Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois in 2010?

[wayne easton]

to the COMMUNIST, to whom Reagan was a menace, I looked back at the posts, and I still fail to see you post your real name as I have. You could do all those things you give as excuses to me, but I AM NOT AFRAID BECAUSE I AM NOT A COWARD LIKE YOU. How about trying a SUBSTANTIVE discussion. IF you stop calling people names, using insults, ect. I will not call you a coward any more. BUT, if you continue to BULLY people, I will continue to show how small your knowledge really is , because I am educated, and if I want to, I will make you look like a FOOL.

[sticks and stones]

wayne easton wrote:

to the COMMUNIST, to whom Reagan was a menace, I looked back at the posts, and I still fail to see you post your real name as I have. You could do all those things you give as excuses to me, but I AM NOT AFRAID BECAUSE I AM NOT A COWARD LIKE YOU. How about trying a SUBSTANTIVE discussion. IF you stop calling people names, using insults, ect. I will not call you a coward any more. BUT, if you continue to BULLY people, I will continue to show how small your knowledge really is , because I am educated, and if I want to, I will make you look like a FOOL.

who cares if any one post there real name --come on get real nobody knows or cares if you use your real name--say what you got to say and move on ..

[wayne easton]

The fallacy of logic upon which you most often use is called "ad hominem", which is Latin. It has been recognized as false logic for over 2000 years. Almost all of the logic strategies that you attempt to use to "prove" your points are FALLACIES OF LOGIC, or in Joe's words, "malarky". I may just have to start breaking out my Latin to use against your pathetic rants. I may just start labeling each fallacy of logic that you use in Latin, then you can look it up and maybe actually learn something. If you are "educated", why do you use these empty fallacies of logic? You essentially say, 2 + 2 = 3, because zero is a number, then counting 0,1,....2,3 so 2+ 2=3. That would be a fallacy of logic. This is the type of sense you make. PLEASE SEE A DOCTOR, AND SHOW THEM YOUR POSTS, YOU NEED HELP.

[sticks and stones]

wayne easton wrote:

to the COMMUNIST, to whom Reagan was a menace, I looked back at the posts, and I still fail to see you post your real name as I have. You could do all those things you give as excuses to me, but I AM NOT AFRAID BECAUSE I AM NOT A COWARD LIKE YOU. How about trying a SUBSTANTIVE discussion. IF you stop calling people names, using insults, ect. I will not call you a coward any more. BUT, if you continue to BULLY people, I will continue to show how small your knowledge really is , because I am educated, and if I want to, I will make you look like a FOOL.

like how you use capital letters for fool yet use the baby ones for your last name- and cause the regan was a menace poster has you going of like a nut case --YOUR THE ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE A FOOL TO ME !! HA HA ..

[wayne easton]

To the communist to whom Reagan was a manace, if you continue to bully people, and make threats, I will continue to bully YOU and show the world YOUR deficiencies.

[wayne easton]

To "sticks and stones", people who display sociopathic tendencies usually like to try and harm people from a safe place, like anomynity, or from a place of greater physical strength, like a bully. If the communist to whom Reagan was a menace was to use his REAL name, like I do, then their "safety" is exposed. There may be repercussions to their rants if their peers know what they are saying. Just like the repercussions of a bully trying to pick on somebody their own size, it's no fun to get beat up after starting a fight, so bullies pick on ones that pose no threat to them, then it is fun. It is no fun to be publicly exposed as a TRUE MORON, just like a bully getting beat up after picking on someone they thought was an easy target. get it?

[wayne easton]

sticks and stones, you are now using the ad hominem. look it up. you have said nothing.

[wayne easton]

sticks and stones, exactly what have I posted that is "going of (sic)like a nut case", everything I have said is either historically true, or supported by the Federalist Papers. I have said nothing that is "nut"-like, only self-evident truths.

[wayne easton]

not threatening anyone, just making an analogy about bullying and posting from anonymity. Before someone makes hay, I misspelled the word before as I was typing fast and I have no spell check and noticed the word did not look right in my previous posts, anonymity not "anomynity". sorry for the misspelling.

[wayne easton]

I will leave the discussion with this quote by Patrick Henry, I believe it was, "Liberty requires ever-vigilence, and nothing can preserve it but downright force; whenever you give up that force, you are inevitibly ruined" good night.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't even know what you are talking about. But yet again no one probably does lol.

