Catholic Priest: Abortion is - Chemical Warfare' in U.S.CNS

Sep 16, 2013 Full story: Cybercast News Service 96

President Barack Obama expressed outrage over the chemical weapons attack in Syria, which killed many children, but he and Secretary of State John Kerry are hypocritical because they support killing children by abortion in America, where chemically induced abortions - "chemical warfare" -- have been occurring as well for 40 years, said Rev.

Full Story
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1 Sep 17, 2013
And the ignorant woman hating anti contraceptives man in a robe speaks:

He continued:“The little, innocent victims of abortion are even being killed ‘chemically’ by such CONTRAceptives/abortificients, such as the morning after pill, the IUD, the NuvaRing, and even high dosages of the birth control pill.‘Chemical warfare’ against our own people has been happening for over 40 years now, and the current ‘leader’ of our country has no problem with it, even adding insult to injury by asking God to bless one of the major suppliers of these chemicals used in the warfare against the innocent, in the organization known as Planned Parenthood.”

But of course they are not at all interested in outlawing contraceptives!!! NO NOT AT ALL....considering it is the GOAL of the CC.
conservative crapola

Bethlehem, PA

#2 Sep 17, 2013
'A Catholic hospital in Colorado has argued in court documents that it is not liable for the deaths of two 7-month-old fetuses because those fetuses are not people'

'...that defense contradicts church teaching that human life is sacred from the moment of conception.'

"Under Colorado law, a fetus is not a 'person' and plaintiff's claims for wrongful death must therefore be dismissed," the hospital argued.

When it comes to dollars, these 'christians' shit-can their teachings.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#3 Sep 17, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
And the ignorant woman hating anti contraceptives man in a robe speaks:
He continued:“The little, innocent victims of abortion are even being killed ‘chemically’ by such CONTRAceptives/abortificients, such as the morning after pill, the IUD, the NuvaRing, and even high dosages of the birth control pill.‘Chemical warfare’ against our own people has been happening for over 40 years now, and the current ‘leader’ of our country has no problem with it, even adding insult to injury by asking God to bless one of the major suppliers of these chemicals used in the warfare against the innocent, in the organization known as Planned Parenthood.”
But of course they are not at all interested in outlawing contraceptives!!! NO NOT AT ALL....considering it is the GOAL of the CC.
Can you please cite any legislation currently under review anywhere in the United States that:
A.) proposes to outlaw contraceptives
and
B.) is sponsored by the RCC
Thanks
Dan

Omaha, NE

#4 Sep 17, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
'A Catholic hospital in Colorado has argued in court documents that it is not liable for the deaths of two 7-month-old fetuses because those fetuses are not people'
'...that defense contradicts church teaching that human life is sacred from the moment of conception.'
"Under Colorado law, a fetus is not a 'person' and plaintiff's claims for wrongful death must therefore be dismissed," the hospital argued.
When it comes to dollars, these 'christians' shit-can their teachings.
Um, if you're in court in Colorado, what frames the decisions?

Colorado law.

Can't "shit-can" Colorado law in Colorado courts, can they?
conservative crapola

Bethlehem, PA

#5 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, if you're in court in Colorado, what frames the decisions?
Colorado law.
Can't "shit-can" Colorado law in Colorado courts, can they?
The thumpers think their trible is the law. How easily their inuendo is exposed. Especially when it comes to dollars.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#6 Sep 17, 2013
conservative crapola wrote:
<quoted text>
The thumpers think their trible is the law. How easily their inuendo is exposed. Especially when it comes to dollars.
They were in state court. State law calls the shots.

Had they ruled in state court according to what the bible does or doesn't say, you'd be leading a march there now.

Can't work both sides of the street, CC.
Michael

Hamilton, Canada

#7 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
They were in state court. State law calls the shots.
Had they ruled in state court according to what the bible does or doesn't say, you'd be leading a march there now.
Can't work both sides of the street, CC.
I too am pro-life but quit using the bible or religion as your platform.

