Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 148939 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

London, KY

#87306 Sep 19, 2012
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you provide the current Romney domestic investments and/or businesses? I'd like to compliment the job producer on strengthening the economy and reducing unemployment.
I don't know, Just like I don't know the investment portfolios of Harry Reed, Barak Obama, Michele Obama, Al Gore, Nancy Pelocy, George Soro's or any of the Dem's or Rupub's in Congress that have access to inside trading....

I Do know that during his long and stable business career he helped put 10's of 1000's to work in assorted companies and through the spending of his money, along with sending Millions of His money to State and local governments in the form of taxes, Again more in taxes than you or I have Made through our entire lives...

But That's actually of Very little import to me personally... I was just replying to another poster that due to personal bias told a blatant lie..."Romney paid no taxes" What ever rate he ended up paying he paid more that the average American Makes in their life time...

The Important issue that really actually matters is that the Current president has shown he is a Socialist.. If you want a Socialist form of government that's of course your choice.. But as History has shown, it will fail and those that become dependent on the socialist government for their lives will be the most harmed when it fails... Only the Elite segment remain once production fails to provide for the unproductive..

And the Current President has so weaken the position of the US that China is now of the mind to send ships into the Sea of Japan with no fear of US intervention, Iran having no fear of US interviention in it's goal of building Nukes, No concern of the US doing anything but lip service in the Islamic goal of a world wide Caliphate...

In the Next few week the current administrations lack of policies and strength will lead to more destruction to American Assets and the Deaths of Americans around the globe...

So I understand your wish for Obama's re-election.. Great, he may very well win... But keep a copy of this post handy and IF he wins please come back and tell me how much the world is better off in 1 year after the election... I am willing to Bet 20 bucks that IF he wins that in one year the world will see over 1 Million dead bodies scattered about... Many Americans....
question

Elizabethtown, KY

#87307 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know, Just like I don't know the investment portfolios of Harry Reed, Barak Obama, Michele Obama, Al Gore, Nancy Pelocy, George Soro's or any of the Dem's or Rupub's in Congress that have access to inside trading....
I Do know that during his long and stable business career he helped put 10's of 1000's to work in assorted companies and through the spending of his money, along with sending Millions of His money to State and local governments in the form of taxes, Again more in taxes than you or I have Made through our entire lives...
But That's actually of Very little import to me personally... I was just replying to another poster that due to personal bias told a blatant lie..."Romney paid no taxes" What ever rate he ended up paying he paid more that the average American Makes in their life time...
The Important issue that really actually matters is that the Current president has shown he is a Socialist.. If you want a Socialist form of government that's of course your choice.. But as History has shown, it will fail and those that become dependent on the socialist government for their lives will be the most harmed when it fails... Only the Elite segment remain once production fails to provide for the unproductive..
And the Current President has so weaken the position of the US that China is now of the mind to send ships into the Sea of Japan with no fear of US intervention, Iran having no fear of US interviention in it's goal of building Nukes, No concern of the US doing anything but lip service in the Islamic goal of a world wide Caliphate...
In the Next few week the current administrations lack of policies and strength will lead to more destruction to American Assets and the Deaths of Americans around the globe...
So I understand your wish for Obama's re-election.. Great, he may very well win... But keep a copy of this post handy and IF he wins please come back and tell me how much the world is better off in 1 year after the election... I am willing to Bet 20 bucks that IF he wins that in one year the world will see over 1 Million dead bodies scattered about... Many Americans....
how are we any more socialist now than we have ever been? And what Obama policies have contributed to this?

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

London, KY

#87308 Sep 19, 2012
question wrote:
<quoted text>
how are we any more socialist now than we have ever been? And what Obama policies have contributed to this?
His policies have increased Food Stamps and welfare rolls and unemployment rolls.. Along over all increase in Government Work force.. But again none of that is all that important.. We have been moving from a Capitalist based society to a Socialist based sociality since the first onslaught that brought us the Social Security Admin and later Medicare... Both are doomed to failure at some point, like it or not... No Nation can supply for a growing dependent class without at some point converting into a totalitarian state... The transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need, how ever you attempt it at some point will cause the system to reach a point where the demand outstrips the demand and then some form of dictatorial control will be required to control abuse and the hoards of dependents when they find what they have become dependent on is forced to be reduced...

