Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201888 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169862 Dec 4, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You can point them out. And you can see their relevance illustrated.
Your problem is you cannot successfully argue the facts brought to your doorstep.
No one cares if polygamists get married dumbshit. For one their numbers are so small they're almost non-existant. Add to that the only things people are concerned about if you can actually find polygamists is that they not coerce, marry underage kiddies or use methods of brainwashing in their practice of polygamy....no different than any other marriage moron.
Your inner bigot came out a long time ago with your sad effort at staining gay marriage so I'd shaddup hypocrit.
So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?

Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.

Congratulations moron.
GodZilla

Toronto, Canada

#169863 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps, by your minority, it is, but the vast majority of us know what is right.
Vast majority my azz! Perhaps we should ask the voters in Maine,Washington and Maryland? LOL,It is losers like yourself that are fast becoming a minority and there is a true fact for you Mr. Neanderthal!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169865 Dec 4, 2012
GodZilla wrote:
<quoted text>
Vast majority my azz! Perhaps we should ask the voters in Maine,Washington and Maryland? LOL,It is losers like yourself that are fast becoming a minority and there is a true fact for you Mr. Neanderthal!
So now you guys are OK with people voting on same sex marriage?

You should make up your minds.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#169871 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Due to the lengthy amounts of posts, by you, I am not going to answer them all, as I would run of time for sleep, and that would be dangerous, given what I do for a living. But sometimes, I just have to slap the shit out of you. So here goes...It isn't just MY opinion, it's the opinion of the vast amount of people that have already lived and died. If the Founders wished for that kind of equality to exist, then why weren't gays getting married 200 years ago ?
For the same reason women couldn't vote, many of the founders were bigots.
R Hudson wrote:
Easy. They were always considered to be aberrations, up until now.
Well, it's now.
R Hudson wrote:
They were not considered by the Founders as a serious threat to the society that they were creating, they had common sense.
Nothing says "common sense" like slavery and murder of innocent Natives.

R Hudson wrote:
As for the amount of "legally" married couples now in existence, it is because some key lawyers and politicians and such have taken over key positions and decided to inundate us with idiocy. Legislate us into "Idiocracy". Easily answered, and have a good night, a$$hole.
Wiccan, yeah right.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#169872 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right, it's YOUR opinion, but you are wrong, my laughing stock opponent. I leave those heifers for guys like you, the abrasive ones with no class. The class of woman that I am "hooked up with" would hurt your feelings...You wouldn't be able to get my type of woman to even give you the time of day.
Yeah, your type of woman would be too drunk to give anybody the type of day.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#169874 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
If I posted pictures of mine, he'd be whacking off to them, within minutes....
You did post your pic. And I think the words you are looking for are "throwing up to them".

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169875 Dec 4, 2012
GodZilla wrote:
<quoted text>
Vast majority my azz! Perhaps we should ask the voters in Maine,Washington and Maryland? LOL,It is losers like yourself that are fast becoming a minority and there is a true fact for you Mr. Neanderthal!
Aw shuddup Bill you silly jackass!

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#169876 Dec 4, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?
Polygamists already have equal rights.
If someone (living as a) polygamist and a non-polygamist walk into the JP and ask to marry more than one person, they will be told the same thing.
Equal.
Should they be allowed to marry more than one person?
Well, that's a topic for a different forum.
akpilot wrote:
Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.
Congratulations moron.
Polygamists have equal rights.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#169877 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you been soliciting lililth again ?
Hey keep your wife off the streets

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#169878 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that you shouldn't put up pictures of your wife, if she looks anything like that.
Dat was your mom.... Ya clueless moron

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169879 Dec 4, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamists already have equal rights.
If someone (living as a) polygamist and a non-polygamist walk into the JP and ask to marry more than one person, they will be told the same thing.
Equal.
Should they be allowed to marry more than one person?
Well, that's a topic for a different forum.
<quoted text>
Polygamists have equal rights.
Thank you for showing everyone you are an idiot.
KochNUTS

Monrovia, CA

#169880 Dec 4, 2012
Look you sick frigging fools, the GOP, Republicans and Tea Party Idiots have and are driving this country in to the sea with their stupid ideas.

