SummerGrove is no longer a jewel but ...
Skeptic

Newnan, GA

#551 Nov 22, 2012
blind n-1 eye wrote:
Kris was on the budget committee and now it says he's the budget chair but it also says he's his own laison on the budget committee unless the information is incorrect!
The budget committee is the only one where the liaison and chair are always the same person, that being the treasurer.
blind n-1 eye

Newnan, GA

#552 Nov 22, 2012
Skeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The budget committee is the only one where the liaison and chair are always the same person, that being the treasurer.
Hey skeptic, thanks for the heads up on the info. My wife found the folder with the bylaws etc., for me and I was going to sit down this evening and re-read the info on committee's and positions, to see if this was being done the way it should be. I'd probably drift off to sleep trying to read through anything this evening, since my wife and daughters outdid themselves with Thanksgiving dinner again this year.
I think I'll wait until tomorrow when all of the food settles and I feel like I can move once again, to read through those documents!
Hope you and yours have a great Thanksgiving evening.
Little Foot

Newnan, GA

#553 Nov 23, 2012
Greetings, to the person who keeps "judging" my comment with an "X", yes, my daughter will be running in next years POA election. I pay the bills, she is over 18 and a member of my household. If you don't like the by-laws, speak out and have them changed.
Little Foot

Newnan, GA

#554 Nov 23, 2012
Let's see, why would my daughter be any different from the other candidates who never come to meetings and all of a sudden feel the need to be on the Board? They haven't a clue.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#555 Nov 23, 2012
jerker wrote:
We need to start a movement to amend the "Bylaws"to only allow HOMEOWNERS to serve on the BOD.
Jerker, I periodically check out this forum and when I saw your post, I wanted to support and respond to your post.
I supported the lady who was running for the board and at the election, I remember she talked about this issue and the fact that we needed to ammend this particular bylaw.
I looked it up and was shocked that it said someone 18 and up who RESIDED in a unit in summergrove, could run for the board. I did not like this at all. Neither the age nor the fact that they didn't have to be a homeowner.
We don't need a student as this board has enough issues. This is not school or a training session and we have our fill of folks who "think this will look good on their resume." ENOUGH PEOPLE>
We would have had someone that has been on two executive boards and had also been a two time committee chair.Folks killed that.
Now, since that was something the lady talked about at the election and you have reminded us about this issue, we surely need to move on this. We must have the correct document drawn up with the correct wording and then collect signatures. It took the board
extending, extending and extending the time to collect signatures to ammend the other bylaw and we need to think about that.
Perhaps there should be a meeting of homeowners, who are interested in this task. I doubt if we'll get the suppport from the board on this issue, but maybe it would be worth mentioning, maybe not although they read this forum just like everyone else does.
The time is certainly NOW to get going on this issue.
Little Foot

Newnan, GA

#556 Nov 23, 2012
Look Closely, it was a JOKE. I agree with Jerker. However, to prove a point, maybe someone will allow their over 18 young adult to run for a position. Then, maybe things will get changed. My 20 year old can barely pay for her cell phone, but according to the by-laws, she COULD run and possibly win with a great promise to all residents.
look closely

Newnan, GA

#557 Nov 23, 2012
Little Foot wrote:
Look Closely, it was a JOKE. I agree with Jerker. However, to prove a point, maybe someone will allow their over 18 young adult to run for a position. Then, maybe things will get changed. My 20 year old can barely pay for her cell phone, but according to the by-laws, she COULD run and possibly win with a great promise to all residents.
Little Foot, I'm personally elated to know that this was a 'JOKE'
AND YOU ARE RIGHT, SOMEONE COULD LET THEIR KID RUN FOR THE BOARD.
When Jerker reminded us of what the HAT LADY had already said in her speech at the election, it was certainly a wake up call that all of us needed to be reminded that THIS IS A CRITICAL ISSUE AND WE NEED TO MOVE ON THIS LIKE YESTERDAY.
This would certainly be an awful feeling in my stomach, if anyone's kid was to run for this already ass backward's board.
Even though I don't recall who it was that originally brought it to our attention on this forum, that we had someone running for the board that wasn't a homeowner,for some reason it fizzled when A REALTOR SAID HE HAD SOLD HIM THE HOUSE. In one section of our bylaws it says the records and tax bills will prove ownership and in another section is has this awful flip type of bylaw. Regardless who first mentioned it on this forum, I for one, am glad someone had the sense to even investigate the issue and bring it up.
We really need to come together and decide what steps to take and we need to do it soon. We need to figure out the legalities of this and move ahead.
Ima Lawyer