That's not an answer to my question, moron.

What;s the matter? Afraid to answer the question because it'll expose you for what you obviously are?

I'll ask again, again, again again ...

If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"

Isn't that right, moron?

Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?

Again, I'll bet you still won't!

That's FOUR cut-and-runs from my question there ... and counting.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

wayne easton wrote:

to whom Reagan was a menace, you call everyone on here a moron, and uneducated, but your sociopathic style of debate proves that in fact YOU are the one without a formal education, because true ACADEMICS do not engage in the juvenile banter in which you attack others personally. Why? Because in academic circles, you would be laughed at for using so many formally recognized fallacies of logic. Your small mind betrays your lies and your claims to be "educated". It is obvious that you have no education past 12th grade,if even that. If you were to use the same strategies in a paper, you would get an "F". Your own words prove that you are the UNEDUCATED.

Did you lose your balls after that first post TOUGH GUY?

I'll ask again coward ...

YES or NO?

Do you want my info bad enough to come and get it ... face to face? I'll show you my college degree when you're standing in front of me at the place I give YOU... on the date and time you give ME.

You say YES, then you get the location. Then you can give me the date and time.

See how simple that is?

That was strike two tough guy - you got one more chance to answer.

Still waiting with my college degree you gutless uneducated loudmouth ...

When will you be showing up?

[excuse me]

Hey wayne............STFU.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

wayne easton wrote:

To "sticks and stones", people who display sociopathic tendencies usually like to try and harm people from a safe place, like anomynity, or from a place of greater physical strength, like a bully. If the communist to whom Reagan was a menace was to use his REAL name, like I do, then their "safety" is exposed. There may be repercussions to their rants if their peers know what they are saying. Just like the repercussions of a bully trying to pick on somebody their own size, it's no fun to get beat up after starting a fight, so bullies pick on ones that pose no threat to them, then it is fun. It is no fun to be publicly exposed as a TRUE MORON, just like a bully getting beat up after picking on someone they thought was an easy target. get it?

Anonymity? Why do you choose to not show up to get my info from me?

Well, coward?

Tell us all won't you?

Now I'll ask again again coward ...

YES or NO?

Do you want my info bad enough to come and get it ... face to face? I'll show you my college degree when you're standing in front of me at the place I give YOU... on the date and time you give ME.

You say YES, then you get the location. Then you can give me the date and time.

See how simple that is TOUGH GUY?

That was strike three.

I'm just gonna keep goin' here ... and expose your mangina to everyone on here.

Still waiting ...

[Reagan was a MENACE]

wayne easton wrote:

To the communist to whom Reagan was a menace,here is your logical reason for owning "assault" weapons. IF you had been educated in history, you would know that Stalin killed @60 MILLION, Mao killed @25 MILLION, Pol Pot killed @2 MILLION, all in the name of your beloved COMMUNISM. If you were educated, you would know that the United States is UNIQUE in the world, in that We the people, WITH FIREARMS, are the sovereign of this REPUBLIC. This nation, this land, and this Republic are OURS. It is not owned by the GOVERNMENT. We need these firearms and their necessary drums and magazines of high capacity so that sociopathic people like you, a communist, are never able to separate us from our rights, which NO MAJORITY, can do. This is a REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY. You talk about "gunning down" the other poster's parents!!!
You prove my point every time you post. Even Democrats on here can tell that YOU ARE just as disturbed as any potential "shooter". Please go to a doctor and show them your posts, before you lose it.

You stupid, paranoid POS ...

You need to work on your literacy there coward.

I already addressed your bullshit "logical" reason in an earlier post. But we know your parent were CONSERVATIVE with your home-schooling.

You Fox News idiots have already been reduced to repeating already debunked talking points.

Your guns won't do SHIT vs a government that has canons, tanks, drones, laser-guided missiles.

Translation: If the govt decides AT ANY TIME that they want you gun nuts gone? Guess what TOUGH GUY?

YOU'RE GONE!

And I'm partying while it happens.

But let me guess ... now you think that you should have those weapons too now because the "big bad communist socialist government!" has them?

And again, like I already pointed out in another prior post ...

Repeat this as many times as you need to ... or as high as you can count, whichever comes first - and I'm gonna go with the latter on this one:

I don't have a gun. And I don't need a gun.

At all!

Why?

Because I've been trained to use my hands and feet, coward.

Why do you think you won't show up to get that info you said you wanted so badly?