As for Obama his History, Policies and statements shows he supports such transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need.. He is a Socialist in both word and deed.. And it matters not what he actually gets accomplished because it's the future that will be impacted...

When Social Security was installed it was fought a a socialist food hold, and it was.. It was sold to the public as a small program to help Only very few Widows and Orphans and would Never be a broad socialistic program the opponents claimed.. It was said to never cost more than a few 100 million per year... It's opponent said that it would someday be the basis for failure of our economic system..

When Medicare was established it was said to be a last resort system for Only the one that fall through the system and never cost more than 30 Million per year...

Last year Social Security paid out 680 Billion and This year OASDI will run a deficit of $41 billion...

With the advent of Obama Care on top of Medicare will be looking at an estimated 3 Trillion dollars outlay...

That's not including the Off Shoots of those Socialistic policies such as Food Stamps, Welfare and other test allocated programs...

The direction we are going is producing a Socialistic Dependent society.. And if we as a people cannot start the trend Back to a capitalistic system, and all the pain it will bring, we will have to convert to a Totalitarian rule.. And we have been trending in that direction... But when the Dependent population finds it will no longer receive the largish of the government because it does not have the resources then they will rise up and totalitarian rule will be applied by force of gun... I see no way to avoid it...

question

Elizabethtown, KY

#87309 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
His policies have increased Food Stamps and welfare rolls and unemployment rolls.. Along over all increase in Government Work force.. But again none of that is all that important.. We have been moving from a Capitalist based society to a Socialist based sociality since the first onslaught that brought us the Social Security Admin and later Medicare... Both are doomed to failure at some point, like it or not... No Nation can supply for a growing dependent class without at some point converting into a totalitarian state... The transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need, how ever you attempt it at some point will cause the system to reach a point where the demand outstrips the demand and then some form of dictatorial control will be required to control abuse and the hoards of dependents when they find what they have become dependent on is forced to be reduced...
As for Obama his History, Policies and statements shows he supports such transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need.. He is a Socialist in both word and deed.. And it matters not what he actually gets accomplished because it's the future that will be impacted...
When Social Security was installed it was fought a a socialist food hold, and it was.. It was sold to the public as a small program to help Only very few Widows and Orphans and would Never be a broad socialistic program the opponents claimed.. It was said to never cost more than a few 100 million per year... It's opponent said that it would someday be the basis for failure of our economic system..
When Medicare was established it was said to be a last resort system for Only the one that fall through the system and never cost more than 30 Million per year...
Last year Social Security paid out 680 Billion and This year OASDI will run a deficit of $41 billion...
With the advent of Obama Care on top of Medicare will be looking at an estimated 3 Trillion dollars outlay...
That's not including the Off Shoots of those Socialistic policies such as Food Stamps, Welfare and other test allocated programs...
The direction we are going is producing a Socialistic Dependent society.. And if we as a people cannot start the trend Back to a capitalistic system, and all the pain it will bring, we will have to convert to a Totalitarian rule.. And we have been trending in that direction... But when the Dependent population finds it will no longer receive the largish of the government because it does not have the resources then they will rise up and totalitarian rule will be applied by force of gun... I see no way to avoid it...
if I'm not mistaken I'm pretty sure Obama didn't start Social Security and Medicare. now I would like to see some of these examples of words and deeds that have inundated us in this socialistic nightmare. you keep saying his policies did this but you arent telling me which policies they are. have to tell you Q, I had you pegged as the top brain on this stupid website. but your political stances make me question that. No disrespect

Little q

Satanic Priest

“There is no god”

Since: Jul 12

War, WV

#87310 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
His policies have increased Food Stamps and welfare rolls and unemployment rolls..
Bullshit!, Bush's policies caused record unemployment, as a result more people have had to enroll in social programs. Do you really think we have forgotten that? Social security had a trillion dollar SURPLUS that BUSH raided so do not blame any one except Bush/cheney for that!
And yes, Bush's tax BREAKS for the wealthiest has hurt all of us, The stock market is at the highest in ten years, corporate profits are at an all time high and taxes on corporations and the wealthiest are an all time low SO WHERE ARE THE JOBS THAT TAX CUTS BRING????
Hey, if you want to believe that crap fine but do not expect others to be so stupid that they fall for it....

