If there was "mounds" of empirical evidence of viable harm gay marriage caused you'd think you'd have found some by now.<quoted text>
Next ?...OK.... there is no empErical evidence, you sure are right about that ....But there is empIrical evidence, mounds out it,....like the facts of life, scientific study, historical precedence, silly stuff like that. The facts are insurmountable. You are in error, and crowing about non-existent victories, delusional, to be sure. Have you ever been taught about the way that people reproduce ? Have you ? Pshaaaw. Buzz off, until you have learned. Empirical evidence means the senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. If you don't like the use of empirical reasoning, there is another school of thought, that of rationalism, which is a theory in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive, in other word, SCIENTIFIC. Which is what you have used to dispute the very presence of a deity, of any kind. No matter which doctrine you wish to subscribe to, you cannot reason away the facts that men and women are designed for opposite-sex mating, and no other type of coupling is moral, or rational. You can use whatever arguments you wish, to justify SSM, but it is morally wrong, and you are not here to redefine our language, or society.
Opinion ? Hah ! No evidence ? Hah ! Just my claim ? Hah ! Open your eyes and wake up, you are an idiot. You are arguing against common sense, something that your douche ass wasn't born with !
And religion is not a method by which we'll rely on to govern American citizens.