiMare wrote: <quoted text> Mating behavior today is the end result of simple genderless life forms evolving into two genders resulting in the ability for those species to survive. Marriage is simply various customs culture created to support and celebrate the mating behavior union of those two genders. It is a union that hails back to the very roots of evolution, the recreation of a simple single genderless life form. Duplicate genders cannot in any aspect replicate those basics. Marriage links the beginning of life to the present. That has always been the case in every single culture. A 'reunion' of genders to 'one.' What has changed? Please, be specific. Gay couples have never and CAN never replicate that. Let me know if you have any more questions. Smile. Well, as usual.....you keep trying to tie procreation and marriage together and what you have NEVER understood is that that's not all that marriage is about......if it was, only those couples who could naturally procreate would be allowed that "SPECIAL" title......but in reality that's not ALL that marriage is about.......sucks to be you!!!
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing You cannot tell us what the "intents and objectives listed in the impeachment" were. Or what the impeachers hoped to accomplish that turned out to be "a total and absolute failure". You are of course very wrong. Clinton was successfully impeached. It's history. Look it up.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing
|
|
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
R Hudson wrote: <quoted text> I am not inclined to respond to Chongo anymore, as it seems oblivious to rational thought. It is. But at least it knows that Bill Clinton was impeached. "Big D" insists Clinton was both impeached and failed to be impeached! Too funny!
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing You continue to insist that Clinton was both impeached and it failed. Let's stop boring everyone and just let them decide who is the blithering idiot on this issue.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> You continue to insist that Clinton was both impeached and it failed. Let's stop boring everyone and just let them decide who is the blithering idiot on this issue. I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing Yes we know. You believe Clinton was impeached and not impeached. Too Funny!
|
|
Bullava
San Dimas, CA
|
The Bull-lava is coming hot and heavy from all those out of town annoying posters.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> Yes we know. You believe Clinton was impeached and not impeached. Too Funny! I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing
|
|
“Reality bites”
Since: Dec 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> SHUDDUP CREEP! I heard about you. I hope Santa sh!ts on your head. Real nice, do you spit or swallow?
|
|
Bullava
San Dimas, CA
|
|
|
“Reality bites”
Since: Dec 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
R Hudson wrote: <quoted text> Your cute little game will not work. You have been given one. If you cannot read, oh well... I read it, still waiting for your real reasons. My guess you are scared of gay people.
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing Yes we know. You believe Clinton was impeached and not impeached. Too Funny! And we know that you are a liar. Not funny.
|
|
Bullava
San Dimas, CA
|
No it doesn't matter, your still posting from out of town now go away!
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> Yes we know. You believe Clinton was impeached and not impeached. Too Funny! And we know that you are a liar. Not funny. I have made my automatic reply smaller to annoy others less Yes he was impeached, partisan vote in the house Yes it was a failure, partisan vote for acquittal in the senate Yes the impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it accomplished nothing
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|