You are the one changing the subject, not I.<quoted text>
I have been clear from the beginning Liar Mike
Yes he was impeached
After being Impeached by the house the impeachment was a total failure, in that it did not achieve a single objective that was listed in the impeachment
You keep trying to change the subject, that isn’t going to work, I am saying the same thing I said in the beginning.
He was impeached
And that impeachment was a total and absolute failure, it failed the votes in the Senate and not a single objective written in the Impeachment was fulfilled, absolute and total failure.
Go ahead Liar Mike, find a post where I said he was not impeached, or conversely go to your history books and show that the impeachment was successful in removing Clinton from office as was stated in the impeachment as its intent.
It either succeeded in removing him from office as was stated in the Impeachment, or it was a failure… which is it Liar Mike?
You have changed your original assertion "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "...the intent and objectives failed". Two very different things. And then you call me a liar.
The impeachment did not "fail the votes in the Senate" you blithering jackass! The Senate does not vote on the House's impeachment, only to convict or acquit.
One more time.
Was Clinton impeached or did it fail? Calling me a liar is not an answer. Stop changing the subject and answer the simple question.