#FreeKate Insanity Intensifies: Is Te...

#FreeKate Insanity Intensifies: Is Teen Lesbian the Rosa Parks of Jailbait?

There are 247 comments on the The American Spectator story from May 29, 2013, titled #FreeKate Insanity Intensifies: Is Teen Lesbian the Rosa Parks of Jailbait?. In it, The American Spectator reports that:

Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt's prosecution for having sex with a 14-year-old girl has, as I reported last week, made the Florida teenager a cause cA©lA bre of the gay-rights movemen t. Since the 18-year-old ex-cheerleader rejected a plea bargain on charges of lewd and lascivious conduct - it is a felony under Florida law for an adult to have sex with ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The American Spectator.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#33 Jul 23, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
The sole reason this case is getting any attention whatsoever is because of the young lesbians in lust angle to it. If either of them had been male, you'd hear crickets chirping. If either of them had been male, it would unlikely have led to a prosecution, even with the younger child's parent's calling for the other kid's head on a platter. Unless there was some sort of coercion involved, even though the law says they can't consent, when your 14 year-old consents that willingly to an 18 year-old, selling a technical violation of the law is usually harder to get past a jury. That's where the young lesbians in lust angle is coming back to haunt the 18 year-old in this case.
It's terrible that a jury would treat an LGBT person more harshly than a straight person.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#35 Jul 23, 2013
equalityboy81 wrote:
It's terrible that a jury would treat an LGBT person more harshly than a straight person.
When you get down to the basic facts, an 18 year-old high school senior gets with a 14 year-old in the same school. Although the 14 year-old cannot legally consent, the alleged victim, from all accounts, enthusiastically volunteered. If either were male, but not both, it would never have been prosecuted because once that 14 year-old got up on the stand and said they knew what they were doing and were happy to be doing it, no jury in the world would convict even though the law was clearly broken. It's lesbian lust that sells the technical violation that straight kids being straight kids wouldn't.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#37 Jul 24, 2013
If they are so worried about sexual relations between 14 and 18 that go to the same high school together then they need have something in between middle school/junior high and high school where those under 16 attend. You put 18 and 14 year olds together in the same school it is likely some of them are going to date.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#39 Jul 24, 2013
The AssTroll Stopper wrote:
...
Dumpling, you are acting under the seriously false assumptions that your obvious psychological issues with anyone and anything you see as "homosexual" are normal, expected and socially tolerable. Never been the first two and you are quickly beginning to run out of road on the last. Now go find a good therapist and a different life than the one you're now living.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#42 Jul 24, 2013
Hon, if even 1% of your sad and pathetic schtick here is you in real life, I can't help but feel sorry for you. Keep your coat closed sweetie, you ain't got nothing special to be showing off like that.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#51 Aug 20, 2013
She deserves all the jail time, she's gonna get...She earned it all....

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#52 Aug 20, 2013
I read today that this idiot has been contacting the girl even as her case has been unfolding, and even met with her recently for "intimate relations".

If true, she deserves to have the book thrown at her.

“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#53 Aug 20, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Dumpling, you are acting under the seriously false assumptions that your obvious psychological issues with anyone and anything you see as "homosexual" are normal, expected and socially tolerable. Never been the first two and you are quickly beginning to run out of road on the last. Now go find a good therapist and a different life than the one you're now living.
Calling him Dumpling is a sign that you need the shrink and not him.

“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#54 Aug 20, 2013
Quest wrote:
I read today that this idiot has been contacting the girl even as her case has been unfolding, and even met with her recently for "intimate relations".
If true, she deserves to have the book thrown at her.
I initially called for a lenient sentence for Kaitlyn, but after hearing the latest allegations, if they are proven true, I believe she deserves a maximum sentence and a lifetime as a registered sex offender.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#55 Aug 20, 2013
flbadcatowner wrote:
Calling him Dumpling is a sign that you need the shrink and not him.
You're seriously overpricing your free advice sweetie.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#56 Aug 21, 2013
Are you kidding?....Over 20,000 texts since the Judge said, No Contact....And the Mom deserves Contempt of Court charges for begging them to erase evidence of the contacts.....

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#59 Aug 21, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
Are you kidding?....Over 20,000 texts since the Judge said, No Contact....And the Mom deserves Contempt of Court charges for begging them to erase evidence of the contacts.....
Given how this all turned out, I think the 14 year-old should be charged for her role in violating the court's order and both sets of parents with neglect for allowing it to continue once they knew. The only victims in this are the taxpayers who have to pick up the legal tab for this nonsense, stupid parents with horny teenagers who are none to bright themselves, but a lot smarter than their parents.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#60 Aug 21, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
An 18 year old, an ADULT, is having sex with a 14 year old in a public bathroom, and you find that acceptable ???!!!
THROW THE BOOK AT HER ! 60 YEARS IN THE SLAMMER !
Do you remember how (and why) the voting age was lowered to 18?
Dan

Omaha, NE

#61 Aug 21, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Given how this all turned out, I think the 14 year-old should be charged for her role in violating the court's order and both sets of parents with neglect for allowing it to continue once they knew. The only victims in this are the taxpayers who have to pick up the legal tab for this nonsense, stupid parents with horny teenagers who are none to bright themselves, but a lot smarter than their parents.
Um, the 14-year old wasn't under Court Order.

Hunt was under court order and violated it, and her parents made effort to eliminate the evidence of same.

