Bud released a drunk
First Prev
of 11
Next Last
Was for Bud

Iota, LA

#1 Jan 12, 2010
The toxicology report was released and the results were clear, Tori Gosserand was nearly times the legal limit. It does not matter what provision there was in the law, Bud released Tori and she was STILL DRUNK!!! Channel 2 released the results last night and this morning. There is no way anyone that drunk should have been released from jail. Bud owes this parish an apology and he needs to apologize to every victim and their faimilies that have been affected by drunk drivers. I feel no other sheriff would have released a visible drunk after they killed someone. I do not condone the actions of the judge for setting the bond, nor do I condone the actions of Mr. Laurent for having the property assessed. I applaud the actions of Lanel Landry who did not come out to record the bond, but it was the action of the Sheriff that allowed Tori to walk out of jail on an IMPROPER BOND. All Bud had to do to save his AZZ was to tell the Moores that the bond was not properly recorded and in order to get her out they would have to secure a cash bond or utilize a bails bondsman. Based on the alcohol limit of Tori, we are ALL lucky that more lives were not taken.

Since: Jan 10

United States

#2 Jan 12, 2010
I DIDN'T REALIZE NEWS CHANNELS WERE ALLOWED TO DRAW LEGAL BLOOD ALCOHOL'S ON PEOPLE...UNLESS U SEE THE RESULTS, WHICH U WILL NEVER, ARE ACTUALLY HERE IT FROM THE STATE POLICE OR AN AUTHORIZED PERSONAL KEEP YOUR F****** MOUTH SHUT. BY THE WAY HOW OLD ARE U? HAVEN'T U LEARNED THAT NEWS STATIONS WILL SAY ANYTHING EVEN IF IT IS FALSE ACCUSATIONS TO GET PEOPLE TO TUNE IN TO THEIR BROADCASTING.
MAKE US

Hammond, LA

#3 Jan 12, 2010
moneyhungryBitch-s wrote:
I DIDN'T REALIZE NEWS CHANNELS WERE ALLOWED TO DRAW LEGAL BLOOD ALCOHOL'S ON PEOPLE...UNLESS U SEE THE RESULTS, WHICH U WILL NEVER, ARE ACTUALLY HERE IT FROM THE STATE POLICE OR AN AUTHORIZED PERSONAL KEEP YOUR F****** MOUTH SHUT. BY THE WAY HOW OLD ARE U? HAVEN'T U LEARNED THAT NEWS STATIONS WILL SAY ANYTHING EVEN IF IT IS FALSE ACCUSATIONS TO GET PEOPLE TO TUNE IN TO THEIR BROADCASTING.
YOU MUST BE RELATED TO THE FAMILY. THE POLICE ALWAYS SAY THEY WERE OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT OR 2 OR 3 TIMES OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT. ANWAY, DIDN'T YOU SEE HER PICTURE ON THE NEWS, A FIRST GRADER CAN TELL SHE WAS ON ANOTHER PLANET. SO YOU KEEP YOUR NICE MOUTH SHUT.
GOOD DAY
Island Boy

Hammond, LA

#4 Jan 12, 2010
Was for Bud wrote:
The toxicology report was released and the results were clear, Tori Gosserand was nearly times the legal limit. It does not matter what provision there was in the law, Bud released Tori and she was STILL DRUNK!!! Channel 2 released the results last night and this morning. There is no way anyone that drunk should have been released from jail. Bud owes this parish an apology and he needs to apologize to every victim and their faimilies that have been affected by drunk drivers. I feel no other sheriff would have released a visible drunk after they killed someone. I do not condone the actions of the judge for setting the bond, nor do I condone the actions of Mr. Laurent for having the property assessed. I applaud the actions of Lanel Landry who did not come out to record the bond, but it was the action of the Sheriff that allowed Tori to walk out of jail on an IMPROPER BOND. All Bud had to do to save his AZZ was to tell the Moores that the bond was not properly recorded and in order to get her out they would have to secure a cash bond or utilize a bails bondsman. Based on the alcohol limit of Tori, we are ALL lucky that more lives were not taken.
Not trying to argue, but how do you know Bud signed the bond. Do you have proof of that. Mr. Laurent just did his job. He was asked to come in and assess the property. He didn't release her. If you know for sure who signed the bond please let us know.

