Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,148

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#228888 Feb 7, 2014
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio wrote:
<quoted text>
Why donchoo share?
'Cause I'm a horny old bull!

There were two bulls standing on top of a mountain. The young one says to the old one: "Hey pop, let's say we run down there and f*** one of them cows". The older one says: "Naah. Lets walk down and f***'em all".

Ah good times! Getting old is a lot of fun. Shot my first turkey right before Thanksgiving. Scared the sh!t out of everyone in the frozen food department!
Jake

Los Angeles, CA

#228890 Feb 7, 2014
The Homo activists didn't last long in Russia. Cops were ont them like stink on shit. Too bad our government is weak where it wants to be.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#228891 Feb 7, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say you're just an old dude full of bull!
That too. Ah good times!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228892 Feb 8, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL,
1. Where did I claim any of those things (Clearly a blonde 3 digit IQ...)?
2. Ah, there goes your crowd thinking again. The whole idea of marriage is fidelity. It's called adultery when you break the vow.
3. "We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner v Oklahoma
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival."- Loving v Virginia
"Our Court has not recognized a fundamental right to marry that departs in any respect from the right defined by the US Supreme Court in cases like Skinner which acknowledged that marriage is "fundamental to the very existence and survival of the [human] race" because it is the primary institution supporting procreation and child-rearing (316 US at 541; see also Zablocki, 434 US 374; Griswold, 381 US 479). The binary nature of marriage—its inclusion of one woman and one man—reflects the biological fact that human procreation cannot be accomplished without the genetic contribution of both a male and a female. Marriage creates a supportive environment for procreation to occur and the resulting offspring to be nurtured. Although plaintiffs suggest that the connection between procreation and marriage has become anachronistic because of scientific advances in assisted reproduction technology, the fact remains that the vast majority of children are conceived naturally through sexual contact between a woman and a man."- Hernandez v Robels
"It is an institution in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress. "- Maynard v Hill
4. http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmit ...
Blonde...
Smile.
Six_Of_One wrote:
<quoted text>
FACT #1) sex is not a requirement of marriage
FACT #2) marriage is not a requirement for sex
Got it? One more time, I know you need it....
.
FACT #1) sex is not a requirement of marriage
FACT #2) marriage is not a requirement for sex
Still confused???? Well??
.
And do you think calling me blonde is some sort of insult? Really? Clueless wonder that you are....! Bless your simple mind.
Now, smile!
Dumbing down on Blonde?

One more time, I know you need it...

ss marriage is an oxymoron.

Smile.
Fargo

Sierra Madre, CA

#228893 Feb 8, 2014
Dead horses are re killed on a hourly bases.
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#228895 Feb 8, 2014
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Wake up you fool. There are way more perverts in the homosexual sector than any other. There are way too many homo's in the teaching field for example as YOU can not deny, Why is this? The homo cult is bad for America.
Sorry Jake. Get over it or leave.
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#228896 Feb 8, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
What a gay claim! The last thing straights think about when getting married is a 'legal contract'.
Go get a lawyer if you want a legal contract.
Smirk.
Marriage is a legal contract, whether you admit it or not. Denying reality doesn't change reality. No lawyer required.

More bad news for you wackos: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/us/more-fed...
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#228897 Feb 8, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL,
1. Where did I claim any of those things (Clearly a blonde 3 digit IQ...)?
2. Ah, there goes your crowd thinking again. The whole idea of marriage is fidelity. It's called adultery when you break the vow.
3. "We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner v Oklahoma
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival."- Loving v Virginia
"Our Court has not recognized a fundamental right to marry that departs in any respect from the right defined by the US Supreme Court in cases like Skinner which acknowledged that marriage is "fundamental to the very existence and survival of the [human] race" because it is the primary institution supporting procreation and child-rearing (316 US at 541; see also Zablocki, 434 US 374; Griswold, 381 US 479). The binary nature of marriage—its inclusion of one woman and one man—reflects the biological fact that human procreation cannot be accomplished without the genetic contribution of both a male and a female. Marriage creates a supportive environment for procreation to occur and the resulting offspring to be nurtured. Although plaintiffs suggest that the connection between procreation and marriage has become anachronistic because of scientific advances in assisted reproduction technology, the fact remains that the vast majority of children are conceived naturally through sexual contact between a woman and a man."- Hernandez v Robels
"It is an institution in the maintenance of which in its purity the public is deeply interested, for it is the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress. "- Maynard v Hill
4. http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmit...
Blonde...
Smile.
The Defense of Marriage Act, the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages legalized by the states, is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday by a 5-4 vote.

