Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
149,101 - 149,120 of 200,324 Comments Last updated 11 hrs ago

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170241
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again, with that fantasy stuff. He didn't say that. He said marriage had a clear purpose, other than sexual gratification. Can't you post without adulterating context ? And you are not in any position to hand anything over, you have no power to control it. The Constitution was written very clearly, and no mention was made of SSm. Your side is using legal loopholes to turn our society upiside down, and if we didn't have special interest groups involving themselves in politics, we'd not be facing this issue now. Fact of the matter is, common sense has been replaced with libertine values, and we are witnessing the demise of sensibility and order. Our politicians have decided that the very nature of our country is to be violated.
He never listens good. He gets confused and he's dumb and always angry. I call him Big Dope.

He's real stubborn to the point of stupid.

All and all lots of fun! Enjoy!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170242
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
"Sugar nipples"? Whoa! Easy there cowboy!
So you kinda support marriage equality in the manner of you don't give two shiets. And I am a shiet for brains and you don't give two shiets and I am an asshat and shiet for brains I should keep beating my chest and my number is zero and there are problems with "disallation"?
Cool story Fruitloop!
Yes sugar nipples, I dont car if a man marries 2 ladies nor do I care if a lady marries 2 men, or three men or women marry, matters not. But this thread is not about that now is it asshat? You see we are talking about same sex marriage. Now pull your head out of your ass. Let me help ya out sugar nipples this is the title of the thread. Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Questions ?
DaBoats

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170243
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

More the merrier!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170244
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Yes sugar nipples, I dont car if a man marries 2 ladies nor do I care if a lady marries 2 men, or three men or women marry, matters not. But this thread is not about that now is it asshat? You see we are talking about same sex marriage. Now pull your head out of your ass. Let me help ya out sugar nipples this is the title of the thread. Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage
Questions ?
Oh yes. I'll have many questions for you. Thanks for volunteering. Lets start off with a few.

So tell us fruitloops. Why do you call another man "sugar nipples"?

Why does supporting marriage equality mean my head is up my ass?

Why is same sex marriage worthy of discussion but poly worthy of only insult?

So, work on them and get back to me fruitloops. I have many more for you too. Thanks again.
Wahoo

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170246
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Couldn't happend to a nicer Republican instead of offering condolences, I'll just say WAHOO!

And a double does of, I told you so, keep missing with the American tax payers and they will find away to even the score.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170255
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's total BS.
Here is what I've presented:
The Constitution grants all citizens equal protection.
Either debate, or don't reply, deal?
Grow a pair, LOLSER.
The problem is you don't comprehend the definition of "Equal Protection"- you seem to think that is synonymous with equal outcome.

BTW< how about you come off the playground for a minute and stop ending your sentences with- grow a pair, and LOLSER- thay hardly add any meaning to your already meaningless rants.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170256
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Dummy, when I said "you" I wasn't talking about you as a person. I was talking about the content of the Constitution...we all know you didn't write it.
Anyone want to try and translate this into English?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170257
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

8

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
The bible isn't the law of his country, nor is it a valid reason to condemn homosexuals.
But the wonderful thing about this country- you are free to read and follow the bible and not practice homosexuality without fear of reprisal.
Wow, this post got 7 poor judge-its?

Goes to show the sheeple mentality found in this thread. You either can't, or don't bother to read.

My guess, based on previous exchanges with some of the people in this thread, it is a comprehension problem.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170260
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, this post got 7 poor judge-its?
Goes to show the sheeple mentality found in this thread. You either can't, or don't bother to read.
My guess, based on previous exchanges with some of the people in this thread, it is a comprehension problem.
You actually go back and count them?

Geesh.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170261
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

8

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, this post got 7 poor judge-its?
Goes to show the sheeple mentality found in this thread. You either can't, or don't bother to read.
My guess, based on previous exchanges with some of the people in this thread, it is a comprehension problem.
It's a bias problem. Compounded by stupidity and bigotry.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170262
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Say, aren't you the moron who used to call himself "ACLU-Tom" ? "Asshat" is a dead giveaway...
Wrong as usal buttercup

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170263
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, this post got 7 poor judge-its?
Goes to show the sheeple mentality found in this thread. You either can't, or don't bother to read.
My guess, based on previous exchanges with some of the people in this thread, it is a comprehension problem.
Correct, nice post

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170264
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
You actually go back and count them?
Geesh.
You don't have to count them son, the number is right there.

