Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201846 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171485 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
..........You know..........
Really?

Is he a character mascot for a Mexican tortilla company??

An act on "America's Got Talent" who juggles pinatas?

Maybe a hit man in the Panama midget mafia?

LOL!!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171486 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You should try and type in English.
You should go find examples of this mysterious emperical evidence about gay marriages as being viably harmful.

LOL!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171488 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you were without any moral fiber, and you can be swayed from your core beliefs ? You are no real man, then. I bet if you went to prison, you'd be wearing lipstick, in no time. It doesn't have to cause harm, it is plainly wrong, to mock marriage in this way. It doesn't cause any harm to let a child have a cookie before dinner, but it if it is wrong, then it is not allowed. This is no different, dumbfuck.
Really.

So letting a kid have a Famous Amos treat before dinner shows harm to gay marriage???

How does that even connect?

If you're trying to draw an analogy yours makes no sense as well.

You first have to specify a viable harm in gay marriage.

And then you might want to tell me why giving a kid an Oreo before he slops down his Raviolis is really that bad.

You're so messed up you can't even THINK about gays marrying without presenting some bizarre picture of your thoughts on the subject in here.

I mean...WTF???? Do you read the shit you write before posting it???

LOL!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171489 Dec 16, 2012
Mr Magic wrote:
<quoted text>
Me thinks you looks like a queer monkey. Me thinks monkeys stink. Me thinks you and monkey both like to l:ck a.ss
Keep thinking Mister Magico.

LOL!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#171490 Dec 16, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't smile too wide sister.
Your link doesn't come up. My guess is you already knew it.
And as of yet I've heard no specific genes being attributed to those whom are gay. I would think that would be national news so it looks like you're back to reaching for straws.
Come back when you've got anything to offer. Otherwise beat it you crazy loon.
LOL!!!
Trust me, it will come up often...

This article validates everything I have been saying and you have been scoffing. Perhaps that is evidence you need a letter???

http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about...

New Ideas About the Evolution of Homosexuality
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#171491 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
It doesn't cause any harm to let a child have a cookie before dinner, but it if it is wrong, then it is not allowed. This is no different, dumbfuck.
You have got to be kidding me.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#171498 Dec 16, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
You should go find examples of this mysterious emperical evidence about gay marriages as being viably harmful.
LOL!!
They already tired that in court, they lost with the entire money and political power of the Mormon church behind it

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171499 Dec 16, 2012
Impeachment Cobblers wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then, let us share some red X and peanuts my friend.
I like the lemons best! Peanuts too. I get lots of them from the kind and generous people of tolerance and diversity!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171500 Dec 16, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
You have got to be kidding me.
Stupid post. Thanks for sharing. Glad you added that to the discussion!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171501 Dec 16, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
They already tired that in court, they lost with the entire money and political power of the Mormon church behind it
Oh, there you are! You left so abruptly the other day without ever telling us was Clinton's impeachment a success or a failure?

You've said it was a failure. But then you say he was impeached. Which is it?

Anxiously awaiting your simple one word answer, thank you in advance!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171502 Dec 16, 2012
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>sweetie he's gonna get way more then a hand job.... mmmm
Oh Yeah, he's gonna get his bank account cleaned out and the clap. Both at the same time!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171504 Dec 16, 2012
Critics, including Michael DiRucci said Rice's comments about the attack on Sunday news programs in the immediate aftermath were out of line with the true intelligence about the incident, and were an attempt by the administration to avoid tying it to terrorism.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#171506 Dec 16, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, there you are! You left so abruptly the other day without ever telling us was Clinton's impeachment a success or a failure?
You've said it was a failure. But then you say he was impeached. Which is it?
Anxiously awaiting your simple one word answer, thank you in advance!
Duh, as numerous posts have explained before, the impeachment of President Clinton failed, as the required 2/3 vote for guilty was not reached in the Senate.

Here is a complete description of the Impeachment process for you. Why don't you read it and educate yourself. This way you won't look like an ignorant fool, at least on this subject,

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentand...

"A process that is used to charge, try, and remove public officials for misconduct while in office.