"The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. "By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment."

Windsor v U.S.

SMIRK

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228898 Feb 8, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a legal contract, whether you admit it or not. Denying reality doesn't change reality. No lawyer required.
More bad news for you wackos: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/us/more-fed...
4

What a gay claim! The last thing straights think about when getting married is a 'legal contract'.
Go get a lawyer if you want a legal contract.
Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#228899 Feb 8, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
The Defense of Marriage Act, the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages legalized by the states, is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday by a 5-4 vote.
"The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. "By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment."
Windsor v U.S.
SMIRK
Reality ruled that ss couples are only ever mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered halves of marriage making ss marriage an oxymoron.

No court can overrule reality.

Smile.
Ooops

Sierra Madre, CA

#228900 Feb 8, 2014
Dead horses are re killed on a hourly bases, oops there goes another one.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#228901 Feb 8, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say you're just an old dude full of bull! And is that how you see women? Just a crowd waiting for the picking? That's disgusting. We are not here for your entertainment.
You're not?.....damn.....Clearly, there's been a communications error.....
Jake

Los Angeles, CA

#228902 Feb 8, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Jake. Get over it or leave.
Is that the best you can do X? Like all other homosexuals, you can't handle the truth.
Smiles

Sierra Madre, CA

#228904 Feb 8, 2014
Didn't you get a happy meal with your happy ending?
Cali Girl 14

Idyllwild, CA

#228905 Feb 9, 2014
Jake wrote:
The Homo activists didn't last long in Russia. Cops were ont them like stink on shit. Too bad our government is weak where it wants to be.
Ya they will sue everyone huh?
Hand shake

Sierra Madre, CA

#228906 Feb 9, 2014
I heard there are special hand shakes going around?
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#228908 Feb 9, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality ruled that ss couples are only ever mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered halves of marriage making ss marriage an oxymoron.
No court can overrule reality.
Smile.
The Court counts, you don't. waa..... waa...... waaa..........
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#228909 Feb 9, 2014
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that the best you can do X? Like all other homosexuals, you can't handle the truth.
Your post wasn't true. But then when did you phobes care about providing factual data to back up your claims. You don't because there isn't any proof. That's why you lose in court.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#228910 Feb 9, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post wasn't true. But then when did you phobes care about providing factual data to back up your claims. You don't because there isn't any proof.
Oh the irony.

Judged:

24

24

24

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Hand shake

Sierra Madre, CA

#228911 Feb 9, 2014
I heard there are special hand shakes going around?
It's called, winner take all.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nevada City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Linden High School remembers Pearl Harbor Dec 7 SHlTWORMDAEGUDEBD... 3
Nevada County Food Bank to Stop Distribution in... Dec 2 Jessie 1
Patient blacklisting happens (Jul '06) Nov 30 Grady Henderson 31
Review: DI Pietro Windy Noreen MFT Oct '14 Melonnee Desiree ... 1
Review: No Problem Oct '14 GoldCountry Roofing 1
'Little Shop of Horrors', a cult classic, bloss... Sep '14 Zombella 1
East Palo Alto's Highway 101 Ped/Bike Bridge Al... Aug '14 fishes 1
Nevada City Dating
Find my Match

Nevada City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Nevada City News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Nevada City

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:33 pm PST