Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#171461 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got nothing.
You've got your baseless claims and still have not been able to present viable harm that gay marriage causes.
You dumbfuck...I was in your camp a few yearfs ago. I thought a lot of things about gay marriage that weren't exactly positive towardsa their pursuit of being able to marry.
That was until I did actual research...not the bullshit selective sampling of any off the wall aspect & unrelated nonsense you bring in here but I actively looked for harm gay marriage caused.
I found the opposite. And I LOOKED friend given I was like you and didn't want to wrong.
Fact is I was. I find it much easier to defend same sex marriage at this point given it's righteous.
I too don't "like" gay marriages. I won't go to one nor will I send noe flowers but it boils down to a basic right our fellow American citizens should have.
Period.
Gotta go to a Christmas party.
If you even had an IQ you might want to chew on what I advised....C-Ya!
Aside from validating my comments about evolutionary mating behavior, this new study is an explanation of how and why homosexuality a genetic defect.

"Different genes are involved in the development of genitals, reproductive organs, body shape, sexual orientation and every other trait where genes shape sexual differentiation. And so epi-marks to these different genes will have different influences on those traits.

Mostly, these kinds of epi-marks should not be passed from parent to offspring. But occasionally some are. And when the epi-marks on genes that effect sexual orientation get passed from father to daughter then some traits that would normally develop in female-specific ways end up more masculinized. Likewise mother-son transmission of epi-marks can result in the feminization of some traits that would normally develop in a more masculinized fashion."

http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about ...

Big Smile.
TheWayItWillBe

Covina, CA

#171462 Dec 15, 2012
BoneHead gives in, he didn't have a choice in the matter.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171469 Dec 15, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>hey just curious ducrouchi ... did you at least pause from topix long enough to jack--off or something
Don't worry about me toots, but maybe your imaginary rich fiance "Jerry" needs a hand job.

Thanks anyway but you know, you're pretty skanky and all.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171470 Dec 15, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>well while you spent all day playing with yourself and commenting on gay topix i spent the day shopping at bellevue square with money Jerry gave me.... aaawh to bad for you.... oh i bought two really sexy chemises i'm sure he will love
>GAG!<

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171472 Dec 15, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry about me toots, but maybe your imaginary rich fiance "Jerry" needs a hand job.
Thanks anyway but you know, you're pretty skanky and all.
sweetie he's gonna get way more then a hand job.... mmmm

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171474 Dec 15, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>sweetie he's gonna get way more then a hand job.... mmmm
Yuck.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171476 Dec 15, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yuck.
hey don't worry... maybe someday you will find a women who loves you like i love jerry..... but i doubt it
TheWayItWillBe

Covina, CA

#171477 Dec 15, 2012
Signed sealed and delivered so read it next time Porta Potty.

“One day at a time”

Since: Oct 12

----<>-----<>----<>-----<>---

#171478 Dec 15, 2012
Children please!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171479 Dec 15, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>hey don't worry... maybe someday you will find a women who loves you like i love jerry..... but i doubt it
I hope not.
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#171480 Dec 15, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it was terrible. Innocent little children gunned down.
Have some class for once in your life and don't use this horrible tragedy to support your stupidity on a silly topix thread.
Mr. Hudson didn't do it for chrissakes. If I had to guess between the two of you who would be more likely to do this, it would be you.
If the school is using children as an excuse to torture people with colon restriction devices, and the schools are run by the government, doesn't the constitution protect our right not to be tortured by the government?
Impeachment Cobblers

Ashburn, VA

#171481 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Incredibly well spoken.
Well then, let us share some red X and peanuts my friend.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171482 Dec 15, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Aside from validating my comments about evolutionary mating behavior, this new study is an explanation of how and why homosexuality a genetic defect.
"Different genes are involved in the development of genitals, reproductive organs, body shape, sexual orientation and every other trait where genes shape sexual differentiation. And so epi-marks to these different genes will have different influences on those traits.
Mostly, these kinds of epi-marks should not be passed from parent to offspring. But occasionally some are. And when the epi-marks on genes that effect sexual orientation get passed from father to daughter then some traits that would normally develop in female-specific ways end up more masculinized. Likewise mother-son transmission of epi-marks can result in the feminization of some traits that would normally develop in a more masculinized fashion."
http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about ...
Big Smile.
Don't smile too wide sister.

