Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri in 2010?

[JIHADIST IN CHIEF]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
So you think that it was a big mistake for the various nations to overthrow their dictators and take their first steps toward democracy?
Egypt now has its first freely-elected president.
You wanted perhaps that Egypt should have continued to have a dictator? I suppose you are still upset that America revolted against the King of England?
You show your true colors, "JIHADIST." You support repressive regimes. And of course, as a "JIHADIST," you support the Taliban.
If supporting democracy is "pandering," I am in favor of "pandering."

WOW!!! You just can't help but prove you're an idiot.

Egypt...yep they have their first freely-elected presdient...A member of the Muslim Brotherhood who is anti-American, Anti-Israel, and anti anything that isn't Muslim. With Mubarack at least he was an ally who respected Israel and America
.
Lybia...has yet to be determined but more often then not the devil we know is far better then devil we don't know.

Your 500th attempt to try and get me to stop using a screen name that is about your Lord and Saviour Obama is as always an EPIC FAIL! Especially since everyone on this thread knows I hate Muslims with every ounce of my being. Next to Liberals and pedophiles they are the biggest scumbags in the world. But, I am happy to know it is still bothering you. Keep trying as I will be using this name from now until whenever I decide not to. Which at this point, knowing it is upsetting you, is indefinate.

Of course you are in favor of pandering to our enemies, you too are an America hating pile of scum just like every Muslim in the world is.

Enjoy another wasted day of your life on here Dawg. Unlike yiou I have a life and far better things to do then kick your ass all day.

Now don't forget to bring out all your aliases and spend all day talking to yourself. Be sure and write soem more love poems to your obsession Dan too.

Quite a life you live. ROFLMAO!!!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

JIHADIST IN CHIEF wrote:

<quoted text> ...
3. Obama is a Muslim. Enough said....

3. President Obama is not Muslim. You lie. Enough said.

[JIHADIST IN CHIEF]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
If the "turmoil" in several countries is basically a series of orchestrated minor skirmishes, YES! In your typical "knee-jerk" way, you have conjured up visions of entire countries in numerous widespread battles. These attacks were very limited in scope -- a group of "demonstrators" storming in most cases single embassies.
Not having been in the military, and not having any governmental experience, you have no personal basis for judging how large and how extensive these attacks were. You falsely visualize dozens of countries engaging in civil war. Not true. As one bit of evidence, the Libyans immediately arrested four persons who were involved in the attack on the US embassy. That would not happen in a large-scale war.
As to yourself, I have not yet decided whether you are clueless, or whether you are being paid to foment violence and unrest in America. Agitprop!

Just another EPIC Yellow COWARD FAILURE!!!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

JIHADIST IN CHIEF wrote:

<quoted text> ... "shooting without aiming" was nothing more then Obama trying to hide the fact that he got bitch smacked by Romney for his failure in handling the Middle East....

Romney has been severely criticized by true patriots, both Republican and Democrat, for his initial false and ill-advised statements regarding the embassy attacks. All US citizens understand that, in moments of crisis, America stands together behind the country and behind the President.

A presidential candidate, above everyone else, should have enough knowledge and understanding not to make foolish partisan political statements during an ongoing crisis.

Romney could have looked "presidential" by literally standing beside President Obama and stating that America stands united against the embassy attacks.

Instead, he "showed his ass" by giving "aid and comfort" to America's enemies through his incorrect and ill-advised self-serving criticisms. This guy is clearly "not ready for prime time." Romney should go back to his primary business of destroying American companies, and shipping American JOBS and HIS MONEY offshore.

[Poos ur daddy]

I understand that Obama feels he has to take some drastic measures to achieve economic recovery. However, severe cuts in the military budget seem like a dangerous proposition in light of global turmoil.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

JIHADIST IN CHIEF wrote:

<quoted text> ...
Egypt... yep they have their first freely-elected presdient... A member of the Muslim Brotherhood who is anti-American, Anti-Israel, and anti anything that isn't Muslim. With Mubarack at least he was an ally who respected Israel and America ...

So you think perhaps that Egypt should have elected a Christian for their first freely-elected president? Someone that YOU approve? So you admit that you are not REALLY for democracy?

The president of Egypt and the Israeli government are getting along just fine, without your interference in their affairs.

I suspect that Egyptian President Morsi respects Israel and America just as much as former President Mubarak did. Diplomatic relations continue among the three countries, despite your sitting in your trailer in Smithville and worrying about it. I am sure they will call you if they need you.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

JIHADIST IN CHIEF wrote:

<quoted text> ...
Your 500th attempt to try and get me to stop using a screen name that is about your Lord and Saviour Obama is as always an EPIC FAIL! Especially since everyone on this thread knows I hate Muslims with every ounce of my being. Next to Liberals and pedophiles they are the biggest scumbags in the world. But, I am happy to know it is still bothering you. Keep trying as I will be using this name from now until whenever I decide not to. Which at this point, knowing it is upsetting you, is indefinate....

No. Sorry. I have predicted that you will start considering not using your silly name on Monday, Sep. 17, and by Wednesday, Sep. 19, you will discard it. I am rarely wrong with my predictions, be it about screen names or political elections.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Poos ur daddy wrote:

I understand that Obama feels he has to take some drastic measures to achieve economic recovery. However, severe cuts in the military budget seem like a dangerous proposition in light of global turmoil.

What are you talking about? A few hundred "demonstrators" attack a few embassies, and you think that we are in "global turmoil"? You sure do not remember World War II, do you?

I suppose you agree with Romney, who is offering billions more in defense budget THAN THE PENTAGON HAS REQUESTED. And Romney has essentially PROMISED to attack Iran. That's what we need -- another unnecessary war to further damage the economy.

And in the meantime, Romney refuses to increase taxes on his 1% buddies, and intends to destroy Medicare and to put your Social Security savings into the stock market where it can be stolen from you!

[Poos ur daddy]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
What are you talking about? A few hundred "demonstrators" attack a few embassies, and you think that we are in "global turmoil"? You sure do not remember World War II, do you?
I suppose you agree with Romney, who is offering billions more in defense budget THAN THE PENTAGON HAS REQUESTED. And Romney has essentially PROMISED to attack Iran. That's what we need -- another unnecessary war to further damage the economy.
And in the meantime, Romney refuses to increase taxes on his 1% buddies, and intends to destroy Medicare and to put your Social Security savings into the stock market where it can be stolen from you!

Whoa Tiger, I mean Dawg--That wasn't necessarily a jab at Obama nor an endorsement of Romney. In fact, I wouldn't agree any more to a large increase. You should know by now that I'm not a firm proponent of either party. I just feel that the military budget cuts could be more moderate. I'm not saying that recent demonstrations along are a cause to go to condition red. I expect them to run their course and wain. Perhaps I'm having a 'chicken little' moment, but I have the impression that we will be in some conflict somewhere for a long time to come.

[Norton]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
I haven't noticed Romney stop campaigning. Romney must really be afraid he is not going to win.
(Incidentally, "the world" is not "in utter chaos." YOUR ALTERNATE world may be, but the REAL WORLD is not.)

......and you either still have on your rose-colored glasses or just plain dumb. Which is it?

CHEERS!

[Muslim Dictator Prez]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
... of Romney!
With all this global turmoil, we cannot afford to risk America's future on an untested, inexperienced president who is best known for doing and saying things without thinking. We need to continue with President Obama, who has proved that he is a strong leader with years of experience as Commander-in-Chief.
Like they said about President Roosevelt during World War II, "Don't change horses in the middle of the stream!"

Ya oboma is tested and he FAILED!! Just like Peanut Carter and head job in oval office Clinton did! Once again you prove you are a dumb yellow dawgShit!

LIBYAN OFFICIAL WARNED USA '3 DAYS BEFORE ATTACK'

Three days before the deadly assault on the United States consulate in Libya, a local security official says he met with American diplomats in the city and warned them about deteriorating security.

Jamal Mabrouk, a member of the February 17th Brigade, told CNN that he and a battalion commander had a meeting about the economy and security.

He said they told the diplomats that the security situation wasn't good for international business.

"The situation is frightening, it scares us," Mabrouk said they told the U.S. officials. He did not say how they responded.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/meast/lib...