Impeachment is a fundamental constitutional power belonging to Congress. This safeguard against corruption can be initiated against federal officeholders from the lowest cabinet member, all the way up to the president and the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Besides providing the authority for impeachment, the U.S. Constitution details the methods to be used. The two-stage process begins in the House of Representatives with a public inquiry into allegations. It culminates, if necessary, with a trial in the Senate. State constitutions model impeachment processes for state officials on this approach. At both the federal and state levels, impeachment is rare: From the passage of the Constitution to the mid-1990s, only 50 impeachment proceedings were initiated, and only a third of these went as far as a trial in the Senate. The reluctance of lawmakers to use this power is a measure of its gravity; it is generally only invoked by evidence of criminality or substantial abuse of power."

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171507 Dec 16, 2012
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Duh, as numerous posts have explained before, the impeachment of President Clinton failed, as the required 2/3 vote for guilty was not reached in the Senate.
Here is a complete description of the Impeachment process for you. Why don't you read it and educate yourself. This way you won't look like an ignorant fool, at least on this subject,
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentand...
"A process that is used to charge, try, and remove public officials for misconduct while in office.
Impeachment is a fundamental constitutional power belonging to Congress. This safeguard against corruption can be initiated against federal officeholders from the lowest cabinet member, all the way up to the president and the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Besides providing the authority for impeachment, the U.S. Constitution details the methods to be used. The two-stage process begins in the House of Representatives with a public inquiry into allegations. It culminates, if necessary, with a trial in the Senate. State constitutions model impeachment processes for state officials on this approach. At both the federal and state levels, impeachment is rare: From the passage of the Constitution to the mid-1990s, only 50 impeachment proceedings were initiated, and only a third of these went as far as a trial in the Senate. The reluctance of lawmakers to use this power is a measure of its gravity; it is generally only invoked by evidence of criminality or substantial abuse of power."
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...
You are wrong. Clinton's impeachment did not fail.

What a dope!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171508 Dec 16, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Trust me, it will come up often...
This article validates everything I have been saying and you have been scoffing. Perhaps that is evidence you need a letter???
http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about...
New Ideas About the Evolution of Homosexuality
If it was an actual link to an article or website it should be up all the time dumbass. Websites aren't like Ernie's Grocery Store in backwoods Mississippi where they're open 9-5 on Mondays through Friday and 10 to 4 on weekends.

Good God you dumbass....who are you trying to bullshit? LOL!!!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171509 Dec 16, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly me, I thought it was a reference to a drink in a bar...oops, silly me :D
That Red X sounds like a good one I'll have a few of those.

Yeah I don't pay much attention to those silly judge-its either except I like to see lots of negative ones which I always get. When they use the fire one it means you hit the sweet spot!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171510 Dec 16, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
You have got to be kidding me.
'R. Hudson's' sad effort at an analogy of little kiddies downing a chocolate chip cookie before supper probably constitutes an example of his "empirical evidence" against gay marriage.

LOL!!!!
Clooed

Covina, CA

#171511 Dec 16, 2012
It wit be what it will be.

Until them put a lid on it, yapper.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171512 Dec 16, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
'R. Hudson's' sad effort at an analogy of little kiddies downing a chocolate chip cookie before supper probably constitutes an example of his "empirical evidence" against gay marriage.
LOL!!!!
I wouldn't try and suck up to Mona he's a real grouch! Might bite you.

And besides he's opposed to marriage equality.

YUK!YUK!YUK!
Clooed

Covina, CA

#171513 Dec 16, 2012
When all the jerks come out,but they are from different parts of the state AND OR WORLD.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Linda Ronstadt gained fame with pop songs, but ... (Nov '08) Jul 26 Ted 8
News Police Write Ordinance for City Council that Cr... (Jun '12) Jul 22 Riverbank resident 5
TE Cable Service (Jan '06) Jul 21 KeS 2
News In brief: Higher tax rates kick in for Greece -... Jul 20 Eleanor 1
to the young girl selling tamales at winco (Feb '10) Jul 14 spt54 103
News Man, woman discovered dead inside Modesto house (Sep '08) Jul 12 BeenMobbin 12
Walmart in Oakdale? (Aug '07) Jul 9 TellItLikeItIs 15
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Oakdale Mortgages