Thank you
Potty mouth hater

United States

#5 Jan 12, 2010
Amen! You are exactly right - she should keep her potty mouth SHUT! All she and the others that are defending the drunk girl are doing is FEEDING THE PUBLIC OUTRAGE. I think I just changed my own mind - let them continue to enrage the public. And THEN we will see what is done with the girl. The pressure will intensify on the judge.
MAKE US wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU MUST BE RELATED TO THE FAMILY. THE POLICE ALWAYS SAY THEY WERE OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT OR 2 OR 3 TIMES OVER THE LEGAL LIMIT. ANWAY, DIDN'T YOU SEE HER PICTURE ON THE NEWS, A FIRST GRADER CAN TELL SHE WAS ON ANOTHER PLANET. SO YOU KEEP YOUR NICE MOUTH SHUT.
GOOD DAY

Since: Jan 10

United States

#6 Jan 12, 2010
A FIRST GRADER SHOULDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. WELL, A FIRST GRADER RAISED IN A NORMAL HOUSEHOLD!!!
Tee hee

Craigsville, VA

#7 Jan 13, 2010
Island Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not trying to argue, but how do you know Bud signed the bond. Do you have proof of that. Mr. Laurent just did his job. He was asked to come in and assess the property. He didn't release her. If you know for sure who signed the bond please let us know.
Thank you
Bud admitted on television he did it and that he would do it again if a person had "the means."
Observer

United States

#8 Jan 13, 2010
The news got it from the D.A. THe D.A. Got it from the State Police Crime lab.
moneyhungryBitch-s wrote:
I DIDN'T REALIZE NEWS CHANNELS WERE ALLOWED TO DRAW LEGAL BLOOD ALCOHOL'S ON PEOPLE...UNLESS U SEE THE RESULTS, WHICH U WILL NEVER, ARE ACTUALLY HERE IT FROM THE STATE POLICE OR AN AUTHORIZED PERSONAL KEEP YOUR F****** MOUTH SHUT. BY THE WAY HOW OLD ARE U? HAVEN'T U LEARNED THAT NEWS STATIONS WILL SAY ANYTHING EVEN IF IT IS FALSE ACCUSATIONS TO GET PEOPLE TO TUNE IN TO THEIR BROADCASTING.
Slim Jim

Baton Rouge, LA

#9 Jan 13, 2010
The Bond can not be filed until a mortgage certificate is done by the Clerk's office. This allows to see if there is enough equity in the property being put up to post a bond. If a clerk, assessor, and sheriff is called out to do a property bond, then it must be done. LL didn't go out because she does not do mortgage certificates. Although, she is in charge of that office and can dictate to any employee in there to do it, whether if it means coming out late at night or not. And at this point, it doesn't matter because the girl was let out of jail. It was wrong regardless who did what. By LL not doing her part really is moot at this point.
Was for Bud wrote:
The toxicology report was released and the results were clear, Tori Gosserand was nearly times the legal limit. It does not matter what provision there was in the law, Bud released Tori and she was STILL DRUNK!!! Channel 2 released the results last night and this morning. There is no way anyone that drunk should have been released from jail. Bud owes this parish an apology and he needs to apologize to every victim and their faimilies that have been affected by drunk drivers. I feel no other sheriff would have released a visible drunk after they killed someone. I do not condone the actions of the judge for setting the bond, nor do I condone the actions of Mr. Laurent for having the property assessed. I applaud the actions of Lanel Landry who did not come out to record the bond, but it was the action of the Sheriff that allowed Tori to walk out of jail on an IMPROPER BOND. All Bud had to do to save his AZZ was to tell the Moores that the bond was not properly recorded and in order to get her out they would have to secure a cash bond or utilize a bails bondsman. Based on the alcohol limit of Tori, we are ALL lucky that more lives were not taken.
EXCUSE ME

Ventress, LA

#10 Jan 13, 2010
Lanell Swindler Landry does not KNOW how to do a mortgage certificate, that is why she did not go out! She has been there for 10 YEARS and has never tried to learn the ins and outs of the office. IF she KNEW HOW to do a mortgage certificate she would have helped the Moore family. Check her contributions too!!! She is there to draw a check only.
Observer

Iota, LA

#12 Jan 13, 2010
Her BAC was nearly 4 times the legal limit, her property bond was not properly processed, SHE KILLED A PERSON. SHE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN JAIL. CASE CLOSED. The D.A. can't handle the case (friends with JM), The Sheriff couldn't keep her in jail (campaign financed by JM), The assessor opened his office on CHristmas Eve (Friends with JM), The judge set the bond (JM contributed to his campaign) WHO IS ON TERRI'S SIDE! THAT WOULD BE US!
Slim Jim wrote:
The Bond can not be filed until a mortgage certificate is done by the Clerk's office. This allows to see if there is enough equity in the property being put up to post a bond. If a clerk, assessor, and sheriff is called out to do a property bond, then it must be done. LL didn't go out because she does not do mortgage certificates. Although, she is in charge of that office and can dictate to any employee in there to do it, whether if it means coming out late at night or not. And at this point, it doesn't matter because the girl was let out of jail. It was wrong regardless who did what. By LL not doing her part really is moot at this point. <quoted text>
Island Boy