There is no political party with the will to address the abortion issue. Isn't it time we educate our children from a young age that abortion is not a solution..........regardless of what religious belief anyone is.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#8 Sep 17, 2013
Michael wrote:
<quoted text>
I too am pro-life but quit using the bible or religion as your platform.
There is no political party with the will to address the abortion issue. Isn't it time we educate our children from a young age that abortion is not a solution..........regardless of what religious belief anyone is.
I agree, and I do not use religion as my basis to argue against abortion.
Lamer

Hopkins, MN

#9 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you please cite any legislation currently under review anywhere in the United States that:
A.) proposes to outlaw contraceptives
and
B.) is sponsored by the RCC
Thanks
Oh, you mean the personhood bills that have been moving through red controlled states such as Ohio, Mississippi, OK, ect...
Dan

Omaha, NE

#10 Sep 17, 2013
Lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you mean the personhood bills that have been moving through red controlled states such as Ohio, Mississippi, OK, ect...
Actually, I'm looking for legislation that would outlaw contraceptives, backed or sponsored by the Catholic Church.

That was Morgana's premise (that the RCC seeks to outlaw contraceptives), so I'm looking for some substantiation of that.
Lamer

Hopkins, MN

#12 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I'm looking for legislation that would outlaw contraceptives, backed or sponsored by the Catholic Church.
That was Morgana's premise (that the RCC seeks to outlaw contraceptives), so I'm looking for some substantiation of that.
Oh, so you mean persoonhood bills making their way thru states like Ohio, MS, and OK, ect?

Do i need to read these bills to you?
Dan

Omaha, NE

#13 Sep 17, 2013
Lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so you mean persoonhood bills making their way thru states like Ohio, MS, and OK, ect?
Do i need to read these bills to you?
Do said personhood bills seek to outlaw contraception?

If so, yes, please point those accordant sections out.

If not, then tell me why you think a personhood bill amounts to outlawing contraception. Abortion isn't contraception. Conception has already occurred in case of abortion.
Responsibility

Petaluma, CA

#14 Sep 17, 2013
Michael wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't it time we educate our children from a young age that abortion is not a solution
Dear, good parents have been telling their children this along with the words "Roe v. Wade" and "women have a right to make decisions about their bodies".

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#15 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Do said personhood bills seek to outlaw contraception?
If so, yes, please point those accordant sections out.
If not, then tell me why you think a personhood bill amounts to outlawing contraception. Abortion isn't contraception. Conception has already occurred in case of abortion.
For the sake of clarity, please define "conception".
Michael

Hamilton, Canada

#16 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, and I do not use religion as my basis to argue against abortion.
Good!
Dan

Omaha, NE

#17 Sep 17, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
For the sake of clarity, please define "conception".
Um, okay.

a. Formation of a viable zygote by the union of the male sperm and female ovum; fertilization

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#18 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, okay.
a. Formation of a viable zygote by the union of the male sperm and female ovum; fertilization
So, it's your contention that grating personhood to that zygote is NOT an attempt to outlaw contraceptives?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#19 Sep 17, 2013
LOL, "granting", not "grating".
Lamer

Hopkins, MN

#20 Sep 17, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Do said personhood bills seek to outlaw contraception?
If so, yes, please point those accordant sections out.
If not, then tell me why you think a personhood bill amounts to outlawing contraception. Abortion isn't contraception. Conception has already occurred in case of abortion.
FL from 2009 http://womensissues.about.com/b/2009/09/14/fl...
-Oral contraceptives and morning after pill would be gone

Federal Push: from 2011 http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/06/03/2...

OK: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/29/okla...

Virginia: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-573787...

AL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pain-capable...

What you seem to be missing is what these "personhood" bills do. The moment of concpetion,(hours after you have sex) you now have a "person" whom has its own rights. So any oral contraceptive/morning after pill would be illegal as that person seems to more rights than the mother.

But hey, alteast she can use a carpool lane by herself right??
Dan

Omaha, NE

#21 Sep 17, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
So, it's your contention that grating personhood to that zygote is NOT an attempt to outlaw contraceptives?
Yes, as a contraceptive prevents the occurrence of the zygote.

The zygote is "post-facto" RE: conception. It's already occurred.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North Smithfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Family Fun Center Owner Charged with Sex Assaul... (Feb '09) Oct '14 annonymous 18
CVS health to end tobacco sales almost a month ... Oct '14 BillDuckman 12
Pedestrian accident in Woonsocket leaves one ma... Sep '14 401man 1
Two Teen Girls Face Child Porn Charges ... For ... (Mar '06) Sep '14 dad of 3 1,107
Police investigate Woonsocket murder l WPRI.com (Mar '09) Sep '14 keri 19
Cumberland man arrested for watching kids in a ... Jul '14 rahn 1
Woonsocket Woman Allegedly Drags Boy Down Sidewalk Jul '14 rahn 1
More from around the web

North Smithfield People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

North Smithfield News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in North Smithfield

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:32 am PST