Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,192

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170585 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn, you are as dumb as you are ugly. And that is dumb!
What you said it the laws against inter-racial marriage didn't involve race because they applied to people of all races.
If a man goes into the JP and asks to marry a man, he'll be told, "No". A woman doing the exact same thing will be told, "Yes" Why? Because of their genders (genitalia).
If Rose_NoHo goes into the JP and asks to marry someone she'll be told, "Get the hell out of here you spun out old bag!"

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170590 Dec 9, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But bigfoot, I was right.
Akpilot didn't say anything at all about my argument, and just called me names.
Other than that...
I'm just gonna call you a name too. I got a good one!

"Old Hippo Leg".

Take that picture down now!
LowTide

Covina, CA

#170592 Dec 9, 2012
The funds are mighty low on the Republican side now days.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170593 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And, since it is a non-gender issue, that is, truly, a display of your equal rights at work...
Stupid, if it weren't a gender issue, then you would be able to marry a person regardless of your or their gender.
GtAquarter

Covina, CA

#170596 Dec 9, 2012
Magic finger beds are the best.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170597 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant dolt, you pretend to misunderstand, but you attempting misdirection, again. You posed a question concerning women not being able to marry one another. This I explained thusly. Then you posed the same question in reverse, after adding some inter-racial nonsense, which I clarified. Now, you ask a question, based on marriage laws. I answered those, now, Answer mine. Show where I approve of slavery, if you can. State your religious beliefs. If you can speak properly. And explain why gay people should be allowed to marry. Equate heterosexuality with homosexuality.
I think that's Rose tactic #2 on AK's Rose_NoHo tactic list. Misdirect.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170598 Dec 9, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Jan Brewer is the only TRUE American Politician left in this country. She is NOT afraid to stand up for the American people who believe in a moral and traditional marriage. You can sit on your boyfriends dick and spin on it yourself !!!
It's funny that you "small government" con dumb think government should be in charge of enforcing traditions. Do you think someone who gives a couple something made of china instead of cotton for their second anniversary should go to jail?

BTW, unless a non consenting party is involve, and act can't be immoral. So, unless someone is forced into a gay marriage, it can't be immoral.
WWYT club

Covina, CA

#170599 Dec 9, 2012
What were you thinking?

Are you some kind of strung out follower of FOX news or something?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170600 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
My response was to this post:
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, stupid, if genitals don't matter when it comes to marriage laws, why can't a woman marry another woman in most states?
To which I responded that it was because SSM was illegal for men and women alike, making her posed question, in regards to this scenario, a non-gender issue.
Hmmm..
Prior to Loving v VA, black/white marriages were illegal for both blacks and whites, so it wasn't a race issue?
WWYT club

Covina, CA

#170601 Dec 9, 2012
Done cooked your own goose, has an average IQ of 80 - which is 20 points lower than the national average.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#170602 Dec 9, 2012
WWYT club wrote:
What were you thinking?
Are you some kind of strung out follower of FOX news or something?
Most people are now, didn't you know.

They wanted fair and balanced news.

And of course not having to look at Candy Crawley...

Smirk.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170603 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Says you. If we had video capability in here, I'd show you how easily I could use a $100 bill to light up one of my expensive cigars, little boy.
Well, then you would be able to afford video capability. Even cell phones have it.
Looks like you got called on your BS.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#170604 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
First, You show your inability to understand valid reasoning. Second, The 14th Amendment does not require anyone to marry. Third, homophobia is a nonsense word invented by “gay” sophists as a rhetorical weapon against its opponents. It lumps together all opponents as mentally-ill “gay bashers” and in doing so declares mainstream doctrines to be harmful and illegitimate. You'll have to define the term and the distinction between homophobia and non-homophobic opposition to homosexuality. And, finally, fourth, gay marriage isn't an institution, yet, and it won't be. It is a flash in the pan, and will disqualified soon.
mADE UP??

Homophobia encompasses a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT). It can be expressed as antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, or hatred, and may be based on irrational fear.[1][2][3][4]

Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as discrimination and violence on the basis of sexual orientations that are non-heterosexual.[1][2] According to the 2010 Hate Crimes Statistics released by the FBI National Press Office, 19.3 percent of hate crimes across the United States "were motivated by a sexual orientation bias."[5] Moreover, in a Southern Poverty Law Center 2010 Intelligence Report extrapolating data from fourteen years (1995–2008), which had complete data available at the time, of the FBI's national hate crime statistics found that LGBT people were "far more likely than any other minority group in the United States to be victimized by violent hate crime."[6]

Recognized types of homophobia include institutionalized homophobia, e.g. religious homophobia and state-sponsored homophobia,[7] and internalized homophobia, experienced by people who have same-sex attractions, regardless of how they identify. Forms of homophobia toward identifiable LGBT social groups have similar yet specific names: lesbophobia[8]– the intersection of homophobia and sexism directed against lesbians, biphobia – towards bisexuality and bisexual people, and transphobia, which targets transsexualism, transsexual and transgender people, and gender variance or gender role nonconformity.

