Comments
1 - 20 of 21 Comments Last updated Jan 8, 2013
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Evil White Guy

Memphis, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd— she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said,“I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and “It will be carefully focused.” Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, she said on Dec. 21st that she had personally looked at pictures of guns in 1993, and again in 2012.
According to a Dec. 27th posting on Sen. Feinstein’s website and a draft of the bill obtained by NRA-ILA, the new ban would, among other things, adopt new definitions of “assault weapon” that would affect a much larger variety of firearms, require current owners of such firearms to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act, and require forfeiture of the firearms upon the deaths of their current owners. Some of the changes in Feinstein’s new bill are as follows:
• Reduces, from two to one, the number of permitted external features on various firearms. The 1994 ban permitted various firearms to be manufactured only if they were assembled with no more than one feature listed in the law. Feinstein’s new bill would prohibit the manufacture of the same firearms with even one of the features.
• Adopts new lists of prohibited external features. For example, whereas the 1994 ban applied to a rifle or shotgun the “pistol grip” of which “protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon,” the new bill would drastically expand the definition to include any “grip ... or any other characteristic that can function as a grip.” Also, the new bill adds “forward grip” to the list of prohibiting features for rifles, defining it as “a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as a pistol grip.” Read literally and in conjunction with the reduction from two features to one, the new language would apply to every detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifle. At a minimum, it would, for example, ban all models of the AR-15, even those developed for compliance with California’s highly restrictive ban.
• Carries hyperbole further than the 1994 ban. Feinstein’s 1994 ban listed “grenade launcher” as one of the prohibiting features for rifles. Her 2013 bill carries goes even further into the ridiculous, by also listing “rocket launcher.” Such devices are restricted under the National Firearms Act and, obviously, are not standard components of the firearms Feinstein wants to ban. Perhaps a subsequent Feinstein bill will add “nuclear bomb,”“particle beam weapon,” or something else equally far-fetched to the features list.
• Expands the definition of “assault weapon” by including:
• Three very popular rifles: The M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944 and for many years sold by the federal government to individuals involved in marksmanship competition), a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the SKS.
• Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.
• Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel.
Merry Xmas

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

good
Happy New Year

Ferriday, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Very Good About Time
Evil White Guy

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

· Requires owners of existing “assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm, and requires an owner to submit photographs and fingerprints to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), to inform the BATFE of the address where the firearm will be kept, and to obtain the BATFE’s permission to transport the firearm across state lines.

· Prohibits the transfer of “assault weapons.” Owners of other firearms, including those covered by the NFA, are permitted to sell them or pass them to heirs. However, under Feinstein’s new bill,“assault weapons” would remain with their current owners until their deaths, at which point they would be forfeited to the government.

· Prohibits the domestic manufacture and the importation of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The 1994 ban allowed the importation of such magazines that were manufactured before the ban took effect. Whereas the 1994 ban protected gun owners from errant prosecution by making the government prove when a magazine was made, the new ban includes no such protection. The new ban also requires firearm dealers to certify the date of manufacture of any >10-round magazine sold, a virtually impossible task, given that virtually no magazines are stamped with their date of manufacture.

· Targets handguns in defiance of the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects the right to have handguns for self-defense, in large part on the basis of the fact handguns are the type of firearm “overwhelmingly chosen by American society for that lawful purpose.” Semi-automatic pistols, which are the most popular handguns today, are designed to use detachable magazines, and the magazines “overwhelmingly chosen” by Americans for self-defense are those that hold more than 10 rounds. Additionally, Feinstein’s list of nearly 1,000 firearms exempted by name (see next paragraph) contains not a single handgun. Sen. Feinstein advocated banning handguns before being elected to the Senate, though she carried a handgun for her own personal protection.

