Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201846 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178457 Feb 5, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
British lawmakers on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage championed by Prime Minister David Cameron, despite strong opposition from within his Conservative Party.
In a first House of Commons vote, lawmakers voted 400 to 175 in support of the legislation.
Pietro Armando wrote:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ 2012/08/14/mohammed-retakes-to p-spot-in-english-baby-names/
Mohammed reclaimed its place as the most popular name for baby boys born in England and Wales in 2011 — convincingly ahead of Harry, in second place, according to data released by the government this week.
The government declared that Harry was the most popular boy’s name, but if you add up the five most popular different spellings of Mohammed, that name comes top.
Mohammed is also the most popular boy’s name of the past five years for England and Wales, ahead of Oliver and Jack. It came first or second every year since 2007, the only name to do so.
And it could become even more popular in 2012, given the adulation around long-distance runner Mo Farah, who won two gold medals for Britain at the Olympics.
The popularity of the name comes as Britain’s Muslim population is expected to double in the next 20 years.
The country, which was about 2% Muslim in 1990, grew to 4.6% Muslim in 2010, with nearly 2.9 million followers of the faith, according to analysis by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.
By 2030, the United Kingdom will be just over 8% Muslim, with more than 5.5 million adherents, the Washington-based think tank projected in a 2011 report,“The Future of the Global Muslim Population.”
Mohammed first became the most popular boy’s name in England in 2009, then was knocked back into second place the next year as Oliver enjoyed a huge surge in popularity.
Harry, the name of Prince William’s younger brother and J.K. Rowling’s boy wizard, leaped into second place in 2011, with 7,523 boys given the moniker, topping the 7,007 Olivers.
But the name of the Muslim prophet was given to 7,907 baby boys, according to CNN analysis of Office of National Statistics data. Mohammed, Muhammad and Mohammad were all among the top 100 most popular names, with Muhammed and Mohamed also coming in the top 200.
A total of 37,564 babies have been given a variation of the name in the past five years. Some 36,653 Olivers and 36,581 Jacks were born in England and Wales since 2007. The British government keeps separate statistics for Scotland and for Northern Ireland, the other two nations that make up the United Kingdom.
The 2011 British census had an optional question about religion. Results are expected in November.
At least four different spellings of the name Mohammed are among the 1,000 most popular American boys’ names in 2011, according to the Social Security Administration.
Mohamed is the top, in 428th place, with Muhammad in 480th, Mohammed in 562nd and Mohammad in 609th.
The United States is about 0.8% Muslim, with about 2.6 million adherents, the Pew Forum calculates.<quoted text>
In all of recorded human history, gay couples claiming marriage have extremely rarely and briefly appeared. They have NEVER established themselves and spread.

I see trouble on the horizon...

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178459 Feb 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Jane Dodo wrote:
British lawmakers on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage championed by Prime Minister David Cameron, despite strong opposition from within his Conservative Party.
In a first House of Commons vote, lawmakers voted 400 to 175 in support of the legislation.
<quoted text>
In all of recorded human history, gay couples claiming marriage have extremely rarely and briefly appeared. They have NEVER established themselves and spread.
I see trouble on the horizon...
me

I forget, in which cultures was SSM legally recognized previously? I eagerly await your answer.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178461 Feb 5, 2013

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178462 Feb 5, 2013
Sure, now he goes on break.........
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178464 Feb 5, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
British lawmakers on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage championed by Prime Minister David Cameron, despite strong opposition from within his Conservative Party.
In a first House of Commons vote, lawmakers voted 400 to 175 in support of the legislation.
It was no big deal in the UK, since they were always a very gay country anyway.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178465 Feb 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It was no big deal in the UK, since they were always a very gay country anyway.
Bi, if we're going to be technical.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178466 Feb 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Jane Dodo wrote:

<quoted text>
In all of recorded human history, gay couples claiming marriage have extremely rarely and briefly appeared. They have NEVER established themselves and spread.
I see trouble on the horizon...
I forget, in which culture/s was SSM legally recognized previously? Still waiting for your answer.

Just pull down your drawers and talk to the mangina.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178467 Feb 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Science. You might want to acquire a basic understanding of evolution and mating behavior.
Furthermore, if it is not, please, inform us what is?
Bazinga!
Speaking of evolution, do you think you should have been aborted? You call yourself a "monster mutation".

