#22 Jun 26, 2009
How about two dollars for minors, and 5 dollars for everyone over 21. Everyone has to wear a bracelet and police can easily identify those with alcohol.
Downtown is the place to be! Columbus park restaurants and bars need the business.
#23 Jun 26, 2009
Yes, five bucks is not that bad. But also, these concerts were created to bring people to downtown Stamford. Remember what the downtown was like 15 years ago? And businesses must spend money to make money.
They obviously have to do something because of the popularity of the concerts. But I miss the old days when there was less security and it had more of that laid back Stamford atmosphere. But I guess those days are gone.
#24 Jun 26, 2009
Got it. I see on the DSSD site that, as of last year's report, they're funded "primarily by 126 property owners who pay an annual fee to the District based upon their property assessments... in addition, a significant portion of the DSSD's program income is derived through sponsorships."
54.3% from assessments, 41.5% from sponsorships, 3.9% grants, 0.3% interest.
It gets spent 47% on marketing and event promotion, 24.7% operations, clean, safe & green, 21% general admin, 7.3% retail and economic development.
I would have no problem with the concerts if their cost were entirely paid from sponsorships. But expecting downtown owners to pay for everyone else's entertainment doesn't seem right.
A concert series is a luxury, one in which most citizens can enjoy partially (at least 1 concert) if they choose and I'd prefer to see them come up for vote on the public ballot every four years. "Do you want a special tax of X% to be assessed solely for the purpose of the DSSD Concert Series, for which Stamford residents will pay no entrance fee?" or X minus something and have a small cover charge, etc..
#25 Jun 26, 2009
With lots of the riff raff gone, I may actually go to "Alive at Five" now. Good job Stamford.
#26 Jun 26, 2009
Hey Matt Vallee of Norwalk: go tell your city to hold a free concert series.
#27 Jun 26, 2009
DSSD Director was recently quoted as saying sponsorship loss was around 30%. The cover was in part to offset that loss, and in part to impose some control over the event (note last year's rowdyism, etc.).
#28 Jun 26, 2009
That's a different kettle of fish. In effect, the DSSD is a feifdom, an entity unto itself. If you own a building within its boundary, you're paying, period. That's the way our city fathers set it up. It really answers to no one in local government. Its stated goal is to enhance and promote its constituent area. As far as its goal setting and operations go, I am not a downtown property owner, and cannot really comment on how fairly, wisely or well it allocates its resources. However, I must say that most reactions to its efforts seem positive.
#29 Jun 26, 2009
I appreciate the info, Vox. thanks.
#30 Jun 26, 2009
The Alive @ 5 series is great. The problems are:
The area is too small for the crowds they got last year.
DSSD losing corporate sponsorship.
Cover Charges - will reduce the number of people attending and cover additional expenses incurred by the DSSD. Done.
Limit the number of attendees: Just like stadium, limit the number of people who can enter the area. Sell tickets ($5) in advance. You won't have overcrowding and you will be able to control the crowd size.
Ban all those under 21: That will eliminate the underage drinking. Maybe not practical, but something to think about.
Move the venue: Probably can't do that because there is no place within the DSSD district that is any larger.
Stop Alive @ Five altogether: This will eliminate everyone's complaining about the rules.
#31 Jun 26, 2009
maybe you could hum a few bars?
#32 Jun 26, 2009
I'll pay $5 for the crowd last night. No underage kids who can't handle their liquor running around.
Here's my one complaint: Tiernan's. They were running an absolute scam last night. At their back door they were telling people that if they paid $5 they would have "access to the park." Just to be clear, in order to get a bracelet that enables you to have a beer outside, you must first buy a ticket at the entrance then proceed to get a bracelet with that ticket.
Tiernan's led people to believe that the $5 paid at the door could be used in place of the ticket at the door. In essence, they were promising a short cut in for people when it was actually just a cover for Tiernan's OR a shortcut through Tiernan's to a place where you couldn't drink. You would need to pay another $5 for this ticket to get the bracelet.
We told the organizers at the front of this scam (they were well aware of it) and I hope Tiernan's changes their ways for the upcoming Alive at 5 concerts.
#34 Jun 26, 2009
We were there, five bucks for a GREAT show, no problem.
But there was still a large group of underage kids drinking under the big tree, but the were well behaved.
Smash mouth stoping the concert to throw out a jerk throwing water bottles, Priceless.
This year unlike the past years, we did not take a table at a resturant, we end up spending too much money. I did not seem to be hurting the resturants and we had a great time for very little money.
#35 Jun 26, 2009
I for one do not disagree with the 5 dollar fee. It is extremely reasonable. I think that the lines were a bit out of control, perhaps once they get the rhythm going it will be better. Also...
The whole Kids after 6:30 rule really makes no sense at all, they will just be there earlier.
Better control at the entrance by the police would be a more effective way.
Either way, I think the fee makes sense, the concert was extremely enjoyable.
#36 Jun 26, 2009
Thanks to a..hole mayor malloy.
Add your comments below
|Travel ban lifted in Berkshire, nearby counties...||Jan 28||Praxis33||3|
|Memory of Malcolm X Returns to Boston in Prison...||Jan 24||Taajsgpm||2|
|Tom Brady knew of deflated football||Jan 23||Insider||1|
|Store owner shuts doors owing thousands to cons... (Feb '09)||Dec '14||BobS||23|
|Review: Asia Treasures (Mar '09)||Dec '14||BrianEd||3|
|Discrimination at Franklin Hair Salon (Nov '06)||Dec '14||wake up||60|
|Boston to Wrentham Limo Service 02116||Oct '14||Limo Service 02116||1|
Find what you want!
Search Norfolk Forum Now
Norfolk News Video
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC