Level 2

Since: Jan 13

Williamson, WV

#10963 Jan 27, 2013
ignorance wrote:
<quoted text> There is no bill to ban handguns that is a lie. All of your other facts, first of all, should have sources cited. Did you know that half of all mass murders in this country have been committed after the assault weapons ban? http://www.businessinsider.com/12-deadliest-m... You also were talking about why we have a second amendment. The reason was to protect white land owners from a slave uprising. It wasn't that the founding fathers thought one day you wouldn't like the president and you should be able to shoot him. It wasn't for you crazy fools to overthrow the new democracy they had just created. You are arguing about owning assault weapons and high capacity clips. You don't need those things for self defense.

Your forum name speaks for itself. If you can't use a search engine, pull up an article on any major news site, or go directly to her or congress's web page and read it you are sorry as they come. It's all over every site, I don't need to cite anything because you're too lazy or ignorant to look. If you had read it, which you did not clearly, it absolutely DOES seek for handguns and shotguns to banned as well. The reason we have a 2nd Amendment is for our self protection and protection from a TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. Like what's happening right now, one who aids the enemy, strips rights from citizens, does not abide by the Constitution and has an illegitimate "President" playing dictator. Something else you clearly have not read or more likely don't understand. It's in plain english, says not one word in it about slaves or hunting. Also, they are MAGAZINES not "clips". Easy to tell you don't own a gun or know how they operate. You don't tell me what I need or what I don't need, that's covered in the Constitution as well but we all know you don't have a clue what that really means. It's like me saying you don't need a car because you can walk wherever you need to go. I "need" the best I can afford and as much as I can afford, that's also covered in there. An AR is the best you can get right now legally so I got a few, legally. Just because you can't handle or are afraid of them irrationally does not necessitate MY need. It's the best tool for the job, sorry you can't afford one or are a big pussy I guess. I was in the Army and it's nothing compared to what I had in there. Did you know Adam Lanza shot those kids with handguns? Yeah, NBC covered it and the video is online but I'm betting you're a Piers Morgan viewer (retarded) and never bothered to look anywhere but there or any other news site pushing the Obama propaganda. I have several AR 15's and they are no different than Remington 270 or similar hunting rifle in function, they only "look" different and have a larger magazine. Both fire the same bullet the exact same way and both kill things. No one is taking them nor will I register them under an illegal un-constitutional right infringing "executive order". Those are in violation of the Constitution as well, FYI. Do yourself a favor and check out some alternative news sites (ones not pushing the lefts biased propaganda and outright lies), read the Constitution and Bill of Rights and find out what it means and not what some racist actor (Danny Glover) "thinks" it means. All this stuff about cover-ups, us sending money to Al Qaeda, Benghazi cover-up, Fast and Furious gun running cover up, you think you wouldn't be so brainwashed but you are. ALL of that has been covered by the media and the truth found out. Why you are so quick to trust a government that no longer goes by it's own rules (Constitution) run by a President who lies consistently and violated his own NDAA act(aiding the enemy)along with his oath of office? It's pure insanity and socialism you are backing. Hint: we are a democratic republic, NOT a democracy or communists. Big difference and you are basically a traitor to your country.
hope

Huntington, WV

#10964 Jan 27, 2013
MindlessFoxBot wrote:
<quoted text>This country is still governed by the authority of the US Constitution, regardless of what you pansy a$$ commies want. What part of shall not be infringed dont you understand? Cars may play a vital role in daily life, but boats, ATV's, swimming pools, and jet skis dont. They are also not Constitutionally protected, but yet we still have them. Banning them all would save thousands of lives, but I dont hear the rally to outlaw them. Could that be because this is America, not China, were we are a free country? We dont need some commie nancy pants telling us what we can eat, read, drive, watch. It already appears the ban will fail. Glad there are still freedom loving Americans who respect the Constitution still left among our politicians. God Bless America!
our government is sooo not governed by the authority of the US constitution. the patriot act, NDAA and sopa...ect, are all unconstitutional. the all mighty $$$ governs this country.
Ignorance

Fairmont, WV

#10965 Jan 27, 2013
MindlessFoxBot wrote:
<quoted text>And their comes the next trick people with nothing to stand on resort to... the old "Prove the lie I told was a lie". LMAO
Of the 11 deadliest shootings in the US, five have happened from 2007 onward.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/...

Now move on to child slaves. We might agree on that.
Ignorance

Fairmont, WV

#10966 Jan 27, 2013
daDookieJew wrote:
<quoted text>
Your forum name speaks for itself. If you can't use a search engine, pull up an article on any major news site, or go directly to her or congress's web page and read it you are sorry as they come. It's all over every site, I don't need to cite anything because you're too lazy or ignorant to look. If you had read it, which you did not clearly, it absolutely DOES seek for handguns and shotguns to banned as well. The reason we have a 2nd Amendment is for our self protection and protection from a TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. Like what's happening right now, one who aids the enemy, strips rights from citizens, does not abide by the Constitution and has an illegitimate "President" playing dictator. Something else you clearly have not read or more likely don't understand. It's in plain english, says not one word in it about slaves or hunting. Also, they are MAGAZINES not "clips". Easy to tell you don't own a gun or know how they operate. You don't tell me what I need or what I don't need, that's covered in the Constitution as well but we all know you don't have a clue what that really means. It's like me saying you don't need a car because you can walk wherever you need to go. I "need" the best I can afford and as much as I can afford, that's also covered in there. An AR is the best you can get right now legally so I got a few, legally. Just because you can't handle or are afraid of them irrationally does not necessitate MY need. It's the best tool for the job, sorry you can't afford one or are a big pussy I guess. I was in the Army and it's nothing compared to what I had in there. Did you know Adam Lanza shot those kids with handguns? Yeah, NBC covered it and the video is online but I'm betting you're a Piers Morgan viewer (retarded) and never bothered to look anywhere but there or any other news site pushing the Obama propaganda. I have several AR 15's and they are no different than Remington 270 or similar hunting rifle in function, they only "look" different and have a larger magazine. Both fire the same bullet the exact same way and both kill things. No one is taking them nor will I register them under an illegal un-constitutional right infringing "executive order". Those are in violation of the Constitution as well, FYI. Do yourself a favor and check out some alternative news sites (ones not pushing the lefts biased propaganda and outright lies), read the Constitution and Bill of Rights and find out what it means and not what some racist actor (Danny Glover) "thinks" it means. All this stuff about cover-ups, us sending money to Al Qaeda, Benghazi cover-up, Fast and Furious gun running cover up, you think you wouldn't be so brainwashed but you are. ALL of that has been covered by the media and the truth found out. Why you are so quick to trust a government that no longer goes by it's own rules (Constitution) run by a President who lies consistently and violated his own NDAA act(aiding the enemy)along with his oath of office? It's pure insanity and socialism you are backing. Hint: we are a democratic republic, NOT a democracy or communists. Big difference and you are basically a traitor to your country.
What a joke. You tell me to read the news and then you say the newtown killer didn't use an assault rifle? http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/newto... . You don't even believe the truth. The medical examiner said every victim was hit multiple times with rounds from that weapon. I hope you break gun laws because a nut job like you doesn't need a gun.
1 post removed

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10968 Jan 28, 2013
1-28-2013
WASHINGTON (AP)— Law enforcement leaders who met with President Barack Obama Monday urged him to focus on strengthening gun purchase background checks and mental health systems, but did not unify behind his more controversial gun control efforts.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10969 Jan 28, 2013
I must agree with "Ignorance" on 2 things, he did use an assault rifle on the children in Newton. The coroners report says he did. The cowardly evil POS then shot himself with a pistol. I also agree that Dookie sounds like a Fox news nut job who probably shouldnt own a gun.
1 post removed
Bored

United States

#10971 Jan 28, 2013
They all lie and say what peple want to hear but never do anything
Ignorance

Fairmont, WV

#10972 Jan 28, 2013
MindlessFoxBot wrote:
I must agree with "Ignorance" on 2 things, he did use an assault rifle on the children in Newton. The coroners report says he did. The cowardly evil POS then shot himself with a pistol. I also agree that Dookie sounds like a Fox news nut job who probably shouldnt own a gun.
Finally, something we can agree on.
Ole Joe

Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia

#10973 Jan 29, 2013
I gotta take a dump
Black Gold

Mount Hope, WV

#10974 Jan 29, 2013
Thoughts
No seriously ANY thoughts ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

Is there an echo in here. Can anybody hear me?

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Black Gold

Mount Hope, WV

#10975 Jan 29, 2013
Black Gold

Mount Hope, WV

#10976 Jan 29, 2013
C O A L

Mount Hope, WV

#10977 Jan 29, 2013
Reposted from another thread.
==========

Information overload. We are starting to wonder - if The Heritage Foundation is funded by Koch and others, with that name, Heritage, are we being misled.

Should we start questioning who owns that american flag waving faux news.
Could it be - some newspaper owning australian, who at what 50 years old moved to england and took over their press. Getting hatcher elected. After 10-15 years there could he have moved here, became a citizen (no illegal immigrant - he is rich).

Then later when he bought many CBS stations did the law need to be changed because he was over the 30% ownership rules in certain markets.

As he saw China a big player, could he have sold off his DirecTV, made more investments in Europe and Chinese satellites and decided he needed an insider in china. Could he have married a what ~ 27 year old politburo chinese connected lady when he was 77 years old? Am I remember stuff right about this true red blooded , flag waving AMERICAN?
Black Gold

Mount Hope, WV

#10978 Jan 29, 2013
In case you were afraid to click some of those links above ;-)

Fair Use Educational
http://wvgazette.com/News/201009260391
snip
September 26, 2010
Koch brothers' billions reach West Virginia
By Paul J. Nyden

CHARLESTON, W.Va.-- Brothers Charles and David Koch have spent tens of millions of dollars financing right-wing political organizations including Tea Party groups...