· Contains a larger piece of window dressing than the 1994 ban. Whereas the 1994 ban included a list of approximately 600 rifles and shotguns exempted from the ban by name, the new bill’s list is increased to nearly 1,000 rifles and shotguns. Other than for the 11 detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles and one other semi-automatic rifle included in the list, however, the list appears to be pointless, because a separate provision of the bill exempts “any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.”
Evil White Guy

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

The Department of Justice study. On her website, Feinstein claims that a study for the DOJ found that the 1994 ban resulted in a 6.7 percent decrease in murders. To the contrary, this is what the study said:“At best, the assault weapons ban can have only a limited effect on total gun murders, because the banned weapons and magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders. Our best estimate is that the ban contributed to a 6.7 percent decrease in total gun murders between 1994 and 1995.... However, with only one year of post-ban data, we cannot rule out the possibility that this decrease reflects chance year-to-year variation rather than a true effect of the ban. Nor can we rule out effects of other features of the 1994 Crime Act or a host of state and local initiatives that took place simultaneously.”

“Assault weapon” numbers and murder trends. From the imposition of Feinstein’s “assault weapon” ban (Sept. 13, 1994) through the present, the number of “assault weapons” has risen dramatically. For example, the most common firearm that Feinstein considers an “assault weapon” is the AR-15 rifle, the manufacturing numbers of which can be gleaned from the BATFE’s firearm manufacturer reports, available here. From 1995 through 2011, the number of AR-15s—all models of which Feinstein’s new bill defines as “assault weapons”—rose by over 2.5 million. During the same period, the nation’s murder rate fell 48 percent, to a 48-year low. According to the FBI, 8.5 times as many people are murdered with knives, blunt objects and bare hands, as with rifles of any type.

Traces: Feinstein makes several claims, premised on firearm traces, hoping to convince people that her 1994 ban reduced the (relatively infrequent) use of “assault weapons” in crime. However, traces do not indicate how often any type of gun is used in crime. As the Congressional Research Service and the BATFE have explained, not all firearms that are traced have been used in crime, and not all firearms used in crime are traced. Whether a trace occurs depends on whether a law enforcement agency requests that a trace be conducted. Given that existing “assault weapons” were exempted from the 1994 ban and new “assault weapons” continued to be made while the ban was in effect, any reduction in the percentage of traces accounted for by “assault weapons” during the ban, would be attributable to law enforcement agencies losing interest in tracing the firearms, or law enforcement agencies increasing their requests for traces on other types of firearms, as urged by the BATFE for more than a decade.
not scared

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

puleese, quit trying to scare people to buy more guns and ammo, President Obama is not going to take your precious guns, you will still be able to hold them & show them to everybody that visits you. No body from California is coming either.
Billy jean

Bixby, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Dec 28, 2012
 

Judged:

2

People from California are mean
Evil White Guy

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

not scared wrote:
puleese, quit trying to scare people to buy more guns and ammo, President Obama is not going to take your precious guns, you will still be able to hold them & show them to everybody that visits you. No body from California is coming either.
The president has done more than I ever could to get more people to buy guns. More people have legally purchased firearms under this president than any other I can think of. I'm not sure about the people from California part but I guess that's good if it's true. With what they've done to their own state I doubt they would be any help to us.
forwhatitsworth

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

We don't call California the "Granola State" for nothing. It's filled with flakes, nuts and fruits. Oh, and a bunch of actors who don't have an IQ high enough to come in out of the rain, yet still think their opinions are worth something. I've met a number of "Hollywood's finest" and most of them were dumber than a box of rocks. And without the makeup, air-brushing and stylists to dress 'em, can barely remember to take a shower every day.
Merry Xmas

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

not scared wrote:
puleese, quit trying to scare people to buy more guns and ammo, President Obama is not going to take your precious guns, you will still be able to hold them & show them to everybody that visits you. No body from California is coming either.
Oh you're wrong!

Me, Oprah, George Clooney and Micahel Moore will be arriving on a fleet of Chevy Volts the day after this bill is signed to confiscate every gun (shot, BB, airsoft or otherwise)and while were at it we also be burning American flags, forcing dudes to marry each other and tearing down Baptist churches and replacing them with mosques or even worse libraries filled with copies of The Nation and with TVs broadcasting PBS!!