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178468 Feb 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
A nut is not a casing of seeds. The nut is the seed.
And a marriage with having kids is a part of a human marriage, you inhuman oaf!
"A nut is a fruit composed of a hard shell and a seed"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nut_ (fruit)
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178469 Feb 5, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of evolution, do you think you should have been aborted? You call yourself a "monster mutation".
No, we think you should have been.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178470 Feb 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Your probably confusing me with another poster. I said I'm 59, not 45.
My bad.
Who would guess you're a 59 year old virgin?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178471 Feb 5, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Gender segregated institutions would be forced to deal with same sex marriage among staff and inmates; consider the consequences. We already have too much prison rape; same sex marriage could bring much worse; forced prison marriage. In our prisons, regulations control behavior. Those rules were created to keep sex out of prisons by gender segregating inmates.
Consent is problematic, at best, among the imprisoned and institutionalized. Not all marriage is based on love, people marry for economic and social advantage too. Don't bring more harm than good, out of legitimate sympathy for gay couples. Use your head, not your heart or random other parts...
So, let us know when members of the Ravens will be forced to marry each other! You did claim that members of professional sports teams would be forced to marry each other.
Polixed

Monrovia, CA

#178472 Feb 5, 2013
What ever possed you to post something dum like that?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178473 Feb 5, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
He did. Next he'll counter with something entirely insane like "why don't you marry your gerbil while you're at it."
It never fails.
We just want to marry the person we love, and they have to bring in plural marriage because they have no argument against SSM, other than the fact that they find it "creepy"?
As for me, Kimare won't even let the missus look at me; he's afraid she'll turn lesbo when she sees me.
I'm sure that you are very funny in the real world, but not here... I said nothing about a gerbil, why would you ? Marriage is an institution that is reserved for 1 man and 1 woman. If we are to redefine marriage at all, why not alter the number of partners that are allowed ? Is it because your crowd doesn't care about true equality ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178474 Feb 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah "they" sure are jackasses! You can't marry gerbils. They're for butts! But you should be allowed to marry who you want.
You aren't insisting on the traditional, arbitrary and discriminatory number of two while at the same time insisting gender is irrelevant. Are you?
Yes, they are. These biased, low IQ types pretending to be intelligent make me laugh my ass off. Supposedly intelligent discussions with chimps, that's all this is. If they weren't so wrapped up in acting superior, they might be able to see the true nature of equality insists on absolute freedom of choice(s)...Even now, they argue that SSM is the only valid form of marriage that counts as discriminated against. Forget having them be fair and unbiased about incest.....Only need 2 partners for that....Fits their parameters...But they would call THAT creepy....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178475 Feb 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D only whines when he considers my posts off topic. He is my personal topix cop. Ever vigilant!
He attempts to censor my posts because he doesn't like me. And that's all he's got since he cannot effectively rebut my posts. He gets frustrated and angry. Too funny!
...Angry midgets are hilarious....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178476 Feb 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
YUK!YUK!YUK!
No, you are wrong...You meant "hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha........hahaha "
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178477 Feb 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I am giving you one last chance. I am defending you against Rose, so you best not rile it up!
Look, man, I like it when you dog Chongo, but as to riling it up ? Collossall hilarity there. If you could just stick to one side, you might earn a couple of supporters, but you paste everyone. so get what you give. I warned you about that before...stick to one side and enjoy some camaraderie...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178478 Feb 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I am defending him from Rose!
Randy -Rock- Hudson: 50.
Largelanguage: 59.
Rose_Noho: 56.


I appreciate the effort, but I require no protection from Chongo. I would rather you picked one side and stuck to it...Chongo (rose_no_ho) is insane.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178479 Feb 5, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you aren't a child, as most kids would normally collapse after I've said those biting words! I will kill you off soon though!
But, please, you aren't going to kill anyone off.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North-Hollywood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ban Illegal Immigrants and Large-Capacity Ammun... 16 hr Big Gamer 2
News LAPD officer arrested at Mexican border crossin... 17 hr Pektoh854 15
Aint No Gobal Wamin Amigo 23 hr dGo mDaedn lyHo i... 2
News Meth Pills Were in In-n-Out Drink, Man Claims i... Sat Mitt s Santorum S... 1
News Deputies Shoot Stick-Wielding Suspect In Whittier Sat Lemon Drop 2
News Stalker case leads to lawsuit against St. Bruno... (Feb '13) Sat tellinitlikeitwas 1,334
Bobbi Kristina Brown Dies at 22, Family Confirms Sat Charles Simpsin 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

North-Hollywood Mortgages