Cover Up and Lies
Neighbor

Wheaton, IL

#1 Oct 3, 2012
Ok, now we all know.

We were lied to by Obama, and all his administration from day one on the Benghazi Embassy. Lied to all Americans, face to face, in the press, to all.

We now know they anticipated the attack, and provided no security. Our Ambassador requested security and Obama's team denied it. Now he and 3 other Americans are dead.

What do we do with a POTUS & his Administration caught dead to right with 15 days of lies and cover up? This is not a political tit for tat, this is deception of America at the highest level.

Where is the press on this? Even if you are a Dem, you too should be outraged!
Seal Message

Wheaton, IL

#2 Oct 3, 2012
Seal Message

Wheaton, IL

#3 Oct 3, 2012
Jack

Houston, TX

#4 Oct 3, 2012
Neighbor wrote:
Ok, now we all know.
We were lied to by Obama, and all his administration from day one on the Benghazi Embassy. Lied to all Americans, face to face, in the press, to all.
We now know they anticipated the attack, and provided no security. Our Ambassador requested security and Obama's team denied it. Now he and 3 other Americans are dead.
What do we do with a POTUS & his Administration caught dead to right with 15 days of lies and cover up? This is not a political tit for tat, this is deception of America at the highest level.
Where is the press on this? Even if you are a Dem, you too should be outraged!
I was outraged when Bush mislead us with all the yellow cakes of uranium so that he could get us a wat with Iraq. I was also outraged when they got plenty of warning from internal intelligence about bin Laden's plan to attack on 911, and they "provided no security". Tens of thousands of lives were lost due to that incompetent administration, so this is nothing. Heck, even if Obama killed the US ambassador himself on CNN, it's still nothing compared to what the neo-cons did to innocent american lives on 911 and bogus middleeastern "wars".

Save the drama, dude.
Chow

Lemont, IL

#5 Oct 3, 2012
Jack wrote:
<quoted text>I was outraged when Bush mislead us with all the yellow cakes of uranium so that he could get us a wat with Iraq. I was also outraged when they got plenty of warning from internal intelligence about bin Laden's plan to attack on 911, and they "provided no security". Tens of thousands of lives were lost due to that incompetent administration, so this is nothing. Heck, even if Obama killed the US ambassador himself on CNN, it's still nothing compared to what the neo-cons did to innocent american lives on 911 and bogus middleeastern "wars".

Save the drama, dude.
Another lie from your messiah is dismissed. Shame on YOU.
Neighbor

Wheaton, IL

#6 Oct 3, 2012
Jack just needs to e bitXched slaped is all.

Note how he cowardly avoids the facts on Obama. <LOL Darn spinless sissy for sure. No American would respond the way this girly man did. <lol

He's white static noise out here...

Duck and hide Jack... Duck and hide from the truth about Obama.
Professor

United States

#7 Oct 3, 2012
Jack wrote:
<quoted text>
I was outraged when Bush mislead us with all the yellow cakes of uranium so that he could get us a wat with Iraq. I was also outraged when they got plenty of warning from internal intelligence about bin Laden's plan to attack on 911, and they "provided no security". Tens of thousands of lives were lost due to that incompetent administration, so this is nothing. Heck, even if Obama killed the US ambassador himself on CNN, it's still nothing compared to what the neo-cons did to innocent american lives on 911 and bogus middleeastern "wars".
Save the drama, dude.
Bush was unaware of the attack, along with the pentagon. The pentagon was targeted Jack. Bush responded with action against our enemies. That made it possible for our military operations to find Bin Laden and kill him. Obama had NOTHING to do with the mission. As president he gave authority when informed. SURPRISINGLY. Thanks to BUSH going to war with our enemies the bin, laden mission was possible. Big difference from obama attempting to cover up the slaughtering of our Ambassador and military personel. They have our UN AMBASSADOR go on tv and LIE about a video provoking the attacks in light of the previous attacks against AMERICA carried out by muslims. Along with the leaders of the Muslim world calling for death to America. My 15 old son has more common sense than that. Shame on you and this Administration for allowing this to happen and then protecting our enemies in an attempt to cover up the truth. GOD BLESS OUR AMBASSADOR AND MILITARY PERSONEL. THE GOOD PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WILL NOT ALLOW THEIR DEATHS TO BE IN VAIN.
Jack

