Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201877 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#151740 Jul 24, 2012
When we defend the citizens of California in court, the men will wear dresses, be held in contempt or make a joke of law and custom. The court a circus and judges, clowns.

Gender roles matter, why do you think they wear black robes?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151741 Jul 24, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Untrue. Lesbians are not promiscuous, but if you look like Hillary, what choice do you have? Male gays on the other hand are very loose, hence the AIDS epidemic.
RnL2008 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but men in general are usually promiscuous regardless of sexual orientation and again, we don't stop straight men from marrying just because they have been promiscuous, now do we?
As for the HIV/AIDS epidemic......sorry, but it's been around long before the 80's, and regardless of where you believe it started, it affects folks from all walks of life today and again, we don't prevent heterosexuals who are infected from getting married.
Honey, your gay twirling is busted again.

"The third odd thing about homosexuality is the quantity of homosexual men’s preferences, as compared to those of homosexual women. Homosexual men are famously promiscuous, a fact that became well-known with onset of AIDs, when studies of gay men who were HIV positive revealed average numbers of partners in the hundreds (and even though gay men who were HIV negative had much lower numbers, the average for them was still dramatically higher than the average numbers for heterosexual men)."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-murde...

You were saying???

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#151742 Jul 24, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
When we defend the citizens of California in court, the men will wear dresses, be held in contempt or make a joke of law and custom. The court a circus and judges, clowns.
Gender roles matter, why do you think they wear black robes?
And......what are they wearing when they are defending 'YOUR' rights??? Hmmmm.
J more

Covina, CA

#151743 Jul 24, 2012
Just more trash talk.

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#151744 Jul 24, 2012
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that people in penis suits leading leather "slaves" down the street on dog chains have the unmitigated gall to compare this with the Civil Rights March on Washington?

Or maybe we should reserve our incredulity for the straights who tell us nude men in dog chains and those in penis suits are just harmless folk expressing their Freedom of Speech?

Homosexuals are people with a mental disorder -- but what explains a hetero who when shown degenerate exhibitionism like this and think it has something to do with "Equal Rights"?
http://moonbattery.com/...
http://www.google.com/imgres...

or this:

http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...

or this
http://hideousbelltown.blogspot.com/2009/06/p...

Honestly, are the words "hedonistic" and "degrading" even part of your vocabulary, and if so, what -- if not gay pride parades -- do you reserve them for?
Mikey

United States

#151745 Jul 24, 2012
Does anyone else think that it was a gay plot to win in court what they could not at the ballot box? The judge that ruled gay marriage is constitutional was a flamer himself! This proves that the ruling was a set up and gays do not have the right to marry! Can't win at the ballot box, so go to a judge that had a special interest in the case! That gay judge should never have been allowed to rule on this case!
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#151746 Jul 24, 2012
It sure is a nice summer afternoon. I spent a few hours at the marina working on my boat getting it ready for Catalina this weekend. Talked with alot of real nice people too. I hope you all have a great evening. . . .
Bill Of Rights

Tempe, AZ

#151747 Jul 24, 2012
Mikey wrote:
Does anyone else think that it was a gay plot to win in court what they could not at the ballot box? The judge that ruled gay marriage is constitutional was a flamer himself! This proves that the ruling was a set up and gays do not have the right to marry! Can't win at the ballot box, so go to a judge that had a special interest in the case! That gay judge should never have been allowed to rule on this case!
Read the transcript of the trial stupid! The judge ruled the only way he could with the evidence presented before him! The Pro prop 8 side had absolutely nothing in the way of evidence for the judge to rule any other way! As far as him being gay it didn't matter one iota! Do you take a black judge off a case that has to do with civil rights? NO! Do you take a women off a case that deals with women's rights? NO! And you forgot to mention that a higher court upheld the Judges verdict! So very glad I could help! Prop 8 was and remains Unconstitutional!

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#151748 Jul 24, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
Am I the only one who finds it repulsive that people in penis suits leading leather "slaves" down the street on dog chains have the unmitigated gall to compare this with the Civil Rights March on Washington?
Or maybe we should reserve our incredulity for the straights who tell us nude men in dog chains and those in penis suits are just harmless folk expressing their Freedom of Speech?
Homosexuals are people with a mental disorder -- but what explains a hetero who when shown degenerate exhibitionism like this and think it has something to do with "Equal Rights"?
http://moonbattery.com/...
http://www.google.com/imgres...
or this:
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...
or this
http://hideousbelltown.blogspot.com/2009/06/p...
Honestly, are the words "hedonistic" and "degrading" even part of your vocabulary, and if so, what -- if not gay pride parades -- do you reserve them for?
You are the ONLY ONE who is obsessed with penis suits!
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#151749 Jul 24, 2012
Bruno wrote:
<quoted text>
Because they are creating extra paper work and will most likey have to ask for public assistance to pay for the huge medical bills that they will incounter over the years to fight the deadly virus they bring to there marriage
...yawn...