Charge Hunt court costs if it's a money thing with you.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#64 Aug 21, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>Given how this all turned out, I think the 14 year-old should be charged for her role in violating the court's order and both sets of parents with neglect for allowing it to continue once they knew. The only victims in this are the taxpayers who have to pick up the legal tab for this nonsense, stupid parents with horny teenagers who are none to bright themselves, but a lot smarter than their parents.
They are both likely minipulateing their parents, but your absolutely correct about the victim's guilt in this additional interaction.....Something still very strange, about the victim's parents and how or why, they went about all this....?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#65 Aug 21, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you remember how (and why) the voting age was lowered to 18?
Way before Vietnam, it was to match the viable military induction age....i think...lol....
Dan

Omaha, NE

#66 Aug 21, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text> They are both likely minipulateing their parents, but your absolutely correct about the victim's guilt in this additional interaction.....Something still very strange, about the victim's parents and how or why, they went about all this....?
What, in your opinion, was "strange" about it?

Seems fairly standard. They didn't get satisfaction from their dealing with Hunt's parents on the matter, the Hunt girl persisted in her untoward behavior and they went to the local authorities.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#67 Aug 21, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
What, in your opinion, was "strange" about it?
Seems fairly standard. They didn't get satisfaction from their dealing with Hunt's parents on the matter, the Hunt girl persisted in her untoward behavior and they went to the local authorities.
The reasoning and the timing...they allowed it to proceed, but waited until Kate turned 18, in order to contact law enforcement.....puzzling....al so, have any idea of what this does to a 14 year old girls, social position in a school and a small community?
Dan

Omaha, NE

#70 Aug 21, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>The reasoning and the timing...they allowed it to proceed, but waited until Kate turned 18, in order to contact law enforcement.....puzzling....al so, have any idea of what this does to a 14 year old girls, social position in a school and a small community?
Incorrect.

Kaitlyn Hunt turned 18 on August 14, 2012.

She began seeing the 14 year old in September of 2012, according to the Hunt family's initial statements, and in November 2012 according the victim in the arrest affidavit.

Either way, Kaitlyn was 18 prior to the matter in question.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#71 Aug 21, 2013
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>The reasoning and the timing...they allowed it to proceed, but waited until Kate turned 18, in order to contact law enforcement.....puzzling....al so, have any idea of what this does to a 14 year old girls, social position in a school and a small community?
Partial Timeline:

Kaitlyn Hunt turned 18 years old on August 14, 2012 (arrest affidavit records her birthday is 8/14/94)

- Six days later, the school district held the first day of classes on August 20 (School District of Indian River County)

- According to some statements from the Hunt family, Kaitlyn began dating the 14 year old in September 2012.(Free Kate Facebook group "About" page)

- According to the arrest affidavit, the 14 year old girl stated that she and Kaitlyn began dating in November 2012 (more recent accounts by Kelley Smith Hunt have also indicated November) and listed at least three occasions in which sexual activity took place:
•The first sexual activity involved arranging (via text message) a meeting in the bathroom during class-time on a date "before Christmas" - in a bathroom stall, Kaitlyn removed the 14 year old girl's pants and penetrated her with a finger.
•On January 4, 2013 the 14 year old girl ran away from home. Kaitlyn picked up the 14 year old girl, brought her back to the Hunt residence and engaged in sexual activity, including oral sex and use of a vibrator.
•On another occasion in mid-January ("approximately one month ago" according to the affidavit, which is dated February 16), Kaitlyn and the 14 year old girl again met in the school bathroom stall and engaged in sexual activity.

- According to Kaitlyn's mother, at some point between mid-January and mid-February Kaitlyn and the 14 year old girl stopped seeing each other. This isn't at all true, but pretending it is it's still unclear whether the claim would have the relationship ended before or after the night of February 7 when a group approached the Smiths with their concerns about the relationship.

On February 8, the 14 year old and her parents first reported the sexual relationship to the police after being approached the previous night by a coach, other staff and students who raised concerns about the nature of the relationship. It is unclear from the redacted report what degree of awareness the Smiths may or may not have had of the relationship prior to the night of February 7.(IRC Case Report (PDF))

- On February 15, the 14 year old and her parents were further interviewed regarding the details of the offense. Also, a controlled phone call was conducted between the victim and Kaitlyn during which Kaitlyn confirmed the sexual relationship.(arrest affidavit)

- On February 16, Kaitlyn Hunt was arrested and interviewed. In her statement, Kaitlyn confirmed that at least two of the sexual encounters took place (at some point in the school bathroom, and in her home on January 4), although according to her account the sexual activity began "after Christmas." (arrest affidavit)

- Based on the age difference stated by the Hunt family, the younger girl would have turned 15 in March or April, about 1 to 2 months after Kaitlyn's arrest and 6 to 7 months after the Hunts claim the relationship between the girls began.

SOURCE: http://supporthonesty.net/

Site is documented.

Your last statement is a tad puzzling. Being victim of a crime certainly is difficult, but I'm not sure it bears directly upon her "social position" or "standing".

It will be detrimental for Hunt once she's convicted, assuredly, but I'm not clear on your statement respective to the victim.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

North Beach Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Cops: Naked man hung out near road Aug 22 David 2
Review: Robert J. Kulas, P.a. (Mar '13) Aug 20 katie91 11
News King's legacy still cause of debate (Jan '14) Jul '15 Go Blue Forever 1,089
Review: Brevard County Bar Association Lawyer R... Jul '15 MARY MEDS 3
moving to vero beach (Mar '07) Jul '15 MARY MEDS 72
DO NOT rent from Troy Stephan Jul '15 MARY MEDS 3
The Great Connector Ha (Sep '10) Sep '10 The Great Connect... 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

North Beach Mortgages