Newnan, GA

#558 Nov 24, 2012
I am sure that those of you commenting on the topic of a non-homeowner have good intensions or positive motivations. However, without sounding cynical, it goes to show how little people really know about the inner workings of an association like SG. There is so much more than meets the eye. Every homeowner in SG could sign a petition wanting the change but unless the majority of the board is willing to make it happen it won’t. So let’s break it down.
Scot Miller, Cindy Bruce’s friend and personal appointee to the board, does not own the home he resides in. His name is not on the deed. He won’t vote to go forward with it. Richard Dulaney is a self-professed non- homeowner, his wife is on the deed. Remember at the annual meeting he was “personally offended” this issue was even brought up. Oh, go cry in the corner with Phillip Zeluski. Boo!! Did that offend you too? So you are already down two board members and you need at least 4 to agree to do something about it. Then you have “Wild Bill” Eaton. He is still in Cindy’s back pocket. His earpiece is tuned to Cindy’s frequency. So he won’t go for it because it will make the former queen mad. Then Kris Lovell, he too is in Cindy’s back pocket. So no dice there either. That just leaves three board members which aren’t enough to get the ball rolling.

Folks this is why personal agendas are foolish.Personal agendas have no place on the board. You all MUST think long and hard when you cast your vote for a board member. The real movement you should address is the election process itself. Our current system allows a single person to seat a board. That is way too much power.

The other issue that we should be addressing is replacing CMA or at least replacing the property manager with a more effective one. Cindy Bruce made an attempt to secure Darcy’s job prior to leaving. But if you look at most of SG’s problems they all point to CMA and/or the property manager. I would begin to list the issue but they are far too extensive.
Skeptic

Newnan, GA

#559 Nov 24, 2012
Ima Lawyer wrote:
Our current system allows a single person to seat a board.
Perhaps my brain is fogged from too much turkey, but you'll have to explain to me what you mean by that.
Smokecreen

Newnan, GA

#560 Nov 24, 2012
I agree with you Ima Lawyer, with no exceptions. My question would be as Skeptic asked; "Our current system allows a single person to seat a board." I don't understand this. Please explain.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#561 Nov 24, 2012
Ima Lawyer wrote:
Our current system allows a single person to seat a board. That is way too much power.
The other issue that we should be addressing is replacing CMA or at least replacing the property manager with a more effective one.
Man this just made me sit down for a minute. For myself, there is no personal agenda, however, I definitely support issues the hat lady addressed in her bio and her speech at election time re taking steps to ammend who can run for the board. I also am glad jerker reminded us we needed to do something about this. I think blind in-i eye, smoke screen, little foot and others support these issue, however you certainly brought it right on down home regarding the reality of this situation. I personally hadn't looked at it this way when you talked about the number of board members who need to be behind this issue. Damn, that was a slap in the face, when we look at those we have that might be for the homeowners since they apparently forget when their little position comes to a close, they have to come right back into realityville.
The hat lady talked about the "quarter of a million dollars" we're paying for management and admin, yet it apparently didn't kick in with folks. I know it kicked my butt, because I never looked at it in those terms. Was I thinking and looking at those figures on a monthly basis? Probably! Somehow it looks different than seeing it by the year! I also
want management changed. I don't want the landscape company because when the lady talked about the amount of money we're paying, once again
the yearly amount knocked me over. Since cindy was talking up her little
sweetie pie, Scot, and how wonderful he is at landscaping, I look to get a notice any minute now, that his company is the one we're dealing with.
For me, folks are giving cindy way too much recognition. This chick is
nothing and nobody. Every time I read a message, it speaks to the power
she has. That's only true, if we give her that power. She is out. So is
her thinking. The folks she has backed, need to have all eyes on them.
Wild bill, scot and Kris have to live in this community. The problem we have now, is getting folks to turn out for these meetings and they MUST
SPEAK THEIR MIND. No comments, no actions will change.
Please let us know what you mean by one person seated. I'm lost on that issue. We need to get direction here. Darcy needs to be gone like yesterday, so I'm on board with that. Cindy's buddies on the board and also those sprinkled in the audience, will fall by the wayside also.
Wikki

