Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#183270 Mar 13, 2013
right on wrote:
<quoted text> Two words for you bub, Sodom and Gomorrah
Ezekiel 16:49 Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy (nothing about homosexuality)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183271 Mar 13, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
Marriage isn't about evolution. Marriage is about marriage.
Any two heterosexual people can (and do) have offspring all of the time.
Kimare's argument that a marriage certificate--a piece of paper--is needed to keep males from spreading their seed is ridiculous.
In the wild, in fact, it's more advantageous for the strongest male to spread his genes to as many different females as possible. This results in a greater number of stronger offspring.
So, his "one-man, one-woman" argument is not based on evolution. It's based on man-made morals and values that have no basis in science.
And ultimately, it has no impact on same-gender marriage; which is about legal equality.
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?

Really.

Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?

Marriage has no correlation to procreation?

2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.

To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.

3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.

4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.

Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.

5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!

However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.

Welcome back VV.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183272 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Discredit your posts????? You haven't proved them in the first place. They are nothing but your opinion..... based on lies and misinformation. But here in America, you are free to hold the craziest opinions you can conjure up. Just don't be surprised when people laugh in your face.
Do you really think you are fooling anyone with ad homoan attacks and no logical defense?

The truth is in black and white. It looks like shit on your face.

Snicker.
Tents

Covina, CA

#183274 Mar 13, 2013
Leave it to the WACKo Boy Scouts or should I say Mormon's - it was the mormon men that were doing this in the first place.
rob

Klamath Falls, OR

#183275 Mar 13, 2013
when is it ever good to talk about your deviant sex life in public, next people will want to marry kids

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#183277 Mar 13, 2013
Quest wrote:
Stringing unrelated words together just makes you look silly.
It just prove's Quest's poor reading comprehension.

.
Quest wrote:
What you need to do is prove that gay couples legally marrying has any negative effect on society, on other couples, and on their own children.
I don't need to prove anything, I'm for keeping the law as is. Your the one backing the suit, in America you have to prove your complaint, the defendant isn't required to prove innocence.

.
Quest wrote:
Can't do that? Then keep conflating marriage with apartheid and segregation.
Same sex marriage is gender segregation marriage. In other words, same sex marriage is gender apartheid marriage. Words have meanings, same sex means the opposite of gender diversity and integration.
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

#183278 Mar 13, 2013
The new Pope Francis (St Francis of Assisi) isn't going to be giving San Francisco (St Francis of Assisi) gays any slack. He's conservative and hardline and will be keeping an eye on what's going on around here......

http://www.businessinsider.com/pope-francis-c...
Bergoglio is seen an unwaveringly orthodox on matters of sexual morality, staunchly opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and contraception. In 2010 he asserted that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children.
annie

Klamath Falls, OR

#183280 Mar 13, 2013
yeah, Vallejo,
where the Christan help center had a gay prest that lived upstairs from the teen boys shelter, not teen girls, they had a men's section, and a woman and children's section, but why the teen boys in the same building as a gay priest?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183281 Mar 13, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you're saying is he couldn't out do your average of blowing and tossing salad for 60 homeless men in dire need of a bath per day for free.
I do believe that is what he is saying, yes...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183282 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
uh-huh.... so you blank your mind when you rail against gays, eh? Interesting.
Oh....Do I? What else do I do?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183283 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep butting in. It proves your obsession.
He's not butting in, I invited him. While you made false claims.
duck soup

Klamath Falls, OR

#183284 Mar 13, 2013
free Hitler showers for the D-faced
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183285 Mar 13, 2013
Francisco dAnconia wrote:
<quoted text>
what obsession?
you are an angry ignorant a-hole and I don't mind telling anyone you are posting to while I am around...
obsession like you and my job?
It's X-Box that has the obsession.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183287 Mar 13, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Stringing unrelated words together just makes you look silly.
What you need to do is prove that gay couples legally marrying has any negative effect on society, on other couples, and on their own children.
Can't do that? Then keep conflating marriage with apartheid and segregation.
Actually, sweets, we don't need to do that, at all. It's you who must show compelling need for changing the existing laws.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183289 Mar 13, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Discredit your posts????? You haven't proved them in the first place. They are nothing but your opinion..... based on lies and misinformation. But here in America, you are free to hold the craziest opinions you can conjure up. Just don't be surprised when people laugh in your face.
Kimare's posts make perfect sense. You just have no recourse, but to scoff and ignore. It's the only defense that you have. Like going off-topic to accuse someone of being a lawyer. Or not being a lawyer. Or trying a case. Or not trying a case. Aw, shit, who knows what you are trying to say ? Not that it matters.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183290 Mar 13, 2013
right on wrote:
<quoted text>It is disgusting that we have come to this point in our decrepit society that we actually consider allowing men to marry men and women to marry women. I cannot wait for the return of God.
I'm not pushing the religious side of this, just the common sense part of it, so I agree with you...

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#183291 Mar 13, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Marriage isn't about evolution?
Really.
Marriage has nothing to do with evolutionary mating behavior?
Marriage has no correlation to procreation?

2. Of course heterosexuals have offspring outside of marriage.
To the immediate and devastating consequences for the child.
3. I made no such claim about a 'piece of paper'. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. It does not need a 'piece of paper'.
4. I did not base my one man/one woman on evolution. I based it on the cross cultural 'constraint' of marriage. That means marriage restricts the drive of evolutionary mating behavior primarily for the sake of the child.
Social scientist surmise that marriage would not exist if it were not for the desire of humans to maintain contact with their child and pursue that child's best interests.
5. Legal equality is not possible, since gay couples are a direct defective contradiction to evolution's primary goal. Literally 'unmarriage'!
However, legal rights for gay couples are available through other means without imposing an imposter relationship on marriage.
Welcome back VV.
Smirk.
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183293 Mar 13, 2013
NE Jade wrote:
<quoted text>Oh that great story where Lot's wife turned into a large salt lick, and his two daughters took him up into a cave, got him drunk, and boinked their father silly? Great family values story!
Silly thing, it's not a "family values story", it's a comparison. Dopey Jade....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183294 Mar 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Con dumb parroting. You don't even know what socialism is! Why are you against the Constitution and equal rights?
Yes, why don't you describe socialism to us, while staying on-topic?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#183295 Mar 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of imposer...humans only have 23 pairs of chromosomes. How many do you have?
Should you have been aborted?
LOL!
Oh yes, that's VERY on-topic. Why don't you spin the propeller on your beanie while you describe socialism to us?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Murrieta Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Legalized Panhandling @ Stater Bros!!! Menifee (Apr '10) Sun Revelations 9
Review: Final Strike Martial Arts Dec 2 Yhoover16 26
KIRBY VACUUMS SCAMS-ACE company in murrieta (Oct '07) Dec 1 Alexander 430
Menifee- will it take a turn for the worst? (Aug '09) Nov 23 Pantiks 92
Doctors in area Nov 20 Shelly92 1
Donovan Kearns Nov 19 barstowmule 4
News Video shows motorist trying to run down woman, ... Nov 16 Aline 1

Murrieta Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Murrieta Mortgages