In any case that proceeds as far as this one has, There can not be any limitation on the facts that are put before the ruling board and it's decision. In any Body of a crime or case all facts are determined to be worthy of examination in order to bring justice and fairness to any hearing. As I have read certain behavioral attitudes and actions of the complainant are being omitted. Is this fair in our system of fairness and truth ? The actions of a person often determine the social compatibility and acceptance of that person into the social population. When behavioral traits are determined to be anti-social ,the displayed behavior is often an attempt to disrupt the norm without putting ones own self on trial.Is this Fair?