Houston, TX

#8 Oct 4, 2012
Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush was unaware of the attack, along with the pentagon. The pentagon was targeted Jack. Bush responded with action against our enemies. That made it possible for our military operations to find Bin Laden and kill him. Obama had NOTHING to do with the mission. As president he gave authority when informed. SURPRISINGLY. Thanks to BUSH going to war with our enemies the bin, laden mission was possible. Big difference from obama attempting to cover up the slaughtering of our Ambassador and military personel. They have our UN AMBASSADOR go on tv and LIE about a video provoking the attacks in light of the previous attacks against AMERICA carried out by muslims. Along with the leaders of the Muslim world calling for death to America. My 15 old son has more common sense than that. Shame on you and this Administration for allowing this to happen and then protecting our enemies in an attempt to cover up the truth. GOD BLESS OUR AMBASSADOR AND MILITARY PERSONEL. THE GOOD PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WILL NOT ALLOW THEIR DEATHS TO BE IN VAIN.
Bush responded by continuing to read "My Pet Goat". Nuff said.
Jack

Houston, TX

#9 Oct 4, 2012
Nearly 7,000 Americans are dead, and another 40,000 wounded... for what?

If you could rewind the clock back to Sept 12, 2001, would anyone seriouly make the decision to invade Iraq again? C'mon!?!?

A lot of people hate us over there, but we are breeding it and multiplying their hatred by our dumb imperialistic "wars".

I know stupid people like "professor retard" believe that Iraq was directly connected to Al Quaida because they're all brown people with weird religions, but I think anyone with a brain now knows that the Iraq invasion has nothing to do with the "war on terror". It was a war for oil, and shame on the Bush administration for using 911 as a catalyst for a "war" they were going to do anyway.

Furthermore, unless there is a Pakistani war that I missed in the news, occupying Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with killin bin Laden.

Had Al Gore won the election in 2000, I feel comfortable saying that we would have 7,000 less dead american soldiers, and nearly 50,000 less wounded, as well as having a more stable middle east. We wouldn't have wasted trillions in war and we would most likely not be as deep in the hole economically.

And if you really would follow the same footsteps that Bush did (and really Obama continuing to do), then I don't see how you can proclaim that you "support the troops".

In 25 years, history books are going to attribute Iraq and Afghanistan as huge blunders in American foreign policy.
Neighbor

La Grange Park, IL

#10 Oct 4, 2012
Jack, you are a foolish kid. You live in sound bite, and probably Stewart for "news". You are unaware or ignore the little school girls Sadam's son's would call in to rape them, the newly wed who's wife was raped in front of him, the 100's of mass graves found, the 15,000 Kurs who were murdered with a single biological attack, and the list goes on just on those points. Then the fact that Sadam funded & supported Alqueda training camps, and on & on that line. You see, if not for America, then who would stop all that. You pick the point that "every" intelligence source in the world agreed Sadam had WMD's, and we found insignificant evidence. But he did have 6 months to ship them to Syria too. But who knows. My point kid, is that there are a million sound reasons America did what it did, and the fight was on their land, not your neighborhood too.

Don't be a shoot, ready, aim minion. Look at all facts as an adult. It's all pretty serious stuff kid. You can guess & make up what "might" have happened, but that's pipedreaming. Me? If I practiced more, I bet I would be pitching for the Sox today. <Same logic as yours.... Your living self generated fairy tales kid. Serves no purpose.
Jack