Satanic Priest

“There is no god”

Since: Jul 12

War, WV

#87311 Sep 19, 2012
Oh, and if you can afford to own a Senator you do not NEED a tax break!

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

London, KY

#87313 Sep 19, 2012
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>Bullshit!, Bush's policies caused record unemployment, as a result more people have had to enroll in social programs. Do you really think we have forgotten that? Social security had a trillion dollar SURPLUS that BUSH raided so do not blame any one except Bush/cheney for that!
And yes, Bush's tax BREAKS for the wealthiest has hurt all of us, The stock market is at the highest in ten years, corporate profits are at an all time high and taxes on corporations and the wealthiest are an all time low SO WHERE ARE THE JOBS THAT TAX CUTS BRING????
Hey, if you want to believe that crap fine but do not expect others to be so stupid that they fall for it....
Nope... Bush Policies had Nothing to do with the events that caused the Unemployment levels... Those were a byproduct of a Democrat based Homes For Everyone policy started under Carter and continued by Democratic Congresses in there blind support for Freddy and Fanny while getting kick backs in the form of contributions... Bush had a Democratic Congress that Passed the Bailout that Bush signed (A Mistake) and every attempt to correct the impending housing crisis was thwarted by a Democrat Congress...

As for Jobs.. Tax Cuts will cause companies to hire and corporations also but Not until such taxes are Consistent and stable... Right now If I were a Company I would not hire anyone because I have No Idea what that new hire will cost me in terms of Heath Care costs, and taxes... In an Environment where the Economy is 16 Trillion in debt and I do not know what I will be forced over the next couple of years to pay I would not hire a new dish washer if I was making stacks of money now...
spaceship earth_ss

El Dorado Hills, CA

#87314 Sep 19, 2012
Conservative columnist Peggy Noonan denounced Mitt Romney's presidential campaign in a blistering blog post on Tuesday.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/pegg...
spaceship earth_ss

El Dorado Hills, CA

#87315 Sep 19, 2012
Mitt Romney HIDDEN VIDEO SECRET TAPE mother jones fundraiser israel.

spaceship earth_ss

El Dorado Hills, CA

#87316 Sep 19, 2012
What if Jesus had a wife?

This is the question that Christianity confronts today after a fragment of papyrus has been presented at a conference of scholars in Rome. The ancient Coptic document includes the phrase "Jesus said to them, my wife" using a term that undoubtedly references a woman who was his spouse and not some metaphorical partner.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-dantoni...
Please explain

Columbia, KY

#87317 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>

The Important issue that really actually matters is that the Current president has shown he is a Socialist.. If you want a Socialist form of government that's of course your choice.. But as History has shown, it will fail and those that become dependent on the socialist government for their lives will be the most harmed when it fails... Only the Elite segment remain once production fails to provide for the unproductive..
So you wanna play with the Obama is a socialist card. How bout first we establish that the one thing Socialists hate is profit. Now, if Obama was a socialist his first couple of years in office when he held the SuperMajority would've gone something like this...He would have disbanded Wall Street, not bailed them out and overseen their bonuses. He would've nationalized all the banks since they were failing on a daily basis. He would've became CEO of GM and Chrysler and everyone in the country would've gotten a new vehicle. He sure wouldn't let the profiteers stay in there. He would've established a single payer healthcare system, instead of making a mandate that all Americans must buy corporate health insurance. And he would've made himself a dictator. But he attempted to work with Republicans even though he didn't have to. If Obama is a socialist, he is the worst socialist in history.

And now the best thing Republicans have to win the election is to release a 14 year old video. It says more about the pitiful state of Republicans than anything new about Obama. He's been saying this stuff for years! Hell even Bill Clinton said at the convention "we're in this together". I guess he's socialist, oh wait, he signed NAFTA! Maybe Obama is one of those Christians who wants to legislate his favorite parts of the Bible. Like in Matthew where Jesus commands us to take care of the "the least of us" Or maybe in John, where we're instructed, If you have two coats give one to you neighbor. Or maybe he's worried about the souls of the rich because it says a camel has a better chance to move through an eye of a needle than pass through the gates of heaven.

