Patrick Michaels: No corn? Let them eat ethanol

Jul 26, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Wave

Climate change policies much more than the vagaries of climate are now beginning to create the instabilities that cooler heads have been warning about for years.

Comments
1 - 7 of 7 Comments Last updated Apr 9, 2013
Fun Facts

Las Cruces, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 26, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

I think drinking would be the method of consuming ethanol. I think that's been done before.

This is what was known prior to our government's decision to produce gasoline from our food source.

Half the corn food crop will go into your gas tank.

Not only will we destroy food, there is no environmental value in turning food to gasoline. In fact, more environmental damage is done by ethanol production that oil production.

You don't have to look far to see bad government in action. Your grocery store shelves, will remind you each time you shop.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jul 26, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

3

1961, Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, England, my electrician friend takes his usual bottle of hooch to a party.

90% ethanol, 10% a mixture of whiskey, rum, gin, vodka and an unknown fruit juice.
Bottle marked DANGEROUS.
Idea:
Few people can afford booze, so a shot glass of his jungle juice gets the party going.

Result, unknown Scottish guy steals bottle, locks himself in bathroom, drinks contents and dies a short time later.

End result, party breaks up early, can't find another one, so it doesn't go down in history as the best ever.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jul 26, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

It would be more sensible to switch ethanol production to sugar at this time. Surely corn production doesn't need the market and sugar beets don't need the protection (any more).

Import more 'raw sugar' from cane (cheaper than beets) with controls that it only goes to ethanol production. That would make sense.

But the entrenched monopolies and subsidies are a hard thing to change fast enough to adapt to AGW. Or even 'natural' climate change. The problem is the entrenched special interests and the political process, not the technology.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jul 26, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

"Sugar cane is one of the more interesting crops that one can plant. A sugar cane farmer must have a ton of patience; the crop can take as much as 2 years to grow before harvest time. In some places, it is only 6 months, but the average is 1 year. This is a mighty long time to wait for your investment to mature and to see any kind of return on it at all."

Facts that are of no interest to people like Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jul 27, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

3

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
It would be more sensible to switch ethanol production to sugar at this time. Surely corn production doesn't need the market and sugar beets don't need the protection (any more).
Import more 'raw sugar' from cane (cheaper than beets) with controls that it only goes to ethanol production. That would make sense.
But the entrenched monopolies and subsidies are a hard thing to change fast enough to adapt to AGW. Or even 'natural' climate change. The problem is the entrenched special interests and the political process, not the technology.
Or just stop producing ethanol to stick in a gas tank. The amount of fossil fuel needed to turn corn, sugar beets, or sugar cane into ethanol is such that it dosn't change anything.

Meanwhile we can take the ethanol for corn (aka moonshine) and the ethanol from the sugar cane (aka rum) and let you drink your misery away.
LessHypeMoreFact

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
The amount of fossil fuel needed to turn corn, sugar beets, or sugar cane into ethanol is such that it dosn't change anything.
Actually it does three things.

One is that it reduces the amount of refining that goes into the 'base stock' for gasoline, saving energy.

Two is that it provides a 'price support' for grain producers (80% of which goes to meat production or industrial products like starch and sugars).

Third, is that it replaces toxic MTBE as an octane booster (as well as keeping engines cleaner). An important issue that Exxon just lost their bet on..

tinyurl.com/bmkrc3o
litesong

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The ethanol industry says that 10% ethanol blends only lose 3% mpg than 100% pure gasoline. First, why do they think they deserve that?

Second, 10% ethanol blends take lots more than 3%. Thousands of people, unhappy with ethanol, report 10% or more losses with ethanol. Personally, our 3 cars indicate a mpg loss of 5%, 7% & 8+% in losses. You see, ethanol needs higher compression engines to get its best efficiency, nearly the compression of diesel engines. That is why ethanol engines of Indy cars have higher compression ratios than gasoline engines used in NASCAR.

Third, engines using 100% pure gasoline run smoother, quieter & with a trace extra low rpm torque, such that less downshifting is necessary when ascending hills, compared to 10% ethanol blends.

Yes, let the ethanol industry, designed to force ethanol into gasoline engines, dry up. Less fossil fuel will be used in the ethanol production to produce ethanol. Very little extra gasoline, if possibly none at all, will be used to run your gasoline engine.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Nashville Discussions

Search the Nashville Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
IL Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Terry rigsby 48,944
hoes 20 hr Chris 3
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) Sun newpoly 1,864
IL Who do you support for Secretary of State in Il... (Oct '10) Sun Chicagobunny 527
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) Sat All better now 3,834
IL Who do you support for Attorney General in Illi... (Oct '10) Jul 16 rdarbin 641
IL Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois ... (Oct '10) Jul 6 george 6,590
•••
•••
•••
•••

Nashville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Nashville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Nashville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Nashville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••