Hammond, LA

#13 Jan 13, 2010
Observer wrote:
Her BAC was nearly 4 times the legal limit, her property bond was not properly processed, SHE KILLED A PERSON. SHE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN JAIL. CASE CLOSED. The D.A. can't handle the case (friends with JM), The Sheriff couldn't keep her in jail (campaign financed by JM), The assessor opened his office on CHristmas Eve (Friends with JM), The judge set the bond (JM contributed to his campaign) WHO IS ON TERRI'S SIDE! THAT WOULD BE US! <quoted text>
And beleive me, a lot of us are on her side. If the s**t goes down the wrong way, then the s**t will hit the fan.
carma

Cottonport, LA

#14 Jan 13, 2010
The D.A. is not friends with J.M.
angel

Baton Rouge, LA

#15 Jan 14, 2010
Observer wrote:
The news got it from the D.A. THe D.A. Got it from the State Police Crime lab.<quoted text>
Where did you get this informatiom that this information was released by DA office?
Slim Jim

Baton Rouge, LA

#16 Jan 14, 2010
I agree with you 100-percent on everything you have said. And her BAC was 4 times the legal limit because she wasn't tested until later that morning. I think people running for an elected office should run with their own money and not the monies from other big contributors because they wouldn't owe any favors such as this big favor was done.
Observer wrote:
Her BAC was nearly 4 times the legal limit, her property bond was not properly processed, SHE KILLED A PERSON. SHE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN JAIL. CASE CLOSED. The D.A. can't handle the case (friends with JM), The Sheriff couldn't keep her in jail (campaign financed by JM), The assessor opened his office on CHristmas Eve (Friends with JM), The judge set the bond (JM contributed to his campaign) WHO IS ON TERRI'S SIDE! THAT WOULD BE US! <quoted text>
Slim Jim

Baton Rouge, LA

#17 Jan 14, 2010
They (all political leaders) should clock in. I wonder if they would how many hours would appear on their time card. I bet she (LL) wouldn't have a full day on her time card.
EXCUSE ME wrote:
Lanell Swindler Landry does not KNOW how to do a mortgage certificate, that is why she did not go out! She has been there for 10 YEARS and has never tried to learn the ins and outs of the office. IF she KNEW HOW to do a mortgage certificate she would have helped the Moore family. Check her contributions too!!! She is there to draw a check only.
Say What

United States

#18 Jan 14, 2010
Slim Jim wrote:
I agree with you 100-percent on everything you have said. And her BAC was 4 times the legal limit because she wasn't tested until later that morning. I think people running for an elected office should run with their own money and not the monies from other big contributors because they wouldn't owe any favors such as this big favor was done. <quoted text>
While that seems very logical and I agree in theory.... If that were the case, only the rich would hold office and that really isn't fair representation.
Slim Jim

Baton Rouge, LA

#19 Jan 14, 2010
Not if someone that is a working class person runs for it and votes are not bought and the real working people would stick together and vote for someone that wants to do the job and is not there for paycheck.
Say What wrote:
<quoted text> While that seems very logical and I agree in theory.... If that were the case, only the rich would hold office and that really isn't fair representation.
Observer

Iota, LA

#20 Jan 14, 2010
The D.A. advised the media that he is good friends with the family. I believe his words were "I know the Gosserand family very well." Who should we believe, you are the D.A.? If he did not know the family well why would he EVER consider removing himself and his office from the case?
carma wrote:
The D.A. is not friends with J.M.
Observer

Iota, LA

#21 Jan 14, 2010
If you don't believe me, ASK THE D.A.'s office. The D.A. requested that the media not use his name when reporting the toxicology report. Some D.A. he is. Ask HIM, PLEASE!!!!
angel wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did you get this informatiom that this information was released by DA office?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 11
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New Roads Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rod Dreher is on the cover of the latest Greate... (Apr '13) 7 hr settle down cleg 613
sonnys pizza Fri no name 1
Floodfrauders Aug 26 Wondering 1
Broadband, and why West Feliciana needs it (Sep '10) Aug 25 Warner 118
New Roads Snapchats... Let's swap and snap Aug 24 Louisiana69 1
Who will be the next mayor of new roads Aug 23 Big Dog 16
False River 22 Ft. at Light House Canal Aug 21 just me 6

New Roads Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New Roads Mortgages