In West Virginia, the brothers help fund a conservative Morgantown think tank and several positions at the West Virginia University economics department through the Charles G. Koch Foundation.

Economics professor Russell Sobel recently told the West Virginia Public News Service that his department would lose two faculty members and two graduate fellowships without money from the Kochs.

Sobel also works closely with the Public Policy Foundation of West Virginia, the Morgantown think tank which published his book, "Unleashing Capitalism: Why Prosperity Stops at the West Virginia Border and How to Fix It," in 2007.

The Sobel book is a collection of 12 essays, arguing that government regulations hurt West Virginia's economy.

One essay questions the value of "mandated" mine safety laws, stating government regulations may increase accident rates.

The foundation also published "An Economic Examination of West Virginia's Prevailing Wage Law," a research report by Andrea M. Dean, a Charles G. Koch Doctoral Fellow at WVU's Economics Department, in 2009.

West Virginia's "prevailing wage law" requires that contractors doing public construction work receive wages similar to contractors in the private sector, especially to prevent government agencies from hiring cheap out-of-state labor… end snip.
hope

Huntington, WV

#10979 Jan 29, 2013
so what can we do now? those bourgeois pigs have got to go.
1 post removed
Belle

Buckhannon, WV

#10981 Jan 29, 2013
Joe is an actual full-time West Virginian - not some part-timer like Raese.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#10982 Jan 29, 2013
If it wasn't for Manchin III be one for Obama I would go with Manchin...but unfortunate that he votes for such decay.....
Hylton

Charleston, WV

#10983 Jan 29, 2013
I Did not VOTE for JOE
C O A L

Mount Hope, WV

#10984 Jan 30, 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_miners '_strike_(1984–1985)

…The coal industry was finally privatised in December 1994 to create a firm named "R.J.B. Mining", now known as UK Coal. Between the end of the strike and privatisation, pit closures continued with a particularly intense group of closures in the early 1990s.…

In 1983, Britain had 174 working mines; by 2009, this number had decreased to six.[46]

During the strike, Scargill had constantly claimed that the government had a long-term plan to reduce the industry in this way. The miners' will to resist deteriorated rapidly and there was a very apathetic response to the intensive period of closures in the early 1990s, despite evidence that there was much more sympathy for the miners then than in 1984.

Nottinghamshire miners had hoped that their pits were safe, but they too were mostly closed in the 1985-1994 period. This was widely resented as a betrayal of the promises that had been made to working miners in the strike; they had been told that their jobs were safe and their industry had a future.

The subsequent behaviour of the Conservative government was seen by most on the left, and in the "heavy" industries, to confirm fears about how they had been used to divide the miners' union...
----------
IF we'd get a couple of very rare and destructive weather events could the public push for less coal? Miners might want to save some money, think about learning other trades and be prepared to move where the work is?

Almost Heaven politicians need to try harder for more industry and jobs not related to coal. Just off the top of my head - could we pay for starting more industry by taxing Large timber and mineral holders. They would be captives - who cares IF they sold off and left the state - whoever they sold it to would owe the taxes.
C O A L

Mount Hope, WV

#10985 Jan 30, 2013
Black Gold wrote:
In case you haven't seen these - Let's try those links again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =IaKm89eVhoEXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
I LOVE those links! Thanks for making them youtube, I never fear clicking on youtube links. And the others you also posted were kewl too !!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Oak Hill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Aka Deja Blue (Feb '14) 41 min notBeavis 825
Let's Play One Word,...!!! (Mar '13) 44 min notBeavis 1,599
Let's Play,...One Word I Stole From A Dead Person! (Oct '13) 47 min notBeavis 379
Game - Keep A Word - Drop A Word (Aug '11) 47 min notBeavis 4,221
Ricky Anne McClister and Tommy Stull 2 hr Missy 1
dirty old rotten man stalking kids now watch ou... 5 hr DIRTY ROTTEN OLD MAN 2
ricky stupid simmons 5 hr DIRTY ROTTEN OLD MAN 6
Oak Hill Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Oak Hill People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Oak Hill News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Oak Hill

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:54 am PST

NFL 3:54AM
Mike Tomlin downplays spat with Reggie Nelson
NBC Sports 4:37 AM
Panthers believe anything is possible now
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
NFL Super Bowl Odds, Wild Card Analysis
NBC Sports 5:29 AM
Mike Tomlin: We're thankful Le'Veon Bell injury isn't major
Bleacher Report 6:12 AM
Steelers Attempt the Worst Fake Punt