Two words originate from homophobia: homophobic (adj.) and homophobe (n.), the latter word describing a person who displays homophobia or is thought to do so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophobia

NOT SO MUCH BUTTER CUP

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170607 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorant dolt, you pretend to misunderstand, but you attempting misdirection, again. You posed a question concerning women not being able to marry one another.
And they can't, because of their genders. Duh, fugly.
R Hudson wrote:
This I explained thusly. Then you posed the same question in reverse, after adding some inter-racial nonsense, which I clarified. Now, you ask a question, based on marriage laws. I answered those, now, Answer mine. Show where I approve of slavery, if you can.
I've done that.(170451)You claimed slavery made America great, that sounds like approval to me.
R Hudson wrote:
State your religious beliefs. If you can speak properly. And explain why gay people should be allowed to marry. Equate heterosexuality with homosexuality.
Again, you hideous moron, gay couples should be allowed to marry because men and women should have equal rights when it comes to marriage.
Heterosexuality and homosexuality are both sexual orientations.
I'm an Orthodox Jew (like you are a Wiccan...LOL!)
WWYT club

Covina, CA

#170611 Dec 9, 2012
It will be 2013 soon so get your brain set on advancement.
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#170613 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Queers, and heteros alike, use terms, such as this, to denote softness, as in this derogatory statement that I was directing to the poster that I was posting to. Are you foolishly trying to play "connect the dots" and failing to make the correct connection? Really, you should not try to conduct a battle of wits, when you are plainly unarmed, and ill-prepared for such an encounter. I did like your comment about Jan Brewer, but you generally come across as a dumbass. I decided to resign from the union, however, not because you said that I must, but because my union dues can stay in my pocket. I prefer them there. If you are going to shoot blindly into the crowd, then you are an unfocused little fellow. I am against SSM, and would expect you to be, also, from your posts. Do you have anything resembling an education? Or are you simply a fool with no serious points to make ? Seems to me that you are simply a clown, who wishes to argue with anyone. Not that I mind the presence of a fool, it adds to the targeting richness in here, but please try to show some idea of who is on which side. It makes more sense.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/09/geor...

FYI
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#170614 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Homophobia was psychiatric jargon invented to describe a person’s fear of homosexual inclinations in him or herself.“Gay” activists simply stole the term and redefined it as “hate and/or fear of
homosexuals.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/09/gay-...

---Oh my.

---More factual happenings.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#170615 Dec 9, 2012
KiMare wrote:
The fundamental basis of marriage is a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
There is an obvious distinction between redumbant gender couples and diverse gendered couples. You know, the union of Mars and Venus vs the collision of Uranus and Uranus.
Pointless prattle. Marriage is a legal contract. Marriage is a right. We should have equal rights in the US. You are against equality.
KiMare wrote:
Which brings us to the inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning factor of anal sex. A violent abuse of evolutionary design.
That makes no sense.
And no matter how often you are told the facts, you try to equate anal sex and homosexuality. MOST people who have anal sex are straight. And not all gay people do. Anal sex isn't inherently harmful, demeaning or unhealthy. More importantly, the sex acts people choose to engage in are none of the government's business.
KiMare wrote:
On a more personal level, a love relationship between diverse
genders results in human fruit.
Since you don't have to be able to reproduce in order to marry, that's a non issue. Learn the facts!
KiMare wrote:
The singular birthplace of every single other relationship. Worth of distinction and protection. You are a product of such. However, your duplicate relationship is absolutely desolate. There is no more a profound distinction...
All of this makes it absolutely idiotic to equate the two relationships. A silly attempt to impose an imposter relationship on marriage. A counterfeit that becomes more and more exposed the closer it is joined to the real thing.
Smile.
Do you think you should have been aborted? Can you reproduce? If you could, would your kids also be, as you claim you are "monsters"?:)
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#170617 Dec 9, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
While you're about answering my questions, do tell where the video button is, in here ? Then, perhaps I can use my technology to show me doing exactly that. I'm sorry, did you say something about BS ?
Looks like there's a shift taking place.

"One in five surveyed admitted to changing their view on same-sex marriage in the last few years, as President Barack Obama said he did earlier this year."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/poll-pl...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170618 Dec 9, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/09/gay-...
---Oh my.
---More factual happenings.
---Oh my.

---Dan.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oakdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Crook in Arnold Oct 23 Commander Bunny 3
OAKDALE (NWO) FEMA CONCENTRATION CAMP being bui... (Nov '08) Oct 20 Riverbank resident 105
Yucaipa City Council candidates answer questions Oct 8 Qeolersan 1
h*rny sky pe Oct 3 fallen10 1
Stanislaus county Embezzles hundred of thousand... (Nov '08) Oct 1 KeS 9
Fraud claims coming to court (Jun '07) Oct 1 KeS 3
Review: 5 Star Auto Sales Inc (Aug '10) Sep 26 motownx 6
Oakdale Dating
Find my Match

Oakdale Jobs

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]