[Muslim Dictator Prez]

Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike

An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mid...

[Ginger]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
3. President Obama is not Muslim. You lie. Enough said.

Read his book, I did. Great information. No matter what anyone thinks he is, we all know for sure, he is a failure as President, some people just can't admit it.

[GOPs BAIN in theASS]

JIHADIST IN CHIEF wrote:

<quoted text>
Just another EPIC Yellow COWARD FAILURE!!!

DAN the only EPIC Failure here ...would seem to be you and permanent employment ... bada BAIN!

[BARNEYII]

Muslim Dictator Prez wrote:

Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike
An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/mid...

ROF-LMAO One hell of a contradiction of the way this story begins,

"an unprecedented show of force as Israel and Iran move towards the brink of war"

And the way he closes his story,

"25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, will today begin an annual 12-day exercise"

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Poos ur daddy wrote:

<quoted text>
Whoa Tiger, I mean Dawg--That wasn't necessarily a jab at Obama nor an endorsement of Romney. In fact, I wouldn't agree any more to a large increase. You should know by now that I'm not a firm proponent of either party. I just feel that the military budget cuts could be more moderate. I'm not saying that recent demonstrations along are a cause to go to condition red. I expect them to run their course and wain. Perhaps I'm having a 'chicken little' moment, but I have the impression that we will be in some conflict somewhere for a long time to come.

Unfortunately, you are probably correct about the US being in some conflict somewhere for a long time to come. I have two points:

1. The US military is undoubtedly highly "combat-ready" because of our long involvement with Iraq and Afghanistan -- 11 years in the case of the latter, which is the longest war the US has ever fought.

2. The character of the wars we have been fighting has changed gradually from widespread major warfare to smaller regional wars. We are uniquely capable to fight such wars because of our extensive technology.

We do have more difficulty in fighting in small encounters like guerrilla -terrorist attacks. Our strategic response to such attacks is to destroy the terrorist organizations from the top down. This is a long, painstaking task, as was proved in the case of Osama bin Laden.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
......and you either still have on your rose-colored glasses or just plain dumb. Which is it?...

Ah, yes! Today I have on my rose-colored glasses and I am feeling exceedingly dumb. You guessed it. Nice job!

How's that "Rapture" project of yours coming along?

(Over the weeks, I have asked you on several occasions to provide me with chapter and verse regarding statements you have made. You have never responded. I would have thought that an eminent Bible scholar such as yourself could have provided that information to me immediately. Do you have any estimate of when you will be able to provide me with those various answers? It has been so long that I am beginning to forget the questions.)

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Muslim Dictator Prez wrote:

<quoted text> ...
LIBYAN OFFICIAL WARNED USA '3 DAYS BEFORE ATTACK'
Three days before the deadly assault on the United States consulate in Libya, a local security official says he met with American diplomats in the city and warned them about deteriorating security.
Jamal Mabrouk, a member of the February 17th Brigade, told CNN that he and a battalion commander had a meeting about the economy and security.
He said they told the diplomats that the security situation wasn't good for international business.
"The situation is frightening, it scares us," Mabrouk said they told the U.S. officials. He did not say how they responded.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/meast/lib...

With high-quality information like that, I am really surprised that we were not better prepared. According to your article, the "local security official" provided the following detailed information:

1. The security situation isn't good for international business
2. The situation is frightening, it scares us

With the pinpoint details of that report, we should have been right on top of the situation!

Thanks to CNN for bringing this to our attention, as well as the other CNN report about the earthquakes which are going to occur somewhere in the world within the next 30 days! Detailed reporting like this is totally invaluable for our being prepared! Thanks again, CNN!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Ginger wrote:

<quoted text> Read his book, I did. Great information. No matter what anyone thinks he is, we all know for sure, he is a failure as President, some people just can't admit it.

Thanks for your information, Ginger! It's people like YOU who keep me well-informed about what's going on in the world. You are equally as useful as CNN! Thanks again!

[real ruby]

Poos ur daddy wrote:

I understand that Obama feels he has to take some drastic measures to achieve economic recovery. However, severe cuts in the military budget seem like a dangerous proposition in light of global turmoil.

totally agree with you.