Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Xavier Breath]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Welcome to the conclusion that everyone else has already come to.
( chuckle )

Well..... he's not smart enough to lie. I think he's just crazy and uneducated.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

Well, off to physical therapy.
You clowns try real hard to construct a cogent argument against marriage equality while I'm gone.
You know something better than "STFU Mormon boy!!" Or "no you don't, you're lying!"
Buncha dummies.

We will be discussing the overturn of Prop 8 instead :)

[Lancers]

Defactoo bull.

[Big D]

Xavier Breath wrote:

<quoted text>
Well..... he's not smart enough to lie. I think he's just crazy and uneducated.

Well the lying part is his saying he is in favor of same sex marriage, and then attacks anyone else that is in favor of it and desperately trying to change the subject to poly, which later he says he doesn’t actually care about, but only how he can use that topic to attack anyone in favor of same sex marriage.

He twists and turns so often I don’t think he knows what he is for or against.

[Jazybird58]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

Well, off to mental therapy.

You bet

[Xavier Breath]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Well the lying part is his saying he is in favor of same sex marriage, and then attacks anyone else that is in favor of it and desperately trying to change the subject to poly, which later he says he doesn’t actually care about, but only how he can use that topic to attack anyone in favor of same sex marriage.
He twists and turns so often I don’t think he knows what he is for or against.

Exactly. Brain damage.

[Big D]

I am curious... when are we expecting the Supremes’ to rule on Prop 8 ... was it June?

[RalphB]

Big D wrote:

I am curious... when are we expecting the Supremes’ to rule on Prop 8 ... was it June?

I may be wrong, but I think they will hear arguments in March, and make their ruling public in June. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

[nothing]

SameOseeds of loonies.

[Big D]

RalphB wrote:

<quoted text>
I may be wrong, but I think they will hear arguments in March, and make their ruling public in June. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

don’t know, I think you may be right.

The big question will be, not which way they rule, that is fairly obvious ( at least to me ), but how broad the ruling will be, affecting only California, or affecting all states.

I personally expect the narrower ruling, but still hold hope for the wider ruling
I

[Pietro Armando]

Big D wrote:

I am curious... when are we expecting the Supremes’ to rule on Prop 8 ... was it June?

Why would Diana Ross rule on that?:)

[GOP idiots]

Whats even more shameful is the facts this lousy piece of DUNG and his party of idiots will be shutting down the government and the VA because they are just plain stupid.

They have and are ruining this country.

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (BAY'-nur) is a pathtic piece of DUNG and he can't learn to shut his stinking mouth.

Boehner also says the compensation claims backlog remains alarmingly high nationally and in Ohio. He says system failures reported by Ohio veterans are shameful, like his filthy mouth shameful.

[Big D]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would Diana Ross rule on that?:)

LOL :D

[Big D]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would Diana Ross rule on that?:)

I posted that as a joke of course, but it got me thinking ( never a good thing ) about titles and how we address people, you know our founders disagreed on how the president should be addressed.

"The 1787 Constitution of the United States did not specify the manner of address for the chief executive. When George Washington was sworn in as the first President of the United States in 1789, he initially used the style, "His High Mightiness, the President of the United States and Protector of their Liberties," a title elaborated by the Joint Congressional Committee on titles over the course of a month. Critics charged that it smacked of monarchy. Washington consented to the demands of James Madison and the United States House of Representatives that the title be altered to "Mr. President." The first Vice President of the United States and the second President, John Adams, felt the title showed too little deference and lacked prestige, but he was unsuccessful in replacing it."

Off topic... but interesting anyway

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW, when did I claim- IKYABWAI was a word?

Stupid, you said,
"I suggest you grab a REAL dictionary and look up the big words you don't understand." This implies you thought "IKYABWAI" was a (big) word.
LOL! You can't twist your way out of this! Damn, you are dumb!

And again, dummy, the Urban Dictionary is a fine resource for finding the meanings of acronyms used on the internet.

[Brian_G]

Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:

whatever

Lil started it.

[Xavier Breath]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would Diana Ross rule on that?:)

She is the boss.

[Rose_NoHo]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to understand 'context'. I was speaking of the PRIMARY EXPRESSION of intimacy as designed by nature. For heteros' it is intercourse. They have the default option of anal sex. It is rarely exercised by hetero's. Gays have only the default option. Inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
Smirk.

You don't seem to know what "default" means, stupid. And gay people have other options. And, stupid, anal sex isn't inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

[Rose_NoHo]

Pietro Armando wrote:

<quoted text>
How would "consummation" be defined as in the "marriage was consummated"?

Who cares?
IF it really were an issue, the definition could just be that the couple engages in a sexual act.
What is your point?

[Frankie Rizzo]

Jazybird58 wrote:

<quoted text>I dishonestly change people's people's posts because I am a dumbass who cannot argue intelligently.

You bet!