A bunch of Koch Brothers followers.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169881 Dec 4, 2012
KochNUTS wrote:
Look you sick frigging fools, the GOP, Republicans and Tea Party Idiots have and are driving this country in to the sea with their stupid ideas.
A bunch of Koch Brothers followers.
Considering the DNC has been pretty much running this country for the last 6 years, I am curious as to how you arrived at this conclusion.
Swords up

Monrovia, CA

#169883 Dec 4, 2012
There is NO ban anymore, if West Point marries than it's no brainer.
Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#169884 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Due to the lengthy amounts of posts, by you, I am not going to answer them all, as I would run of time for sleep, and that would be dangerous, given what I do for a living. But sometimes, I just have to slap the shit out of you. So here goes...It isn't just MY opinion, it's the opinion of the vast amount of people that have already lived and died. If the Founders wished for that kind of equality to exist, then why weren't gays getting married 200 years ago ? Easy. They were always considered to be aberrations, up until now. They were not considered by the Founders as a serious threat to the society that they were creating, they had common sense. As for the amount of "legally" married couples now in existence, it is because some key lawyers and politicians and such have taken over key positions and decided to inundate us with idiocy. Legislate us into "Idiocracy". Easily answered, and have a good night, a$$hole.
The Founding Fathers wished for a government which allowed all it's citizens a full set of liberties providing those liberties did not produce harm.

We're almost there. Two hundred years ago slavery was in existance, women were second class citizens, Asians could not buy land yet we've managed to bring them up to speed and now it's time to allow gays tohave a full set of freedoms and liberties by allowing them to marry the adult of their choice.

I already said this but there ya go genius.

And as far as gays not being accepted 200 years ago I'll go with that. In case you don't get a calendar advising you what it will be next year after New Years Eve is over it's 2013...not 1813.

We've eveolved as a nation to represent what the Fouding Fathers put in place as a government tghat represents the people. Those people include homosexuals.

By the way...I don't care what you do for a living. I myself sincerely doubt it involves any duties which requires an IQ above that of a trained spider monkey.

As far as me being an asshole....I AM. But I'm spot on by advising you we should let gays marry nationwide.

LOL!!!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169885 Dec 4, 2012
GodZilla wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah,He'd be gagging! LOLOLOL
YUK!YUK!YUK! Real funny one Bill.

What a jackass!
Dan A Sea

Monrovia, CA

#169886 Dec 4, 2012
Look slicker twit, leave this topic alone.
Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#169887 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right, it's YOUR opinion, but you are wrong, my laughing stock opponent. I leave those heifers for guys like you, the abrasive ones with no class. The class of woman that I am "hooked up with" would hurt your feelings...You wouldn't be able to get my type of woman to even give you the time of day.
I bet.

The woman you'd manage to land would probably get all defensive once I offered to chip in for some plastic surgery by advising me I need to save that money for myself.

She'd no doubt also hurt my eyes given whatever hag you're hooked up with could no doubt peel the paint off a government building and scare junkyard dogs into sterility given her looks.

BAH HAH HAH!!!!
Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#169889 Dec 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps, by your minority, it is, but the vast majority of us know what is right.
Majority of whom.

Drunkards whose second home is at Ernie's Bar & Pool Hall?

LOL!!!!
Dan C

Sacramento, CA

#169890 Dec 4, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?
Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.
Congratulations moron.
Never said that liar.

Next.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mountain Center Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
facetime? (gay guys only) (Jul '11) Wed Bottom 36
Drugs on rise in Palm Springs (Sep '07) Tue Creeps 20
Keep a Word, Drop a Word! (Apr '12) Aug 23 _Zoey_ 211
Young couple have job offer in Rancho Mirage - Aug 21 gjstewart 1
Any other sex addicts here in the AV?? Aug 10 PalmGuy 4
Sasquatch Aug 3 Smells like squatch 1
Need a place to let my golden swim and play Jul 29 Anonymous 1

Mountain Center Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Mountain Center Mortgages