I don't know, nor do I care because he will never pass socialist legislation with a Republican House or a dysfunctional filibuster loving Senate. So GET OVER IT!! The right has thrown around the word Socialist so much, only they are the ones that can hear it. Them and Clint Eastwood and the empty chair.
Please explain

Columbia, KY

#87318 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope... Bush Policies had Nothing to do with the events that caused the Unemployment levels... Those were a byproduct of a Democrat based Homes For Everyone policy started under Carter and continued by Democratic Congresses in there blind support for Freddy and Fanny while getting kick backs in the form of contributions... Bush had a Democratic Congress that Passed the Bailout that Bush signed (A Mistake) and every attempt to correct the impending housing crisis was thwarted by a Democrat Congress...
As for Jobs.. Tax Cuts will cause companies to hire and corporations also but Not until such taxes are Consistent and stable... Right now If I were a Company I would not hire anyone because I have No Idea what that new hire will cost me in terms of Heath Care costs, and taxes... In an Environment where the Economy is 16 Trillion in debt and I do not know what I will be forced over the next couple of years to pay I would not hire a new dish washer if I was making stacks of money now...
Have you conveniently forgotten that Bush had a Super Majority? He could have made those tax cuts permanent. No because it is better to have it as a political football to divide us every election cycle. Republicans had their Super Majority and did nothing to save us from your socialist nightmare. Guess its just not that important to them.
Please explain

Columbia, KY

#87319 Sep 19, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope... Bush Policies had Nothing to do with the events that caused the Unemployment levels... Those were a byproduct of a Democrat based Homes For Everyone policy started under Carter and continued by Democratic Congresses in there blind support for Freddy and Fanny while getting kick backs in the form of contributions... Bush had a Democratic Congress that Passed the Bailout that Bush signed (A Mistake) and every attempt to correct the impending housing crisis was thwarted by a Democrat Congress...
As for Jobs.. Tax Cuts will cause companies to hire and corporations also but Not until such taxes are Consistent and stable... Right now If I were a Company I would not hire anyone because I have No Idea what that new hire will cost me in terms of Heath Care costs, and taxes... In an Environment where the Economy is 16 Trillion in debt and I do not know what I will be forced over the next couple of years to pay I would not hire a new dish washer if I was making stacks of money now...
Paul Ryan also voted for TARP along with many more Republicans. Hard to pin that just on Dems. So you're admitting that no amount of money or tax cuts would get you to create jobs. Thanks for your honesty. Of course most people already knew that tax cuts have never proven to create jobs. Nice having you back that up.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

London, KY

#87320 Sep 19, 2012
Please explain wrote:
<quoted text>
So you wanna play with the Obama is a socialist card. How bout first we establish that the one thing Socialists hate is profit. Now, if Obama was a socialist his first couple of years in office when he held the SuperMajority would've gone something like this...He would have disbanded Wall Street, not bailed them out and overseen their bonuses. He would've nationalized all the banks since they were failing on a daily basis. He would've became CEO of GM and Chrysler and everyone in the country would've gotten a new vehicle. He sure wouldn't let the profiteers stay in there. He would've established a single payer healthcare system, instead of making a mandate that all Americans must buy corporate health insurance. And he would've made himself a dictator. But he attempted to work with Republicans even though he didn't have to. If Obama is a socialist, he is the worst socialist in history.
And now the best thing Republicans have to win the election is to release a 14 year old video. It says more about the pitiful state of Republicans than anything new about Obama. He's been saying this stuff for years! Hell even Bill Clinton said at the convention "we're in this together". I guess he's socialist, oh wait, he signed NAFTA! Maybe Obama is one of those Christians who wants to legislate his favorite parts of the Bible. Like in Matthew where Jesus commands us to take care of the "the least of us" Or maybe in John, where we're instructed, If you have two coats give one to you neighbor. Or maybe he's worried about the souls of the rich because it says a camel has a better chance to move through an eye of a needle than pass through the gates of heaven.
I don't know, nor do I care because he will never pass socialist legislation with a Republican House or a dysfunctional filibuster loving Senate. So GET OVER IT!! The right has thrown around the word Socialist so much, only they are the ones that can hear it. Them and Clint Eastwood and the empty chair.
Socialist hate Profit... Where the heck did you ever come up with that... Did you ever see any of the photos of palaces, estates, private planes, compounds and lavish affairs had by Chinese, North Korean, Soviet, Cuban and Venezuelan leaders and elite? They Love Profit.. Theirs at the cost of the working people that become to workers to supply the elite under totalitarian rule... What Socialist hate is for the Worker to make a Profit from his efforts... When a worker makes a profit it is seized and transfered to the masses through the hands of the elite that siphon off what they require to maintain those lavish lifestyles....