Newnan, GA

#562 Nov 24, 2012
Smokecreen wrote:
I agree with you Ima Lawyer, with no exceptions. My question would be as Skeptic asked; "Our current system allows a single person to seat a board." I don't understand this. Please explain.
Ditto
jerker

Newnan, GA

#563 Nov 24, 2012
The homeowners have some rights and say so about what they want; the BOD does not have to initiate or approve everything. If we want to amend the bylaws to keep non-homeowners from serving in any capacity, all we need to do is secure enough signatures (quorum) via a petition. Then, a large contingent of the petition signers appear at the next BOD meeting and demand that it be brought before the homeowners for a vote. Any and all homeowners can attend a BOD meeting to find out what business is being considered, and by whomk.
Little Foot

Newnan, GA

#564 Nov 25, 2012
Maybe even change one other item, such as a requirement for a candidate running for the BOD, needs to have served on a committee of choice for at least 6 months to a year and attendance of POA meetings prior to running. That sounds fair to me.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#565 Nov 25, 2012
jerker wrote:
The homeowners have some rights and say so about what they want; the BOD does not have to initiate or approve everything. If we want to amend the bylaws to keep non-homeowners from serving in any capacity, all we need to do is secure enough signatures (quorum) via a petition. Then, a large contingent of the petition signers appear at the next BOD meeting and demand that it be brought before the homeowners for a vote. Any and all homeowners can attend a BOD meeting to find out what business is being considered, and by whomk.
Jerker,my hat is certainly off to you. You know, I couldn't remember who first addressed the issue of a non-homeowner running for the board so I went back and started searching through this forum to find out that info.

Jerker, it was YOU! On Oct. 13, you advised us that you had checked county tax records and discovered Scot Miller was NOT on the document. All of a sudden "BHGRE" jumps in on Oct. 15, saying "HE sold Scot Miller the house." Now that wasn't the thing that was crossed the line. No, it was BHGRE's statement about: "It was OUTRAGEOUS FOR SOMEONE SO UNEDUCATED AS THE INDIVIDUAL WHO POSTED THIS, WOULD TRY TO DISCREDIT MR. MILLER."

Now Jerker, that was a comment that seemed to fit the profile of, say, some "JERK" like Scott Cosby. You know the JERK. He's the one that said for us to "SHOP PUBLIX, NOT KROGER." You know, he's that realtor dude!
THE ONE WHO MAKES THE UNPROFESSIONAL, IGNORANT STATEMENTS LIKE "SHOP PUBLIX, NOT KROGER.

Jerker, thanks for bringing this to our attention. It got off our minds until Candidate Tish, brought it to our attention again, at the election. I personally believe if she had been elected to the board, we would not only know how to proceed, but also, we'd have her support to make sure this is successful.

Since we know the board reads this forum and that means they have also provided their attorney (not ours) with this forum information, we really need to set a time, date to discuss this issue. Not that it's a secret because we want them to know we're coming after them to get this done.