What a dope!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170266
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes. I'll have many questions for you. Thanks for volunteering. Lets start off with a few.
So tell us fruitloops. Why do you call another man "sugar nipples"?
Why does supporting marriage equality mean my head is up my ass?
Why is same sex marriage worthy of discussion but poly worthy of only insult?
So, work on them and get back to me fruitloops. I have many more for you too. Thanks again.
Is buttercup better? Cool beans buttercup, if you want to discuss poly, start a thread, I am sure you will find many who would just love to post on it. You see Buttercup, this thread pertains to the quetion of same sex marriage and the legality of negating a right that was once given in Calif. Thanks for playing " You're a Dumbass", please pick up your door prize as you exit the building. OH by the way, Buttercup you don't really support marriage equality, you just feel the need to scream "Look at me"

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170268
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Say, aren't you the moron who used to call himself "ACLU-Tom" ? "Asshat" is a dead giveaway...
Yeah that "sugar nipples" gay slang sounds familiar too.

There was some dope went by "Jbird56" or Jackass bird58" something like that used to post dumb stuff same as this "jazzybird" clown here a while ago. But could be Tom too, you might be right. He was a loud mouth jackass too.

Whatever. This clown won't last long.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170270
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I almost forgot, could you please tell wat the tyler to stop talking about f*cking the jesus ferak, as it is off-topic ?
I will do that right after jesus freaks stop trying to pass off the bible as law. Unless of course you are confused and some how think that our laws are based on the bible. In that case never mind I cant fix stupid

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170271
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

R Hudson wrote:
Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence that homosexuality is not innate. There is a very considerable
body of testimony from tens of thousands of men and women who once lived as homosexuals. These ex-
“gays” have renounced their former lifestyles and many have become heterosexual in self-identification and
desire, while others have stopped at the point of comfort with their own gender and freedom from same-sex
desires. The “gay” movement’s challenge to former homosexuals to, in essence, prove they aren’t still
innately “gay” is the height of absurdity since homosexual immutability was never proven in the first place.
Why is the question of immutability so important? Because if homosexuality is not innate, it must be
acquired. And if it can be acquired, we dare not allow homosexuality to be legitimized to our children. If
there remains any shadow of doubt as to the cause of homosexuality, we must err on the side of protecting
our children. Indeed we must actively discourage them from viewing homosexuality as safe and normal,
when in fact it is demonstrably neither safe nor normal. It bears noting here that normalcy is functioning
according to nature or design. Normalcy is not based on popular opinion.
In summary, the true definition of homosexuality is same-gender sexual conduct. A homosexual is a person
who defines himself or herself by the participation in or desire to participate in such conduct. This definition
is both logical and intuitively sound.
For the sake of our children and the health of our society, we must not accept the redefinition of these
terms. We must force the advocates of the “born that way” argument to admit that they can’t prove it, and
that since they can’t prove it, they must admit the possibility that homosexuality may be acquired. We must
never allow a discussion to proceed forward if the immutability of homosexuality is assumed as a premise.
We must challenge the premise and force the logical concessions, without allowing the subject to be
changed.
From: http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resource...
tl;dr nice cut and paste job

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170272
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong as usal buttercup
Why is he "buttercup" but I'm "sugar nipples"? Which is hotter?

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170273
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't have to count them son, the number is right there.
What a dope!
Whats the matter sugar nipples, your blow up doll have a slow leak?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170274
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Is buttercup better? Cool beans buttercup, if you want to discuss poly, start a thread, I am sure you will find many who would just love to post on it. You see Buttercup, this thread pertains to the quetion of same sex marriage and the legality of negating a right that was once given in Calif. Thanks for playing " You're a Dumbass", please pick up your door prize as you exit the building. OH by the way, Buttercup you don't really support marriage equality, you just feel the need to scream "Look at me"
You mad fruitloops?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Oakdale Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Oakdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Oakdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oakdale
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••