I know the next reply is Just like Corporations do... No Actually as with capitalism the kid in school can become a millionaire with the right idea and the skills... I socialism he can only do so if the Elite Allow such... If such a person finds a way to make a million the System will strip most of it and give him what they think he is worth.... Unless he is favored by the party and then he gets to trample the workers also...
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87321 Sep 20, 2012
trusted wrote:
I dont get upset much , and it takes alot to do it , but someone calling the old , freeloaders does tend to rub me the wrong way. If they should not be able to get free help , then none should. Just for a moment lets all say ,we are 75 and are not able to work anymore, yes I said anymore, because we have done so all our lifes. You know , if not in public, you worked on your family farm for years to supply and feed your family.....Workibng back then was so much more than now. They got up with the sun rose, and to bed when it set, all to do all the work all over again. Now that is what I call, paying your dues in life. Would you want your grandmother or grandfather , mother or father to go without, when they get older?
Remember too...
In those days we didn't push our elderly into nursing homes either!
And they were burried in the family plot!
He was talking about 'Obama' people that don't pay taxes, and Wanting handouts not being interested in tax cuts!
The top 10% of income earners pay 75% of the taxes...
There are more Obamanites that will take more if you give it to them! 16 Trillion, and counting!
We NEED someone better in charge!
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87322 Sep 20, 2012
LOL in a suit wrote:
<quoted text>
We both know you are a liar, I can not find where I have lied, could you please show the lie that I posted.
Lol, "buy a clue" just go ahead and say "f*ck you", show that christian love openly.
Unlike you...
When I say "Buy a Clue" I truly mean for you to acquire evidence, and information!
Your language does yer Grammy proud!
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87323 Sep 20, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know, Just like I don't know the investment portfolios of Harry Reed, Barak Obama, Michele Obama, Al Gore, Nancy Pelocy, George Soro's or any of the Dem's or Rupub's in Congress that have access to inside trading....
I Do know that during his long and stable business career he helped put 10's of 1000's to work in assorted companies and through the spending of his money, along with sending Millions of His money to State and local governments in the form of taxes, Again more in taxes than you or I have Made through our entire lives...
But That's actually of Very little import to me personally... I was just replying to another poster that due to personal bias told a blatant lie..."Romney paid no taxes" What ever rate he ended up paying he paid more that the average American Makes in their life time...
The Important issue that really actually matters is that the Current president has shown he is a Socialist.. If you want a Socialist form of government that's of course your choice.. But as History has shown, it will fail and those that become dependent on the socialist government for their lives will be the most harmed when it fails... Only the Elite segment remain once production fails to provide for the unproductive..
And the Current President has so weaken the position of the US that China is now of the mind to send ships into the Sea of Japan with no fear of US intervention, Iran having no fear of US interviention in it's goal of building Nukes, No concern of the US doing anything but lip service in the Islamic goal of a world wide Caliphate...
In the Next few week the current administrations lack of policies and strength will lead to more destruction to American Assets and the Deaths of Americans around the globe...
So I understand your wish for Obama's re-election.. Great, he may very well win... But keep a copy of this post handy and IF he wins please come back and tell me how much the world is better off in 1 year after the election... I am willing to Bet 20 bucks that IF he wins that in one year the world will see over 1 Million dead bodies scattered about... Many Americans....
Great post!
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87324 Sep 20, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
His policies have increased Food Stamps and welfare rolls and unemployment rolls.. Along over all increase in Government Work force.. But again none of that is all that important.. We have been moving from a Capitalist based society to a Socialist based sociality since the first onslaught that brought us the Social Security Admin and later Medicare... Both are doomed to failure at some point, like it or not... No Nation can supply for a growing dependent class without at some point converting into a totalitarian state... The transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need, how ever you attempt it at some point will cause the system to reach a point where the demand outstrips the demand and then some form of dictatorial control will be required to control abuse and the hoards of dependents when they find what they have become dependent on is forced to be reduced...
As for Obama his History, Policies and statements shows he supports such transfer of wealth from those that have to those that need.. He is a Socialist in both word and deed.. And it matters not what he actually gets accomplished because it's the future that will be impacted...
When Social Security was installed it was fought a a socialist food hold, and it was.. It was sold to the public as a small program to help Only very few Widows and Orphans and would Never be a broad socialistic program the opponents claimed.. It was said to never cost more than a few 100 million per year... It's opponent said that it would someday be the basis for failure of our economic system..
When Medicare was established it was said to be a last resort system for Only the one that fall through the system and never cost more than 30 Million per year...
Last year Social Security paid out 680 Billion and This year OASDI will run a deficit of $41 billion...
With the advent of Obama Care on top of Medicare will be looking at an estimated 3 Trillion dollars outlay...
That's not including the Off Shoots of those Socialistic policies such as Food Stamps, Welfare and other test allocated programs...
The direction we are going is producing a Socialistic Dependent society.. And if we as a people cannot start the trend Back to a capitalistic system, and all the pain it will bring, we will have to convert to a Totalitarian rule.. And we have been trending in that direction... But when the Dependent population finds it will no longer receive the largish of the government because it does not have the resources then they will rise up and totalitarian rule will be applied by force of gun... I see no way to avoid it...
Another great post....
One might concider the Book of Revelations, and Daniel to be more true than thought by many!
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87325 Sep 20, 2012
Satanic Priest wrote:
<quoted text>Bullshit!, Bush's policies caused record unemployment, as a result more people have had to enroll in social programs. Do you really think we have forgotten that? Social security had a trillion dollar SURPLUS that BUSH raided so do not blame any one except Bush/cheney for that!
And yes, Bush's tax BREAKS for the wealthiest has hurt all of us, The stock market is at the highest in ten years, corporate profits are at an all time high and taxes on corporations and the wealthiest are an all time low SO WHERE ARE THE JOBS THAT TAX CUTS BRING????
Hey, if you want to believe that crap fine but do not expect others to be so stupid that they fall for it....
Obviously one of the 47%... an Obamanite!
You are Obaminable!
Yes and Amen