Don't you get tired of writing stupid shit? WHAT extra paperwork? And what makes you think all gay couples have HIV?

public assistence pays for medical bills, does it? hahahahahahaha
Haven't you read the propaganda from Family Research Council?

downloads.frc.org/EF/EF08L43.pdf

We are better educated and make more money than you do.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#151750 Jul 24, 2012
Bruno wrote:
It sure is a nice summer afternoon. I spent a few hours at the marina working on my boat getting it ready for Catalina this weekend. Talked with alot of real nice people too. I hope you all have a great evening....
oooOOOooo.... Catalina.... I know why you go there......
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#151751 Jul 24, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
When we defend the citizens of California in court, the men will wear dresses, be held in contempt or make a joke of law and custom. The court a circus and judges, clowns.
Gender roles matter, why do you think they wear black robes?
Are you smoking crack, AGAIN?

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#151752 Jul 24, 2012
Bruno wrote:
You look nice in you wedding dress Rose 2008
Thanks......:-)

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#151753 Jul 24, 2012
Imprtnrd wrote:
<quoted text>You are the ONLY ONE who is obsessed with penis suits!
Not just penis suits ...

Here's a photo of two guys dry-humping.
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...

Here's another of four giant penises leading one of your gay pride marches.
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...

How can you argue dry-humping and giant penises have nothing to do with sex?

Why are you astonished when people tell you this kind of exhibitionism transmits the message the LGBT is a sex cult?

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#151755 Jul 24, 2012
Mikey wrote:
Does anyone else think that it was a gay plot to win in court what they could not at the ballot box? The judge that ruled gay marriage is constitutional was a flamer himself! This proves that the ruling was a set up and gays do not have the right to marry! Can't win at the ballot box, so go to a judge that had a special interest in the case! That gay judge should never have been allowed to rule on this case!
Buttercup, the claim that Judge Walker was in any way, shape or form biased because he was gay has already been heard by another Judge and so soundly rejected that that ridiculous notion isn't even a part of the appeal. You also evidently haven't heard that the appeal of the ruling that overturned the amendment has already been heard and decided and by a 2-1 vote, still overturned and neither of those judges flamed. This case is actually on its way to the Supreme Court, where nine Justices, all of the heterosexual variety, are all going to quietly decline to give it even one more hearing. California's amendment is about to be sacrificed to political expediency by early this Fall and same sex marriage will return to California before the end of the year. It may all be a gay plot sweetie, but when we're right we're right.
Mon Sign or

Covina, CA

#151756 Jul 24, 2012
The highest-ranking Catholic Church cleric charged and convicted in the landmark Philadelphia child sexual abuse trial was sentenced to 3 to 6 years in prison Tuesday, July 24, 2012.

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#151757 Jul 24, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Not just penis suits ...
Here's a photo of two guys dry-humping.
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...
Here's another of four giant penises leading one of your gay pride marches.
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...
How can you argue dry-humping and giant penises have nothing to do with sex?
Why are you astonished when people tell you this kind of exhibitionism transmits the message the LGBT is a sex cult?
Wow, you really are desperate to prove your point, but it matters not because under the 1st Amendment, they have the right to freely express themselves and it's not illegal.......all these images do is show that Gays love to be flamboyant.....not a sex cult!!!
Mikey

United States

#151758 Jul 24, 2012
Bill Of Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the transcript of the trial stupid! The judge ruled the only way he could with the evidence presented before him! The Pro prop 8 side had absolutely nothing in the way of evidence for the judge to rule any other way! As far as him being gay it didn't matter one iota! Do you take a black judge off a case that has to do with civil rights? NO! Do you take a women off a case that deals with women's rights? NO! And you forgot to mention that a higher court upheld the Judges verdict! So very glad I could help! Prop 8 was and remains Unconstitutional!
NO EVIDENCE!!! Try ten million years of gay marriage never existing and being illegal until a bunch of loser gays got together and went to a judge with a special interest in the case! A black judge can be fair and rule on points of law! A female, if it's not that time of the month, can be fair too! A gay judge should not have ruled on this case because he was blinded by his own special interest in making himself feel legal! I hope he burns in hell! Not for being gay, but for having a special interest and ruling with his but not his brain!

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#151759 Jul 24, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
Here's another of four giant penises leading one of your gay pride marches.
http://clog.dailycal.org/wp-content/uploads/2...
Hon, the Penises are protesting circumcision and they clearly aren't leading the parade.... By the way, are these from your personal collection or do you spend your days looking for photos to be allegedly offended by?

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Atlanta, GA

#151760 Jul 24, 2012
Our request has been a wonderfully simple one: explain the proliferation of penises in your gay pride parades -- tell us why you include them in your parades.

We've informed you that unless shown otherwise, the only conclusion a reasonable man can logically draw from your glut of phallic iconography is that you are a sex cult -- NOT a Civil Rights Group.

Here are images from you parades again:
http://clog.dailycal.org/2008/06/29/we-spy-ch...

Will you please take the time to explain why your glut of deviant sex imagery is unlike that seen in any "Civil Rights" parade before?

Thank you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mountain View Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trump seeks to dismiss lawsuit over Trump Unive... Fri WasteWater 1
La Victoria's Orange Sauce (Jan '06) Thu TMM 131
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Thu Great Artist 98
Sprint Customers Beware Thu Egregious Sprint 3
ANyone know what happened to the girl in east p... (Mar '07) Jul 20 No more illegals 43
Gay/bi skype Jul 19 Joelansing789 5
News Complex view of Islam found in poetry of Iran, ... Jul 18 The Proclaimer 1

Mountain View Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Mountain View Mortgages