|
Former Stamford Resident
|
As I remember when this story first broke, I said something to the effect of "it takes two" or words to that effect. I`m not condoning what this guy was about to do,but a lot of people were defending the girl.Now the story says that she sent photos of herself all made up and saying that she was older. I guess she was partly to blame for what could have turned out to be a grusome story. I`ll say it again , it takes two",sometimes.Girls are not always innocent just because they`re pretty.
|
|
Still in Stamford
|
The guy was still meeting her at a high school -- how much older could he have really thought she was?
|
|
Oh come on
|
Former Stamford Resident wrote: As I remember when this story first broke, I said something to the effect of "it takes two" or words to that effect. I`m not condoning what this guy was about to do,but a lot of people were defending the girl.Now the story says that she sent photos of herself all made up and saying that she was older. I guess she was partly to blame for what could have turned out to be a grusome story. I`ll say it again , it takes two",sometimes.Girls are not always innocent just because they`re pretty. How do you know this girl is pretty? How do you know for a fact that she "sent" pictures, and he didn't simply see them on her myspace or facebook page? Why are you on such a rampage against this child?
|
|
Yikes
|
Former Stamford Resident wrote: As I remember when this story first broke, I said something to the effect of "it takes two" or words to that effect. I`m not condoning what this guy was about to do,but a lot of people were defending the girl.Now the story says that she sent photos of herself all made up and saying that she was older. I guess she was partly to blame for what could have turned out to be a grusome story. I`ll say it again , it takes two",sometimes.Girls are not always innocent just because they`re pretty. Paraphrasing how I reacted to your previous posts, if I recall correctly: that's an awful lot of judgment based on two very short articles.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
Why don`t you people give me and the others that have a clue about life a huge break. Stop with the "child" stuff. The article said that Oklahoma said she sent him photos all made up and looked older.Just because she`s 17 years old dosen`t mean she`s not capable of being deceitful. A lot of 17 yr. olds are going on 35. The judge let him go. He must have believed him a little.Maybe you all are not aware , but some girls are actually worse than boys.Time to take a giant dose of reality folks.What, just because she lives in New Canann you think that it`s not possible? Wake up .
|
|
Hard Up
|
Whatever, it's still a long way to travel to get a piece!! What a loser!!
|
|
Why
|
isn't this pervert behind bars? He gets slapped on the hand and told to get back to Oklahoma, so he can prey on other innocent victims....Perhaps they could at least put out a warning to the police and community in Oklahoma...
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
Hard Up wrote: Whatever, it's still a long way to travel to get a piece!! What a loser!! Yes, he is a loser. Just think , all the money for bus fare for nothing. But , she did entice him.
|
|
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
Why wrote: isn't this pervert behind bars? He gets slapped on the hand and told to get back to Oklahoma, so he can prey on other innocent victims....Perhaps they could at least put out a warning to the police and community in Oklahoma... There had to be some reason why the prosecutor didn`t want to try the case, and the judge let him go, maybe he was just a goofy farm boy with a dream.I hope he and the girl learned a leason here.Maybe her parents should keep her off the computer for a while.
|
|
panties in a bunch
|
Former Stamford Resident wrote: Why don`t you people give me and the others that have a clue about life a huge break. Stop with the "child" stuff. The article said that Oklahoma said she sent him photos all made up and looked older.Just because she`s 17 years old dosen`t mean she`s not capable of being deceitful. A lot of 17 yr. olds are going on 35. The judge let him go. He must have believed him a little.Maybe you all are not aware , but some girls are actually worse than boys.Time to take a giant dose of reality folks.What, just because she lives in New Canann you think that it`s not possible? Wake up . sounds to me like you don't know how them thar internets work. maybe you should check out a few newfangled sites on that WWW called 'myspace' and 'facebook.' also you should probably not believe every word you read in the advocate. that strikes me as a recipe for disaster. also why do you hate girls?
|
|
panties in a bunch
|
Former Stamford Resident wrote: <quoted text>maybe he was just a goofy farm boy with a dream. love it, the 17 year old is not a child, but the 30-something perp is a "goofy farm boy." your clue that you brag about wouldn't sell on craigslist (another one of those newfangled WWW sites) for $1.
|
|
Was young once
|
Maybe places like my page should start getting some type of proof of age or stop letting people putting pictures up. why not just have chat without pictures.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
panties in a bunch wrote: <quoted text>
sounds to me like you don't know how them thar internets work. maybe you should check out a few newfangled sites on that WWW called 'myspace' and 'facebook.' also you should probably not believe every word you read in the advocate. that strikes me as a recipe for disaster. also why do you hate girls? Dear panties in a bunch,you`re right, I don`t know much about myspace and facebook,nor do I care. I`m not a teen ager. I`m a full grown adult who has children and grand children. I think, being that I`ve been around the block a few times, that I know a little about human nature, plus I didn`t fall off the turnip truck yesterday either.You sound like a frustrated woman that needs to get her panties unbunched.And by the way, I don`t hate girls, as a matter of fact I love females, pretty ones anyway,and In my time I`ve had numerous relationships with very beautiful and more than willing women. All I was saying was that this young girl could have gotten herself in a very dangerous situation, and if she were my daughter, I would have to have a very long talk with her about the dangers there are in this screwed up world we live in.The internet can be a very dangerous place. She should concider herself very lucky, and accept her part in what happened.
|
|
panties in a bunch
|
you should check again. 'cause your panties are still in a bunch.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
Was young once wrote: Maybe places like my page should start getting some type of proof of age or stop letting people putting pictures up. why not just have chat without pictures. How often does it happen that you read in the papers or the internet news that some young girl met some guy on the internet and ran away with him.Some of these girls as young as 14 or 15 years old.Sometimes they`re found alive and safe and sometimes their bodies are found. On the other side of the coin , how many times some unsuspecting guy is led to believe that he`s talking to a young teen aged girl and is going to get the best sex of his life, and the teen ager turns out to be a cop setting him up.Will they ever learn.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
panties in a bunch wrote: you should check again.'cause your panties are still in a bunch. Bite me
|
|
panties in a bunch
|
Former Stamford Resident wrote: <quoted text>Bite me not in your wildest dreams, geezer.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
I said I love pretty women, you sound like you`re ugly to the bone. Why do you still keep answering me , You can stand on any street corner and be relieved of your frustrations. Oh and by the way, you also sound like you`re pissed because Hillary lost .
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
WE`re done , stop stalking me.
|
|
Former Stamford Resident
|
That is unless you just can`t get enough of me.
|
Yellow Pages
Cars
Judge it!
72°F
Sagittarius
Most Popular