Winchester, KY

#87326 Sep 20, 2012
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope... Bush Policies had Nothing to do with the events that caused the Unemployment levels... Those were a byproduct of a Democrat based Homes For Everyone policy started under Carter and continued by Democratic Congresses in there blind support for Freddy and Fanny while getting kick backs in the form of contributions... Bush had a Democratic Congress that Passed the Bailout that Bush signed (A Mistake) and every attempt to correct the impending housing crisis was thwarted by a Democrat Congress...
As for Jobs.. Tax Cuts will cause companies to hire and corporations also but Not until such taxes are Consistent and stable... Right now If I were a Company I would not hire anyone because I have No Idea what that new hire will cost me in terms of Heath Care costs, and taxes... In an Environment where the Economy is 16 Trillion in debt and I do not know what I will be forced over the next couple of years to pay I would not hire a new dish washer if I was making stacks of money now...
We're past the trap, and heading towards the septic tank!
No stopping now!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mount Sterling Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fair 14 min Cheyo 2
Curtis Griffin (Feb '09) 4 hr Idk 28
Adam Douglas MISSING 4 hr Right 11
Chad Donathan 5 hr Concerned citizen 1
Amber Rowe 6 hr Bobby 7
Alice Mashino at KDMK 6 hr Angie 18
Phil Rison (Dec '14) 7 hr Pass the Gas 3,400
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Mount Sterling Mortgages