Your link doesn't come up. My guess is you already knew it.

And as of yet I've heard no specific genes being attributed to those whom are gay. I would think that would be national news so it looks like you're back to reaching for straws.

Come back when you've got anything to offer. Otherwise beat it you crazy loon.

LOL!!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171483 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Next ?...OK.... there is no empErical evidence, you sure are right about that ....But there is empIrical evidence, mounds out it,....like the facts of life, scientific study, historical precedence, silly stuff like that. The facts are insurmountable. You are in error, and crowing about non-existent victories, delusional, to be sure. Have you ever been taught about the way that people reproduce ? Have you ? Pshaaaw. Buzz off, until you have learned. Empirical evidence means the senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. If you don't like the use of empirical reasoning, there is another school of thought, that of rationalism, which is a theory in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive, in other word, SCIENTIFIC. Which is what you have used to dispute the very presence of a deity, of any kind. No matter which doctrine you wish to subscribe to, you cannot reason away the facts that men and women are designed for opposite-sex mating, and no other type of coupling is moral, or rational. You can use whatever arguments you wish, to justify SSM, but it is morally wrong, and you are not here to redefine our language, or society.
Opinion ? Hah ! No evidence ? Hah ! Just my claim ? Hah ! Open your eyes and wake up, you are an idiot. You are arguing against common sense, something that your douche ass wasn't born with !
If there was "mounds" of empirical evidence of viable harm gay marriage caused you'd think you'd have found some by now.

And religion is not a method by which we'll rely on to govern American citizens.

Next.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171484 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Money, you mean... You are addressing your superior, and you should act like it.
Here we go again.

LOL!!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171485 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
..........You know..........
Really?

Is he a character mascot for a Mexican tortilla company??

An act on "America's Got Talent" who juggles pinatas?

Maybe a hit man in the Panama midget mafia?

LOL!!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171486 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You should try and type in English.
You should go find examples of this mysterious emperical evidence about gay marriages as being viably harmful.

LOL!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171488 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you were without any moral fiber, and you can be swayed from your core beliefs ? You are no real man, then. I bet if you went to prison, you'd be wearing lipstick, in no time. It doesn't have to cause harm, it is plainly wrong, to mock marriage in this way. It doesn't cause any harm to let a child have a cookie before dinner, but it if it is wrong, then it is not allowed. This is no different, dumbfuck.
Really.

So letting a kid have a Famous Amos treat before dinner shows harm to gay marriage???

How does that even connect?

If you're trying to draw an analogy yours makes no sense as well.

You first have to specify a viable harm in gay marriage.

And then you might want to tell me why giving a kid an Oreo before he slops down his Raviolis is really that bad.

You're so messed up you can't even THINK about gays marrying without presenting some bizarre picture of your thoughts on the subject in here.

I mean...WTF???? Do you read the shit you write before posting it???

LOL!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171489 Dec 16, 2012
Mr Magic wrote:
<quoted text>
Me thinks you looks like a queer monkey. Me thinks monkeys stink. Me thinks you and monkey both like to l:ck a.ss
Keep thinking Mister Magico.

LOL!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#171490 Dec 16, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't smile too wide sister.
Your link doesn't come up. My guess is you already knew it.
And as of yet I've heard no specific genes being attributed to those whom are gay. I would think that would be national news so it looks like you're back to reaching for straws.
Come back when you've got anything to offer. Otherwise beat it you crazy loon.
LOL!!!
Trust me, it will come up often...

This article validates everything I have been saying and you have been scoffing. Perhaps that is evidence you need a letter???

http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about...

New Ideas About the Evolution of Homosexuality

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Available for dating Bachelorette (Dec '13) Dec 20 KeS 2
New OAKDALE Fema Concentration camps being buil... (Nov '08) Dec 18 classified1234 12
Review: A & A Temporary Fencing (Jun '14) Dec 18 Matt Dalek 2
Obamaa s Action on Immigration Praised in Modesto Dec 3 stell88 1
1980's Restaurant; Rax or Arbies? (Jul '06) Nov '14 xsturgeonx 3
Turlock candidate has long history in Stanislau... (Oct '06) Nov '14 Joe 6
Walmart in Oakdale? (Aug '07) Nov '14 Riverbank resident 13
Oakdale Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:39 pm PST