Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri in 2010?

[Strong Proud Conservative]

Yellow Dawg Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
No. More like Romney telling students who want to go to college to "borrow the money from your parents"!
(Not all parents are as rich as Romney's father George, who was chairman and president of American Motors Corporation from 1954 to 1962. Romney has NO CLUE about the average American. He thinks that middle-class Americans have an annual household income of $200,000!)

That's another liberal propaganda lie that was debunked by factcheck. The number deducted was only $80.00.

[gfys]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>They eliminated the oversampling.

Lol! That's idiotic. It's there for a reason. The poll would be atrociously off, if they eliminated Oversampling.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Romney's Nightmare Scenario

Writing in the "Washington Post," Ezra Stein points out that Obama's finances are better off than Romney's, despite "conventional wisdom." The reason is that much of those so-called "Romney funds" are actually controlled by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Karl Rove, who can spend those funds ANY WAY THEY WISH.

And, if the RNC and Rove decide that Romney is going to LOSE, they may start spending those funds on Republican campaigns to elect "state" Republicans, in efforts to get strategic numbers of Republicans voted in to block President Obama in the Senate and the House, should President Obama win!

Romney may well find himself in competition with the Republican Party and Karl Rove for funds -- in which case, Mitt definitely LOSES!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klei...

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
That's another liberal propaganda lie that was debunked by factcheck. The number deducted was only $80.00.

What are you MUMBLING ABOUT?$80? Huh? You are worse than your "Mumbler-in-Chief" Mitt Romney!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
You wouldn't look my links up anyway. You can't handle anything that actually shows you the true facts.

Why don't you provide some links and TRY US?

So far, you have only been feeding us FALSE "FACTS"!

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Dawg Delusions wrote:

<quoted text> Why don't you look at what you can do for yourself instead of looking at worthless polls. The 8-12% of voters that will male the difference in this election are not being polled. They will decide about 5-7 days before the election base on a few economic variables. You poll nerds need to get a life........

Sort of an "epiphany" just as they are walking into the voting booth, eh?

You should be so lucky! If they have any "epiphany," it will be to vote for President Obama.

[Yellow Dawg Democrat]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
They eliminated the oversampling.

By arbitrarily adding 15% to Romney's REAL NUMBERS?

Sounds like a plan to me!

So what do they do with your much-touted "correctly-sampled" "Rasmussen" numbers? Right now, "Rasmussen" shows President Obama ahead by 1%!

[Strong Proud Conservative]

gfys wrote:

<quoted text>
Lol! That's idiotic. It's there for a reason. The poll would be atrociously off, if they eliminated Oversampling.

Yes it is there for a reason. It's there to bias the poll and disenfranchise voters.

[Truth]

Republicans look for voter fraud, find little

http://news.yahoo.com/republicans-look-voter-...

CONservatives just trying to keep the elderly and the poor from voting.

[gfys]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>Yes it is there for a reason. It's there to bias the poll and disenfranchise voters.

Yeah, that's it. Do you have any valid points to make at all? Or even anything based in reality, and not Glen Beck fantasy land.

[AdamsTruths]

About the voter fraud: Politicians love power dude. They will do some pretty shady things to stay in our get in power. Yeah it might sound a little racist I'll give you that but remeber there main goal is to defeat OBAMA. Screaming out racism is really just the other side trying to stay in power to.."OH GOD THERE BEING RACIST" I'm postive that's what your screaming and so are alot of other people. That's why I'm voting for GARY JOHNSON 2012. Let's change Washington ourselves because the Democrats and Republicans are'nt...

[DanFromSmithvill e]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama is responsible for the economic issues as well.

Either you are this stupid or you are playing some sort of game. Considering that this is Topix, that would still me you that stupid.

[DanFromSmithvill e]

Dawg Delusions wrote:

<quoted text> Why don't you look at what you can do for yourself instead of looking at worthless polls. The 8-12% of voters that will male the difference in this election are not being polled. They will decide about 5-7 days before the election base on a few economic variables. You poll nerds need to get a life........

Why thank you for that well thought out advice.

You can't be serious? 8-12%? Really? 5-7 days before the election? My goodness. There should be a poll for them.

Maybe we could borrow your poll. The one up your butt.

[GOPs BAIN in theASS]

Strong Proud Conservative wrote:

<quoted text>
They eliminated the oversampling.

Or more likely the people who only have cell phones ( and vote Obama )....only old white people have land lines...so the polls are really more biased to Romney than they really should be...and since Obama is ahead in every poll, you know whtat that means?

OBAMA LANDSLIDE!!!!!!!!

SPCa since you need an example from the past to understand the present ...So as far as this election goes think GOLDWATER!!!!!

hahahahahahahahahaha

[GOPs BAIN in theASS]

Norton wrote:

<quoted text>
..........and you are stupid, too!
CHEERS!

The only CHEERS you're going to hear ...is when Romney and Ryan give their concession speeches!!!!

bada BAIN!!!!

[Swampman]

GOPs BAIN in theASS wrote:

<quoted text>
Or more likely the people who only have cell phones ( and vote Obama )....only old white people have land lines...so the polls are really more biased to Romney than they really should be...and since Obama is ahead in every poll, you know whtat that means?
OBAMA LANDSLIDE!!!!!!!!
SPCa since you need an example from the past to understand the present ...So as far as this election goes think GOLDWATER!!!!!
hahahahahahahahahaha

yep! I remember:a clone to romney.

[Poos ur daddy]

Although the freedom of speech in America has undergone constant attack in the last few years (NOT limited to Obama's term in office), I still believe it has merit.
In my opinion two very distasteful examples come to mind:
1. The mindless garbage in the movie trailer "Innocence of Muslims"
2. The anticipated rant by Ahmadinejad at the UN

I know some may argue that US constitutional rights should not extend to either.
But if we are to apply our beliefs fairly, suck it up..

[GOPs BAIN in theASS]

Poos ur daddy wrote:

Although the freedom of speech in America has undergone constant attack in the last few years (NOT limited to Obama's term in office), I still believe it has merit.
In my opinion two very distasteful examples come to mind:
1. The mindless garbage in the movie trailer "Innocence of Muslims"
2. The anticipated rant by Ahmadinejad at the UN
I know some may argue that US constitutional rights should not extend to either.
But if we are to apply our beliefs fairly, suck it up..

Well SUCK is something conservatives do really well ...bada BAIN!

[Really]

Obama 4 more years

[The Muslim Dictator Prez]

Howard Stern Does It Again: Interviews Obama Supporters in Harlem, Hilarity Ensues

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/howard-stern-...