Dad tells 911, police that he acciden...

Dad tells 911, police that he accidentally dropped infant

There are 17 comments on the The Morning Journal story from Jul 2, 2007, titled Dad tells 911, police that he accidentally dropped infant. In it, The Morning Journal reports that:

Elwood Sadowsky, the 32-year-old North Olmsted resident charged with aggravated murder of his 4-month-old daughter, told 911 he accidentally dropped her, a tape of the 911 call reveals.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Morning Journal.

caroline

Purchase, NY

#1 Jul 5, 2007
People should not be quick to judge, unless they know all of the facts...
baby to one

Carteret, NJ

#2 Jul 10, 2007
If you knew this man, you would know he is guilty as charged.
C2Bplus1

Denver, CO

#3 Jul 11, 2007
Why do you say that? Is he a violent person?
baby to one

Brooklyn, NY

#4 Jul 13, 2007
yes he is. quick tempered and easily frustrated.
Accused Once

Vass, NC

#5 Sep 13, 2008
Short falls can and do cause injuries that are confused as Shaken baby syndrome. There is video taped evidence of this and a pathologist named Dr. Plunkett has demonstrated it.

Having said that, unless you know the details of the case, maybe you should reserve judgement.
djt

Sunnyside, WA

#6 Sep 13, 2008
I have details about this case none of you can possibly know, including that Elwood Sadowsky suffered from Moyamoya disease, which causes seizures and blackouts. There was evidence at the scene that he had already fallen once that day, before doing so while holding the child he adored.
The only bruising on her at the time she was picked up by the ambulance was a "bruise" identified weeks earlier by the pediatrician as a birth mark and remained unchanged. It can even be seen in earlier photos. She was very ill from birth and independent doctors are finding evidence of a prior bleeding disorder and liver problems which also create a brittle bone condition and spontaneous fractures. He took a guilty plea to protect his wife, as so many in these cases. If you want a dose of reality, read my website http://legaljustice4john.com which is still under construction and revision, but which deal with science, not conjecture and assumption.
SomeoneWiser

Cleveland, OH

#7 Sep 22, 2008
I do know the father and I also happen to know the "baby to one" and "c2Bplus1" and I honestly cannot believe those two demented fools would have the gall to come here and post lies about someone they do/did not know, never met face-to-face, nor never knew his name until this mother talked to them online on a baby website. Those two never knew this family other than the mother's first name until this incident happened. The idea that they would make-up code names and converse on a blog about a topic like this suggests that maybe "baby to one" didn't have enough to do after stealing women's money from that website in this mother's name, but had to make herself feel important by posting on this forum in such a manner, pretending to know this man what-so-ever. Shame on both of them! The truth always comes out in the end. The mother never told anyone other than me that this woman stealing that money. I told her to tell the women, but she didn't want to get involved given what was going on in her life at the time.

Not only does this woman steal money from these mothers from the website, but she comes here to post vile things about a stranger! I do not know why the mother to this deceased child ever went on that site. They were obviously not "friends" as she liked to believe. I guess some people are so into the drama of other people's lives they have to egg it on.

This surely is bordering on some level of psychosis!
djt

Sunnyside, WA

#8 Sep 23, 2008
I wanted to add to my post. I said he "took a guilty plea to protect his wife" not meaning to protect her from guilt, because she wasn't even home at the time, but the prosecutor was using emotional blackmail, threatening to go after his innocent wife if he didn't take a plea instead of going to trial where any intent to do harm, which is the basis of any criminal prosecution, would have been hard to prove since there was no evidence of "malice aforethought" whatsoever, only of an accident. He also didn't realize that the fact that she was very ill from the first vaccination on may have been the true cause of death and that she had signs of a bleeding disorder that would also likely cause a brittle bone condition that independent doctors are now finding in the medical reports. That would make all fractures of a metabolic nature which could happen spontaneously, from circumstances that wouldn't normally cause such injuries, or as in the case of ribs, look like healing fractures in various stages of healing when it was actually the skin covering on the bones bleeding and becoming callus covered and calcify, looking like healing fractures on x-ray or to the eye.
abc

Seattle, WA

#9 Mar 23, 2009
djt
Thank you for the info you provided in your link. I have followed this story a bit but feel that only the father and God know what really went on. That being said, I have a family friend being accused of shaking his son and he has not been allowed to see his kids for seversl months. From what I have been told of their story their child exhibited many of the signs you talked about in your link and got sick following his i believe 3 month vaccines (i don't remember which ones) but was always a rather sickly child. Thankfully, the boy did not have any permanent injuries but it is still a tragedy that the father has been kept from his family while the case is investigated. Reading your post as well as following Amanda's story, has really opened my eyes to some things and makes me think that there is a definite corollation between the vaccines and these severe reactions that needs to be further examined.
def

Port Clinton, OH

#10 May 14, 2009
A lot more people will find themselves in ABC's situation if people don't start expecting these doctors to look for the truth.

Differential diagnosis was not done in this case. The assumption of SBS was made long before any of the symptoms where there. In fact, some of the "symptoms" of SBS were manufactured during "treatment" if you can call it that.

ABC, that father will never be allowed to return to his son because of what he is accused of. Follow the money. Those hospitals get grant money for "outing" shaken baby cases. They get accolades and probably honestly think they've found a child abuser. When the emotions get involved there is nothing they're going to do to save that child.

You're very lucky your family friend's son didn't die.

There are a dozen if not more reasons why the triad of Shaken Baby Syndrome (now changed to all abusive head trauma by the AAP so that no one can clear their name because it's already like fighting a ghost).

Ohio does not have full discovery for criminal cases. It's been being fought for, but in 2007 when this man was up for the death penalty his prosecutor could have sat on exculpatory evidence, such as two missing blood tests to this day which have not shown up.

There are many people, ABC, who know what happened to this baby other than God and the birth father. They're just not talking.
Friend of Alan

Chicago, IL

#11 May 24, 2009
Even if the man had a temper....It doesn't mean he would hurt the child...Even if he would hurt the child doesn't mean he hurt the child....To place an innocent person in jail for something that hasn't been proved is wrong...no matter if the man has a temper or not....Without doing a diffential diagnosis then he has been depraved of his constitutional rights...we are presumed innocent until proven guilty yet so many times it works in the way that we are presumed guilty until we prove ourselves innocent and even then people look at you with guily eyes. Had this man been a famous or very wealthy man....we know the story and conclusions would be a lot different..I don't know this person. It is possible for him to not have caused harm to this child. Even if you know the man and have ill feelings about him you still don't know since you were not there. Saying a prayer for the child is more important than judging this man...regardless if you know him or not. Dr. Plunkett is one of many broadminded doctors that are fighting these predisposed diagnoses of the innocents being labled guilty before ALL of the evidence is presented, researched and laid out on the table. If you haven't spent hundreds of hours studying this subject then do so before passing judgement. This is for you Cameron...Dad loves you
Allison

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

#12 Jan 16, 2010
Tim

Maple Heights, OH

#13 May 4, 2010
Jackass
kryysteez

United States

#14 May 14, 2010
This man is NOT GUILTY. The baby died from a VACCINE reaction and should never have been given vaccines because of the history of seizures in the family. Doctors are suppose to get family history before giving vaccines. They are also suppose to recognize vaccine reactions and discontinue future vaccines. His child was showing adverse reactions right after the HepB shot in the hospital at birth. The doctor could have prevented this tragity, just like thousands of others. There are thousands of INNOCENT people in prison falsely convicted of SBS
Tom Vaughan

Columbus, OH

#15 Aug 24, 2010
Dr. Plunkett is an expert in this field and is correct. He testified in the 2007 Marsha Mills trial but the jury would not listen. Two jurors slept during his testimony. The prosecution forced the jury to view 53 gruesome autopsy photos very slowly not less than four times throughout the trial. Dr Steiner and Dr. Emily Scott testified that a fall down five cement steps to a concrete sidewalk could not cause death. The assistant coroner, Dr. Sterbenz withheld the fact from the jury that the Akron ChildrenÂ’s Hospital doctors gave the toddler uncross-matched blood in a transfusion at the emergency room. The wrong blood can cause bruising and or death. Marsha was baby-sitting two of her four grandchildren with two other children when the child fell off the back porch down the steps. The prosecution claimed she must have just snapped and beat him to death even though the other three children were just fine and there was NO evidence to support the beating theory. I have seen this woman laugh when a baby unexpectedly pissed in her face. She has great patience and a deep love for children. Believe it or not, she is still in prison four years later and being the good Christian that she is, has forgiven everyone that unjustly put her there. Find out more at www.marshamills.org
Angel

Cleveland, OH

#16 May 4, 2011
I used to know n were friends with Elwood Tripper" Sadowsky, but have not kept in touch with him since i last saw him in jail, before trial. Can somebody please tell me what's happened with him since then???
to Angel

Cleveland, OH

#17 Jun 20, 2011
TheAmandaTruth Project.com There's a contact us page. You can get in touch there.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North Olmsted Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Dell Bethel, Renaissance man: North Ridgeville ... (Nov '08) Aug 15 Niki 7
News What's next for Mayor Debbie Sutherland, Bay Vi... Aug 9 justbnme 1
News Cupcake Wishes brings flavorful fun to Avon's F... (Aug '13) Aug 2 dapperme 2
News Happier Meal? McDonald's nixing some unpalatabl... Aug 2 Elise Gingerich 1
Ward 1 Councilman David Tadych Could Be Feeling... Jul 29 justbnme 1
News 911 call about ISIS causes panic at Ohio hotel Jul '16 Maverick 808 3
News Cleveland Clinic doc who sought Libertarian Par... Jul '16 Poker Paul 1

North Olmsted Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

North Olmsted Mortgages