Since: Nov 12

United States

#24 Jan 6, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
So if you own a nuclear weapon, is that anyone's business?
NO
Independent

Paducah, KY

#25 Jan 6, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
<quoted text>NO
So if I asked if 2 + 2 = 4, this joker would say "no." What a dumbass!

Since: Nov 12

United States

#26 Jan 6, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
So if I asked if 2 + 2 = 4, this joker would say "no." What a dumbass!
When you ask a stupid question like that what kind of answer would you expect? Numb nuts.
Independent

Owensboro, KY

#27 Jan 6, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
<quoted text>When you ask a stupid question like that what kind of answer would you expect? Numb nuts.
So your answer was "yes?" Please tell us there's still hope.

Since: Nov 12

United States

#28 Jan 6, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
So your answer was "yes?" Please tell us there's still hope.
My answer is, your question is too stupid to answer! there is no way I could get my hands on nuclear material to build a bomb. So be real and drop the bullshiz argument for trying to step on our rights
Independent

Beaver Dam, KY

#29 Jan 7, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
<quoted text>My answer is, your question is too stupid to answer! there is no way I could get my hands on nuclear material to build a bomb. So be real and drop the bullshiz argument for trying to step on our rights
Ok, then how about a tank? Is that OK to own by an individual? How about a bazooka? How about a rocket launcher? Surely you must have a line that you think should not be crossed? Is it OK for young thugs with no record to walk around with machine guns?

Since: Nov 12

Murray, KY

#30 Jan 7, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, then how about a tank? Is that OK to own by an individual? How about a bazooka? How about a rocket launcher? Surely you must have a line that you think should not be crossed? Is it OK for young thugs with no record to walk around with machine guns?
Get real you sound like a nut!
Independent

Beaver Dam, KY

#31 Jan 7, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
<quoted text>Get real you sound like a nut!
So, you don't want to answer any questions for fear of sounding like a nut. OK. That doesn't make me a nut. I'm just probing the limits of the Faux news brain.

Since: Nov 12

Murray, KY

#32 Jan 7, 2013
Whats "Faux news"? Never heard of it. Dumb azz
Independent

Owensboro, KY

#33 Jan 7, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
Whats "Faux news"? Never heard of it. Dumb azz
What's "azz?" Never heard of that. "Faux" is in any dictionary and should not have to be looked up. Dumbass.

Since: Nov 12

Murray, KY

#34 Jan 7, 2013
looked on my chanel listings (I have 178 news chanels) no "Faux" Must be a chanel just for A HOLES! thats why your the only one that can see it.
Independent

Powderly, KY

#35 Jan 7, 2013
Annoying Keyboard Tapper wrote:
looked on my chanel listings (I have 178 news chanels) no "Faux" Must be a chanel just for A HOLES! thats why your the only one that can see it.
Well, you got half of that right.
FAUXf uck

Murray, KY

#36 Jan 7, 2013
Please quit feeding trolls.

Since: Nov 12

United States

#37 Jan 7, 2013
F.B.I. stats for 2011: Murders by knives 1694, hands or feet 726, clubs or hammers 496, rifles of ANY TYPE 323. Why do we need more gun control again?????
meow

United States

#38 Jan 7, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, then how about a tank? Is that OK to own by an individual? How about a bazooka? How about a rocket launcher? Surely you must have a line that you think should not be crossed? Is it OK for young thugs with no record to walk around with machine guns?
Yes all of those are OK to be owned by an individual. But only after a very extensive background check. In fact, it is perfectly legal for someone to own any of those listed as long as proper procedure is followed and all the hoops are jumped through. Don't ever hear of any massacres that a law abiding citizen in possession of said weapons commits, do you?
Independent

Powderly, KY

#39 Jan 7, 2013
meow wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes all of those are OK to be owned by an individual. But only after a very extensive background check. In fact, it is perfectly legal for someone to own any of those listed as long as proper procedure is followed and all the hoops are jumped through. Don't ever hear of any massacres that a law abiding citizen in possession of said weapons commits, do you?
Not yet, but I don't think there is any procedure for an individual to follow to assume ownership of weapons of war. You may not own your own jet fighter. You may not take your own tank and for a spin around town. But it's much cheaper to buy a gun that will kill 30 people in a few moments time, and much easier to take those same groups of people by surprise. It's all about drawing lines, and those who claim there should be no lines aren't really part of the debate, for the public recognizes them for what they are.

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#40 Jan 7, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>
Not yet, but I don't think there is any procedure for an individual to follow to assume ownership of weapons of war. You may not own your own jet fighter. You may not take your own tank and for a spin around town. But it's much cheaper to buy a gun that will kill 30 people in a few moments time, and much easier to take those same groups of people by surprise. It's all about drawing lines, and those who claim there should be no lines aren't really part of the debate, for the public recognizes them for what they are.
What are we? I'm an American who lives by the constitution & am unsure what you mean by that comment.
meow

Duluth, GA

#41 Jan 7, 2013
Independent wrote:
<quoted text>Not yet, but I don't think there is any procedure for an individual to follow to assume ownership of weapons of war. You may not own your own jet fighter. You may not take your own tank and for a spin around town. But it's much cheaper to buy a gun that will kill 30 people in a few moments time, and much easier to take those same groups of people by surprise. It's all about drawing lines, and those who claim there should be no lines aren't really part of the debate, for the public recognizes them for what they are.
An individual can, in fact, own a tank. That is, if they got the dough for it.
Luke

Murray, KY

#42 Jan 8, 2013
meow wrote:
<quoted text>
An individual can, in fact, own a tank. That is, if they got the dough for it.
.

I own two tanks. A blue one, and a white one with stripes. People say they aren't in style, but what do they know right.
Independent

Eddyville, KY

#43 Jan 8, 2013
meow wrote:
<quoted text>
An individual can, in fact, own a tank. That is, if they got the dough for it.
Not unless it is disarmed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Murray Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
hardee's drive through 20 min Alice 5
Coons with fancy cars!! 20 min Beth 4
Flash of News (Aug '13) 34 min Dr Brian 5,691
cookout 1 hr Resident 10
mailbox hitter 4 hr old crow 2
Bear club members 10 hr mad mother 1
Murray WALMART Getting New Manager 12 hr Goodluck 12
Murray Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Murray People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Murray News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Murray

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 2:23 pm PST

NBC Sports 2:23PM
Ogletree, Laurinaitis 1-2 in tackles entering finale - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 5:50 PM
Complete Preview of Rams vs. Seahawks
Bleacher Report12:06 AM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans: Complete Week 17 Preview for Tennessee
Bleacher Report 2:12 AM
St. Louis Rams vs. Seattle Seahawks: Complete Week 17 Preview for Seattle
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans