Should state mandate immunizations? N...

Should state mandate immunizations? New requirements effective in July

There are 9752 comments on the Chattanoogan.com story from May 4, 2011, titled Should state mandate immunizations? New requirements effective in July. In it, Chattanoogan.com reports that:

Immunizations are one of the most efficient and cost-effective ways to protect children against childhood diseases and Tennessee law requires documented immunizations.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chattanoogan.com.

Windy

Cookeville, TN

#10253 Sep 1, 2014
Windy wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess we all need a nanny to make decisions for the stupid common man.
Wonder if they ever found them WMDs?
That last sentence is concerning those wondrous experts, the ones who knew best ,the nanny folks. So how did that all work out?
TheRealZeke

Paris, TN

#10254 Sep 1, 2014
Windy wrote:
<quoted text>
That last sentence is concerning those wondrous experts, the ones who knew best ,the nanny folks. So how did that all work out?
So, you believe that if someone is wrong about one thing, that person is wrong about everything.

You are clearly wrong about that claim. So you are indeed wrong about everything.
Snowball

Johnson City, TN

#10255 Sep 1, 2014
you know wrote:
<quoted text>You are really silly.
Are you ok with your child getting polio or whooping cough ?
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10256 Sep 2, 2014
WTH wrote:
next ? mandated micro-chips implanted , can't buy or sell without it , think of the children.
Oh, I see. You are too stupod to make up your own name, huh?
Windy

Knoxville, TN

#10257 Sep 2, 2014
Windy wrote:
<quoted text>
That last sentence is concerning those wondrous experts, the ones who knew best ,the nanny folks. So how did that all work out?
Yes, dear the same exact people make the vaccines. Isn't that right?
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10258 Sep 2, 2014
Snowball wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you ok with your child getting polio or whooping cough ?
Of course not, but they are OK with YOUR child getting Polio or Whooping Cough, though.
WOW

Lexington, TN

#10259 Sep 2, 2014
The CDC's Pink Book, lists SIDs & autism as adverse events following vaccine administration. PDF is available from the CDC. You'll actually have to read it though.

Hannah Poling, Bailey Banks + 81 more children compensated by VICP,( these are the families who have come forward), makes you wonder haw many more are out there.

Wake up parents,

H1N1 Flu Vaccine: 14-Fold Increased Risk for narcolepsy:

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.a...
WOW

Lexington, TN

#10260 Sep 2, 2014
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control owns a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as “EboBun.” It’s patent No. CA2741523A1 and it was awarded in 2010.

Patent applicants are clearly described on the patent as including:

The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health & Human Services, Center For Disease Control.

The patent summary says,“The invention provides the isolated human Ebola (hEbola) viruses denoted as Bundibugyo (EboBun) deposited with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America) on November 26, 2007 and accorded an accession number 200706291.”

It goes on to state,“The present invention is based upon the isolation and identification of a new human Ebola virus species, EboBun. EboBun was isolated from the patients suffering from hemorrhagic fever in a recent outbreak in Uganda.”

It’s worth noting, by the way, that EboBun is not the same variant currently believed to be circulating in West Africa. Clearly, the CDC needs to expand its patent portfolio to include more strains, and that may very well be why American Ebola victims have been brought to the United States in the first place. Read more below and decide for yourself.

From the patent description on the EboBun virus, we know that the U.S. government:

1) Extracts Ebola viruses from patients.

2) Claims to have “invented” that virus.

3) Files for monopoly patent protection on the virus.

To understand why this is happening, you have to first understand what a patent really is and why it exists. A patent is a government-enforced monopoly that is exclusively granted to persons or organizations. It allows that person or organization to exclusively profit from the “invention” or deny others the ability to exploit the invention for their own profit.

It brings up the obvious question here: Why would the U.S. government claim to have “invented” Ebola and then claim an exclusively monopoly over its ownership?

U.S. Government claims exclusive ownership over its “invention” of Ebola

The “SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION” section of the patent document also clearly claims that the U.S. government is claiming “ownership” over all Ebola viruses that share as little as 70% similarity with the Ebola it “invented”:

…invention relates to the isolated EboBun virus that morphologically and phylogenetically relates to known members filoviridae… In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated hEbola EboBun virus comprising a nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: a) a nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1; b) a nucleotide sequence that hybridizes to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 under stringent conditions; and c) a nucleotide sequence that has at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity to the SEQ ID NO:

The CDC patent goes on to explain it specifically claims patent protection on a method for propagating the Ebola virus in host cells as well as treating infected hosts with vaccines:

In another aspect, the invention provides a method for propagating the hEbola virus in host cells comprising infecting the host cells with the inventive isolated hEbola virus described above, culturing the host cells to allow the virus to multiply, and harvesting the resulting virions.

In another aspect, the invention provides vaccine preparations, comprising the inventive hEbola virus, including recombinant and chimeric forms of the virus, nucleic acid molecules comprised by the virus, or protein subunits of the virus. The invention also provides a vaccine formulation comprising a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of the inventive hEbola virus described above, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

No medical reason to bring Ebola to the United States.

http://www.google.com/patents/CA2741523A1...
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10261 Sep 2, 2014
WOW wrote:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control owns a patent on a particular strain of Ebola known as “EboBun.” It’s patent No. CA2741523A1 and it was awarded in 2010.
Patent applicants are clearly described on the patent as including:
The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health & Human Services, Center For Disease Control.
The patent summary says,“The invention provides the isolated human Ebola (hEbola) viruses denoted as Bundibugyo (EboBun) deposited with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”; Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America) on November 26, 2007 and accorded an accession number 200706291.”
It goes on to state,“The present invention is based upon the isolation and identification of a new human Ebola virus species, EboBun. EboBun was isolated from the patients suffering from hemorrhagic fever in a recent outbreak in Uganda.”
It’s worth noting, by the way, that EboBun is not the same variant currently believed to be circulating in West Africa. Clearly, the CDC needs to expand its patent portfolio to include more strains, and that may very well be why American Ebola victims have been brought to the United States in the first place. Read more below and decide for yourself.
From the patent description on the EboBun virus, we know that the U.S. government:
1) Extracts Ebola viruses from patients.
2) Claims to have “invented” that virus.
3) Files for monopoly patent protection on the virus.
To understand why this is happening, you have to first understand what a patent really is and why it exists. A patent is a government-enforced monopoly that is exclusively granted to persons or organizations. It allows that person or organization to exclusively profit from the “invention” or deny others the ability to exploit the invention for their own profit.
It brings up the obvious question here: Why would the U.S. government claim to have “invented” Ebola and then claim an exclusively monopoly over its ownership?
U.S. Government claims exclusive ownership over its “invention” of Ebola
The “SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION” section of the patent document also clearly claims that the U.S. government is claiming “ownership” over all Ebola viruses that share as little as 70% similarity with the Ebola it “invented”:
…invention relates to the isolated EboBun virus that morphologically and phylogenetically relates to known members filoviridae… In another aspect, the invention provides an isolated hEbola EboBun virus comprising a nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of: a) a nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1; b) a nucleotide sequence that hybridizes to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 under stringent conditions; and c) a nucleotide sequence that has at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identity to the SEQ ID NO:
Tculturing the host cells to allow the virus to multiply, and harvesting the resulting virions.
In another aspect, the invention provides vaccine preparations, comprising the inventive hEbola virus, including recombinant and chimeric forms of the virus, nucleic acid molecules comprised by the virus, or protein subunits of the virus. The invention also provides a vaccine formulation comprising a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of the inventive hEbola virus described above, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
No medical reason to bring Ebola to the United States.
http://www.google.com/patents/CA2741523A1...
I hear they plan to infect all the tin foil hat crowd and then ask if they want a vaccine.
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10262 Sep 2, 2014
WOW wrote:
The CDC's Pink Book, lists SIDs & autism as adverse events following vaccine administration. PDF is available from the CDC. You'll actually have to read it though.
Hannah Poling, Bailey Banks + 81 more children compensated by VICP,( these are the families who have come forward), makes you wonder haw many more are out there.
Wake up parents,
H1N1 Flu Vaccine: 14-Fold Increased Risk for narcolepsy:
http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.a...
Bet you had immunizations though, huh?
Mindy