Houston, TX

#11 Oct 4, 2012
Neighbor wrote:
Jack, you are a foolish kid. You live in sound bite, and probably Stewart for "news". You are unaware or ignore the little school girls Sadam's son's would call in to rape them, the newly wed who's wife was raped in front of him, the 100's of mass graves found, the 15,000 Kurs who were murdered with a single biological attack, and the list goes on just on those points. Then the fact that Sadam funded & supported Alqueda training camps, and on & on that line. You see, if not for America, then who would stop all that. You pick the point that "every" intelligence source in the world agreed Sadam had WMD's, and we found insignificant evidence. But he did have 6 months to ship them to Syria too. But who knows. My point kid, is that there are a million sound reasons America did what it did, and the fight was on their land, not your neighborhood too.
Don't be a shoot, ready, aim minion. Look at all facts as an adult. It's all pretty serious stuff kid. You can guess & make up what "might" have happened, but that's pipedreaming. Me? If I practiced more, I bet I would be pitching for the Sox today. <Same logic as yours.... Your living self generated fairy tales kid. Serves no purpose.
I don't know who you think I am, but I may be older than you.

And nobody is buying the load of crap that we went into Iraq for the poor, innocent Iraqi's. This is comical that Republicans, who don't even give 2 craps about the poor and sick in their own country, but we're supposed to believe that Bush went in for humanitarian reasons. Save it. If you want to talk real humanitarian atrocities going on in the world, we would be in Africa saving millions of lives instead of throwing a few bucks at them every year and watching that money end up in the wrong hands. Genocide and AID's in Africa are 10 times worse than Saddam's regime in Iraq. The problem with Africa is that they don't have our oil.

If I could resurrect Saddam Huesein, I would. I would tell him, sorry dude. Take your god forsaken crazy ass country back. At least he had some kind of order instead of the mass chaos and cluster-f%&k that we are going to leave the joint in.

Iraq was a mistake. Afghanistan was a mistake. We could have accomplished what we needed to accomplish without sending a couple hundred thousand troops over there and trillions of dollars. At this point, if we really wanted to win those "wars", we might as well throw an American flag in the sand and put 2 more stars on the flag. The second we leave, it's going to be 10 times worse than when we got over there.

Wise up old man.
My man mitt

Schererville, IN

#12 Oct 4, 2012
Jack wrote:
Nearly 7,000 Americans are dead, and another 40,000 wounded... for what?
If you could rewind the clock back to Sept 12, 2001, would anyone seriouly make the decision to invade Iraq again? C'mon!?!?
A lot of people hate us over there, but we are breeding it and multiplying their hatred by our dumb imperialistic "wars".
I know stupid people like "professor retard" believe that Iraq was directly connected to Al Quaida because they're all brown people with weird religions, but I think anyone with a brain now knows that the Iraq invasion has nothing to do with the "war on terror". It was a war for oil, and shame on the Bush administration for using 911 as a catalyst for a "war" they were going to do anyway.
Furthermore, unless there is a Pakistani war that I missed in the news, occupying Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with killin bin Laden.
Had Al Gore won the election in 2000, I feel comfortable saying that we would have 7,000 less dead american soldiers, and nearly 50,000 less wounded, as well as having a more stable middle east. We wouldn't have wasted trillions in war and we would most likely not be as deep in the hole economically.
And if you really would follow the same footsteps that Bush did (and really Obama continuing to do), then I don't see how you can proclaim that you "support the troops".
In 25 years, history books are going to attribute Iraq and Afghanistan as huge blunders in American foreign policy.
Thanks for the comments. Did reverend wrights church just let out?
Neighbor

La Grange Park, IL

#13 Oct 5, 2012
This is your brain, Jack is your brain on drugs. Can't imagime anyone that ignorant of facts, and argueing the fairy tales as he does. He's white static noise out here.I have to wonder how he got that way? Abbuse? Drugs? Prison? Cult? He makes no sense at all. For some reason I feel his parents dressed him in hockey gear, and made him ride the little bus to school too. Has to be...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

New Lenox Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Truth about what welfare is costing taxpaye... 17 min Bye Felica 11
A THIRD woman alleges she was sxually assaulted... 3 hr Teddy 6
Sparlkeys Commets o the DNC 5 hr AssYellowStreak 9
Law and Order 5 hr Going Home 18
Will the REAL Lway taxpayers unite! (Nov '15) 6 hr Northie 4,559
David Freiberger 9 hr Law n Order 9
"After Eight Years" 9 hr Alpha Male 11

New Lenox Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

New Lenox Mortgages