And speaking of that info ... I'll ask again, coward ...

YES or NO?

Do you want my info bad enough to come and get it ... face to face? I'll show you my college degree when you're standing in front of me at the place I give YOU... on the date and time you give ME.

You say YES, then you get the location. Then you can give me the date and time.

See how simple that is TOUGH GUY?

You're 0-4.

I'm just gonna keep goin' here ... and expose your mangina to everyone on here.

Still waiting ...

[Reagan was a MENACE]

wayne easton wrote:

to the COMMUNIST, to whom Reagan was a menace, I looked back at the posts, and I still fail to see you post your real name as I have. You could do all those things you give as excuses to me, but I AM NOT AFRAID BECAUSE I AM NOT A COWARD LIKE YOU. How about trying a SUBSTANTIVE discussion. IF you stop calling people names, using insults, ect. I will not call you a coward any more. BUT, if you continue to BULLY people, I will continue to show how small your knowledge really is , because I am educated, and if I want to, I will make you look like a FOOL.

I'll ask again, coward ...

YES or NO?

Do you want my info bad enough to come and get it ... face to face? I'll show you my college degree when you're standing in front of me at the place I give YOU... on the date and time you give ME.

You say YES, then you get the location. Then you can give me the date and time.

See how simple that is TOUGH GUY?

You're 0-5.

I'm just gonna keep goin' here ... and expose your mangina to everyone on here.

Still waiting ...

You might want to take bullying lessons in the meantime - because you suck at it!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

excuse me wrote:

Hey wayne..........STFU.

LOL! That just might work ...

It'll take him a day or so to figure out what STFU means. And that won't happen until he stops his bunny slippers from fighting.

I'd just enjoy the silence for a little while!

[John316]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not an answer to my question, moron.
What;s the matter? Afraid to answer the question because it'll expose you for what you obviously are?
I'll ask again, again, again again ...
If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you andp your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"
Isn't that right, moron?
Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?
Again, I'll bet you still won't!
That's FOUR cut-and-runs from my question there ... and counting.

What a moron..we should all just give up our constitutional right to own a gun to make some liberal feel good. Tell you what, ill give up my right to an assault weapon when the libs give up the right to free speech and the so called constitutional right to an abortion! Ain't gonna happen! A liberal can't keep its mouth shut!

[Largelanguage]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not an answer to my question, moron.
What;s the matter? Afraid to answer the question because it'll expose you for what you obviously are?
I'll ask again, again, again again ...
If anyone had taken guns out of this kid's household BEFORE it happened I GUARANTEE YOU that you and your POS, gun-rights buddies would have screamed how a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot was victimized for just exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!"
Isn't that right, moron?
Care to answer that question without lying your ass off?
Again, I'll bet you still won't!
That's FOUR cut-and-runs from my question there ... and counting.

No, we wouldn't, he has no right to steal.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
No, we wouldn't, he has no right to steal.

That's not an answer to my question, you mono-syllabic moron.

I'll even use CAPS this time to try to point out how idiotic your statement is.

"No, we wouldn't, he has no right to steal."

Who is "he", moron?

Why is it every time you give an answer it only compounds the stupidity in your responses, moron?

If you're trying to say that "Nobody has the right to take that kid's guns!" then you answered exactly how I thought you would. And I'll have to assume you did here since getting a simple answer from you is (as with all idiots who need reality fed to them through their Fox News umbilical cord) completely impossible.

You just admitted that you wouldn't have done a damn thing to prevent this kid from getting his hands on that weapon even though the kid was (in YOUR own words here) "psychologically damaged" and "emotionally troubled". And you just admitted you would let him KEEP that weapon too.

These are the people who's gun rights you stick up for? The kind you want to carry around assault weapons that can massacre school kids? Even AFTER such massacres have already happened ... and recently too?

So let me point this out to everybody on here: knowing what he would have done a day before his rampage you STILL WOULD LET HIM HAVE ACCESS TO THAT GUN?

You're pathetic!

Someone should have made you attend the autopsy of all those kids that were killed - every one of them - so you can see first-hand what letting a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!" does when he's a KNOWN MENTAL CASE and (OOPS!) suddenly decides to no longer be a "100% law abiding, flag-waving patriot exercising his Constitutionally-protected right to have guns!".

I can't beat down on here any lower than you already are.

YOU'RE DISMISSED.

Now go slap your parents for having had you.