Any ideas folks, on ways to proceed for us homeowners to handle our business?
happy hour cowboy

Newnan, GA

#566 Nov 26, 2012
If Jerker would identify his or her self, we should encourage to run for the board.
Smokecreen

Newnan, GA

#567 Nov 26, 2012
happy hour cowboy wrote:
If Jerker would identify his or her self, we should encourage to run for the board.
I second that.
Smokecreen

Newnan, GA

#569 Nov 26, 2012
WG, I too had read the CMA comments online a year ago. I too agree that employees are more than likely posting the positive, glowing comments. We hope that many people will start attending and volunteering on committees.

Everything that you have posted, is TRUE. Jerker, it' just not going to happen. We can barely get enough residents to vote. Good call, but not possible.(Unless it hits pockets!$$$)
Whoop Glory

Atlanta, GA

#570 Nov 26, 2012
To everyone that disagrees with those of us on this blog that attempt to shed light on unethical behavior and untruths formulated by the SG board and property management take note, read the reviews on CMA. Read them closely with an open mind. You will immediately see the similarities to what SG has also experienced. Also pay close attention to the dates of the posts. They have been out there for some time. Can so many people be wrong???

It is my personal opinion the property manager has become too close to several people which automatically creates a situation where the property manager cannot function objectively. She has lost her ability to be impartial because of her close personal relationships. Has anyone else noticed has sickening close and cozy Cosby sits to Darcy at monthly meetings? This is a corporation to serve the needs of the residents of SG. The property manager is here to serve the residents of SG, serve the needs of the board and direct the board when need. The property manager has turned her position into serving the needs of a select few. It’s time for a change. There are too many personal friendships that stand in the way of running this community and doing what’s best for this community.

The only way change will come about is for homeowners to be impacted and get involved in numbers. The last thing the board wants is for a large group of angry residents to show up at a meeting. The board claims they want resident involvement….but only on their terms. As long as you sit quietly and not oppose them they are content.
blind n-1 eye

Newnan, GA

#571 Nov 26, 2012
Smokecreen wrote:
WG, I too had read the CMA comments online a year ago. I too agree that employees are more than likely posting the positive, glowing comments. We hope that many people will start attending and volunteering on committees.
Everything that you have posted, is TRUE. Jerker, it' just not going to happen. We can barely get enough residents to vote. Good call, but not possible.(Unless it hits pockets!$$$)
You are right, as others are, about volunteering for committees and the one that deals with what committees get, is the budget committee. Let's say, that's where the dirt is done. At the festival, Ms. Tish was telling folks they should get on the budget committee, and now I see why that was said. It makes perfect sense after I saw a message on our
SG site, where the members of the budget committee names were mentioned. A budget committee members is now a chair and board member and we were waiting to see a reply to her message about steve, since he would always say you can't cut budgets. What the hell sense did that make? None. You can cut any budget out there. Request are request and have NO guarantee's for any committee, or at least they shouldn't unless you're SPECIAL! I want the Scott/Scot issue cleared up about the budget committee also. No wonder the question hasn't been answered. That's alright, I bet it won't die, and if it gets off someone's radar,my wife or myself will bring it up to make sure we get an answer
to that question. Every committee person, needs to be listed under each committee. You don't want your name on a committee, get the hell of the committee. We should know who the workers are.
I hope a LOT OF FOLKS turn out and get on the budget committee. That should put some brakes on some of the spending because a lot of eyes
would be watching what's going on.
Folks, I hope we all find some time to get involved, for our own good.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Newnan Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Newnan lawyer suspended for 6 months (Nov '14) Fri PULTE POLLUTES 14
The Freedom Foundation in Peachtree City (Nov '09) Thu Concerned and Scared 106
Deputies Smith and Sepanski murder handcuffed m... Aug 23 Left handed Pete 11
News This poor excuse didn't even last a year. (Jan '13) Aug 16 ZIONISM is Racism 3
fine doctors of newnan (Feb '11) Aug 12 General Patton 20
attorney (Jun '12) Aug 3 Lady In Black 4
News Long-serving Coweta chief judge to leave bench (Apr '12) Aug 3 Lady In Black 33

Newnan Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Newnan Mortgages