Also, all mullets will be cut and the offending hair will be permed. This is by order of Chancellor Polabo. He likes dudes with curly hair.
Merry Xmas

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

forwhatitsworth wrote:
We don't call California the "Granola State" for nothing. It's filled with flakes, nuts and fruits. Oh, and a bunch of actors who don't have an IQ high enough to come in out of the rain, yet still think their opinions are worth something. I've met a number of "Hollywood's finest" and most of them were dumber than a box of rocks. And without the makeup, air-brushing and stylists to dress 'em, can barely remember to take a shower every day.
CA also has a gdp 8 times of that of good ol' Louisiana so all that flake, fruit and nuts must be going to good use.
Worker

Many, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

Merry Xmas wrote:
<quoted text>
CA also has a gdp 8 times of that of good ol' Louisiana so all that flake, fruit and nuts must be going to good use.
And even with all of that, they are going bankrupt. What does that tell you?
polabo

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
And even with all of that, they are going bankrupt. What does that tell you?
if by bankrupt means a $1,000,000,000 budget surplus next fiscal year you are correct
forwhatitsworth

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Dec 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

CA also has about 8 times the population of Louisiana, a massive tourist industry, Silicone Valley, the film and music industry, as well as oil and gas revenue, some of the highest taxes in the nation and freakin' earthquakes. And my home here in Natch would probably be an 800K home out there. Between the traffic, the high cost of living and everything else, I think I'll stick to interacting with Californians when I go to my place in Santa Fe. Lord knows, enough of them have left California for SF, fleeing the lifestyle, and what do they do when they get there? They try their dead level best to make things how they did them in California. You can ALWAYS spot a transplanted Californian in Santa Fe. They're the ones decked out in full broomstick skirt regalia, thousand dollar "cowboy" boots and 40 lbs of turquoise jewelry. We sit there in our Carharts and Sorrels and just laugh at 'em. GREAT entertainment, and it costs nothing.
Evil White Guy

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Dec 30, 2012
 

Judged:

2

Merry Xmas wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh you're wrong!
Me, Oprah, George Clooney and Micahel Moore will be arriving on a fleet of Chevy Volts the day after this bill is signed to confiscate every gun (shot, BB, airsoft or otherwise)and while were at it we also be burning American flags, forcing dudes to marry each other and tearing down Baptist churches and replacing them with mosques or even worse libraries filled with copies of The Nation and with TVs broadcasting PBS!!
Also, all mullets will be cut and the offending hair will be permed. This is by order of Chancellor Polabo. He likes dudes with curly hair.
Funny
Worker

Many, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Dec 31, 2012
 

Judged:

2

polabo wrote:
<quoted text>
if by bankrupt means a $1,000,000,000 budget surplus next fiscal year you are correct
You must read different news reports than I do.
sambo

Campti, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Worker wrote:
<quoted text>
You must read different news reports than I do.
That was the queer natch. polabo,he needs to move to calif with all the other queers!!!
gun owner

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 7, 2013
 
I hope the don't ban asault rifles.
The Colonel

Natchitoches, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jan 8, 2013
 
luv my machine gun
Sorry

Bixby, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jan 8, 2013
 
Large clips should be banned. Only used to hunt people!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

83 Users are viewing the Natchitoches Forum right now

Search the Natchitoches Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Repeal 2nd Amendment 9 min Wally 242
Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Louisiana... (Oct '10) 22 min Not Landrieu 2,624
Ex-teacher arrested ? 28 min antiredneck 58
Stank 59 min Ebonics 4
City Marshal Race 1 hr Easy 29
that thread disappeared like the $ from the bank 4 hr Teaux cents 19
Kendrick Blake & Imitria Gay (Jul '13) 4 hr Dumb dumb 9
•••
•••
•••
•••

Natchitoches Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Natchitoches People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Natchitoches News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Natchitoches
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••