Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

UnTill

San Dimas, CA

#193970 May 31, 2013
How Well Do You Know Your Sex Laws?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#193972 May 31, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're saying that a straight man would want to marry a lesbian--a woman who would NOT have sex with him?
You assume she would not want to have sex with him.
I'm sure there are men who would like to marry a bisexual woman. But would you want your son to marry a bisexual woman who brings other women into the home--in front of your grandkids?
No, after the grand kids are in bed silly rabbit. Seriously Very Red, there are standards.

Suppose the bisexual woman wanted a husband and a wife, would u support that as a "fundamental right"? After all there is a "B" in LGBT. Why aren't those letters in alphabetical order?
I realize you're being an idiot, but I felt compelled to point out how ridiculous your comment was.
As someone who supports the rights of the LGBT community, you seem to be against mixed orientation marriages. Are you suggesting the state prohibit such marriages?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193973 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume she would not want to have sex with him.
<quoted text>
No, after the grand kids are in bed silly rabbit. Seriously Very Red, there are standards.
Suppose the bisexual woman wanted a husband and a wife, would u support that as a "fundamental right"? After all there is a "B" in LGBT. Why aren't those letters in alphabetical order?
<quoted text>
As someone who supports the rights of the LGBT community, you seem to be against mixed orientation marriages. Are you suggesting the state prohibit such marriages?
Probably he is, he'll just add it to his list of banned marriages right under polygamy. Then say we have marriage equality because SSM is allowed.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193974 May 31, 2013
UnTill wrote:
How Well Do You Know Your Sex Laws?
You're getting creepier and creepier.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#193975 May 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah right. That's what he meant VV. Sure.
I realize you're being an idiot, but I felt compelled to point out how ridiculous your comment was.
Hey, he's the one who seems to be in favor of gay people entering into sham marriages with straight people. I was simply pointing out how stupid his comment was. Not sure why you're coming after me. You need to get your buddy in check.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#193976 May 31, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, he's the one who seems to be in favor of gay people entering into sham marriages with straight people. I was simply pointing out how stupid his comment was. Not sure why you're coming after me. You need to get your buddy in check.
You misrepresent my words. Please retread what I wrote. Are you opposed to mixed orientation marriages in which both parties freely consent? Should the state prohibit such marriages?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193977 May 31, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, he's the one who seems to be in favor of gay people entering into sham marriages with straight people. I was simply pointing out how stupid his comment was. Not sure why you're coming after me. You need to get your buddy in check.
Because you're being dishonest. He never said or implied he wanted his bisexual wife to bring home sex partners in front of her children.
FpizzoS

San Dimas, CA

#193978 May 31, 2013
The T2 tard's are posting like crazy today!

Just because the owners of Chick-fil-A's are backwards and live in a mental deficient world.

Staying away from locations like this and Papas Johns might be a good thing to do, it might be catching.

They have serious mental problem to over come, poverty will help them a lot. FpizzoS to you too!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#193979 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
You assume she would not want to have sex with him.
<quoted text>
No, after the grand kids are in bed silly rabbit. Seriously Very Red, there are standards.
Suppose the bisexual woman wanted a husband and a wife, would u support that as a "fundamental right"? After all there is a "B" in LGBT. Why aren't those letters in alphabetical order?
<quoted text>
As someone who supports the rights of the LGBT community, you seem to be against mixed orientation marriages. Are you suggesting the state prohibit such marriages?
A lesbian is someone who is attracted to women only. That's why it's safe to assume that a lesbian would not want to have sex with a man.

A bisexual woman might be interested in marrying a man, if she developed a close, personal relationship with him.

I'm not sure why the "B" comes after "L" and "G". Not so long ago the community was referred to as "GLBT". But many believed that it was somewhat discriminatory to place the "G" before the "L". So, that's why you see it written this way.

I can't imagine a "mixed orientation marriage", although I know that they have occurred.

Many closeted gay people enter into marriages with someone of the opposite gender for a variety of reasons. Maybe they feel pressured by their family or community. Maybe they hope they'll change their attractions if they marry someone of the opposite gender.

There are those guys who marry a woman and then sneak out behind their wife's back to have sex with guys. I think it's referred to as being on the "down low".

And I'm sure there have been marriages between gay men and gay women--for show or to get insurance benefits or some other secondary gain.

Nevertheless, a mixed orientation marriage wouldn't likely be mutually satisfying.

I can't imagine being married to a woman. I've never been sexually attracted to women. And I think it would be a shitty thing to do to a woman--to marry her under false pretenses.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#193980 May 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Because you're being dishonest. He never said or implied he wanted his bisexual wife to bring home sex partners in front of her children.
Then why would a man want to marry a lesbian? That's what he said. He said that many men would like the idea of marrying a lesbian. Wouldn't that imply that the lesbian would bring home other women?
Bud Longneck

Rock Island, IL

#193981 May 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So he does.
Priceless!
LOL still hoping to be voted as biggest tard in the US? You have my vote
Bud Shorts

San Dimas, CA

#193982 May 31, 2013
Bud Shorts needs a refill.
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#193983 May 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Third rate smartass jackass says what?
Ok I guess you are stuck on stupid.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

#193984 May 31, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
You misrepresent my words. Please retread what I wrote. Are you opposed to mixed orientation marriages in which both parties freely consent? Should the state prohibit such marriages?
No and no. Now give it a rest.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193985 May 31, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why would a man want to marry a lesbian? That's what he said. He said that many men would like the idea of marrying a lesbian. Wouldn't that imply that the lesbian would bring home other women?
No. It does not imply anyone would bring home sex partners in front of their children.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193986 May 31, 2013
Bud Longneck wrote:
<quoted text>LOL still hoping to be voted as biggest tard in the US? You have my vote
Does it say I'm hoping to be voted "biggest tard in the US" Flash? Read it again. Sound it out. Think real hard. Ask for help.

Remember! There are no stupid posts. Only stupid posters such as yourself.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193987 May 31, 2013
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok I guess you are stuck on stupid.
Hey Bruno you third rate circus clown, always meaning to ask you, did you enjoy or resent the way Sasha Baron Cohen portrayed you in the movie?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#193988 May 31, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
No and no. Now give it a rest.
Are you going to blow your stack again tonight? Get all angry and sh!t? Have another cute little sissy-fit?
Bud Longneck

Rock Island, IL

#193989 May 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm hoping to be voted "biggest tard in the US"
You have my Vote. Frankie, biggest tard in the US.
Bud Shorts

San Dimas, CA

#193991 May 31, 2013
Bud Shorts says; get a long ya little doggies.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Nevada City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Holiday boutique! Nov 30 Jess 1
does clint walker live here (Sep '10) Nov 23 Joanna 10
News Home Invasion Robbery Near Nevada City (Dec '15) Oct '16 Stop murdeters 10
News Double Down (May '16) Jul '16 mothballs r okay 6
News Fatality Accident on Banner Mountain Claims Lif... (Aug '15) Sep '15 Vanessa 2
News Court Wrap: Restitution hearing postponed in Ye... (May '15) Jun '15 stolen from by Huni 3
News Amgen Tour of California route to traverse Neva... (Jan '15) May '15 cgross1010 2

Nevada City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Nevada City Mortgages