United States

#10263 Sep 2, 2014
WTH wrote:
<quoted text>I hear they plan to infect all the tin foil hat crowd and then ask if they want a vaccine.
no , not want but have to no CHOICE think of all the WTH idiots that can't think for them selves or care about side effects . don't want stupidity vaccine you might get cured of posting on non-read site.
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10264 Sep 2, 2014
Mindy wrote:
<quoted text> no , not want but have to no CHOICE think of all the WTH idiots that can't think for them selves or care about side effects . don't want stupidity vaccine you might get cured of posting on non-read site.
"no not want but have to no"?? What on earth are you babbling about. Go take your meds... oh yeah, you don't believe in those obviously.
DeDominicis

Sevierville, TN

#10265 Sep 2, 2014
If you ask some idiots we don't need grain ,dairy or public safty at all. These are the ones that had retarded children.
TheRealZeke

Kingsport, TN

#10266 Sep 2, 2014
Mindy wrote:
<quoted text> no , not want but have to no CHOICE think of all the WTH idiots that can't think for them selves or care about side effects . don't want stupidity vaccine you might get cured of posting on non-read site.
Your confused post here is clear evidence that you are a very confused person.
DeDominicis

Sevierville, TN

#10268 Sep 2, 2014
TheRealZeke wrote:
<quoted text>
Your confused post here is clear evidence that you are a very confused person.
Zeke, ask it what side effects it had a traded kid and thinks delicious pandemic aide caused the damn issue.
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10269 Sep 2, 2014
Wonder why none of them will; answer about whether they have had immunizations or not. Seems if they are true believers, they would be proud to NOT have had any. On the other hand if they and / or their children have had immunizations that would make them what? Yes, HYPOCRITES!
DeDominicis

Sevierville, TN

#10270 Sep 2, 2014
I don't think they make the kids retarded or any of that.
Murphy

Harriman, TN

#10271 Sep 2, 2014
Cosby woman

Cosby, TN

#10273 Sep 3, 2014
The vaccines given to my children 25-30 yrs ago were not as near as many that they give children now these days. Yes parents and grandparents protect your children , too many vaccines can be dangerous for your children, and traumatic. Drs. Give them out because drug companies recommend them. Even if you travel to other countries , you can go to health food stores to get natural protection , without getting all side effects . Government is reaching too far into family's decisions on keeping your child healthy and safe , they are telling you what you Have to put in your body , now with the new healthcare law, big brother monitoring you, pretty scarey.
WTH

Knoxville, TN

#10274 Sep 3, 2014
Cosby woman wrote:
The vaccines given to my children 25-30 yrs ago were not as near as many that they give children now these days. Yes parents and grandparents protect your children , too many vaccines can be dangerous for your children, and traumatic. Drs. Give them out because drug companies recommend them. Even if you travel to other countries , you can go to health food stores to get natural protection , without getting all side effects . Government is reaching too far into family's decisions on keeping your child healthy and safe , they are telling you what you Have to put in your body , now with the new healthcare law, big brother monitoring you, pretty scarey.
OK, so which immunizations should be omitted? What natural protection do you believe exists for malaria? Exactly what proof do you have of diseases cured or prevented by a health food store. I agree about the government, but you are way off on the medical care.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Morristown Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Gatlinburg fire. Who dropped the ball 18 min Wondering 3
Who is having sex (Mar '11) 19 min Wondering 28
Fireplace Installation 1 hr Wolfnit 1
Koch food going down 2 hr yep 19
You ran back to all that and left so good luck ... 3 hr Hah 5
Hot county cops 3 hr Hah 5
Poll Do you sleep in a recliner instead of a bed? (Dec '10) 3 hr Hah 36

Morristown Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Morristown Mortgages